When comparing Textadept vs EDITFILE, the Slant community recommends Textadept for most people. In the question“What are the best programming text editors?” Textadept is ranked 24th while EDITFILE is ranked 53rd. The most important reason people chose Textadept is:
You can write plugins pretty easily. [Here](http://foicica.com/textadept/api.html) is the API doc, quite compact. [Here](http://foicica.com/hg/ctags/file/a1a51a95b899/init.lua) is a module which adds a support for ctags.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Has both GUI and TUI
Both text and GUI versions behave mostly the same, just the way notepad users would expect it to.
Like shift+arrows - select, Ctrl+c - copy, Ctrl+o - open a file.
Pro Small and portable
Has very few dependencies, and very small footprint. Can be copied to a new system in a moment, unpacked and be at your service.
Has a built-in lua engine.
It's available for Windows, Mac and Linux.
Pro Splits EDI X12, EDIFACT, and TRADACOM Files
EDITFILE can split the EDI X12, EDIFACT, and TRADACOM files into each individual messages.
Pro Exports EDI X12, Delimitted Application Files into Excel Spreadsheet
EDITFILE has the feature to export ANSI X12 documents, Delimitted Application Files into CSV.
Does not have an IRC channel or some kind of forum where a community of developers/plugin writers could evolve around. Has a mailing list which is said to be active but that does not feel that attractive.