Sony WF-SP800N vs Beats urBeats 3 (2012)

The Sony WF-SP800N is a great Canal Earphone for its $98 asking price.

The Beats urBeats 3 (2012), however, while a reasonable product for $76, doesn't stack up against its competitors quite as well. If you're considering Canal Earphones in the $40 range, you might want to check out some better options.

The Sony WF-SP800N has done great in quite a few roundups from some of the most highly trusted sources available, such as Rtings, CNET, PCmag, and Tom's Guide, which perform high-quality in-depth testing. It got awarded the "Best Sony Headphones For Sports" title by Rtings, "Best noise canceling for runners" by CNET, and "A Good Pair for Runners" by PCmag in their respective roundups. Earning that much praise from such respected sources is undoubtedly an impressive accomplishment.

As for the Beats urBeats 3 (2012), it was really well-received by reviewers at Rtings, a reliable source that's known for conducting its own, high-quality, in-depth testing. It performed great in its "The 6 Best Earbuds For Small Ears - Spring 2021" roundup and was named its "Best Wired Earbuds For Small Ears", which, on its own, makes it a product that warrants a closer look.

Lastly, we averaged out all of their review ratings and observed that the Sony WF-SP800N, with its 8.2 average, performed considerably better than most Canal Earphones - the mean score for the product category being 7.4 out of 10 - while the Beats urBeats 3 (2012) managed an average of 6.7.

There's one caveat here - it might not be entirely justifiable to do a direct Sony WF-SP800N vs. Beats urBeats 3 (2012) review average comparison since they aren't priced the same and more expensive products tend to get higher review scores from some sources.