Sony WF-SP800N vs Anker Soundcore Spirit

The Sony WF-SP800N and Anker Soundcore Spirit Pro make for very strong choices and are great Earphones for their respective $198 and $31 asking prices. Depending on how much you're willing to spend, either of these options will serve you well.

The Sony WF-SP800N has managed to do great in various roundups conducted by reviewers from highly trusted sources that perform objective in-depth testing, like Rtings, CNET, PCmag, and Tom's Guide - it was dubbed "Best Sony Headphones For Sports" by Rtings, "Best noise canceling for runners" by CNET, and "Best for Most Features" by PCmag. Any product that's held in such high regard by some of the most reliable sources should be considered by everyone who's looking for a Earphone at this price.

Returning to the Anker Soundcore Spirit Pro, Tom's Guide, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Super-cheap sports headphones with great sound" in its "The best cheap running headphones in 2021" roundup, which is quite a feat.

We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.

We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Sony WF-SP800N got its highest, 10, rating from What Hi-Fi?, while the Anker Soundcore Spirit Pro earned its best, 10, score from Head-fi.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Earphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Sony WF-SP800N and Anker Soundcore Spirit Pro managed averages of 7.9 and 9.5 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Sony WF-SP800N vs. Anker Soundcore Spirit Pro comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.