Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Falcon?
Ad
Ad
FastAPI
All
17
Experiences
Pros
15
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Dependency injection
It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc.
See More
Top
Con
Smaller community
Since FastAPI is relatively new, its community is smaller than Django Rest Framework. But it can grow with time.
See More
Top
Pro
Standards
It is based on standards: OpenAPI, JSON Schema and OAuth 2.0.
See More
Top
Pro
Data validation
It validates the data using the types you declared. Even in deeply nested JSON requests.
See More
Top
Pro
High-performance
It's based on Starlette and Pydantic, so, it's one of the fastest Python frameworks.
See More
Top
Pro
Editor completion
It is based on Python type declarations, so, editors and tools can give great support. Including type checks and autocompletion everywhere.
See More
Top
Pro
One of the fastest growing communities
See More
Top
Pro
Fast is really fast (!)
It's easy to develop API based applications in Python on deadlines for Android and IOS Development.
See More
Top
Pro
Automatic docs
It generates interactive API documentation automatically from your code.
See More
Top
Pro
Database independent
It's independent of database or ORM, but compatible with all of them. Including relational databases and NoSQL.
See More
Top
Pro
Async IO / optional
It's based on Async IO, which gives it high concurrency. But you can use non-async libraries and it runs them appropriately.
See More
Top
Pro
World class documentation
It has some of the best documentation of any framework.
See More
Top
Pro
WebSockets
Because it's an async framework, it can handle async-native protocols like WebSockets.
See More
Top
Pro
OAuth 2.0
It has integrated support for OAuth 2.0. Including declaring required scopes per endpoint. So, you can easily integrate it with external OAuth 2.0 providers or build your own with it.
See More
Top
Pro
Background tasks
Included support for background tasks, thanks to being based on Starlette.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports GraphQL
Python's graphene library is included as an optional dependency meaning that GraphQL API's are supported out of the box, with no additional tweaking needed.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Cross-platform
License:
MIT
Type:
standard and feature rich micro-framework
Initial Release:
2019
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
193
29
Flask
All
11
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Minimalist without losing power
Flask is very easy to get up and going, with vanilla HTML or with bootstrap pieces. It doesn't take much lines of Python to load Flask to get headers working, etc, and since it's all modular you don't have to have something you don't want in your application.
See More
Top
Con
Not async-friendly
Flask is explicitly not designed to handle async programming.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of resources available online
Flask is one of the most popular Python web frameworks, if not the most popular one. As such, there's plenty of guides, tutorials, and libraries available for it. A large number of important Python libraries, such as SQLAlchemy have libraries for Flask, which add valuable bindings to make the development process and the integration between these libraries and Flask as easy as possible.
See More
Top
Con
Setting up a large project requires some previous knowledge of the framework
Setting up a large project with Flask is not that easy considering how there's no "official" way of doing it. Blueprints are a useful tool in this regard but require some additional reading and are a bit tricky to get right for a beginner. The lack of some defaults can also be problematic. Having to choose between different libraries for a certain task is never easy, especially if you have never worked with Flask before.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely easy to build a quick prototype
Even though it's pretty minimalistic out of the box, Flask still provides the necessary tools to build a quick prototype for a web app right after a fresh install. With all the main components pretty much packed in the flask package, building a simple web app in a single Python file is as easy as it gets.
See More
Top
Con
Threadlocals and globals used everywhere
The default way of creating applications in flask makes it hard to use reusable and clean code.
See More
Top
Pro
Very flexible
Flask gives developers a lot of flexibility in how they develop their web applications. For example, the choice of not having an ORM, but instead choosing one suited to the task, or another area where Flask gives a lot of options to developers is the templating. They can use Jinja2, Flask's default templating language or choose from a number of different templating languages they desire.
See More
Top
Con
HTML-oriented, not API-oriented
Not necessarily designed for making APIs, though that is possible
See More
Top
Pro
Great documentation
The official documentation is very thorough and complete. Everything is explained in-depth and followed by extremely well-explained tutorials that tackle real-world problems.
See More
Top
Pro
Able to use ORM or "true SQL"
See More
Specs
License:
BSD License
Written in:
Python
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
306
67
Django
All
13
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Con
Can feel bloated for small projects
Django's sheer scale and functionality can feel clunky and bloated for small applications. It has too many bells and whistles which can get in the way when developing a small scale application.
See More
Top
Pro
Developing a simple prototype can be very fast
Django's philosophy of batteries included means that experienced developers won't have to plan too much ahead on what kind of application infrastructure they need and instead just start developing web applications quickly.
See More
Top
Con
The documentation does not cover real-world scenarios
It is a larger documentation indeed, however is not deep and covers non real problems or even don't show any examples. You'll be better with Google or Stackoverflow
See More
Top
Pro
ORM support out of the box
Django supports Object-Relational Mapping. With models defined as Python classes which are actually subclasses of Django's django.db.models.Model. Each attribute of the model is then represented as a database field. Queries are lazily executed and Django gives developers an automatically-generated database-access API.
See More
Top
Con
Routing requires some knowledge of regular expressions
Given a GET request for /topics/426/viewpoints/1/sections/create, how does Django decide which bit of Python code is invoked to handle it? It compares the request path to your giant pile of regular expressions. And then if there's some other regular expression starts matching /top and all your requests for /topics/ start going there, good luck figuring out why. You won't be informed of any conflict until you notice you seem to be getting the wrong pages back. The structure of URL paths is almost universally hierarchal. There is no call to have anything as ridiculously flexible (and notoriously hard-to-read) as regular expressions to organize request routing.
See More
Top
Pro
Top notch documentation and help from community
The official Django documentation is probably some of the best around. Well written, thorough and they explain every little detail of the framework. Django is also a very popular tool, with an extensive community and a lot of experienced developers that have been using it for years. This means that there are a lot of guides and tutorials out there for new and experienced developers alike.
See More
Top
Con
Template errors fail silently by default
If you make a typo in a template variable, or change a view so that variable is no longer passed to the template, you won't get an error message pointing out that something has gone wrong. That reference will just be treated as if it is an empty string instead. There is a way to configure this, but since so many templates have been written assuming this behavior, nobody ever enables template errors because it would break so much of the existing support tools (e.g. the built-in admin interface).
See More
Top
Pro
Highly customizable
Django is in itself a highly customizable web framework. The database, template framework and ORM can all be swapped out.
See More
Top
Pro
Has an admin panel out of the box
Django comes with a highly customizable admin panel and authentication out of the box. This makes the development and production of a simple CMS extremely easy.
See More
Top
Pro
Mature software with many plugins developed over the years
Django was first released in 2005, it has had a lot of time to mature and become better with each release. It also has by far the largest community out of all python frameworks who have continuously over the years built and maintained many powerful plugins.
See More
Top
Pro
Clear and defined MVC organization
Django follows some pretty well established MVC patterns. With everything in place and where requests follow a clear path through urlresolvers, middleware, view and context processors.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple database management
Just a few lines of code can instruct Django to create all the tables and fields required in your database automatically. Schemas are managed with "migrations", that are also created automatically, and can be rolled out from your development box and implemented on production systems with just a single command. This performs any database changes required, from table creation, indexes, renaming fields, and pre-populating initial data. Each migration builds on the previous migrations, so you can trace the evolution of your data and even recreate the layout of your database at any point in the lifecycle of your application.
See More
Specs
Multi Language Support:
Excellent
Written in:
Python
Default Template Engine:
Django
Default ORM:
Django ORM
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
531
115
Bottle
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Flexible
Being a small one file distribution it includes almost every vital thing you need to support little websites (routing, templating). Everything else can be implemented using plugins.
See More
Top
Con
Small community. Difficult to find online docs and examples
See More
Top
Pro
Single-file distribution
Bottle works around the one-file approach, everything is done in a bottle.py file. This means that it's extremely easy to share and upload your application since it practically is just one python file.
See More
Top
Con
Very hard to develop projects that are not smaller than 1000 lines
While Bottle is a great framework for building small applications (generally less than 1000 lines of code), it starts getting very hard to manage your application if you want to go even a bit larger than that. The fact that it follows a single-file distribution model and that it's missing something like Flask's blueprints only make this problem worse.
See More
Top
Pro
No need to install
It is so little there's no need to install, it is included in the standard libs python.
See More
Top
Pro
Async, *let friendly
Using it with gevent is a breeze. It's a WSGI app so it's easy to make it work with anything.
See More
Top
Pro
Truly magnificent
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
46
2
Pyramid
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Very flexible
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
See More
Top
Con
The great number of options it offers can become intimidating
One of Pyramid's greatest drawbacks is that it requires a lot of set up in the beginning of a project. This can feel overwhelming and can keep people away from using it.
See More
Top
Pro
Persistence agnostic
Either NoSQL and SQL (including SQLAlchemy plugin).
See More
Top
Pro
Comes with security included
Includes authorization and authentication with multiple backends.
See More
Specs
Written in:
Python
Default Template Engine:
Jinja2
Default ORM:
SqlAlchemy
Hide
Get it
here
48
5
CherryPy
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Robust configuration mechanism
It's very easy to choose what processes you want by turning them on or off. You can also configure per-URL as well.
See More
Top
Con
Lacking good documentation
CherryPy's documentation could use some work. It generally feels very slim and is seriously lacking in some parts. For a beginner who is just starting with Python Frameworks, working with CherryPy's documentation would be very hard.
See More
Top
Pro
Has production-ready server
Comes with a production level wsgi server that can be used instead of / in addition to gunicorn etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Helps you organize the structure of your code
CherryPy provides some dispatcher patterns that support a wide range of functionality and provide some helpful ways of organizing the code.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
11
2
web2py
All
13
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Documentation is written in form of a book which is good for beginners
web2py documentation does not follow the common pattern of using Sphinx, MkDocs or ReadTheDocs which is goos for exeperienced developers. Although documentation in form of a book is very easy and good for beginners. Turning web2py the most easy and comprehensive framework to learn and also to teach.
See More
Top
Con
Abandoned framework with (almost) no community
See More
Top
Pro
Web2py apps run on GAE, AWS, VPNs, PythonAnywhere, etc
Web2py apps are designed to be portable. With some minor restrictions web2py apps can run on any VPS on SQL databases and/or Mongo, as well as on Google App Engine with the Google Datastore. It is truly code ones and run everywhere. For example at Camio.com we use web2py internally to access a GAE datastore which contains more images than Instagram.
See More
Top
Con
The web IDE is not a full-featured IDE
web2py includes an "admin" app that serves as a web-based IDE for web2py applications. It includes many features, such as application creation, compiling, and packaging; an error ticketing system; a code editor; a debugger; a controller doctest runner; Git and Mercurial integration; and one-click deployment to PythonAnywhere, Google App Engine, and OpenShift. However, particularly with regard to code editing and debugging and version control integration, it is not as full-featured as some of the more popular desktop IDEs such as PyCharm. So, developers expecting a PyCharm-like experience may be somewhat disappointed. In any case, use of the web-based IDE is completely optional.
See More
Top
Pro
User support
The web2py community is open and friendly and it gives concrete support to newbies and old timers. It's not difficult to get answers from the BDFL Massimo Di Pierro himself.
See More
Top
Pro
Maintainable over time
One really positive aspect of web2py application is their maintainability over the years. Old code works even if the framework is updated to the latest version. Not only that, if code is written well it is very short and a new team can pick it up over in little time.
See More
Top
Pro
PyCharm supports web2py
While web2py has its own web based IDE which is convenient, it works with WinIDE, PyCharm, and Eclipse. The first two explicitly support web2py. The latter requires some configuration.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn without losing any power
web2py is very easy to learn for beginners, yet it has a great deal of power and flexibility as application needs become more complex. It includes an impressively comprehensive set of features, making development very productive without the need to integrate a lot of third-party libraries.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be tuned to be really fast in production
The framework is really fast in production after some optimization and fine tuning which can minimize the memory footprint in order to make it run on a really small VPS or slice.
See More
Top
Pro
Easily extendable
Allows users to easily extend functionality by using external libraries.
See More
Top
Pro
No need to import the API to access the models and controllers context at every request
Models and controllers live in the context of the HTTP request. So the developer does not have to import the API to access this context at every request. In other words, the models, controllers and templates in web2py use a domain specific language which uses pure web2py syntax and allows to import any module but exposes a few additional objects.
See More
Top
Pro
Includes a web-based IDE for creating and managing applications
web2py includes an "admin" app that serves as a web-based IDE for web2py applications. It includes many features, such as application creation, compiling, and packaging; an error ticketing system; a code editor; a debugger; a controller doctest runner; Git and Mercurial integration; and one-click deployment to PythonAnywhere, Google App Engine, and OpenShift. It is not intended as a full desktop IDE replacement, but it includes some helpful web2py specific functionality and can be convenient for basic editing and debugging tasks and quick prototyping, even for those who primarily work with a more full-featured desktop IDE or editor.
See More
Top
Pro
web2py supports the classic editor Vim
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
67
16
ActFramework
All
16
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Performance
There are two aspects of performance: how quick a developer can deliver a feature and how fast the app is running on the product server. Act is designed to deliver excellent results in both aspects. With unbeatable developing experience, Act makes it very easy to release a feature; on the other side Act is very fast in runtime. Check out this 3rd party benchmark result.
See More
Top
Con
Incomplete microservice support
Although Act is built to be a great framework that supports microservice development, it lacks some of the key features at the moment, like sending requests to other microservices from within the app, service governance, and messaging handling.
See More
Top
Pro
Hot reload
You never restart while you're working on your Act application. Act's hot reload feature is fast and stable, it makes you feel like dealing with scripting language frameworks like Django or NodeJs. Watch this video and feel it.
See More
Top
Con
Very small community
As of February 2017, Act is a brand new framework (even though the project started at the end of 2014). Community is still forming.
See More
Top
Pro
Scalability
Act is built as a stateless framework. It supports horizontal scale.
See More
Top
Con
Functional testing support still under development
Developers are still working on innovative functional testing support for Act.
See More
Top
Pro
Secure
Act is built as a secure product. It provides built-in CSRF/XSS prevention mechanism. And act-aaa makes it very easy to implement Authentication/Authorization/Auditing in your app.
See More
Top
Con
Documentation is still being written
Act's documentation is still under development.
See More
Top
Pro
Superb RESTful support
Act makes creating RESTful service a kids game. It features AdaptiveRecord (allows front end to drive the data structure), JSON response control (just declare the fields you want to present or hide) and RESTful URL routing with path variables.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to deploy
ActFramework is not a servlet framework and there are no requirements on containers/app servers. It has a small package size (a helloworld distribution package size is less than 20 MB), a small memory feet print (a helloworld app heap usage is less than 20MB) and a fast boot up speed (a helloworld app starts in less than 3s).
See More
Top
Pro
Templating
Act's view architecture is very flexible and support using multiple view engines in your app. The default template engine is Rythm, a very developer friendly and powerful template engine. Act also support other templating solutions including freemarker, velocity, thymeleaf, and mustache via plugins.
See More
Top
Pro
Configuration for multiple environments
Act supports load configuration from a common dir and then overwriting it from a profile dir. Makes it very easy to manage configurations in different environments (e.g., dev, uat, sit, prod) Watch this video to see the innovative way Act delivers its configuration support.
See More
Top
Pro
Concise and expressive
Act does not require you to put Annotation when it is able to infer the intention from other parts of the code, i.e., you don't use @PathVariable or @RequestParam to tell Act the binding parameter name. And you don't need a ModelMap to bind variables to render argument names. Act has sophisticated byte class scanner to detect the variable names to do bindings automatically.
See More
Top
Pro
Comply to standards
Act's IoC is built on top of Genie, a fast dependency injection library that fully supports JSR330, and Act's validation solution is built on top of JSR303. Act is NOT an odd framework to most Java developers. Unlike Play1.x, ACT applications follow the standard maven project structure and it is very easy to integrate other Java libraries.
See More
Top
Pro
Database access
Act's DB layer is extremely easy to use. It supports SQL databases (through ebean orm) and MongoDB (through morphia). Using multiple datasource can never be that easy with Act's DB layer. Go here for more information on this.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast and flexible routing
You can configure your routing in either Spring MVC/Jersey style with annotation or Play style with route table or a combination of both. Act's routing supports RESTful URL path variables, optionally validated with regular expressions.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
23
0
jam.py
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Clean and simple Application Builder, easy to learn and get results fast
No need to learn huge 'Djangoish' frameworks. Easy to deploy with Apache, small deployment footprint. Security built in the App.
See More
Top
Con
Still need to learn Python etc to get the full potential of Jam.py
General Python, JS, etc. knowledge is still needed to fully take advantage of Jam.py.
See More
Top
Pro
Great for non-developers looking to visualize data
You can get productive with jam.py really quick even if you have little to no development experience. A dashboard can be built pretty quickly with minimal effort.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
18
0
DbSchema
All
8
Experiences
Pros
7
Specs
Top
Pro
Graphical Diagram Editor
Includes the possibility to edit tables and data directly in the diagram without writing SQL statements.
See More
Top
Pro
Multi-platform
Runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux.
See More
Top
Pro
Virtual Foreign Keys
If the Database schema is missing real foreign keys, it is possible to create virtual ones to be used within the tool.
See More
Top
Pro
Generator for Random Data
Includes the possibility to generate random numerical data or fetch random entries from a text file to populate the database.
See More
Top
Pro
Generate schema from existing database
Includes the possibility to generate an ER diagram from an existing database.
See More
Top
Pro
SQL editor with syntax highlighting
Includes an SQL editor with syntax highlighting and code completion feature.
See More
Top
Pro
Graphical Query Editor
Includes a visual query editor capable of using different join types, filters as well as the 'group by' clause.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Technology:
Java
Price (2023-06-26):
196$ + Taxes
Hide
See All
Experiences
$127
17
0
Sinatra
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Small loading time
Since it has very few dependencies, the loading time for a Sinatra app is considerably small.
See More
Top
Con
Hard to scale well
Because it's rather small and minimalistic, scaling up is not very easy with Sinatra. You need a great deal of knowledge on libraries and modules that may be useful for your particular use-case. As your application grows larger it may be hard to keep things clean and minimalistic, losing a lot of the advantages that Sinatra has.
See More
Top
Pro
Has only the bare minimum needed
Sinatra has taken an approach of having only the most useful components needed to build applications out of the box. It has simple routes along with a Domain Specific Language over a Rack layer.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
10
0
Dropwizard
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Enhanced productivity and less timewasting
The application can be run and debugged from the IDE without the need to recompile or redeploy the WAR file. This is because a Dropwizard web application creates on main program which starts the jetty container.
See More
Top
Con
Does not allow a lot a freedom of choice
Dropwizard removes a lot of freedom that the developer may have with other frameworks because of the fact that it tries to do everything itself. It chooses the best Java libraries for the job required, without allowing the developer much choice.
See More
Top
Pro
Application metrics integrated into the framework
Dropwizard comes with application metrics integrated out of the box. These metrics provide a lot of useful information such as request/response time. For example, to get the execution time of a method, the @Timed annotation is used.
See More
Top
Pro
Quick project bootstrap
Starting a project with Dropwizard si very easy and bootstraping is quick and painless. All that's needed is a single dependency added in the pom.xml file and it's ready to go.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
8
0
Adonisjs
All
9
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Based on Laravel PHP Framework
If you are already programming in PHP with Laravel, you will have no trouble starting development with Node using Adonis.
See More
Top
Con
No NOSQL integration
Only used ORM, not ODM.
See More
Top
Pro
Similar to Rails
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in modules for everything
There are built-in modules for everything: Auth, Social Auth, mailing ect
See More
Top
Pro
Very good documentation
See More
Top
Pro
Has websocket support out of the box
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn, especially if you're already familiar with Laravel
See More
Top
Pro
Option for full-stack or api standalone implementation
You can choose to use the full-stack version or if you wish to build a RESTful API you can choose to use the api standalone version.
See More
Specs
Language:
JavaScript
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
59
2
DbGate
All
8
Experiences
Pros
7
Specs
Top
Pro
Multi database
Supports Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL and MongoDB.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross platform
Windows, Linux or Mac.
See More
Top
Pro
Open Source
MIT License.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports NoSQL for free, unlike Dbeaver
See More
Top
Pro
SQL generator
See More
Top
Pro
Fast exports
Even when exporting large datasets.
See More
Top
Pro
Diagrams
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Web, Docker
Technology:
Svelte
Database management:
SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, MongoDB, MariaDB, CockroachDB, Redshift
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
6
0
SQL Power Architect
All
6
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Convert
Can convert databases and copy the data from tables.
See More
Top
Con
The manual is not free
The SQL Power Architect User Guide costs $ 99.
See More
Top
Pro
OLAP schema modeling
Cubes, Measures, Dimensions, Hierarchies & Levels.
See More
Top
Pro
Reverse engineering
See More
Top
Pro
Drag and Drop
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Unix, Mac
Technology:
Java
Hide
Free / paid
5
0
Sqlectron
All
7
Experiences
Pros
1
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Con
Unmaintained
The creator stopped working on the project, it is in need of maintainers.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in support for major databases
Sqlectron supports PostgreSQL, MySQL (and MariaDB), MSSQL Server, SQLite, and Cassandra.
See More
Top
Con
Written in Electron
See More
Top
Con
Only installable through npm
Horrible package manager that is not allowed on our servers.
See More
Top
Con
No plugins
See More
Top
Con
Buggy
Sqlectron is installable and that's about it. You can't actually add servers to connect to in the app, making it a 200 MB paperweight.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
30
4
DbVisualizer
All
6
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Professional tool
This is a good and stable tool with really good and useful functionality: import/export, SSH tunnelling, fast searching, duplication, DDL visualization etc. If you are a professional, don't complain about the pricing. If you're an amateur, maybe this isn't for you.
See More
Top
Con
Expensive
License for the full product is costly.
See More
Top
Pro
Duplicate row button
Makes it really easy to stub out example data while developing, just change the values with unique constraints and you have extra data ready to go.
See More
Top
Pro
Wildcard finder
Has a search box that will highlight any matching row, regardless of what field is matched (spans multiple columns).
See More
Top
Pro
In-line editing
Allows you to edit and save db rows through a spread-sheet like editor.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Technology:
Java
Hide
Get it
here
97
10
Beekeeper Studio
All
6
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Way less confusing than other DB managers, and has a simple tabbed interface that feels more like VS Code.
See More
Top
Con
Not for a DBA
It's great for web/app developers who interact with a database, but if you're a full time DBA you probably have better powertools available
See More
Top
Pro
Free and Open Source
MIT License!
See More
Top
Pro
Postgres
I use SQLite, MySQL, and Postgres, and Beekeeper supports all of them!
See More
Top
Pro
Autocomplete
The autocomplete is useful but not obtrusive
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Mac, Windows, Linux
Technology:
Electron
Dark Theme:
Yes
Free tier:
Yes, 100% Open Source
See All Specs
Hide
$0
25
4
Lumen
All
8
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Easily upgradable to Laravel
Since it's basically just a minimal version of Laravel, it can be upgraded to a full Laravel app if the need arises. No need for code changes, just import the code to a new Laravel install.
See More
Top
Con
Built for smaller tasks like APIs
See More
Top
Pro
Feature rich
See More
Top
Con
It's based off Laravel and inherits its shortcomings
Lumen inherits many shortcomings of Laravel, such as static proxy classes.
See More
Top
Pro
Highest performing PHP micro-Framework
Lumen is benchmarked at 100/rps (Requests Per Second) faster than Slim v3, which used to be considered the fastest and most performant micro-Framework to date with the ability to handle 1800/rps. (1900/rps vs 1800/rps respectively).
See More
Top
Con
Made to work alongside Laravel
Lumen as a framework is at it's full potential when used alongside it's older brother. Lumen was created to be used for microservices alongside Laravel, which is used for more user-facing applications. If a project is already using another framework other than Laravel, it would be better to use another microframework for microservices instead of Lumen.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
See More
Specs
PHP version:
7.1.3
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
106
14
OmniDB
All
7
Experiences
Pros
6
Specs
Top
Pro
Open source and actively developed
See More
Top
Pro
PL/pgSQL Debugger
See More
Top
Pro
Web-based, can be run locally or deployed on server
OmniDB is web-based and works similarly to pgAdmin 4. You can run the web server locally or deploy it on a server, and connect to it through a web browser.
See More
Top
Pro
Multi-database
Supports PostgreSQL, Oracle, MySQL and MariaDB, with support in the pipeline for Firebird, SQLite, SQL Server and DB2.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple and intuitive interface for everyone.
An easy-to-discover tree panel to classify features/objects on left (with context menus if you don't know what you're doing). Tabs panels for ins and outs on right. That's it.
See More
Top
Pro
OmniDB has 2ndQuadrant as its main sponsor
See More
Specs
Technology:
Python, Django
Database management:
PostgreSQL, Oracle, MySQL, MariaDB
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
75
12
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop