Shure SE112 Wireless (2017) vs KZ ATE (2015)

The KZ ATE (2015) makes for a mediocre Canal Earphone and should be avoided by the majority of people.

In the case of the Shure SE112 Wireless (2017), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.

There are considerably better alternatives that can be found for around $12 and $70 available on the market.

If you're still interested in reading more about the KZ ATE (2015), however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:

The reviewers at Head-fi have featured the KZ ATE (2015) in their KZ ATE In-Ear Monitors review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.

Moving on to the Shure SE112 Wireless (2017): no sources that perform reliable and objective hands-on testing have included it in their Canal Earphone roundups, which usually means that a product doesn't make for a good purchase.

Lastly, we tried to do a direct KZ ATE (2015) vs. Shure SE112 Wireless (2017) comparison of review ratings between these two products, but couldn't find any review scores for the Shure SE112 Wireless (2017).

Compared to all other Canal Earphones on the market, however, the KZ ATE (2015) performed great. When averaged out, it earned a rating of 8.6 out of 10, which is much better than the 7.4 review average of Canal Earphones in general.