Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
TaoTronics SoundLiberty 53 vs KZ ATE (2015)
TaoTronics SoundLiberty 53
The TaoTronics SoundLiberty 53 and KZ ATE (2015) make for good, if unremarkable, Canal Earphones at their respective budgets.
With that said, while they both should serve reasonably well, you might want to look into other options at the $40 and $10 price points - it's likely that there are some better alternatives available.
If you want to learn more about the TaoTronics SoundLiberty 53 and the KZ ATE (2015), however, we prepared a summary of the information that we have:
The TaoTronics SoundLiberty 53 was loved by reviewers at Tom's Guide, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best fake AirPods of 2020" roundup where it was named its "Best fake AirPods for battery life", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
As for the KZ ATE (2015) - Head-fi, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its KZ ATE In-Ear Monitors review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Canal Earphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the TaoTronics SoundLiberty 53 got its highest, 8, rating from Tech Advisor, while the KZ ATE (2015) earned its best, 9, score from WIRED.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Canal Earphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Canal Earphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the TaoTronics SoundLiberty 53 and KZ ATE (2015) managed averages of 8.0 and 8.6 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct TaoTronics SoundLiberty 53 vs. KZ ATE (2015) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.