What is the best alternative to Flask?

Question

Built By the Slant team

Find the best product instantly.

4.7 star rating

Try it now - it's free

score 193 · Answer 1

FastAPI

Top Pro

Dependency injection

It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc. See More

Top Con

Smaller community

Since FastAPI is relatively new, its community is smaller than Django Rest Framework. But it can grow with time. See More

Top Pro

Standards

It is based on standards: OpenAPI, JSON Schema and OAuth 2.0. See More

Top Pro

Data validation

It validates the data using the types you declared. Even in deeply nested JSON requests. See More

Top Pro

High-performance

It's based on Starlette and Pydantic, so, it's one of the fastest Python frameworks. See More

Top Pro

Editor completion

It is based on Python type declarations, so, editors and tools can give great support. Including type checks and autocompletion everywhere. See More

Top Pro

One of the fastest growing communities

Top Pro

Fast is really fast (!)

It's easy to develop API based applications in Python on deadlines for Android and IOS Development. See More

Top Pro

Automatic docs

It generates interactive API documentation automatically from your code. See More

Top Pro

Database independent

It's independent of database or ORM, but compatible with all of them. Including relational databases and NoSQL. See More

Top Pro

Async IO / optional

It's based on Async IO, which gives it high concurrency. But you can use non-async libraries and it runs them appropriately. See More

Top Pro

World class documentation

It has some of the best documentation of any framework. See More

Top Pro

WebSockets

Because it's an async framework, it can handle async-native protocols like WebSockets. See More

Top Pro

OAuth 2.0

It has integrated support for OAuth 2.0. Including declaring required scopes per endpoint. So, you can easily integrate it with external OAuth 2.0 providers or build your own with it. See More

Top Pro

Background tasks

Included support for background tasks, thanks to being based on Starlette. See More

Top Pro

Supports GraphQL

Python's graphene library is included as an optional dependency meaning that GraphQL API's are supported out of the box, with no additional tweaking needed. See More

Specs

Platforms:Cross-platform

License:MIT

Type:standard and feature rich micro-framework

Initial Release:2019

See All Specs

See All Experiences

193 29

score 531 · Answer 2

Django

Top Con

Can feel bloated for small projects

Django's sheer scale and functionality can feel clunky and bloated for small applications. It has too many bells and whistles which can get in the way when developing a small scale application. See More

Top Pro

Developing a simple prototype can be very fast

Django's philosophy of batteries included means that experienced developers won't have to plan too much ahead on what kind of application infrastructure they need and instead just start developing web applications quickly. See More

Top Con

The documentation does not cover real-world scenarios

It is a larger documentation indeed, however is not deep and covers non real problems or even don't show any examples. You'll be better with Google or Stackoverflow See More

Top Pro

ORM support out of the box

Django supports Object-Relational Mapping. With models defined as Python classes which are actually subclasses of Django's django.db.models.Model. Each attribute of the model is then represented as a database field. Queries are lazily executed and Django gives developers an automatically-generated database-access API. See More

Top Con

Routing requires some knowledge of regular expressions

Given a GET request for /topics/426/viewpoints/1/sections/create, how does Django decide which bit of Python code is invoked to handle it? It compares the request path to your giant pile of regular expressions. And then if there's some other regular expression starts matching /top and all your requests for /topics/ start going there, good luck figuring out why. You won't be informed of any conflict until you notice you seem to be getting the wrong pages back. The structure of URL paths is almost universally hierarchal. There is no call to have anything as ridiculously flexible (and notoriously hard-to-read) as regular expressions to organize request routing. See More

Top Pro

Template errors fail silently by default

If you make a typo in a template variable, or change a view so that variable is no longer passed to the template, you won't get an error message pointing out that something has gone wrong. That reference will just be treated as if it is an empty string instead. There is a way to configure this, but since so many templates have been written assuming this behavior, nobody ever enables template errors because it would break so much of the existing support tools (e.g. the built-in admin interface). See More

Top Pro

Highly customizable

Django is in itself a highly customizable web framework. The database, template framework and ORM can all be swapped out. See More

Top Pro

Has an admin panel out of the box

Django comes with a highly customizable admin panel and authentication out of the box. This makes the development and production of a simple CMS extremely easy. See More

Top Pro

Mature software with many plugins developed over the years

Django was first released in 2005, it has had a lot of time to mature and become better with each release. It also has by far the largest community out of all python frameworks who have continuously over the years built and maintained many powerful plugins. See More

Top Pro

Clear and defined MVC organization

Django follows some pretty well established MVC patterns. With everything in place and where requests follow a clear path through urlresolvers, middleware, view and context processors. See More

Top Pro

Simple database management

Just a few lines of code can instruct Django to create all the tables and fields required in your database automatically. Schemas are managed with "migrations", that are also created automatically, and can be rolled out from your development box and implemented on production systems with just a single command. This performs any database changes required, from table creation, indexes, renaming fields, and pre-populating initial data. Each migration builds on the previous migrations, so you can trace the evolution of your data and even recreate the layout of your database at any point in the lifecycle of your application. See More

Specs

Multi Language Support:Excellent

Written in:Python

Default Template Engine:Django

Default ORM:Django ORM

See All Specs

See All Experiences

531 115

score 67 · Answer 3

web2py

Top Pro

Documentation is written in form of a book which is good for beginners

web2py documentation does not follow the common pattern of using Sphinx, MkDocs or ReadTheDocs which is goos for exeperienced developers. Although documentation in form of a book is very easy and good for beginners. Turning web2py the most easy and comprehensive framework to learn and also to teach. See More

Top Con

Abandoned framework with (almost) no community

Top Pro

Web2py apps run on GAE, AWS, VPNs, PythonAnywhere, etc

Web2py apps are designed to be portable. With some minor restrictions web2py apps can run on any VPS on SQL databases and/or Mongo, as well as on Google App Engine with the Google Datastore. It is truly code ones and run everywhere. For example at Camio.com we use web2py internally to access a GAE datastore which contains more images than Instagram. See More

Top Con

The web IDE is not a full-featured IDE

web2py includes an "admin" app that serves as a web-based IDE for web2py applications. It includes many features, such as application creation, compiling, and packaging; an error ticketing system; a code editor; a debugger; a controller doctest runner; Git and Mercurial integration; and one-click deployment to PythonAnywhere, Google App Engine, and OpenShift. However, particularly with regard to code editing and debugging and version control integration, it is not as full-featured as some of the more popular desktop IDEs such as PyCharm. So, developers expecting a PyCharm-like experience may be somewhat disappointed. In any case, use of the web-based IDE is completely optional. See More

Top Pro

User support

The web2py community is open and friendly and it gives concrete support to newbies and old timers. It's not difficult to get answers from the BDFL Massimo Di Pierro himself. See More

Top Pro

Maintainable over time

One really positive aspect of web2py application is their maintainability over the years. Old code works even if the framework is updated to the latest version. Not only that, if code is written well it is very short and a new team can pick it up over in little time. See More

Top Pro

PyCharm supports web2py

While web2py has its own web based IDE which is convenient, it works with WinIDE, PyCharm, and Eclipse. The first two explicitly support web2py. The latter requires some configuration. See More

Top Pro

Easy to learn without losing any power

web2py is very easy to learn for beginners, yet it has a great deal of power and flexibility as application needs become more complex. It includes an impressively comprehensive set of features, making development very productive without the need to integrate a lot of third-party libraries. See More

Top Pro

Can be tuned to be really fast in production

The framework is really fast in production after some optimization and fine tuning which can minimize the memory footprint in order to make it run on a really small VPS or slice. See More

Top Pro

Easily extendable

Allows users to easily extend functionality by using external libraries. See More

Top Pro

No need to import the API to access the models and controllers context at every request

Models and controllers live in the context of the HTTP request. So the developer does not have to import the API to access this context at every request. In other words, the models, controllers and templates in web2py use a domain specific language which uses pure web2py syntax and allows to import any module but exposes a few additional objects. See More

Top Pro

Includes a web-based IDE for creating and managing applications

web2py includes an "admin" app that serves as a web-based IDE for web2py applications. It includes many features, such as application creation, compiling, and packaging; an error ticketing system; a code editor; a debugger; a controller doctest runner; Git and Mercurial integration; and one-click deployment to PythonAnywhere, Google App Engine, and OpenShift. It is not intended as a full desktop IDE replacement, but it includes some helpful web2py specific functionality and can be convenient for basic editing and debugging tasks and quick prototyping, even for those who primarily work with a more full-featured desktop IDE or editor. See More

Top Pro

web2py supports the classic editor Vim

See All Experiences

67 16

score 48 · Answer 4

Pyramid

Top Pro

Very flexible

Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox. See More

Top Con

The great number of options it offers can become intimidating

One of Pyramid's greatest drawbacks is that it requires a lot of set up in the beginning of a project. This can feel overwhelming and can keep people away from using it. See More

Top Pro

Persistence agnostic

Either NoSQL and SQL (including SQLAlchemy plugin). See More

Top Pro

Comes with security included

Includes authorization and authentication with multiple backends. See More

Specs

Written in:Python

Default Template Engine:Jinja2

Default ORM:SqlAlchemy

48 5

score 26 · Answer 5

Falcon

Top Con

Limited in scope

Being designed around building REST APIs and the fact that it's minimalistic with very few dependencies makes Falcon opinionated (you should build a REST API) and limited in scope (you shouldn't be using Falcon to build a news site, blog or ecommerce platform). See More

Top Pro

Built to build REST APIs

Falcon is designed entirely around building REST APIs. It achieves this helps a lot with it being lightweight and simple. It also helps developers take some design choices which would otherwise not be possible with a more general-purpose framework, See More

Top Pro

Lightweight with minimal dependencies

Falcon is a very lightweight framework. This can be noticed simply by looking at the dependency list: other than the python standard library, six and mimeparse are the only dependencies. See More

Top Pro

Performance is really awesome

Specs

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac

Technology:Javascript

26 4

score 46 · Answer 6

Bottle

Top Pro

Flexible

Being a small one file distribution it includes almost every vital thing you need to support little websites (routing, templating). Everything else can be implemented using plugins. See More

Top Con

Small community. Difficult to find online docs and examples

Top Pro

Single-file distribution

Bottle works around the one-file approach, everything is done in a bottle.py file. This means that it's extremely easy to share and upload your application since it practically is just one python file. See More

Top Con

Very hard to develop projects that are not smaller than 1000 lines

While Bottle is a great framework for building small applications (generally less than 1000 lines of code), it starts getting very hard to manage your application if you want to go even a bit larger than that. The fact that it follows a single-file distribution model and that it's missing something like Flask's blueprints only make this problem worse. See More

Top Pro

No need to install

It is so little there's no need to install, it is included in the standard libs python. See More

Top Pro

Async, *let friendly

Using it with gevent is a breeze. It's a WSGI app so it's easy to make it work with anything. See More

Top Pro

Truly magnificent

See All Experiences

46 2

score 8 · Answer 7

Dropwizard

Top Pro

Enhanced productivity and less timewasting

The application can be run and debugged from the IDE without the need to recompile or redeploy the WAR file. This is because a Dropwizard web application creates on main program which starts the jetty container. See More

Top Con

Does not allow a lot a freedom of choice

Dropwizard removes a lot of freedom that the developer may have with other frameworks because of the fact that it tries to do everything itself. It chooses the best Java libraries for the job required, without allowing the developer much choice. See More

Top Pro

Application metrics integrated into the framework

Dropwizard comes with application metrics integrated out of the box. These metrics provide a lot of useful information such as request/response time. For example, to get the execution time of a method, the @Timed annotation is used. See More

Top Pro

Quick project bootstrap

Starting a project with Dropwizard si very easy and bootstraping is quick and painless. All that's needed is a single dependency added in the pom.xml file and it's ready to go. See More

8 0

score 186 · Answer 8

Ruby on Rails

Top Pro

Massive community with lots of tutorials and guides

The sheer scale and massive number of developers using Rails has produced a large number of guides, tutorials, plugins, documentation, videos and anything that can help new and old Rails developers. See More

Top Con

Learning curve seems low at first, but starts becoming steeper

Rails' simplicity is deceptive. It's learning curve is really low at first, and the huge number of tutorials and guides out there for starting with Rails make it even easier. But it starts getting harder and harder as apps become more complicated. If good code conventions and OO design are not followed, then the codebase will be all over the place and it becomes impossible to maintain it. See More

Top Pro

Many plugins (gems) available

There are many third-party plugins (Ruby gems) available for Rails development. The larger ones and those that have a lot of downloads and users are very well documented and easy to use. See More

Top Con

Too much magic

So much behavior is implemented with dynamic behind-the-scenes changes to existing classes that obscure bugs are way too common. Conflicting interactions between multiple plugins that both try to change the same objects are a particularly pernicious example. See More

Top Pro

Ruby is a nice readable language

Ruby has a very clean syntax that makes code easier to both read and write than more traditional Object Oriented languages, such as Java. For beginning programmers, this means the focus is on the meaning of the program, where it should be, rather than trying to figure out the meaning of obscure characters. presidents = ["Ford", "Carter", "Reagan", "Bush1", "Clinton", "Bush2"] for ss in 0...presidents.length print ss, ": ", presidents[presidents.length - ss - 1], "\n"; end See More

Top Con

Too much convention

Top Pro

Good conventions

MVC is a great starting point, and perfect for APIs. You'll rarely if ever have to wonder "where should I put this code?" See More

Top Con

Not a very popular language outside of web development

Top Pro

Small projects are very easy and it's possible to finish one in very little time

The large number of documentation, tutorials, videos and guides which help new developers who are just starting with Rails make it seem very easy to create a small and simple application by relying on code generation and components that come out of the box with Rails. See More

Top Con

Bad performance

Among the slowest frameworks. If you want to scale, you will have to migrate to another land. See More

Top Pro

Cool language

Top Pro

Supported on every major cloud or VPS hosting service

Rails is supported on every major Cloud hosting service nowadays. There are also countless tutorials that help developers deploy their Rails apps if there are any problems on the way. See More

Top Pro

Meta-programming capabilities

Specs

Written in:Ruby

Default Template Engine:ERB

Default ORM:ActiveRecord

Default Test Engine:RSpec & Cucumber

See All Experiences

186 32

score 158 · Answer 9

Symfony

Top Pro

Open Source

Symfony is open source and released under the MIT license. See More

Top Con

Settings

Too many configurations. See More

Top Pro

Easy debugging with a built-in debug toolbar

Symfony comes with a built-in toolbar that helps developers debug their applications during the development phase. The toolbar is also extendable and new components, called panels can be added if needed to help with the debugging process. See More

Top Con

Very hard to install

Setting it up on webhost without a console is difficult. See More

Top Pro

Great plugin ecosystem

One of the greatest strengths of Symfony is it's amazing and large plugin ecosystem, which comes as a result of it's large and dedicated community. Having a large number of plugins means less development time and more productivity. See More

Top Con

Promotes bad development practices

Such as annotations via comments. See More

Top Pro

Highly active community

Symfony has one of the most active communities out of all the PHP frameworks. This is shown by the high number of commits made every day in the GitHub repo. See More

Top Con

Doctrine ORM

Symfony Standard Edition, which is the most widely used distribution, comes integrated with Doctrine, the most resource hogging ORM library. See More

Top Pro

Teaches you good practices

Symfony makes you be a better programmer. You have to deal with the latest object-oriented design patterns such as service-oriented architecture, dependency injection, interface abstraction, and so on. See More

Top Con

You need a lot of files to display a single page

For a simple hello world page you need about 5 files. See More

Top Pro

Uses YAML/XML/PHP/Annotation

Symfony makes use of XML, YAML or PHP annotations to create configurations in order to tell Doctrine on how properties of a certain class should be. See More

Top Pro

Powerful event system

Symfony has a powerful built-in event system that allows you to add flexibility to applications and makes it easier to maintain the codebase down the road. See More

Top Pro

Great templating engine

Uses Twig, which is a simple and easy to learn templating language that can also be used as a standalone engine, outside the framework. See More

Top Pro

Uses Doctrine ORM

Symfony makes use of the Doctrine ORM to add an abstraction layer over the database in order to maintain flexibility without having unnecessary code duplication. See More

Specs

158 31

score 118 · Answer 10

Yii

Top Pro

Rapid development through code scaffolding

Yii takes care of repetitive tasks through Gii, a web-based scaffolding tool. Gii takes care of code generation and creating code templates for: Models Controllers Forms Modules Extensions CRUD controller actions and views There are a lot of scaffolding templates made by community for Gii, that improve generated code functionality by a lot. Gii is very easy to extend yourself. See More

Top Con

Can be hard for beginners

Since Yii requires developers to write code following certain rules, or in other words, it requires developers to follow the "Yii way of doing things" it can be hard for beginners to warm up to it and start using it right away. See More

Top Pro

Comes with important security standarts

Since security is a crucial part of any application, Yii comes with great security features out of the box to help developers create a secure and reliable application. These security features contain but are not restricted to: Input validation Output filtering Features against SQL injection Cross-site scripting prevention See More

Top Con

Not very good at many to many relations

(but there is a good plugin, namely CAdvancedArBehavior extension to do this) See More

Top Pro

Highly extensible

Yii is built to be extremely extensible. Virtually every component of the framework can be extended programmatically. For example, if you want to add a unique id to your views, it's very easy to do: namespace app\components; class View extends yii\web\View { public $bodyId; /* Yii allows you to add magic getter methods by prefacing method names with "get" */ public function getBodyIdAttribute() { return ($this->bodyId != '') ? 'id="' . $this->bodyId . '"' : ''; } } See More

Top Pro

Integrated with a testing framework

Yii makes use of Codeception, a great PHP testing framework that helps developers run their tests. They can be unit, functional or acceptance tests since Codeception supports them all. See More

Top Pro

Lots of plugins available

Yii has about 2000 addons hosted on Yii's official website. These addons significantly decrease development time and increase the developer's efficiency. See More

Top Pro

License

Yii is free and open source and is distributed under the BSD License. See More

Top Pro

Strong community support

Yii has a strong and rather large community behind it. This is proven by the great number of blog posts, tutorials, guides and reviews on the Yii framework as well as the great number of extensions developed for it. See More

Top Pro

Easy to install

Yii uses Composer to handle it's dependency installation. This is rather easy and not very time consuming, although it should be noted that Composer is very resource-intensive considering what it's job is. But that is not really Yii's fault. See More

Top Pro

Best framework for CRUD operation

Yii Framework Provides most of features require for crud functionalities like GridView, Listview and DetailView (with jquery search and validation functions) by generating using GII. See More

Top Pro

Highly extensible without effort

Specs

PHP version:5.4+

Default Template Engine:Twig

Default ORM:Yii Active Record

See All Experiences

118 26

score 564 · Answer 11

Express.js

Top Pro

Setting up is very easy

Setting up a new Express project is very easy. It consists of installing a handful of libraries through NPM run a single npm install and everything is ready to go. See More

Top Con

No single recommended way of doing something

Express considers itself to be a "minimalistic unopinionated framework", it basically lets the developer determine how their project will be organized. On one hand, this gives anyone terrific power and flexibility to use any library they want for a certain task and to organize their project structure however they want. But on the other hand, there's no single recommended way of organizing things, which can be a trap for beginners and experienced developers alike and result in unmaintainable projects. See More

Top Pro

Great routing API

Express' extremely powerful routing API allows developers to do tasks ranging from building a REST API to building the routes for a simple web app and then take it to the next level by using route parameters and query strings. See More

Top Pro

Great for beginner Node.js programmers

With a little learning curve, it is a good choice for new NodeJS developers to get started quickly. Express boasts great, thorough documentation. See More

Top Pro

Express.js is in the Node.js Foundation Incubator Program

Node.js Foundation Announcement here The Node.js Foundation is a Collaborative Project at The Linux Foundation. Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects are independently funded software projects that harness the power of collaborative development to fuel innovation across industries and ecosystems. See More

Top Pro

Relatively mature

Being a somewhat old Node.js web app framework and being one of the most widely used frameworks, Express.js has matured quite a lot during all that time. It's more stable than its competitors and a huge community backing it. See More

Top Pro

Support for a lot of plugins

Express takes advantage of Node's NPM to distribute and install countless plugins made by third parties which solve almost anything a developer would want to do with Express. See More

Top Pro

Has the largest userbase

It's by far the most popular framework for node. See More

Top Pro

Great supportive community

Express has a big community with a lot of guides and tutorials written about it by developers that have been using it for quite some time. See More

Top Pro

Good Oauth/Facebook integration with connect module

You can easily add oAuth integration/social logins to your next web app without much hassle, using this authentication middleware for connect. See More

Top Pro

Has detailed information

Very simple and fast. See More

Top Pro

Lightweight

Top Pro

Massive ecosystem of middleware

If you have not already checked out the Express.js ecosystem of middleware, you should. See More

Specs

Platforms:Cross-platform

License:MIT

Written in:JavaScript

Repository:https://github.com/expressjs/express

See All Specs

See All Experiences

564 103

score 202 · Answer 12

ASP.NET Core

Top Pro

Fast and getting faster

Thanks to breakthroughs in ROSLYN compiler and the efforts of the .NET COre developer team, code written in C# can reach speeds just a step behind C++. See More

Top Con

Microsoft environment

Top Pro

Multi platform

Can run on Windows, Linux and Mac (also Visual Studio Code editor). See More

Top Pro

JSON optimization

In .NET Core 2.1 and 3.0, new APIs are added that make it possible to write JSON APIs that require less memory, using Span<T> and UTF8 strings, and improve throughput of applications like Kestrel, ASP.NET Core web server. See also Utf8JsonReader. See More

Top Pro

Tutorials and documentation quality

Both microsoft and 3rd party tutorials are mostly of high quality and encourage you to use the industry best-practices. See More

Top Pro

Built-in middleware

Built-in middleware featuring: Authentication, Cookie policy, Health Check, MVC, Session etc. See More

Top Pro

Hosting

Ability to host on IIS, Nginx, Apache, Docker, or self-host in your own process. See More

Top Pro

Ease of Use

Top Pro

Security

It is a very secure platform. See More

Top Pro

Tooling

Both VS and VSCode are powerful free IDEs that are well integrated with ASP.net Core. VS Community also allows for commercial use for projects with less than 5 developers. See More

Specs

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac, Docker

Written in:C#

Default ORM:Entity Framework

Visual GUI Builder:Yes

See All Specs

See All Experiences

202 49

score 40 · Answer 13

CakePHP

Top Pro

Built-in ORM that's easy to use

Cake has a built-in ORM which is pretty easy to use and learn. Building queries can also be done very easily and fetching entire columns can be done in one or two lines of code. See More

Top Con

Slow

Because of legacy code, old concepts and prioritizing development speed over everything else, CakePHP is bloated and slow. See More

Top Pro

Fast development

Developing in CakePHP is very fast and flexible. CakePHP is about fast and reliable development, it achieves this by following the convention over configuration principle as it's heavily inspired by Rails (which follows the same programming paradigm). Convention over configuration is all about making it easier for the developer to start immediately writing code without worrying on what's going on "under the hood". See More

Top Pro

Large library of helper classes

CakePHP has a large library of helper classes with features such as: Authorization AJAX Forms E-mails Internationalization etc... See More

Top Pro

Exhaustive list of resources to learn CakePHP

Cake's great community has thrown together an exhaustive and amazing list of resources to get started with CakePHP. It's open source and can be found on GitHub. See More

Top Pro

Open Source

CakePHP open source and is licensed under the MIT license. See More

Specs

PHP version:5.4.16+

Default Template Engine:CakePHP Template

Default ORM:Default ORM included out of the box

See All Experiences

40 13

score 695 · Answer 14

Laravel 5

Top Pro

Good for building RESTful APIs

With migrations, powerful and intuitive Eloquent CRUD, resource routing, and simple JSON response out of the box, a complete REST API can be written in hours. See More

Top Con

Uses too much magic methods

It complicates debugging and autocompletion. See More

Top Pro

Comes with an excellent built-in ORM

Laravel's Eloquent ORM is a simple and fast Object-Relational Mapping which helps with organizing the application's database. It supports the most popular databases (MySQL, Postgres, SQLite, etc.) out of the box. See More

Top Con

Bloated

While the speed doesn't seem to be an issue with it (on local tests), in production it may be hindered. The framework creates a ton of files and folders, some of which your app might not even use. Not good if you don't like having a ton of folders and rigid non-standard PHP folder structure for development. See More

Top Pro

Good documentation

Laravel's documentation is thorough and very good. It covers everything and is very helpful to experienced and new users alike. See More

Top Con

Hard to use model properties

You need to check all model properties in database to know it exists, or declare all them manually. See More

Top Pro

Handles event queuing

Laravel supports event queuing and it does so in a very simple way. To create an event that should be queued just run: php artisan handler:event SendPurchaseConfirmation --event=PodcastWasPurchased --queued This creates a handler that implements the Illuminate\Contracts\Queue\ShouldBeQueued interface. Now when this handler is called it will automatically be queued by the event dispatcher. See More

Top Con

Steep learning curve

While a lot of times you can write things in plain PHP, it will hinder you down the line when you want to use core features and find that you have to rewrite code which then causes issues throughout the app. Documentation is good, but you need to know what you are looking for and practical examples are non-existent. Many features have been updated throughout the versions in such a short time that tutorials you find online are confusing to sort through outdated tutorials and guides that no longer work or have been depreciated. See More

Top Pro

Comes with its own CLI

Laravel comes out of the box with it's own CLI called Artisan. With Artisan developers can do several different tasks such as migrating databases, seeding databases, clearing the cache and much much more. See More

Top Con

Poor performance

Top Pro

Easy to write web apps with authentication

Laravel comes with Authentication capabilities and a fully-powered Auth class out of the box. For passwords it uses bcrypt. See More

Top Con

Follows bad design practices

Uses bad practices, like Singletons, Magic models, Middleware. See More

Top Pro

Easy to learn

Top Pro

Gives developers a great degree of freedom in how they set up their project structure

Laravel allows for free configuration and does not force developers to use a single project structure, instead they can change it to how they wish. See More

Top Pro

Can use Symfony components

Laravel uses many libraries built for the Symfony PHP framework. Many of these libraries are well-built and have been tested by users before. Since the point of using a web framework is to shorten development time and to avoid reinventing the wheel for problems that have already been solved, then it's logical for a framework to use libraries already built to solve problems that have already been solved. See More

Top Pro

Extremely powerful template system

Laravel has a powerful template system called Blade. It's quite similar to Twig or Moustache with lots of curly braces but the real power comes from the usage of PHP code directly in the view. Blade templates compile directly to raw PHP and are processed in the server when a request is made. See More

Top Pro

Gulp tasks in the form of Laravel Elixir

In Laravel 5.0 they added Laravel Elixir, which provides an API for using Gulp tasks for Laravel applications. Elixir supports several CSS preprocessors and even some test tools. But it's still in the early stages of development and it will be developed even further in the following releases. With more methods and more Gulp tasks supported. See More

Top Pro

Great Ecosystem

Has a great Ecosystem with SAAS like: Forge, Envoyer, Nova & from 3rd parties like oh-dear See More

Top Pro

Great Community

Specs

License:MIT License

Initial Release:June 2011

695 164

score 11 · Answer 15

CherryPy

Top Pro

Robust configuration mechanism

It's very easy to choose what processes you want by turning them on or off. You can also configure per-URL as well. See More

Top Con

Lacking good documentation

CherryPy's documentation could use some work. It generally feels very slim and is seriously lacking in some parts. For a beginner who is just starting with Python Frameworks, working with CherryPy's documentation would be very hard. See More

Top Pro

Has production-ready server

Comes with a production level wsgi server that can be used instead of / in addition to gunicorn etc. See More

Top Pro

Helps you organize the structure of your code

CherryPy provides some dispatcher patterns that support a wide range of functionality and provide some helpful ways of organizing the code. See More

11 2

score 59 · Answer 16

Wagtail

Top Pro

Extendable

Although Wagtail comes with only the most basic features, it's by no means an incomplete CMS. It's very extendable and it's up to the developer to choose how to extend it. See More

Top Con

ImageChooser widgets dont fully work in sub panels

Top Pro

Lightweight with the most useful functionalities

Wagtail is a simple and lightweight CMS with the most basic and useful set of features baked in out of the box. See More

Top Con

You need to be experienced in Django to get the most of it

Installing Wagtail on a remote server is a little more complicated than FTPing a bunch of files. Furthermore there's no ecosystem for plugins and themes so it can only be fully extended by a developer experienced with Django. See More

Top Pro

Great separation between developers and editors

Wagtail has the perfect separation between developers and editors. It allows you to construct a site with minimal fuss with features like the awesome stream field and hand it over to virtually any content editor. You can build the site with no knowledge of Django and with the simple interface require no training to get started. Although this will always require developer time, with 2 or 3 days you can quickly get up a boilerplate site that will fulfill 80% of any site you will develop. Leaving only the bespoke parts to do. It also nicely slots into any Django project with no fuss. See More

59 0

score 78 · Answer 17

Koa

Top Pro

Generator support from ground up

Using generators (a bleeding edge feature, even for Node.js) would clean up your code from the mess caused by all those callbacks; making your code more manageable. See More

Top Con

Community is relatively small

Top Pro

Extremely lightweight

Koa is very lightweight with just 550 lines of code. See More

Top Con

Not compatible with express style middleware

Koa uses generators which are not compatible with any other type of Node.js framework middleware. See More

Top Pro

async/await keywords are supported and has transcended beyond generator functions

Generators functions are of course a huge plus, but at the time Koa team has transcended generations functions and shifted towards async/await style programming. It has made the Koa best framework available in the market. See More

Top Con

Has no routes separated by HTTP method or URL pattern

Top Pro

Development team has a proven track record

Koa is developed by the team behind a widely used node.js framework (express.js). See More

Top Con

Wrong Middle ware, security issue

Top Pro

Built for ES6

See All Experiences

78 14

score 49 · Answer 18

Play Framework

Top Pro

Scala

It's like Java, but more Haskell-y. See More

Top Con

Backward incompatibility

The jump from Play 1 to Play 2.x caused a lot of confusion. While it is important to have some kind of evolution, sometimes it causes backward incompatibility which can create some problems. It makes tutorials or modules made for the old version obsolete. This can make it hard for beginners to find useful resources. The template engine which used Groovy now uses Scala. See More

Top Pro

Asynchronous Core

Top Con

Not as many resources to learn

Other languages and frameworks have countless tutorials, books, moocs, etc. Java and Play does not have nearly as much. See More

Top Pro

Interoperable with Java

Top Pro

Fast

Top Pro

Good documentation and a great community

Play has quite a large community which provides numerous tutorials and videos related to developing with Play. The Play official documentation covers many things, such as the framework itself but also specific stuff such as Akka, SBT and Netty. There are also many big companies that base their main sites around Play, one of them is LinkedIn which provides third-party documentation on a regular basis. See More

Top Pro

Play is an extensive ecosystem

Play uses Akka for concurrency, Scala for a templating engine, Netty as a client-server framework and SBT (Simple Build Tool) for building. And they all come out of the box. Play also comes with the option to scaffold your applications. Play is an all-embracing ecosystem designed to increase developer productivity and shorten development times. See More

Top Pro

Simple for beginners

Play is very simple to get started. The documentation is very helpful for beginners and advanced users alike and the official website has a great "Getting Started" tutorial to begin developing with Play. See More

Top Pro

Readable code

Play framework's convention over configuration methodology makes most Play projects have a very similar structure. This means that the code written for the framework is very readable. This enables a developer to switch between applications without having to relearn the ecosystem for every project. The built-in templating system also helps with code and makes it possible to have a very low count of lines of code. See More

Top Pro

Can use Java, one of the most widely known languages

Java is one of the most widely known languages, so people coming from that background can jump right in and not have to learn a new language syntax. See More

Top Pro

Good Websocket Support

See All Experiences

49 14

score 236 · Answer 19

Spring-boot

Top Pro

Inherits all of Spring's strengths

Boot is just a thin configuration layer over Spring Framework, as such it inherits all the strengths of Spring. See More

Top Con

Lacking in UI development

While actually very good and with a very complete and rich feature set to develop and maintain code on the server side, it still doesn't provide any rich framework for building good user interfaces. See More

Top Pro

Preconfigured starters

Top Pro

Fast prototyping

Spring boot is built for fast prototyping. See More

Top Pro

Kick down to Spring

Specs

Platforms:Cross-platform

Written in:Java

Repository:https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot

236 53

score 23 · Answer 20

ActFramework

Top Pro

Performance

There are two aspects of performance: how quick a developer can deliver a feature and how fast the app is running on the product server. Act is designed to deliver excellent results in both aspects. With unbeatable developing experience, Act makes it very easy to release a feature; on the other side Act is very fast in runtime. Check out this 3rd party benchmark result. See More

Top Con

Incomplete microservice support

Although Act is built to be a great framework that supports microservice development, it lacks some of the key features at the moment, like sending requests to other microservices from within the app, service governance, and messaging handling. See More

Top Pro

Hot reload

You never restart while you're working on your Act application. Act's hot reload feature is fast and stable, it makes you feel like dealing with scripting language frameworks like Django or NodeJs. Watch this video and feel it. See More

Top Con

Very small community

As of February 2017, Act is a brand new framework (even though the project started at the end of 2014). Community is still forming. See More

Top Pro

Scalability

Act is built as a stateless framework. It supports horizontal scale. See More

Top Con

Functional testing support still under development

Developers are still working on innovative functional testing support for Act. See More

Top Pro

Secure

Act is built as a secure product. It provides built-in CSRF/XSS prevention mechanism. And act-aaa makes it very easy to implement Authentication/Authorization/Auditing in your app. See More

Top Con

Documentation is still being written

Act's documentation is still under development. See More

Top Pro

Superb RESTful support

Act makes creating RESTful service a kids game. It features AdaptiveRecord (allows front end to drive the data structure), JSON response control (just declare the fields you want to present or hide) and RESTful URL routing with path variables. See More

Top Pro

Easy to deploy

ActFramework is not a servlet framework and there are no requirements on containers/app servers. It has a small package size (a helloworld distribution package size is less than 20 MB), a small memory feet print (a helloworld app heap usage is less than 20MB) and a fast boot up speed (a helloworld app starts in less than 3s). See More

Top Pro

Templating

Act's view architecture is very flexible and support using multiple view engines in your app. The default template engine is Rythm, a very developer friendly and powerful template engine. Act also support other templating solutions including freemarker, velocity, thymeleaf, and mustache via plugins. See More

Top Pro

Configuration for multiple environments

Act supports load configuration from a common dir and then overwriting it from a profile dir. Makes it very easy to manage configurations in different environments (e.g., dev, uat, sit, prod) Watch this video to see the innovative way Act delivers its configuration support. See More

Top Pro

Concise and expressive

Act does not require you to put Annotation when it is able to infer the intention from other parts of the code, i.e., you don't use @PathVariable or @RequestParam to tell Act the binding parameter name. And you don't need a ModelMap to bind variables to render argument names. Act has sophisticated byte class scanner to detect the variable names to do bindings automatically. See More

Top Pro

Comply to standards

Act's IoC is built on top of Genie, a fast dependency injection library that fully supports JSR330, and Act's validation solution is built on top of JSR303. Act is NOT an odd framework to most Java developers. Unlike Play1.x, ACT applications follow the standard maven project structure and it is very easy to integrate other Java libraries. See More

Top Pro

Database access

Act's DB layer is extremely easy to use. It supports SQL databases (through ebean orm) and MongoDB (through morphia). Using multiple datasource can never be that easy with Act's DB layer. Go here for more information on this. See More

Top Pro

Fast and flexible routing

You can configure your routing in either Spring MVC/Jersey style with annotation or Play style with route table or a combination of both. Act's routing supports RESTful URL path variables, optionally validated with regular expressions. See More

See All Experiences

23 0

What is the best alternative to Flask?

Dependency injection

Smaller community

Standards

Data validation

High-performance

Editor completion

One of the fastest growing communities

Fast is really fast (!)

Automatic docs

Database independent

Async IO / optional

World class documentation

WebSockets

OAuth 2.0

Background tasks

Supports GraphQL

Can feel bloated for small projects

Developing a simple prototype can be very fast

The documentation does not cover real-world scenarios

ORM support out of the box

Routing requires some knowledge of regular expressions

Top notch documentation and help from community

Template errors fail silently by default

Highly customizable

Has an admin panel out of the box

Mature software with many plugins developed over the years

Clear and defined MVC organization

Simple database management

Documentation is written in form of a book which is good for beginners

Abandoned framework with (almost) no community

Web2py apps run on GAE, AWS, VPNs, PythonAnywhere, etc

The web IDE is not a full-featured IDE

User support

Maintainable over time

PyCharm supports web2py

Easy to learn without losing any power

Can be tuned to be really fast in production

Easily extendable

No need to import the API to access the models and controllers context at every request

Includes a web-based IDE for creating and managing applications

web2py supports the classic editor Vim

Very flexible

The great number of options it offers can become intimidating

Persistence agnostic

Comes with security included

Limited in scope

Built to build REST APIs

Lightweight with minimal dependencies

Performance is really awesome

Flexible

Small community. Difficult to find online docs and examples

Single-file distribution

Very hard to develop projects that are not smaller than 1000 lines

No need to install

Async, *let friendly

Truly magnificent

Enhanced productivity and less timewasting

Does not allow a lot a freedom of choice

Application metrics integrated into the framework

Quick project bootstrap

Massive community with lots of tutorials and guides

Learning curve seems low at first, but starts becoming steeper

Many plugins (gems) available

Too much magic

Ruby is a nice readable language

Too much convention

Good conventions

Not a very popular language outside of web development

Small projects are very easy and it's possible to finish one in very little time

Bad performance

Cool language

Supported on every major cloud or VPS hosting service

Meta-programming capabilities

Open Source

Settings

Easy debugging with a built-in debug toolbar

Very hard to install

Great plugin ecosystem

Promotes bad development practices