Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
TCL 3 series (2019) vs Vizio P-Series Quantum (2018)
Vizio P-Series Quantum 65" (2018)

The TCL S325 49" (2019) has done great in a couple of roundups conducted by highly trusted sources that perform objective in-depth testing, like Rtings, Wirecutter, and CNET - it earned the "Best Cheap TCL TV" title from Rtings, "Runner Up for Runner-up: TCL 32S327 Roku TV" from Wirecutter, and "Ranked 3 out of 6" from CNET. Any product that's held in high regard by such reliable sources should be considered by anyone that's looking for a TV at this price point.
As for the Vizio P-Series Quantum 65" (2018), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at HomeTheaterReview.com, Techradar, Rtings, and Tom's Guide enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.
We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like Rtings, and learned that they all showed a preference for the Vizio P-Series Quantum 65" (2018).
Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two TVs received. We found that the TCL S325 49" (2019) managed to earn a rating of 7 from CNET, whereas the Vizio P-Series Quantum 65" (2018) got its highest, 9, score from reviewers at HomeTheaterReview.com.
Finally, we calculated their average review scores from all of the data we could find and compared those to TVs in general. It turns out that the Vizio P-Series Quantum 65" (2018), with its 8.3 average, got reviewed considerably better than most of its competition - the overall average for TVs being 7.7 out of 10 points - whereas the TCL S325 49" (2019) performed worse than most, with an average review score of 6.6.
However, it's worth pointing out that a direct TCL S325 49" (2019) vs. Vizio P-Series Quantum 65" (2018) comparison might not be entirely fair, because some sources have a tendency of not taking value for money into account when reviewing products.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing