Shure SE112 (2014) vs Jaybird Run (2019)

The Shure SE112 (2014) makes for a good, if unremarkable, Earphone for people with a $40 budget.

The Jaybird Run XT, however, is merely mediocre at its $113 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.

In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $40 and $95 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.

If you're still interested in learning more about the Shure SE112 (2014) and Jaybird Run XT, however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:

The Shure SE112 (2014) was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best earbuds under $50 of 2020" roundup where it was named its "Best Sound", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

Taking a look at the Jaybird Run XT, it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - Rtings and PCmag - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Shure SE112 (2014) got its highest, 9, rating from AVForums, while the Jaybird Run XT earned its best, 8, score from PCmag.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Shure SE112 (2014) and Jaybird Run XT managed averages of 7.8 and 7.7 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Shure SE112 (2014) vs. Jaybird Run XT comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.