5
User
Recs.
Recs.
5
Updates
Last
Updated
Updated
Activity
11 Options
Specs
Specs are quantitative aspects of the option such as the price
Pros
Pro Domain driven design and type driven development
Because of full dependent types in Idris, the programmer can focus more on modelling the domain with types and waste less time fixing common bugs that the type checker will catch. Dependent types help apply type driven development and a lot of code auto generation, making the compiler and type checker an ally in developing working software instead of just getting in the way.
Know any positive aspects of this option?
Cons
Con Different semantics from Haskell
Idris, while similar to Haskell, has strict semantics, which may cause some confusion if your backend is done in Haskell. If using Idris, it would make sense to do the backend in Idris as well, if not for the fact that Idris currently has fewer libraries available for web development than Haskell.
Know any negative aspects of this option?
Recommendations
Idris
Recommended 2 years ago
Pro
Full dependent typesPro
Domain driven design and type driven developmentIdris
Recommended 4 years ago
Pro
Full dependent typesPro
Domain driven design and type driven developmentIdris
Recommended 4 years ago
Pro
Full dependent typesPro
Domain driven design and type driven development