V-MODA Crossfade M-100 (2012) vs Urbanears Hellas (2016)

While the V-MODA Crossfade M-100 (2012) wasn't able to make it to the very top of any roundups from sources that perform quality hands-on testing, it still got featured in a large number of them. TrustedReviews, TechSpot, CNET, Head-fi, PCmag, Laptop Mag, HomeTheaterReview.com, Rtings, and What Hi-Fi? have all deemed it worthy of a place on their respective shortlists.

As for the Urbanears Hellas (2016) analysis - it impressed reviewers at MakeUseOf, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "The Best Quality Headphones That Don’t Cost a Fortune" roundup and earned the "Ranked 2 out of 9" title.

Our direct V-MODA Crossfade M-100 (2012) vs. Urbanears Hellas (2016) comparison of their review scores has shown that, out of sources that tested both Wireless Headphones, CNET preferred the V-MODA Crossfade M-100 (2012), whereas PCmag seemed to like both equally.

We also looked at which sources liked these products best and found that the V-MODA Crossfade M-100 (2012) got its highest, 9, review score from Digitaltrends, while the Urbanears Hellas (2016) most impressed reviewers at PCmag, which gave it a score of 8.

Finally, we also compared their review scores to the rest of their competition - the V-MODA Crossfade M-100 (2012) earned an average review score of 7.8 out of 10 points and the Urbanears Hellas (2016) received an average of 8.0, compared to the 7.3 average of Wireless Headphones in general.