Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
Vizio P-Series Quantum (2019) vs Samsung RU7300
The Vizio 65" P-Series Quantum (2019) and the Samsung RU7300 65" are decent TVs at their respective price points, but don't manage to stand out from their direct competitors in any meaningful way. We suggest that you also look at some alternatives that can be found for around $1,200 or $700.
If you're still interested in learning a bit more about the Vizio 65" P-Series Quantum (2019) and the Samsung RU7300 65", however, read on for a summary of what we could gather about them:
The reviewers at Rtings have featured the Vizio 65" P-Series Quantum (2019) in their Vizio P Series Quantum 2019 TV Review roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the Samsung RU7300 65" - Rtings, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its Samsung RU7300 TV Review roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.
When we thoroughly analyzed their review scores, we learned that all of the sources that tested both TVs, including Rtings, preferred the Vizio 65" P-Series Quantum (2019) over the Samsung RU7300 65".
We also took a look at which sources they managed to impress the most. The Vizio 65" P-Series Quantum (2019) was liked best by Rtings, which gave it a score of 7.9, while the Samsung RU7300 65" got its highest, 9.4, score from Gadget Review.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other TVs on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by TVs being 7.7 out of 10, whereas the Vizio 65" P-Series Quantum (2019) and Samsung RU7300 65" managed averages of 7.9 and 8.1 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Vizio 65" P-Series Quantum (2019) vs. Samsung RU7300 65" comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.