Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Audio Pro Addon T3 (2015) vs Vifa Oslo (2016)
Audio Pro Addon T3 (2015)
The Audio Pro Addon T3 (2015) makes for a good, if unremarkable, Portable Bluetooth Speaker for people with a $250 budget.
The Vifa Oslo (2016), however, is merely mediocre at its $499 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $250 and $340 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the Audio Pro Addon T3 (2015) and Vifa Oslo (2016), however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
The Audio Pro Addon T3 (2015) managed to earn a spot in roundups from two sources that are known for their trustworthy review methodology - Expert Reviews and What Hi-Fi? - but fell short of making it to the top of their lists.
Taking a look at the Vifa Oslo (2016), it got featured in roundups from two reliable sources that conduct their own testing - PCmag and Wirecutter (NYTimes) - but it fell short of earning a top spot in either.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Portable Bluetooth Speakers, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the Audio Pro Addon T3 (2015) got its highest, 10, rating from Expert Reviews, while the Vifa Oslo (2016) earned its best, 8, score from TechHive.
Lastly, in order to better compare them to the rest of their competition, we averaged out their review scores. The Vifa Oslo (2016) managed to get 8.0 out of 10 - considerably better than the 7.6 review average of Portable Bluetooth Speakers in general - whereas the Audio Pro Addon T3 (2015) earned 10.0 points.
It should be said that doing a direct Audio Pro Addon T3 (2015) vs. Vifa Oslo (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair due to the difference in their prices - some sources don't put much weight on value for money and thus tend to give better review scores to more expensive products.