Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products
Sony WH-1000XM4 (2020) vs beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (2004)
beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (2004)

The Sony WH-1000XM4 was loved by reviewers from numerous highly trusted sources that perform in-depth objective testing, including TechGearLab, Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, CNET, Rtings, and Wirecutter. It did great in their roundups - it was dubbed "Top Pick" by TechGearLab, "Still a popular choice and a great value buy" by Tom's Guide, and "Champion sound paired with excellent ANC" by Laptop Mag. That's high praise coming from sources of such caliber.
Returning to the beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (2004), Rtings, a source that's known for its high-quality in-depth testing, has great things to say about it. In fact, it was named its "Best Lower Mid-Range Open-Back Studio Headphones" in its "The 8 Best Studio Headphones For Mixing And Recording - Winter 2023" roundup, which is quite a feat.
Our direct Sony WH-1000XM4 vs. beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (2004) comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Open-Back Headphones, What Hi-Fi?, PCmag, and SoundGuys preferred the Sony WH-1000XM4, whereas Rtings seemed to like both equally.
We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Sony WH-1000XM4 got its highest, 10, review score from musicphotolife.com, while the beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (2004) most impressed reviewers at xbitlabs.com, which gave it a score of 10.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Sony WH-1000XM4 earned an average review score of 9.0 out of 10 points and the beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro (2004) received an average of 8.4, compared to the 7.8 average of Open-Back Headphones in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing