Shure SE112 (2014) vs CCA C12

While the CCA C12 is a passable option for $48, you might want to look into some other options at its price point - chances are, there are some better alternatives available on the market.

As for the Shure SE112 (2014), we, unfortunately, weren't able to find enough data to draw any meaningful conclusions.

If you are still interested in finding out more about the CCA C12, however, here's what we know about it:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the CCA C12 in their CCA C12 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Returning to the Shure SE112 (2014), Consumer Reports, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Best Cheap Wired Earbuds" in its "Best Headphones for Under $50" roundup, which is quite a feat.

We also performed a thorough CCA C12 vs. Shure SE112 (2014) review score analysis - it turns out that all of the sources that have tested both In-Ear Monitors, including Head-fi, preferred the CCA C12 over the Shure SE112 (2014).

Out of all the sources that reviewed them, the CCA C12 turned out to be most loved by Head-fi, which gave it a score of 8.7, whereas the Shure SE112 (2014) got its highest, 9, rating from reviewers at AVForums.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the CCA C12 did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 8.7 out of 10, compared to the 7.7 overall average of In-Ear Monitors in general, whereas the Shure SE112 (2014) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.6.