Sony WF-1000X (2017) vs Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A

The Sony WF-1000X (2017) is a great Earphone for its $79 asking price.

The Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A, however, while a reasonable product for $21, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Earphones in the $30 range, you might want to check out some better options.

Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the Sony WF-1000X (2017) to be a great product - it earned the "Best Neckband Headphones" title from Rtings and "Best wireless earbuds" from SoundGuys in their respective Earphone roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.

As for the Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A - it was really well-received by reviewers at SoundGuys, a great source that's known for conducting high-quality in-depth testing. It performed great in its "Best waterproof headphones" roundup and was named its "best bang for your buck", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Sony WF-1000X (2017) got its highest, 10, rating from TrustedReviews, while the Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A earned its best, 8, score from Lifewire.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Sony WF-1000X (2017) and Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A managed averages of 8.0 and 8.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Sony WF-1000X (2017) vs. Mpow Flame Bluetooth Headphones BH088A comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.