Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Amethyst?
Ad
Ad
Swish
All
9
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Best window manager for trackpad power users
Gestures are faster than dragging or keyboard shortcuts.
See More
Top
Con
The tutorial within the app is not that thorough
See More
Top
Pro
Multi-monitor and spaces support
Switch intuitively between screens and spaces based on their physical location.
See More
Top
Con
Limited keybinding customization
See More
Top
Pro
Sleek and intuitive
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Intuitive gestures, doesn't get in the way like BetterTouchTool.
See More
Top
Pro
Custom grid offsets
The default setting uses a clean single-pixel divider without any overlaps.
See More
Top
Pro
Matches the Mac language
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
Just squeezing on top of an icon to close the app is a breeze compared to right clicking and selecting "quit," using Command + Q, or APP NAME -> Quit.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$5
54
0
Yabai
All
9
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Con
Can be a steep learning curve at first
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
See More
Top
Con
Needs disabling SIP to get full benefit
SIP is a security feature for Mac. You can use most of the features without disabling it.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates with other apps
Like skhd, sketchybar, hammerspoon scripts, ubersicht Gives you more control and oversight of your machine
See More
Top
Con
Needs additional tools to get the full benefit
Install "skhd" to use keyboard shortcuts
See More
Top
Pro
Actively developed
See More
Top
Pro
Reliable
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely programmable
See More
Specs
License:
MIT
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
8
0
Hammerspoon
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
2
Top
Pro
1512 issues are closed in the download page in GitHub
https://github.com/Hammerspoon/hammerspoon/issues They do fix issues that come from the community.
See More
Top
Con
Has 324 issues on their download page in GitHub
https://github.com/Hammerspoon/hammerspoon/issues I can not list all the issues.
See More
Top
Pro
Deeply customizable
Hammerspoon's Lua scripting and broad API allows you to perform any action you can imagine on your mac. It hooks into many OS APIs directly and has some high-level APIs to manipulate things like Spotify or iTunes. See the full list here.
See More
Top
Con
Some knowledge of programming required
Hammerspoon is scripted in the Lua programming language, and some familiarity with programming in general will be needed to use it. Some plugins exist that can be used by adding some files to a specific folder, but this will not give the flexibility that is so key to Hammerspoon
See More
Top
Pro
Automate actions based on the operating system
Hammerspoon lets you hook into OS level events and trigger any action you can imagine. From setting up a simple keyboard shortcut to launching a complex workflow using multiple apps and scripts.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
24
1
SizeUp
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Keyboard centric
SizeUp has user-configurable keyboard shortcuts for a set of pre-defined actions.
See More
Top
Con
Nag window
If a license is not purchased there is a nag window (which suspends function) that pops up when loading the app (at user login). The nag pop-up is also summoned at certain time intervals and by performing a certain number of commands (manually or by keyboard shortcut).
See More
Top
Pro
Supports multiple monitors / spaces
Windows can be sent to different monitors and spaces. It can also be aligned as needed.
See More
Top
Con
No on-the-fly split screen window settings
Unlike some other tiling window managers, SizeUp has no way to change the size of split screen actions on-the-fly. Any time a user wants to change how much room on the screen a window takes up when using the split screen function, they will need to manually change the settings, which can be time consuming.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple
SizeUp is easy and simple to use without having to configure.
See More
Top
Pro
AppleScript support allows extending functionality
AppleScript permits adding features such as tiling all open windows. Additionally, FastScripts it allows the user to add keyboard shortcuts to AppleScripts.
See More
Top
Pro
Menubar dropdown for shortcuts
Learning a bunch of keyboard shortcuts right off the bat may be difficult to remember at first, which is why a menubar shortcut for the app exists with all the shortcuts listed.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
17
2
KWM
All
8
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Works in the same way that Xmonad & i3 does for Linux
For those who would like the same tiling window management of Xmonad and i3.
See More
Top
Con
No longer being developed
Sadly the developer has moved on to work on a different project (chunkwm), so there will be no more updates for KWM. However the code works well; no matter what version of macOS you are using.
See More
Top
Pro
Runs in the background
The application runs in the background. There is no indication that it is running except the automatic tiling of the windows. There is no menu bar icon or icon in the dock.
See More
Top
Con
Takes long to set up
You need to use the terminal and edit the configuration file in order to adjust it to the way you want. This might be a little confusing for basic users. But once you have it set, you can just copy the config file and use it on a multiple amount of machines.
See More
Top
Pro
Windows respond very fast
Most users claim the tiling and splitting of the windows in KWM respond more quickly and more reliably than the only other known window manager of its type: Amethyst.
See More
Top
Con
You need HomeBrew to install it
Homebrew is required to install it. Takes more to get it work in the terminal to get it installed and working on your system.
See More
Top
Pro
Software is free and open source
See More
Top
Pro
Highly configurable
Using the config file (kwmrc) you can configure a variety of options including Window spacing and padding, borders, hot-key commands, etc... There are those who would say that the possibilities are limitless.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
8
1
Moom
All
10
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Customizable keyboard shortucts
Moom comes with many preset keyboard shortcuts. The user can go into the graphical settings of the app and change any one of them to a different combination of keys.
See More
Top
Con
UI for settings can be confusing
The settings for the app are pretty jumbled and are hard to get a grip of, especially for first time users. While all the settings one would need are there, they are difficult to find or understand, which requires a good bit of playing around with the settings in order to get a feel for them and what they offer.
See More
Top
Pro
You can save tiling window position and size
Users can set window position and size themselves, allowing for a great way to set up a tiling window experience.
See More
Top
Con
Not free
Moom is not free: it costs $9.99.
See More
Top
Pro
Windows can be snapped to the edges of the screen
In addition to using the grid or the overlay, Moom can move and zoom windows by dragging them to screen edges.
See More
Top
Con
Non customisable popover
The pop over is not customisable and has two presets which are odd for instance two presents are two split windows horizontally.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple customization
While you can set keyboard shortcuts, Moom has a very easy-to-use GUI and GUI-based customization features to help you get going right away.
See More
Top
Con
Two steps needed, while some tools only need one
See More
Top
Pro
Adds a zoom button for all apps
Moom adds an overlay zoom button to the corner of all apps which allows any app to go full screen or be placed to certain sections of the screen (such as the top, bottom, or sides). This works even on apps that do not normally allow for full screen views.
See More
Top
Pro
Multi-monitor support
Moom has excellent support for multi-monitor setups. You can drag a window to the edge of your screen into another monitor and snap it there.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$9.99
242
35
BetterSnapTool
All
3
Experiences
Pros
1
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Custom Snap Areas
With this feature, you can move any window into the desired position, select 'advanced: create a custom snap area (using current window as template)' from the toolbar and also edit settings for the snap area. It is also possible to edit the size, position, and presentation of the drop-zone, the shortcut for the custom snap area, and a list apps for which the snap area should be available (eg: only show this zone for VLC).
See More
Top
Con
Vertical monitor orientation snap area bug
The snap feature currently is not working on monitors with vertical orientation. The snap areas show up, but the window never snaps in place. You have to manually adjust each window on the vertical orientation monitor.
See More
Top
Con
Costs
BetterSnapTool is no longer free and now costs $3.
See More
Hide
$2.99
60
12
Slate
All
10
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Extremely configurable
Slate is similar to Linux WMs like Xmonad in that it is nearly infinitely configurable. You can either use the default configuration file or just Javascript for very complex/dynamic settings. Slate also offers editing a ".js" or a ".slate" file for configuration.
See More
Top
Con
Project is no longer in development
Development is no longer active on this project as of 2017.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on hotkeys
Hotkeys can be set to re-size and focus windows, as well as activate layout presets.
See More
Top
Con
Hard to configure
There's no graphical user interface for configuring Slate, meaning it has to be done from the command line interface or by editing a config file. This makes it somewhat difficult and time-consuming.
See More
Top
Pro
It's free
Slate is completely free to download and use, which is a great option in a field of Mac WMs that often costs money to use.
See More
Top
Con
Missing features
Unable to perform all tasks of software it was meant to replace. Can not move windows between 'Spaces' (virtual desktops).
See More
Top
Pro
Allows for tiling
Slate allows for customizing the config file in order to emulate tiling windows.
See More
Top
Con
Video fail
Demonstration video failed to highlight any of the advantages of the windowing system. Or at least, the advantages were so subtly intrinsic that no-one who didn't already use the system could appreciate them.
See More
Top
Pro
Lets you set default layouts
By using a feature called "snapshots", users can set up different default window layouts in Slate that they can switch to and from on the fly.
See More
Top
Pro
Window hints
Slate offers window hints which are an intuitive way to change window focus.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
93
21
Spectacle
All
12
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
5
Top
Pro
Free and open source
Spectacle is licensed under MIT with source code available on GitHub.
See More
Top
Con
Not maintained
The software is free, but no longer seems to be maintained.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple hotkeys
Spectacle offers easy-to-remember preset hotkeys.
See More
Top
Con
Impossible to add new functions
While keyboard shortcuts can be changed for the available actions, there is no way to add custom actions which in turn limits the functionality of the app.
See More
Top
Pro
Mouseless
All windows in Spectacle can be controlled with keyboard shortcuts, so no mouse is needed. This makes for a fast way to control windows.
See More
Top
Con
Limited window sizing capabilities
You can use 1/2 of the screen vertically and horizontally (divide into 4 parts). You can also use the screen in thirds too, but only the left and right third: you can't use the 1/3 in the center. There is no way to do a more granular distribution.
See More
Top
Pro
Great UX
Spectacle is easy to use and configure. It's plug and play.
See More
Top
Con
Breaks on macOS High Sierra / Chrome or Firefox
Doesn't support side by side windows.
See More
Top
Pro
Low footprint
Spectacle only uses up 18-19 MB of RAM, which means there is not much overhead by using this app.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't work with any Adobe products
There are some apps like Adobe Reader that do not work with Spectacle. Basically, any app with a heavily customized UI that breaks OS X accessibility will not work correctly under Spectacle.
See More
Top
Pro
Multi-monitor support
See More
Top
Pro
7+ years of use
Using it for 7 years
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
146
32
Gridsutra
All
9
Experiences
Pros
9
Top
Pro
Good Adobe support
Gridsutra has Adobe support with the ability of stacking Adobe windows.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple UI
The interface if Gridsutra is well thought through and easy to use.
See More
Top
Pro
Window arrangement with a single click
Windows can be arranged or snapped in Gridsutra with a single click.
See More
Top
Pro
Intuitive UI and delightful user experience
See More
Top
Pro
A great tool for a reasonable price
See More
Top
Pro
Highly flexible
Gridsutra works with most MacOS applications.
See More
Top
Pro
Great drag and drop functionality
The drag and drop option in the layout gives freedom to the user for arrangement of any windows to any positions desired.
See More
Top
Pro
Useful ignore/unignore feature
The ignore / unignore feature in Gridsutra allows the user to block unwanted applications to be listed in the layout option.
See More
Top
Pro
Custom layout support
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$4.99
15
5
Magnet
All
12
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
5
Top
Pro
Keyboard centric
Easy to learn keyboard shortcuts.
See More
Top
Con
Cannot setup custom sizes and window positions
Unfortunately, you can only move windows to preset positions.
See More
Top
Pro
Intuitive handling
Just drag the window to one of the sides of the screen and it snaps there. This is especially useful for those who can't be bothered remembering the shortcuts.
See More
Top
Con
Can only be purchased from the App Store
Magnet is only available in App Store.
See More
Top
Pro
Cheap
At $0.99, it is not that expensive.
See More
Top
Con
Can't hide the menu bar icon
It would've been nice to be able to hide the icon so it doesn't clutter the menu bar.
See More
Top
Pro
Mouse controllable
Supports dragging a window along the edges of the screen to activate.
See More
Top
Con
Interference when switching between folders
Default Folder-X app "warns" that Magnet App may interfere with it's ability to switch between folders in Open and Save dialogue boxes.
See More
Top
Pro
Do not have to learn or remember keyboard shortcuts
See More
Top
Con
Causes cursor bugs in IntelliJ IDEs
Unfortunately, Magnet causes the caret to bounce around in IntelliJ IDEs, this is very annoying.
See More
Top
Pro
It's often on sale
For example, at the writing of this pro it's currently at $1.
See More
Top
Pro
Up to six external displays supported
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$4.99
91
30
jMonkey3
All
14
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Con
Terrible API reference
The methods are not defined.
See More
Top
Pro
Java is a great development platform
Java is a well-optimized just-in-time compiled language. It's faster than languages without an effective native-code compiler such as Python or Ruby, similar in speed to other just-in-time compiled languages such as C#, while slightly slower than compiled languages such as C or C++ (with some low-level and numeric benchmarks being similar to C++). Java also has a wide variety of high-class IDEs available.
See More
Top
Con
Not an engine for total beginners
While it's clear that you need to know Java first before using this engine, it is recommended that you have some programming experience as well. Most performance issues and memory leaks are more due to bad programming practices than the engine itself.
See More
Top
Pro
Multiplatform support
Code can be ported to mobile (iOS is in the works) and other Android supported devices with minor changes to the code (just change some implementations that vary on the platform such as inputs and user interface). It can even run on certain Raspberry Pi devices.
See More
Top
Con
Slow release cycle
jMonkey3 lacks manpower to have a fast and decent release cycle.
See More
Top
Pro
Free and open-source
jMonkey is completely free, meaning it's possible to develop and release a game with no fees or royalties. Because it is open-source, jMonkey has plenty of people fixing bugs and, adding to the engine as well as creating a variety of plugins that can be used in the engine.
See More
Top
Con
Relies on archaic tool chain
jMonkey Engine uses Apache Ant for build automation, which is archaic and backwards, even by Java standards.
See More
Top
Pro
Not limited to using its own IDE
Unlike some engines, jMonkey doesn't force its own IDE. You can use its Netbeans-based IDE, but you can also set up a project to work in another IDE such as Eclipse. You can still use the special tools from jMonkey's IDE in such projects.
See More
Top
Pro
Engine modifications can be made using Java
Because jMonkey is implemented in Java, the same language its apps are typically developed in, developers will have an easier time modifying the engine to their needs.
See More
Top
Pro
Has everything
jMonkey3 handles input from computers and mobile devices. It handles networking, physics, rendering, terrain, and cinematics.
See More
Top
Pro
Ease of extensibility
Engine is modifiable.
See More
Top
Pro
Freedom of choice for architecture
The user is not compelled to use any programming architecture nor standard in order to make a project working. JME allows the freedom to use what is best for a game.
See More
Top
Pro
Offers both low-level and high-level ways of editing shaders
Modifying shaders can be done either via a visual tool called Shader Nodes or via GLSL that allow you to make your own shaders without the engine getting in the way or having to hack around to do so.
See More
Specs
Dev platforms:
Windows; OSX; Linux
Desktop targets:
Windows; OSX; Linux
Mobile targets:
Android; iOS
Supported languages:
Java
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
72
27
Tombstone Engine
All
13
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Con
Only available to big studios
See More
Top
Pro
Complete access to high quality C++ source code
Tombstone gives full access to the clean and professional C++ source code allowing editing and upgrading anything in the system.
See More
Top
Con
Small community
See More
Top
Pro
Reliable, fast and well optimized
See More
Top
Con
Lacks D3D support
See More
Top
Pro
No royalties
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of learning resources
Including extensive documentation both in code as well as online along with a wiki, tutorials and a demo game.
See More
Top
Pro
Extending engine's functionality is straightforward
Due to the well-organized, highly modular design of the engine adding custom functionality is easy.
See More
Top
Pro
Full-featured and modern
Comes integrated with support for physics, audio, networking, input devices, resource management as well as modern features such as real-time shadows, horizontal mapping, voxel-based terrain, dynamic lighting, post-processing effects and much, much more.
See More
Top
Pro
Lifetime engine updates
See More
Top
Pro
Supportive community
Tombstone has a small, tight-knit community that's well educated and professional. Eric Lengyel, the main developer, can often be found giving thorough advice to users on the forums.
See More
Top
Pro
Proven to be a capable engine
See More
Specs
Dev platforms:
Windows; OSX; Linux
Hide
See All
Experiences
$495
17
9
Breeze
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Simplicity
In Breeze, the user can very quickly assign pre-set window positions to hot-keys, although there are not many advanced hot-key options.
See More
Top
Con
No Adobe CC support
Adobe CC products do not respond to Breeze.
See More
Top
Pro
Ease of use
The following are number of benefits of using Breeze: It's super simple to setup. It focuses on basic window management. It works with Spaces. "Nag" mode cab be used indefinitely.
See More
Top
Pro
Runs in the menu bar
Breeze lives in the menu bar and there are no windows to clutter my UI.
See More
Hide
3.99
2
0
SMBAct
All
6
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Window manager + switcher
SMBAct works not only as a tiling window manager, but also as a window switcher. This ensures smooth transitions from one functionality to another when you work with two monitors.
See More
Top
Con
Not free
Can be used for free for a month right now, but it's generally available for a fee after free-trial: $14.00.
See More
Top
Pro
Good for those who prefer the keyboard to the mouse
You can do everything with the keyboard. Many preset hotkeys for different actions, but you can set your own. Easy to find and activate any action even if you forget the hotkey through a special window with a quick search.
See More
Top
Con
No possibility to snap to the edges and corners
They promise to add it in the next update, but it is currently not present.
See More
Top
Pro
User friendly
There is a video tutorial with detailed descriptions of how to use it. In addition, the program itself has a lot of tips.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Hide
14.99
2
0
Hyperdock
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Top
Con
Not under active development
Hyperdock doesn't seem to be under active development and hasn't been updated since october 2014.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of small improvements to the dock
Hyperdock adds a lot of small improvements to the default mac dock, like better iTunes controls and calendar event previews.
See More
Top
Con
Can't bring back the 3d dock
See More
Top
Pro
Select individual application
Select individual application windows just by moving the mouse on a dock item, use mouse clicks to quickly open new windows and many more.
See More
Top
Pro
Lets you easily find a window you have open
See More
Top
Pro
Scroll up/down on menu bar to change size
Scroll up for full size.
See More
Top
Pro
Snaps to corners
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$9.99
45
6
ShiftIt
All
8
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Easy to configure
ShiftIt is configured through a simple UI where you simply press the hotkeys you wish to map to a certain action.
See More
Top
Con
A little slow
Similar to Spectacle, but it has a few more features, such as being able to pick the size adjustment increments. Spectacle was a little faster, though. Repeated size changes or moves in succession can cause it to wait for it to complete.
See More
Top
Pro
Free
See More
Top
Con
Imprecise when readjusting sizes
See More
Top
Pro
Intuitive
ShiftIt is very straight-forward to use for most frequent usages.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't support moving windows between workspaces
There's no way to move a window to a different workspace with hotkeys in ShiftIt.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
See More
Top
Pro
Configuration can be committed to your personal dotfiles repository
Configuration winds up living in .hammerspoon/init.lua and .hammerspoon/Spoons/ShiftIt.lua. Very easy to track configuration changes.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
86
12
Babylon.js
All
7
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Small (but helpful) community
Thanks to the increasing popularity of Babylon, it has a growing community of helpful developers. It's easy to find help on their forum.
See More
Top
Con
Young project
Babylon is quite young compared to many of it's competitors (released in 2013). The community is still somewhat small, however growing quickly.
See More
Top
Pro
A good amount of easy to understand resources to learn from
Babylon provides a playground where you can explore examples and play with the code. The official documentation offers a wide variety of well-written tutorials on topics from beginner to advanced. Additionally, there are many tutorials written by the community available that you can find by doing a google search.
See More
Top
Con
Still evolving
See More
Top
Pro
Great base shader material
See More
Top
Pro
Actively developed
Babylon has great project health, with activity on Github daily for bug fixes and new features.
See More
Specs
Rendering:
Physically based rendering
Tech:
WebGL1/2 + JavaScript or TypeScript
Special FX:
particles, postprocesses, lens, glow, etc..
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
229
26
GDevelop
All
18
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
7
Specs
Top
Pro
Easy to use
The whole interface is intuitive and easy to learn: each part of the game can be designed using visual editors. The objects editor is used to create the objects of the game, the scene editor help you to build the levels of your game and the events editor allows to give life to the whole game without programming.
See More
Top
Con
No support for atlas/tilemap and sprite sheet
At this point, you need to separate the tileset maps or character animation sprite sheet before importing it to the engine, but the developers are working on this feature.
See More
Top
Pro
Free and open-source
GDevelop's runtime libraries are MIT licensed. It can be used freely for projects of any type and there are no royalties associated with publishing games developed with GDevelop.
See More
Top
Con
GUI is slow to load
This makes doing the simplest things, like looking at one of your maps, hard to do. In looking into this program, it can stall a PC while trying to load a sample map.
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful events system to create games without programming
No need for coding using this system which is clear and powerful: events are composed of conditions and actions. Actions are launched when conditions are fulfilled. This is a very friendly way of making games and is still efficient for advanced usage, contrary to most other "block"/"drag'n'drop" systems.
See More
Top
Con
No 3d, not even fake 3d
This is a 100$ 2d-only game engine. You could of course use pre-rendered 3d graphics, but your games themselves will exist only in the x and y axes.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source plugin SDK
The plugin SDK is open source, so if you want to extend it, you can.
See More
Top
Con
It's very slow
Although suggested otherwise, GDevelop doesn't compile the games - it just adds wrappers so each OS can run the HTML5 game it creates. That means it runs much, much slower than other engines that do compile games.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of features to build games
The engine includes pathfinding, physics engine, multitouch support, custom hitboxes, platformer engine, tiled maps, multiple layers and cameras out of the box. All of these features can be used without programming knowledge, using the visual editors.
See More
Top
Con
No cross-compiler
The Windows and Linux versions of GDevelop can each compile a native application; but the Windows version cannot compile for Linux, nor vice versa.
See More
Top
Pro
Quickly add behaviors to objects
Prebuilt behaviors can be added to objects. This is a very efficient way to add a physics engine or make a platformer game. Lots of behaviors are included, from the most advanced (Physics, platformer, top-down movement) to really simple one (like the behavior to destroy objects when outside the screen or the one to drag objects with mouse or touch). And you still have full controls over your game as behaviors can be modified using the events!
See More
Top
Con
Optional subscription not mentioned on main site
While the engine is free and open source as stated on the main website, it does not mention that some optional features and services are actually activated through a paid subscription (two tiers: 2€ and 7€). Those features are: no nag screen shown when debugging, additional metrics available on games dashboard, access to more than 2 cloud exports per day (unlimited local export can be done without subscription, provided the right packaging tools are installed and configured), easy removal of GDevelop splash screen (can be done manually without subscription).
See More
Top
Pro
New documentation for gd5 is good for starting
A new doc is improving for gd5 that is nice for beginners and after that you can learn more from examples. Also, gd4 wiki is still there.
See More
Top
Con
Behaviors of Objects are rather generalized
Since it has a fully GUI editor, the objects you are allowed to add in your game are pretty generalized (PhysicsObject, TiledSprite, PlatformerObject, etc). This limits the freedom of a game developer while making a game, as the object msut follow the preset behaviours imposed on it.
See More
Top
Pro
Constant updates
New releases and bug fixes are consistent. New updates are released anywhere within 2 weeks or 1 month from the last one. Its auto-updater also does it job very well making life a lot easier.
See More
Top
Pro
Online version available, compatible with iOS and Android
Thanks to its open source nature, GDevelop-App.com was built over the GDevelop engine. GDevelop-App.com is a complete game creator similar to GDevelop, available directly in your browser and compatible with iPad and most Android tablets and phone! The app is perfect for making games directly from your sofa and you can even start a game on GDevelop-App and export it to open it inside GDevelop.
See More
Top
Pro
Multilanguage support
GDevelop is available in many languages and even community can help in translations.
See More
Specs
License:
MIT
Languages:
C++, JavaScript
Dev platforms:
Windows 7+, macOS 10.11+, Linux, Web
Desktop targets:
Windows 7+, macOS 10.11+, Linux
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free-7$/mo
758
64
PlayCanvas
All
17
Experiences
Pros
13
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Real-time collaborative online editor tool
PlayCanvas has an online editor that lets you build scenes and work with other people in your team in real-time. This is all done through the web browser without having to install any additional software.
See More
Top
Con
Private projects are only available for premium users
The free tier does not support any private projects. Instead, all the code and assets will be hosted openly. While not a problem for open source games and for developers who intend to make an open source game, it can be a deal-breaker for teams who want to keep their code and assets private.
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful assets pipeline
Assets and content delivery is very different on a web platform comparing to native. So PlayCanvas challenges best practices to allow developers decide how their content is delivered and in what form. Async Assets download allows developers to load content as the app goes, instead of asking to download all assets in advance risking users to simply navigate away while staring at loading screens. Formats for 3D models and textures support covers all the popular tools. And the workflow is as simple as dragging and dropping your files right into the Assets Panel. The cloud will do the rest of the hard work optimizing and converting your files into runtime-friendly and compressed data.
See More
Top
Con
No collision offset
See More
Top
Pro
Rendering engine runs on the browser
Has an advanced WebGL renderer that runs in the browser.
See More
Top
Con
Not many tutorials
See More
Top
Pro
Avoids having to download lots of textures for lightmaps
Lightmaps are an efficient way to deliver lighting to your scenes for a long time. But they come with the cost of large textures. PlayCanvas offers a unique solution for a web platform, it renders lightmaps when an app is loading in runtime. This is faster than downloading MBs of textures. And it's much more convenient: simply switch your light sources to bake, and static models to be lightmapped, and the engine will do the rest.
See More
Top
Pro
Friendly and active community
PlayCanvas has Feed as homepage for registered users, listing Dev Logs of other developers. This allows to socialize with other developers like yourself in a twitter-like environment. More to that, there is also an active forum, where developers help each other to solve their challenges. Developers of PlayCanvas itself are always looking forward to chat and help the community with any problems that may arise.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrated physics engine
PlayCanvas lets users integrate physics in their game rather easily, using the powerful Bullet Physics Engine (ammo.js). Should also be noted that the physics engine is delivered as an optional library, so by default being disabled it does not add any extra download size to your apps.
See More
Top
Pro
Has a free tier
Engine is free for projects under 200MB and with no more than 2 people on a team. The free tier has no engine restrictions. Tools are totally free too. There are no special limiting features behind any paywalls, and free users have all the features as paid users. There are no royalties associated with publishing your apps and games - you've made them, you own them. It is free to publish to playcanvas.com as well, just by one click in Editor.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-platform support
PlayCanvas lets you build games that run in mobile, desktop browsers, and native mobile apps. PlayCanvas can even make games that can run inside mobile social media and instant messenger clients like Twitter and WhatsApp.
See More
Top
Pro
Small app size
The engine itself weighs just under 150Kb, and it's always challenged to stay small. There is no extra weight that has to be carried with your app, just your assets and scripts in a runtime-friendly compressed form. This allows users to engage with your content in matter of seconds, and even just under a second on a good connection.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
PlayCanvas is fully open source and is under active development.
See More
Top
Pro
Very easy to use
See More
Top
Pro
Loads extremely fast
See More
Top
Pro
Has hot code reloading
Real-time link between your launched app and the editor allows the developer to preview and play with their scene without needing to refresh the game after every change in the code to see the updated result.
See More
Specs
Price:
Free to Use & Open Source
Supported platforms:
Any Browser on Windows, MacOS, and Linux
Dev platforms:
Windows, Linux, MacOS
Mobile targets:
Android, iOS
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
72
12
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop