Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Codename One?
Ad
Ad
Flutter
All
11
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Open source
See More
Top
Con
Still in development
According to the website, Flutter is still in its early stages of development.
See More
Top
Pro
Great developer tools debug/hotreload/analyser
See More
Top
Con
Based on Dart language
Dart is a Java like language, easy to learn and startup fast for millions of Java developers. BUT if you have to learn it ... it's a con.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on Dart language
Dart is a Java like language, easy to learn and startup fast for millions of Java developers.
See More
Top
Con
Dart is unpopular and never gained serious community traction like Kotlin or Java
See More
Top
Pro
A single codebase for iOS AND Android
See More
Top
Con
Does not support 32-bit iOS devices
If you plan on targeting iPhone 5, 5C or earlier, you can forget about Flutter.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
The developer's goal is to allow people to make apps running at 120 FPS.
See More
Top
Con
Google has a bad history with product loyalty
See More
Specs
Dev platforms:
Windows, Mac and Linux
Desktop targets:
announced Windows
Mobile targets:
Android and iOS
Popular Language Bindings:
Dart
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
211
32
B4X
All
22
Experiences
Pros
15
Cons
6
Specs
Top
Pro
Create easy, fast cross-platform views with less code
B4XUI custom views are designed, by Erel and other forum members, exactly with this in mind; custom views that act and feel exactly the same no matter what platform you target.
See More
Top
Con
Java-dependent Desktop Development
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful general purpose programming tool
As mentioned in its website, "With B4X, anyone who wants to, can develop real-world solutions."
See More
Top
Con
Only for Windows
The IDE, while very handy, only runs on Windows. If you want to code on Mac or Linux, you have to install it on a virtual machine. But you can debug your app by running it on the target OS.
See More
Top
Pro
A very active forum where you can find any issue you have, and quick answers to new ones
See More
Top
Con
The documentation and examples and tutorials are not up to date
The documentation and examples and tutorials are not up to date.
See More
Top
Pro
A highly motivated program author who is very active in the forums
Erel Uziel is simply the most pro-active Soft-Creator/Forum Manager you will ever come across. If it has not yet been asked & answered, just ask and you will be answered withing minutes, and thanks to it being a trully international forum, this is achieved 24h/7d.
See More
Top
Con
For BASIC language lovers
Lots of people are not fans of BASIC-like languages. Enjoyment of B4X, may depend on having a background or affinity for BASIC.
See More
Top
Pro
Very easy to use and powerful for IoT
Support for Bluetooth/BLE, MQTT, TCP/UDP, Serial, NFC, Websockets, HTTP/2 across platforms makes it the ideal tool for IoT projects.
See More
Top
Con
Can still need deep knowledge of Java
Attempts to provide BASIC-like language that is more comfortable for a certain demographic of users, but various circumstances will still require knowledge of Java. "No free lunch".
See More
Top
Pro
Live code swapping
A huge productivity boost when you can run your apps on the devices and make code changes real time without needing to recompile.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of B4W real Web app
Erel needs to make a real Web app designer.
See More
Top
Pro
No complexities compared with other tools
No need to learn JAVA, C+, PHP, or any other complementary languages in order to achieve exactly what you need.
See More
Top
Pro
The best all round
Produces highly optimised end results. Easy to use and quick to learn. When you know how to produce an Android app you near enough know how to produce an IOS app. The fact that there are subtle differences between writing for different platforms is a huge plus - those differences help optimise your code and they're really not difficult to wrap your head round.
See More
Top
Pro
Erel has much passion for his tool
The speed of answer topics is amazing.
See More
Top
Pro
Many informative video tutorials
The tutorials help beginners as well as more experienced programmers grasping important concepts.
See More
Top
Pro
Many code examples of fully working apps for free
The Forum is filled with many code examples of fully working apps for free. Code snippets, animation, different type of views etc. can be easily downloaded and used in your own app.
See More
Top
Pro
Large user community
Over the years it has built up a very active user community that is very involved in the evolution of B4X. In their forums you can find any answer to your questions, and if it is not there, they will answer you.
See More
Top
Pro
RAD
VERY Rapid Application Development, with tons of pro features.
See More
Top
Pro
Tightly integrated framework
See More
Top
Pro
Almost everything is free and complete
Except the IDE for iOS. Even so it's very cheap.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Android, iOS, Windows, Mac, Linux, Web, Raspberry Pi, Arduino
License:
Apache License 2.0
Languages:
B4X
Dev platforms:
Windows, Mac (via VM), Linux (via VM), Web
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free / paid
381
22
Onsen UI
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Open source and free
Onsen UI is open source, and completely free to use.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be used for web apps as well
Onsen UI is usable for classic web development as well as mobile.
See More
Top
Pro
Large selection of components
Onsen UI provides a wide selection of components that are ready to use out of the box and are easily customizable.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Onsen UI provides very clear, well-written and detailed documentation. It uses popular technologies that are likely already familiar to developers (such as jQuery and Angular). The framework is semantic and intuitive to use, making it quite fast to learn.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports React
React is the most trending front-end UI framework, naturally supporting that is a plus.
See More
Specs
License:
Apache 20.0
Mobile targets:
iOS, Android
Hide
Get it
here
29
1
React Native
All
8
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Allows you to develop native apps
React Native allows you to create native apps by generating native views with JavaScript instead of using a web wrapper.
See More
Top
Con
If core team doesn't use a certain feature, it's not developed
Whenever there's functionality you need that they don't use in their apps, it's not going to get developed by them, even if it's obvious it should be in the core. They always say to either submit a PR or create a separate module.
See More
Top
Pro
Large, supportive community
Despite being such a young framework (early 2015), the support for React Native grew quickly. There is a forum, active tag on Stackoverflow and many other ways to get help from the community.
See More
Top
Con
Steep learning curve
React Native is not the most beginner-friendly framework for creating mobile apps with JavaScript. It requires that the developer know React, which is known to have a steep learning curve.
See More
Top
Pro
Backed by Facebook
Facebook writes their mobile apps in React Native so the code base gets pretty thoroughly used in some highly demanding scenarios.
See More
Top
Con
Many existing JS libraries are not usable on React Native; not exactly a 1-to-1 experience to writing React either
Example: Library that provides a full calendar with agenda view. In the end it's much easier to develop in actual JavaScript with a solution such as Ionic, especially if your app needs to work well on the desktop.
See More
Top
Pro
More predictable control of the state
The one way data flow, makes it more predictable and easy to control.
See More
Top
Con
React native only supports react which is getting old
React native is only based on react which is getting old. An old tech developer can't take much breaking changes so it gets more patchs. There is a limit, and react is too verbose and complex. better alternatives available today.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
99
36
Quasar Framework
All
9
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Uses Vue.js 2.0
Vue 3.x available as a plugin.
See More
Top
Con
Developed by a single person
Statistically, apps being developed by a single person can be gone without warning.
See More
Top
Pro
Good documentation and coding samples
See More
Top
Pro
Massive suite of well test & optimized widgets
Instant rebuild for SPA, PWA, Cordova or Electron with Material/iOS Themes.
See More
Top
Pro
Designed from the outset for desktop & mobile
See More
Top
Pro
Can build/test your PWA with/without PWA wrapper
See More
Top
Pro
Supports server side rendering (SSR) like Nuxt + SSR/PWA
"Icon genie" builds app icons and splash images for platforms selected.
See More
Top
Pro
Ability to add custom server side code when using SSR
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Web
License:
MIT
Mobile targets:
Android, Blueberry, iOS, Windows Phone, Web
Supported languages:
Javascript, Typescript
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
175
13
NativeScript
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Svelte Native
Used by Svelte framework for native development.
See More
Top
Con
Nativescript + Angular apps for Android tend to have long startup times.
It's very difficult to have acceptable startup times with NS+Angular in Android. It's not uncommon to see apps taking 6 sec or more to start AFTER having been optimized with Webpack (mandatory!). The same app in iOS takes only 2-3 sec. Also, this seems to happen only with the NS+Angular flavour. People using plain NS (without Angular) don't seem to have the issue.
See More
Top
Pro
Leverages knowledge in Angular
Angular is a very popular framework, and teams already developing angular will feel right at home with Nativescript + Angular
See More
Top
Pro
Works great with vue.js
See More
Hide
Get it
here
33
5
MonoDevelop
All
6
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Free
MonoDevelop is free to download and use.
See More
Top
Con
No longer supported (deprecated since 2018)
Starting with version 4.x, Xamarin rebranded MonoDevelop as Xamarin Studio, but only for the Windows version of the IDE. Stable release 7.6.9.22 / September 21, 2018
See More
Top
Pro
Starting up this program doesn't take as long as starting Visual Studio windows 98
See More
Top
Con
Bad formatting
MonoDevelop doesn't offer much in terms of autocompletion and code formatting. Most of the time the automatic formatting that MonoDevelop does is annoying and not really compliant with C# guidelines.
See More
Top
Con
The MonoDevelop version that ships with Unity is several versions behind
The version of MonoDevelop that ships with Unity is several versions behind the main MonoDevelop branch. It also gets updated very rarely so any annoying bugs that it may have take a lot of time to get fixed.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows Linux Mac
Supported languages:
C#, F#, Visual Basic .NET, Vala
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
Stable release:
7.6.9.22 / September 21, 2018
See All Specs
Hide
Get it
here
194
26
Ionic Framework
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Cordova plugins
Large quantity of plugins to access native APIs without code nothing in native language.
See More
Top
Con
Can be buggy
Ionic is still a young framework (version 1.0 was released in May 2015). There are still some quirks and bugs in the framework to work out, which you can see a list of on their Github. However Ionic is under active development and bugs are generally addressed quickly.
See More
Top
Pro
Large, friendly and active community
Ionic Framework is currently one of the most popular frameworks for hybrid mobile app development. This has resulted in a very large community of active users who contribute to the community by writing tutorials and answering questions.
See More
Top
Pro
Free and open source
Ionic is free to use and open source, resulting in an active and helpful community of users and contributors.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
128
30
ASP.NET Core
All
11
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Fast and getting faster
Thanks to breakthroughs in ROSLYN compiler and the efforts of the .NET COre developer team, code written in C# can reach speeds just a step behind C++.
See More
Top
Con
Microsoft environment
See More
Top
Pro
Multi platform
Can run on Windows, Linux and Mac (also Visual Studio Code editor).
See More
Top
Pro
JSON optimization
In .NET Core 2.1 and 3.0, new APIs are added that make it possible to write JSON APIs that require less memory, using Span<T> and UTF8 strings, and improve throughput of applications like Kestrel, ASP.NET Core web server. See also Utf8JsonReader.
See More
Top
Pro
Tutorials and documentation quality
Both microsoft and 3rd party tutorials are mostly of high quality and encourage you to use the industry best-practices.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in middleware
Built-in middleware featuring: Authentication, Cookie policy, Health Check, MVC, Session etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Hosting
Ability to host on IIS, Nginx, Apache, Docker, or self-host in your own process.
See More
Top
Pro
Ease of Use
See More
Top
Pro
Security
It is a very secure platform.
See More
Top
Pro
Tooling
Both VS and VSCode are powerful free IDEs that are well integrated with ASP.net Core. VS Community also allows for commercial use for projects with less than 5 developers.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Docker
Written in:
C#
Default ORM:
Entity Framework
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
202
49
Xojo
All
4
Experiences
Pros
1
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Easy to make compiled native apps.
See More
Top
Con
Subscription-based/Not free
Using this product you're betting the company will still be around. If they get bought out by an enterprise that wants to use the tech internally, all they need to do is stop offering subscriptions and suddenly you're scrambling to rebuild your entire app on other technology.
See More
Top
Con
No Android support
They plan to eventually support Android, but for now, they only support iOS.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Pi, Web,iOS
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
Hide
Get it
here
78
40
Solar 2D (formerly Corona SDK)
All
19
Experiences
Pros
16
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Very simple to use
See More
Top
Con
Free, but not completely
See More
Top
Pro
Free
Corona SDK is completely free. That includes pro-tier plugins.
See More
Top
Con
Making a device build requires internet connection
To build your app for the device (iOS/Android/AppleTV) Corona requires to fetch resources from online. This would include base application template and plugins. This allows not to perform local build or use Xcode or Android Studio to do a build. Even Large games/apps would build very fast with good internet connection. Your code never leaves computed. Corona SDK would transfer some information to determine which plugins and pieces has to be transferred in order to make a final steps in build. As a bonus - you get basically one button press to get from your Corona Simulator game to game on a device.
See More
Top
Pro
Corona Simulator
Corona SDK ships with Corona Simulator, which runs your game/app directly on your PC/Mac and updates every time you make changes. It provides immediate feedback to your actions, you can see your changes right on the screen, without necessity to make build to device. Getting instant feedback really boosts tenfold prototyping and development speed.
See More
Top
Pro
Good documentation and lots of tutorials
See More
Top
Pro
Content scaling
It's easy to create a game that looks good on many different sized mobile devices.
See More
Top
Pro
Live builds - update builds running on a device automatically
With the live build feature, once you have created a build and installed on a device, you get lightning fast turnaround times because any change on the code or data is updated to the devices running the game (within the local WiFi) immediately. So changes can be tested on the real hardware within a very few seconds. What's even more impressive, this even works flawless with multiple devices running the game. You have to use it to learn how good of a feature this is while development and even more, while doing QA. Imagine fixing bugs and everyone of your QA team/friends/whoever helps to get your game done, has all changes on his device without doing anything but waiting 5 seconds - outstanding.
See More
Top
Pro
Lua syntax
Uses the great and easy-to-learn Lua programming language.
See More
Top
Pro
Very comprehensive API
It's very quick to get things up and running with Corona SDK. The API is extensive and while it's not 100% feature-complete with the iOS API, it's close enough that you could create tons of games and never run into a roadblock. The API docs can be found here.
See More
Top
Pro
Amazing learning curve
Corona does not throw photoshop-like madness full of buttons editor. You can go as fast as you want, learning and building game from ground up. Eventually, you'll learn how much corona is doing for you. But to start you don't have to master complex editor software. It's a great tool to learn to start game development if you want to learn how to program and make games. Your experience will be 100% transferable to any other Pro game engine.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-platform desktop and mobile
Corona works on OS X, Windows and Android (including Kindle Fire & Nook).
See More
Top
Pro
Marketplace for 3rd party plug-ins
See More
Top
Pro
Great community
See More
Top
Pro
Ability to call any native (C/C++/Obj-C/Java) library
See More
Top
Pro
Completely free
Since Corona SDK became Solar2D, it's completely free, as only some third-party plugins are paid.
See More
Top
Pro
Open Source
Since Corona SDK became Solar2D, it's completely open source under MIT license.
See More
Top
Pro
Well supported
See More
Specs
Price:
Free
Languages:
Lua
Dev platforms:
Windows; Macintosh
Desktop targets:
Windows; Macintosh
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
394
50
Tcl
All
9
Experiences
Pros
8
Specs
Top
Pro
Standard library
Unlike *sh Tcl has a rich standard library.
See More
Top
Pro
Sane quoting rules
Unlike in sh you don't need to quote your variable substitutions ('"$1"'). Expanding of arguments occurs mostly explicit and if yet expected in-place (e. g. using eval or subst) it follows strict and well clear rules. So exec test $argv would execute test with single argument. And appending {*} before $argv would execute test with all arguments (list expansion).
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-platform
With a little care you can have the same script work on Linux, *BSD, OS X and Windows.
See More
Top
Pro
Widely available
You can expect a reasonably recent version of Tcl to either installed or available in the repositories of any popular open source *nix.
See More
Top
Pro
Everything is a string
Tcl can operate at the same level of abstraction as the POSIX shell, which makes it easier to manipulate the output of other programs.
See More
Top
Pro
Tk and Expect
See More
Top
Pro
Standalone packages
Tcl enables easy deployment through self-contained binaries known as starpacks.
See More
Top
Pro
Rich scripting capabilities on a single line
Want to run something 5 times? Here you go: set i 0; time { puts done-[incr i] } 5 If you need real conditional cycle? Not a problem: for {set ready 0; set i 1} {$i <= 100 && !$ready} {incr i} { if {[exec do-some-thing] eq "ready" } {set ready 1} } Want to measure performance of something or repeat it max 300 times and not longer than 1 seconds? Very simple: timerate { after 20 } 1000 300 How about notifying yourself when some http-server is back online? Sure thing: while {[catch { close [socket localhost 80] }]} { after 1000 }; puts "\7\7\7ONLINE!" And you can do it also fully asynchronously using events etc.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
54
12
Felgo (formerly V-Play)
All
17
Experiences
Pros
15
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Mature cross platform IDE
Qt-Creator IDE with Code Completion, Debugging and Profiling, integrated Quick Help, Version Control and more.
See More
Top
Con
No 3rd party tutorials
There are little to none amount of tutorials for Felgo other than what was made by the engine developers themselves.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn
Felgo is among the easiest cross-platform tools to use according to a survey done by research2guidance.
See More
Top
Pro
In-game level editor
With the Level Editor components, you can let your players share their levels with the whole game community which is cool because you don't need to create new levels on your own, but the community helps you with it. There are other community features like rewards for good level creators that helps getting more downloads.
See More
Top
Pro
Felgo game network
Leaderboards, Achievements, Challenges are available across platform, even on Desktop. You can also use Cloud Syncinc of your game data that makes it easy to start a game for example on iPhone and then continue on a Nexus Tablet or the other way around. It is also convenient because sharing to all kind of game services & networks like Facebook & Game Center is possible with a single API call. Custom hosting of Game Network servers is also possible if you want to keep the player data.
See More
Top
Pro
Native performance
Although game logic is provided in JavaScript by you, performance-critical parts of the engine like OpenGL ES rendering or particle effects are implemented in rock-solid C++, providing the ultimate performance your game deserves.
See More
Top
Pro
Advanced gaming components
Advanced Gaming Components for handling multiple display resolutions & aspect ratios, animations, particles, physics, multi-touch, gestures, path finding and more.
See More
Top
Pro
Felgo build server
No need for native SDKs, Build in and Install from Cloud with the Felgo Build Server.
See More
Top
Pro
Rapid development
Cut your development time in half. Using the QML language allows for some powerful features that cut code lines and time. Another helpful feature that can help in this area is that there are more than 50 game demos of all genres that come with full source code, meaning one can easily check to see how something was done.
See More
Top
Pro
Support can be found in forums and via e-mail
Felgo has friendly forums where core developers participate as well as fast & helpful email support.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on Qt framework
The Qt framework is a great and mature framework on its own. Using Qt as a game engine base is a smart idea.
See More
Top
Pro
Runtime-balancing
You can use ready-made components to balance any of your game properties at runtime, so also on mobile devices which is great for adjusting forces or input parameters.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of learning resources
Helps get started and improve with lots of tutorials, demo games, examples.
See More
Top
Pro
Social services and monetization
In-app purchases, game and social network integration (such as Game Center and Facebook), ads (with Chartboost and AdMob) and analytics (such as Flurry) are all available across platforms.
See More
Top
Pro
Frequent updates
Every 2-4 weeks new updates provide additional features and fixes based on what users wanted the most.
See More
Top
Pro
Level store
You can even monetize these user-generated levels with in-app purchases with the Felgo Level Store component if you like.
See More
Specs
License:
Proprietary
Languages:
HTML
Dev platforms:
Windows; OSX; Linux
Desktop targets:
Windows; OSX; Linux
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
50
12
jQuery Mobile
All
6
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
3
Top
Con
The project is practically abandoned
The last release was in 2014. Samsung Tizen Advanced UI (TAU), for example, was started with JQuery, but it was forked off and completely rebuilt from scratch with jQuery concepts but without JQuery dependency itself.
See More
Top
Pro
Resources
With HTML5 development being relatively amateur jQuery Mobile has a vast selection of resources to assist. These resources include websites, books, apps and other frameworks, 3rd party plugins and extensions, and more. All of these can help ramp up and excel the project development cycle.
See More
Top
Con
Clunky and slow
See More
Top
Pro
ThemeRoller
An interactive tool that has been created to customize an apps theme. Users can import a current theme, make changes, and export the theme back to the app for integration.
See More
Top
Con
No MVC support
There is no included MVC support in jQuery Mobile. It is possible to achieve this, however, using other frameworks such as BackboneJS in combination with jQuery Mobile, but there are a few limitations. Specifically that MVC frameworks, such as BackboneJS or KnockoutJS, are not compatible with jQuery Mobile page routing.
See More
Top
Pro
Download Builder
To optimize application development jQuery Mobile provides a tool to allow the user to customize the framework. It contains the ability to pick and choose which modules to include and then bundles the framework so it contains only what is needed.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
15
5
Fuse
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Compiles to native platform code
A key difference is that Fuse uses JS exclusively for app logic while producing native code for everything else, including population and manipulation of the UI.
See More
Top
Con
Little reuse of web knowledge
Fuse doesn't support Angular or React so there is little reuse of existing web tech knowledge. The team have said they are exploring Angular 2 and then maybe React though.
See More
Top
Pro
Native performance
See More
Top
Pro
OpenGL UI
With the option to use OpenGL based UI components, Fuse is the only of the three platforms that offer a reliable “write once, run everywhere” approach where designers can control responsive layout, look and feel down to points, pixels and percentages, keyframes and easing curves.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
5
2
Kotlin
All
11
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Great tooling support
Since Kotlin is made by Jetbrains (the developers of IntelliJ IDEA) so it stands to reason that the IntelliJ support for Kotlin is also great. Besides that, Kotlin also works well with existing Java tools such as Eclipse, Maven, Gradle, Android Studio, etc...
See More
Top
Con
May be hard for programmers already used to imperative style to learn functional programming from Kotlin
Since Kotlin does not enforce any particular paradigms and is not purely functional, it can be pretty easy to fall back to imperative programming habits if a programmer comes from an imperative background.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy adoption for existing Java programmers
Kotlin runs on the JVM and Java interoperability has been one of the main objectives since the language was born. It runs everywhere Java does; web servers, mobile devices (Android), and desktop applications. It also works with all the major tools in the Java ecosystem like Eclipse, IntelliJ, Maven, Ant, Gradle, Spring Boot, etc. All of this makes adoption extremely easy even for existing Java projects. On top of this there's also ensured Type safety and less boilerplate code needed.
See More
Top
Con
The need for Java interoperability has forced some limitations
The need to make Kotlin interoperable with Java has caused some unintuitive limitations to the language design.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn if you have prior programming experience
Kotlin's syntax is extremely easy to understand. The language can be picked up in a few hours just by reading the language reference.
See More
Top
Pro
No runtime overhead
The standard library is relatively small and tight. It mostly consists of focused extensions of the Java standard library and as such adds no additional runtime overhead to existing Java projects.
See More
Top
Pro
Officially supported for Android development
Starting with version 3.0 of Android Studio, Kotlin support will be built-in. This means that it's now easier than ever to use Kotlin for existing Android projects or even start writing Android apps only with Kotlin from scratch. This also means that Kotlin and Kotlin plugins for Android Studio will be fully supported in the future and their likelihood of being abandoned is quite small since Google is fully embracing the language for their Android ecosystem (alongside Java and C++).
See More
Top
Pro
Low-risk adoption for existing Java codebases
Since it has such a good interoperability with Java, Java libraries, and Java tools. It can be adopted for an existing Java codebase at little to no cost. The codebase can be converted from Java to Kotlin little by little without ever disrupting the functionality of the application itself.
See More
Top
Pro
Does not impose a particular philosophy of programming
It's not overly OOP like Java and it does not enforce strict functional paradigms either.
See More
Top
Pro
Is built to solve industrial problems
Kotlin has been designed and built by developers who have an industrial background and not an academic one. As such, it tries to solve issues mostly found in industrial settings. For example, the Kotlin type system helps developers avoid null pointer exceptions. Reasearch languages usually do not have null at all, but APIs and large codebases usually need null.
See More
Specs
Current stable version:
1.3
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
333
119
GitHub Electron
All
8
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Con
Looks and feels like an alien
See More
Top
Pro
Relatively low barrier to entry
No need to learn native UI APIs for multiple platforms.
See More
Top
Con
Microsoft
Developed by Microsoft-owned Github
See More
Top
Pro
Has a built in packager which allows you to package web apps
the electron packager tool allows you to package your web app for any target platform that you desire, as long as you provide the correct information.
See More
Top
Con
Extra effort may be required to make things look native on each platform
See More
Top
Con
Mobile platforms not supported
According to documentation only Windows, Linux and Mac are supported, no mobile platforms.
See More
Top
Con
Heavyweight
Requires a bit of system memory, and makes applications bulky due to the fact that all your web apps made in electron work in a NodeJS Shell that is basically a web browser displaying your app.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
21
11
Red
All
6
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
2
Top
Con
Not production ready
Red is still under development and not considered stable.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple toolchain
Other languages have complex, multi-step setups that beginners often get stuck on. Red has no installer, no setup, no dependencies*, just a single small (~1MB) command-line executable with both the compiler and repl. On Windows, you don't even have to launch executable from the command line--it has a GUI-console.
See More
Top
Con
Still in beta
It mostly works. It's good enough for building usable applications, but some planned features are missing.
See More
Top
Pro
Very simple syntax
Red syntax is a lot like Rebol. It's easier than most languages for beginners to pick up.
See More
Top
Pro
Both low and high-level
Red has low enough access to do systems programming, but it's expressive enough for high-level scripting.
See More
Top
Pro
Low cognitive load
Red has very simple syntax that's easy to learn. It gets out of your way and lets you think about the problem instead, enhancing productivity.
See More
Hide
12
12
PaintCode
All
3
Experiences
Pros
3
Top
Pro
Easy to create custom components
You make your components like if you're using a vector drawing program. Just drop shapes, draw curves, set stroke and fill color. You can use variables to store values, colors and gradients to use in your components and make them a bit interactive. After that, you just export your canvases to obj-c/swift and use them in your projects.
See More
Top
Pro
Support for variables and expressions enables a powerful workflow
Variables are values you can store and bind in any inspector property. You can store values (integer, float,…), expressions ("3.1415 * offset - 1"), colors and gradients, you can store and use colors as a global tint and apply that tint to any object. You can create a color based on another color and modify its brightness, saturation or alpha and make shadows or gloss effects.
See More
Top
Pro
Vector based design
Components are density independent.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
0
0
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop