Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on products actually worth buyingthe best products
Sony WH-1000XM4 (2020) vs Bose QuietComfort TW Earbuds
Bose QuietComfort TW Earbuds
The Sony WH-1000XM4 managed to impress reviewers from many of the internet's most highly trusted sources, including TechGearLab, Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, CNET, Rtings, and Wirecutter. It performed really well in their Wireless Earphone roundups - it was named "Top Pick" by TechGearLab, "Still a popular choice and a great value buy" by Tom's Guide, and "Champion sound paired with excellent ANC" by Laptop Mag. That's high praise coming from sources that conduct in-depth hands-on testing.
As for the Bose QuietComfort TW Earbuds - it was received really well by reviewers from a couple of highly trusted sources, such as Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, and SoundGuys; it performed great in their in-depth hands-on roundups and earned the "Best noise-cancelling wireless earbuds" title from Tom's Guide, "The best noise-cancelling earbuds overall" from Laptop Mag, and "Ranked 2 out of 5" from SoundGuys, which indicates that this product is worthy of consideration.
Our direct Sony WH-1000XM4 vs. Bose QuietComfort TW Earbuds comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Wireless Earphones, TechGearLab, Techradar, reviews.org, Lifewire, PCmag, Tom's Guide, and SoundGuys preferred the Sony WH-1000XM4, whereas T3, Expert Reviews, TrustedReviews, What Hi-Fi?, BestProducts.com, Laptop Mag, and Rtings seemed to like both equally.
We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the Sony WH-1000XM4 got its highest, 10, review score from techadvisor.com, while the Bose QuietComfort TW Earbuds most impressed reviewers at What Hi-Fi?, which gave it a score of 10.
Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Sony WH-1000XM4 earned an average review score of 9.3 out of 10 points and the Bose QuietComfort TW Earbuds received an average of 8.9, compared to the 7.2 average of Wireless Earphones in general.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing

analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing