Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Urbanears Hellas (2016) vs TaoTronics TT-BH22 (2017)
TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017)
The Urbanears Hellas (2016) makes for a mediocre On-Ear Headphone and should be avoided by the majority of people.
In the case of the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017), however, we were unable to find enough data to come to any meaningful conclusions.
It's very likely that you can find some considerably better alternatives on the market.
If you're still interested in reading more about the Urbanears Hellas (2016), however, here's a quick summary of what we know about it:
The reviewers at PCmag have featured the Urbanears Hellas (2016) in their Urbanears Active Hellas Review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) - headphonesaddict.com, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its TaoTronics TT-BH22 Review - Are These ANC Headphones Any Good? roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these On-Ear Headphones, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Urbanears Hellas (2016) got its highest, 8, rating from PCmag, while the TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) earned its best, 7.6, score from headphonesaddict.com.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other On-Ear Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by On-Ear Headphones being 7.4 out of 10, whereas the Urbanears Hellas (2016) and TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) managed averages of 8.0 and 7.6 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Urbanears Hellas (2016) vs. TaoTronics TTBH-22 (2017) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.