Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro No dependencies
Which in other words means, a high performance solid core which provides you with a with a minimal (but stable) layer to build your app on.
Pro Websocket support
Up to date with Websocket RFC 6455.
Pro Automated compression
Minification and gzip compression is built in and automatic.
Pro Good documentation and examples
Often updated examples and well written documentation.
Pro Getting the things done efficiently without useless ceremony
Following and adding to Node.js the proven battle-tested paradigm implemented by Django, Laravel & ASP.NET MVC.
Pro Good support
Pro Really reactive community and developers on their Chat
Pro Working on all versions of the node.js
Cons
Con Developed only by one person
Framework is developed by only one person.
Con Paid support
Framework lacks any community, if you need support you are forced to buy support package from developer.
Con Best practices
This framework doesn't adhere to any best practices in software development.
Con Poor design
Framework is designed very poorly, autocomplete in IDEs don't work.
Con Poor documentation
Source code is very poorly documented, only available information is on the official website.
Con Prototype pollution
Con Node IDE support or Autocomplete
Con Poor performance
Commonly Compared
Built By the Slant team
Lustre recommends the best products at their lowest prices.
Try it now - it's free