When comparing MacPorts vs Quicksilver, the Slant community recommends Quicksilver for most people. In the question“What are the best power user tools for macOS?” Quicksilver is ranked 11th while MacPorts is ranked 52nd.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Provides a consistent experience across OS X versions
MacPorts eschews Apple-supplied libraries and links sources against its own making sure that the experience is the same regardless of what OS X version is used.
Pro Nice variants system
MacPorts has a variants system that allows customizing builds with author provided options.
Pro Generally very up to date
MacPorts generally gets new software soon after it's available. This way users will not have to worry if their software is up to date.
Pro A lot more powerful than Spotlight
Pro Makes it really fast to do a lot of actions
There are customizable triggers and capability to execute multilevel commands - e.g. launch terminal app, give the location of script and supply parameters for the script with one command.
Pro Vast extensibility via plugins
A lot of different plugins for browsers, file systems, mail clients, etc.
Pro Easy-to-understand noun-verb paradigm for creating tasks
Con Downloads unneeded libraries duplicating functionality already provided by Apple's libraries
As MacPorts eschews Apple-supplied libraries and links sources against its own a large duplication of functionality across MacPorts and Apple libraries can be found.
Con Bad at limiting dependencies
MacPorts has a habit of pulling very specific versions of dependencies for each package. It downloads different version of already existing dependencies even in cases where the existing dependency version would have worked seamlessly.