Audio-Technica ATH-AR3 (2016) vs TaoTronics TT-BH22 (2017)

The Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - TrustedReviews and SoundGuys - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.

As for the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Techradar, headphonesaddict.com, and TechGearLab enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

We tried doing a direct Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) vs. TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) review score comparison but couldn't find any sources that tested both.

Next, we took a look at which sources liked them best and found that the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) most impressed the reviewers at TrustedReviews, who gave it a score of 9, whereas the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) did best in its Techradar review - it scored 8 points.

Lastly, we compared their review averages and found that the Audio-Technica SonicFuel ATH-AR3BT (2016) did much better than the majority of its competitors, with an average review score of 9.0 out of 10, compared to the 7.4 overall average of On-Ear Headphones in general, whereas the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) hasn't managed to perform quite as well, with an average rating of 7.2.