Skullcandy Uproar (2015) vs Sony MDR-1AM2

The Skullcandy Uproar Wireless (2015) makes for a mediocre On-Ear Headphone and should be avoided by the majority of people.

In the case of the Sony MDR-1AM2, however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.

There are considerably better alternatives that can be found for around $30 and $180 available on the market.

If you're still interested in reading more about the Skullcandy Uproar Wireless (2015), however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:

The Skullcandy Uproar Wireless (2015) managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - PCmag and Reviewed - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.

As for the Sony MDR-1AM2 analysis - it impressed reviewers at Android Central, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best Wired Headphones for Samsung Galaxy Note 9" roundup and earned the "Ranked 1 out of 10" title.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these On-Ear Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Skullcandy Uproar Wireless (2015) got its highest, 8.3, rating from Runnerclick, while the Sony MDR-1AM2 earned its best, 8, score from hardwarezone.com.sg.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other On-Ear Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by On-Ear Headphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Skullcandy Uproar Wireless (2015) and Sony MDR-1AM2 managed averages of 8.2 and 7.5 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Skullcandy Uproar Wireless (2015) vs. Sony MDR-1AM2 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.