V-MODA Crossfade 2 Wireless (2017) vs HiFiMan Sundara (2017)

The V-MODA Crossfade 2 Wireless (2017) is an example of a great Wireless Headphone at its $280 budget.

In the case of the $349 HiFiMan Sundara (2017), however, we weren't able to find enough data to come to any reliable conclusions. If you're considering buying a Wireless Headphone in the $360 range, we encourage you to take a look at some other options.

The V-MODA Crossfade 2 Wireless (2017) got praised by SoundGuys and Rtings - two highly trusted sources that perform in-depth hands-on testing. It was awarded the "Best wireless" title from SoundGuys and "Ranked 2 out of 4" from Rtings in their respective Wireless Headphone roundups.

As for the HiFiMan Sundara (2017), it wasn't able to earn a top spot in any roundups from trusted sources that conduct their own hands-on testing. Nevertheless, it managed to impress reviewers at Head-fi, Headfonics, and Rtings enough to make it onto their respective shortlists.

When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Wireless Headphones, including Head-fi, preferred the V-MODA Crossfade 2 Wireless (2017) over the HiFiMan Sundara (2017).

We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The V-MODA Crossfade 2 Wireless (2017) was liked best by Head-fi, which gave it a score of 9.3, while the HiFiMan Sundara (2017) got its highest, 9.2, score from Head-fi.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Wireless Headphones on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Wireless Headphones being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the V-MODA Crossfade 2 Wireless (2017) and HiFiMan Sundara (2017) managed averages of 8.1 and 8.8 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct V-MODA Crossfade 2 Wireless (2017) vs. HiFiMan Sundara (2017) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.