Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ 2018 vs ViewSonic Elite XG240R 2018
The Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ is a great Monitor for its $2700 asking price.
The ViewSonic Elite XG240R 24", however, is merely passable at its $179 price point. If you're considering buying a Monitor in the $160 range, you might want to check out some of its competitors.
The Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ has done really well in a number of roundups conducted by sources that perform their own hands-on testing, such as PC Gamer, Techradar, and Android Authority - it was awarded the "The best premium-price 4K monitor" title by PC Gamer, "Ranked 2 out of 6" by Techradar, and "Ranked 2 out of 5" by Android Authority. That's high praise from reliable sources.
Taking a look at the ViewSonic Elite XG240R 24", it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - PC Gamer and PCWorld - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Monitors, including PC Gamer, preferred the Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ over the ViewSonic Elite XG240R 24".
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ was liked best by TrustedReviews, which gave it a score of 9, while the ViewSonic Elite XG240R 24" got its highest, 9.8, score from MonitorNerds.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ and ViewSonic Elite XG240R 24" managed averages of 8.0 and 7.8 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ vs. ViewSonic Elite XG240R 24" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing