Suunto 9 vs Mio Slice Fitness Tracker

The Suunto 9 has done great in quite a few roundups from some of the most highly trusted sources available, such as cyclingweekly.com, bicycling.com, and gearinstitute.com, which perform high-quality in-depth testing. It got awarded the "Best cycling smartwatch for smart battery management" title by cyclingweekly.com, "Ranked 1 out of 11" by bicycling.com, and "Ranked 2 out of 6" by gearinstitute.com in their respective roundups. Earning that much praise from such respected sources is undoubtedly an impressive accomplishment.

As for the Mio Slice Fitness Tracker, it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at PCmag, Techradar, and Tom's Guide enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Pedometers, including Techradar, preferred the Suunto 9 over the Mio Slice Fitness Tracker.

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Suunto 9 was liked best by OutdoorGearLab, which gave it a score of 9, while the Mio Slice Fitness Tracker got its highest, 8, score from PCmag.

Lastly, we averaged out all of their review ratings and observed that the Suunto 9, with its 7.8 average, performed considerably better than most Pedometers - the mean score for the product category being 7.4 out of 10 - while the Mio Slice Fitness Tracker managed an average of 7.0.

There's one caveat here - it might not be entirely justifiable to do a direct Suunto 9 vs. Mio Slice Fitness Tracker review average comparison since they aren't priced the same and more expensive products tend to get higher review scores from some sources.