Turtle Beach Recon 70 vs Sennheiser GSP 670

The Turtle Beach Recon 70 makes for an outstanding Gaming Headset at $39. The Sennheiser GSP 670, however, while overall a good product for its asking price, doesn't quite manage to stand out from its competition - there are better Gaming Headsets that can be found for around $210 available here.

The Turtle Beach Recon 70 was loved by reviewers at SoundGuys, a highly trusted source that performs reliable in-depth testing. It did great in its "The best cheap gaming headsets" roundup where it was named its "Best console", which, in itself, makes it a product worth considering.

As for the Sennheiser GSP 670 - it impressed reviewers at PCGamesN, a trustworthy source that conducts solid hands-on testing. It did great in its "Best gaming headset 2021" roundup - in fact, it earned its "most sturdy gaming headset" title, which, on its own, indicates a certain level of quality.

We conducted an analysis of all of the review data that we could find on these two products. First, we focused on sources that tested and rated both of them, like SoundGuys, and learned that they all showed a preference for the Sennheiser GSP 670.

Then we took a look at the highest review scores that these two Gaming Headsets received. We found that the Turtle Beach Recon 70 managed to earn a rating of 8 from Windows Central, whereas the Sennheiser GSP 670 got its highest, 9, score from reviewers at TrustedReviews.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Gaming Headsets on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Gaming Headsets being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the Turtle Beach Recon 70 and Sennheiser GSP 670 managed averages of 7.5 and 8.4 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Turtle Beach Recon 70 vs. Sennheiser GSP 670 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.