Neato Botvac D7 Connected vs Yeedi K600

The Neato Botvac D7 Connected makes for an outstanding Robot Vacuum at $569. The Yeedi K600, however, while overall a good product for its asking price, doesn't quite manage to stand out from its competition - there are better Robot Vacuums that can be found for around $200 available here.

The Neato Botvac D7 Connected has done great in a couple of roundups conducted by highly trusted sources that perform objective in-depth testing, like Rtings, CNET, TechGearLab, and Tom's Guide - it earned the "Best Robot Vacuum For Low-Pile Carpet" title from Rtings, "The best midrange robot vacuum" from CNET, and "Best All-Around Vacuum" from TechGearLab. Any product that's held in high regard by such reliable sources should be considered by anyone that's looking for a Robot Vacuum at this price point.

As for the Yeedi K600 - Reviewed, a source that conducts reliable hands-on testing, has featured it in its The Best Affordable Robot Vacuums of 2021 roundup. However, it didn't make it to any of the top spots.

We examined all of the review data that we could find and first took a look at sources that reviewed both of them, like TechHive, and found that they haven't shown a preference for either product.

Then we checked which sources liked these two Robot Vacuums best and found that the Neato Botvac D7 Connected got its highest, 10, review score from reviewers at TechGearLab, whereas the Yeedi K600 earned its best score of 8 from TechHive.

Lastly, we averaged out all of the reviews scores that we could find on these two products and compared them to other Robot Vacuums on the market. We learned that both of them performed far better than most of their competitors - the overall review average earned by Robot Vacuums being 7.2 out of 10, whereas the Neato Botvac D7 Connected and Yeedi K600 managed averages of 8.3 and 8.0 points, respectively.

Due to the difference in their prices, however, it's important to keep in mind that a direct Neato Botvac D7 Connected vs. Yeedi K600 comparison might not be entirely fair - some sources don't take value for money into account when assigning their scores and therefore have a tendency to rate more premium products better.