KZ ZST (2016) vs Shure SE112 Wireless (2017)

The KZ ZST (2016) makes for a mediocre In-Ear Monitor and should be avoided by the majority of people.

In the case of the Shure SE112 Wireless (2017), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.

There are considerably better alternatives that can be found for around $50 and $80 available on the market.

If you're still interested in reading more about the KZ ZST (2016), however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:

The KZ ZST (2016) managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - Head-fi and Rtings - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.

As for the Shure SE112 Wireless (2017) - it wasn't considered to be a good enough purchase to earn a spot in any roundups conducted by sources that perform objective hands-on testing, which typically indicates that a product isn't worth its asking price.

Lastly, we wanted to do a direct KZ ZST (2016) vs. Shure SE112 Wireless (2017) comparison of their review scores, but couldn't find any ratings for the Shure SE112 Wireless (2017).

Nevertheless, we were still able to analyze how the KZ ZST (2016) fared when compared to the rest of its competition. Our analysis of its review data has shown that it earned an average review score of 7.3, which is on par with the 7.7 overall average of In-Ear Monitors in general.