Steelseries Rival 310 (2017) vs HyperX Pulsefire Surge (2018)

The Steelseries Rival 310 (2017) was well-received by reviewers at Windows Central, a trustworthy source that performs unbiased hands-on testing. It did great in their "Best mouse 2022: The best mice for gaming, ergonomics, and more" roundup - they named it their "Best for big hands", which, by itself, suggests that it's a noteworthy product.

Moving on to the HyperX Pulsefire Surge (2018): it was unable to reach the very top of any roundups from sources that conduct reliable and unbiased testing. Nonetheless, it still managed to impress reviewers from a number of such sites, like Techradar, kitguru.net, Tom's Guide, Rtings, PCmag, CNET, and RocketJumpNinja, enough for them to include them on those lists.

For a direct Steelseries Rival 310 (2017) vs. HyperX Pulsefire Surge (2018) comparison, we took a look at sources that tested both and found that the Steelseries Rival 310 (2017) got reviewed better by Rtings and PCmag, whereas the reviewers at Tom's Guide preferred the HyperX Pulsefire Surge (2018). Reviewers at Techradar haven't shown a preference for either.

We also took a look at which sources liked these two products the most. We found that the Steelseries Rival 310 (2017) received its best, 10, rating from Techradar, while the HyperX Pulsefire Surge (2018) got its highest score of 10 from Techradar.

Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the Steelseries Rival 310 (2017) earned an average review score of 8.5 out of 10 points and the HyperX Pulsefire Surge (2018) received an average of 8.2, compared to the 7.5 average of Gaming Mice in general.