HyperX Cloud II (2015) vs Turtle Beach Recon 70

The HyperX Cloud II (2015) is one of the very best Gaming Headsets that one can get for around $95. The Turtle Beach Recon 70, however, while a very good choice at its $30 price point, falls just short of being remarkable.

Two highly trusted sources that perform well-thought-out in-depth testing consider the HyperX Cloud II (2015) to be a great product - it earned the "Most Durable Gaming Headset Under $50" title from Rtings and "Ranked 2 out of 8" from Digital Camera World in their respective Gaming Headset roundups, which is a good indication of it being a notable product.

As for the Turtle Beach Recon 70 analysis - it impressed reviewers at Techradar, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best Nintendo Switch headphones 2022: the top Switch gaming headsets" roundup and earned the "Best budget" title.

To get a better idea of how they fare when compared directly to each other, we analyzed review scores of sources that tested both. Rtings, for example, preferred the HyperX Cloud II (2015), while Tom's Guide rated both of them the same.

We also took a look at which sources had the best things to say about them. We learned that the HyperX Cloud II (2015) got reviewed the highest by appuals.com - it gave it a rating of 10, while the Turtle Beach Recon 70 most impressed reviewers at Headphone Review, which gave it a score of 8.4.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Gaming Headsets on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Gaming Headsets being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the HyperX Cloud II (2015) and Turtle Beach Recon 70 managed averages of 8.4 and 7.5 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct HyperX Cloud II (2015) vs. Turtle Beach Recon 70 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.