Find the best product and price, effortlessly.
Discover deals on the best products
XYZprinting da Vinci Nano vs CEL RoboxDual (2016)
The XYZprinting da Vinci Nano makes for a good, if unremarkable, Home 3D Printer for people with a $230 budget.
The CEL RoboxDual (2016), however, is merely mediocre at its $949 asking price, when compared to similarly priced products, and won't satisfy the needs of most people.
In either case, we suggest that you first take a look at some other options at the $230 and $680 price points before committing to one of these - it's likely that you'll be able to find some better alternatives.
If you're still interested in learning more about the XYZprinting da Vinci Nano and CEL RoboxDual (2016), however, we wrote a summary of what we could find about them:
The reviewers at Tom's Guide have featured the XYZprinting da Vinci Nano in their Best 3D printers for 2021 roundup. However, it fell short of making it to the top of their list.
As for the CEL RoboxDual (2016) analysis - it impressed reviewers at Techradar, a source that's known for its objective testing and well-thought-out methodology - it performed great in its "Best 3D printer of 2021: top choices for work and home use" roundup and earned the "Best 3D printer for schools and business" title.
We couldn't find any sources that tested both of these Home 3D Printers, so we only analyzed how they performed in reviews from different sites.
We first examined which sources rated each of these best and found that the XYZprinting da Vinci Nano got its highest, 9.1, rating from Gadget Review, while the CEL RoboxDual (2016) earned its best, 8, score from Techradar.
Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Home 3D Printers on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Home 3D Printers being 7.3 out of 10, whereas the XYZprinting da Vinci Nano and CEL RoboxDual (2016) managed averages of 8.6 and 8.0 points, respectively.
Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct XYZprinting da Vinci Nano vs. CEL RoboxDual (2016) comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.
- PET-G
- PLA
- ABS
- HIPS
- Nylon
- PC
- PET-G
- PLA
- TPU/TPE
analysis
Testing
analysis
Testing