Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless (2015) vs TaoTronics TT-BH22 (2017)
Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless (S6HBGY-374)
TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017)
While the Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless (S6HBGY-374) is a passable option for its $49 asking price, you might want to look into other options at its price point - chances are, there are better choices out there.
As for the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017), we, unfortunately, couldn't find enough data on the product to come to any meaningful conclusions.
If you're nevertheless interested in learning more about the Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless (S6HBGY-374), however, you can read on for a summary on what we know about it:
The Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless (S6HBGY-374) was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "Best headphones under $50" roundup where it was named its "Best wireless", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.
Taking a look at the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - Techradar and TechGearLab - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Closed-Back Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless (S6HBGY-374) got its highest, 8, rating from PCmag, while the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) earned its best, 8, score from Techradar.
Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) managed to get 7.5 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.4 review average of Closed-Back Headphones in general - whereas the Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless (S6HBGY-374) earned 6.5 points.
It should be said that doing a direct Skullcandy Hesh 2 Wireless (S6HBGY-374) vs. TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.