Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C 2018 vs BenQ GL series (2012)
The ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C 35” is a relatively good Monitor for people that are willing to spend around $550. The BenQ GL2460HM, by contrast, is quite unremarkable and doesn't stand out in any meaningful way from other products at this price point.
If you're still interested in learning more about the ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C 35” and BenQ GL2460HM, however, we wrote a summary of what we know about them:
Tom's Hardware, a source known for its hands-on testing and objective methodology, had good things to say about the ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C 35”. It performed great in its "Best Gaming Monitors 2020: Budget, 144Hz and More" roundup and earned the "Best Budget Ultrawide Gaming Monitor" title.
As for the BenQ GL2460HM - PCmag, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its BenQ GL2460HM Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both Monitors, including MonitorNerds, preferred the ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C 35” over the BenQ GL2460HM.
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C 35” was liked best by MonitorNerds, which gave it a score of 9.6, while the BenQ GL2460HM got its highest, 8.6, score from MonitorNerds.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Monitors on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Monitors being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C 35” and BenQ GL2460HM managed averages of 7.9 and 7.7 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct ViewSonic Elite XG350R-C 35” vs. BenQ GL2460HM comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.