Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & itβs awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Flutter?
Ad
Ad
Onsen UI
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Open source and free
Onsen UI is open source, and completely free to use.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be used for web apps as well
Onsen UI is usable for classic web development as well as mobile.
See More
Top
Pro
Large selection of components
Onsen UI provides a wide selection of components that are ready to use out of the box and are easily customizable.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Onsen UI provides very clear, well-written and detailed documentation. It uses popular technologies that are likely already familiar to developers (such as jQuery and Angular). The framework is semantic and intuitive to use, making it quite fast to learn.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports React
React is the most trending front-end UI framework, naturally supporting that is a plus.
See More
Specs
License:
Apache 20.0
Mobile targets:
iOS, Android
Hide
Get it
here
29
1
B4X
All
22
Experiences
Pros
15
Cons
6
Specs
Top
Pro
Create easy, fast cross-platform views with less code
B4XUI custom views are designed, by Erel and other forum members, exactly with this in mind; custom views that act and feel exactly the same no matter what platform you target.
See More
Top
Con
Java-dependent Desktop Development
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful general purpose programming tool
As mentioned in its website, "With B4X, anyone who wants to, can develop real-world solutions."
See More
Top
Con
Only for Windows
The IDE, while very handy, only runs on Windows. If you want to code on Mac or Linux, you have to install it on a virtual machine. But you can debug your app by running it on the target OS.
See More
Top
Pro
A very active forum where you can find any issue you have, and quick answers to new ones
See More
Top
Con
The documentation and examples and tutorials are not up to date
The documentation and examples and tutorials are not up to date.
See More
Top
Pro
A highly motivated program author who is very active in the forums
Erel Uziel is simply the most pro-active Soft-Creator/Forum Manager you will ever come across. If it has not yet been asked & answered, just ask and you will be answered withing minutes, and thanks to it being a trully international forum, this is achieved 24h/7d.
See More
Top
Con
For BASIC language lovers
Lots of people are not fans of BASIC-like languages. Enjoyment of B4X, may depend on having a background or affinity for BASIC.
See More
Top
Pro
Very easy to use and powerful for IoT
Support for Bluetooth/BLE, MQTT, TCP/UDP, Serial, NFC, Websockets, HTTP/2 across platforms makes it the ideal tool for IoT projects.
See More
Top
Con
Can still need deep knowledge of Java
Attempts to provide BASIC-like language that is more comfortable for a certain demographic of users, but various circumstances will still require knowledge of Java. "No free lunch".
See More
Top
Pro
Live code swapping
A huge productivity boost when you can run your apps on the devices and make code changes real time without needing to recompile.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of B4W real Web app
Erel needs to make a real Web app designer.
See More
Top
Pro
No complexities compared with other tools
No need to learn JAVA, C+, PHP, or any other complementary languages in order to achieve exactly what you need.
See More
Top
Pro
The best all round
Produces highly optimised end results. Easy to use and quick to learn. When you know how to produce an Android app you near enough know how to produce an IOS app. The fact that there are subtle differences between writing for different platforms is a huge plus - those differences help optimise your code and they're really not difficult to wrap your head round.
See More
Top
Pro
Erel has much passion for his tool
The speed of answer topics is amazing.
See More
Top
Pro
Many informative video tutorials
The tutorials help beginners as well as more experienced programmers grasping important concepts.
See More
Top
Pro
Many code examples of fully working apps for free
The Forum is filled with many code examples of fully working apps for free. Code snippets, animation, different type of views etc. can be easily downloaded and used in your own app.
See More
Top
Pro
Large user community
Over the years it has built up a very active user community that is very involved in the evolution of B4X. In their forums you can find any answer to your questions, and if it is not there, they will answer you.
See More
Top
Pro
RAD
VERY Rapid Application Development, with tons of pro features.
See More
Top
Pro
Tightly integrated framework
See More
Top
Pro
Almost everything is free and complete
Except the IDE for iOS. Even so it's very cheap.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Android, iOS, Windows, Mac, Linux, Web, Raspberry Pi, Arduino
License:
Apache License 2.0
Languages:
B4X
Dev platforms:
Windows, Mac (via VM), Linux (via VM), Web
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free / paid
381
22
Quasar Framework
All
9
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Uses Vue.js 2.0
Vue 3.x available as a plugin.
See More
Top
Con
Developed by a single person
Statistically, apps being developed by a single person can be gone without warning.
See More
Top
Pro
Good documentation and coding samples
See More
Top
Pro
Massive suite of well test & optimized widgets
Instant rebuild for SPA, PWA, Cordova or Electron with Material/iOS Themes.
See More
Top
Pro
Designed from the outset for desktop & mobile
See More
Top
Pro
Can build/test your PWA with/without PWA wrapper
See More
Top
Pro
Supports server side rendering (SSR) like Nuxt + SSR/PWA
"Icon genie" builds app icons and splash images for platforms selected.
See More
Top
Pro
Ability to add custom server side code when using SSR
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Web
License:
MIT
Mobile targets:
Android, Blueberry, iOS, Windows Phone, Web
Supported languages:
Javascript, Typescript
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
175
13
React Native
All
8
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Allows you to develop native apps
React Native allows you to create native apps by generating native views with JavaScript instead of using a web wrapper.
See More
Top
Con
If core team doesn't use a certain feature, it's not developed
Whenever there's functionality you need that they don't use in their apps, it's not going to get developed by them, even if it's obvious it should be in the core. They always say to either submit a PR or create a separate module.
See More
Top
Pro
Large, supportive community
Despite being such a young framework (early 2015), the support for React Native grew quickly. There is a forum, active tag on Stackoverflow and many other ways to get help from the community.
See More
Top
Con
Steep learning curve
React Native is not the most beginner-friendly framework for creating mobile apps with JavaScript. It requires that the developer know React, which is known to have a steep learning curve.
See More
Top
Pro
Backed by Facebook
Facebook writes their mobile apps in React Native so the code base gets pretty thoroughly used in some highly demanding scenarios.
See More
Top
Con
Many existing JS libraries are not usable on React Native; not exactly a 1-to-1 experience to writing React either
Example: Library that provides a full calendar with agenda view. In the end it's much easier to develop in actual JavaScript with a solution such as Ionic, especially if your app needs to work well on the desktop.
See More
Top
Pro
More predictable control of the state
The one way data flow, makes it more predictable and easy to control.
See More
Top
Con
React native only supports react which is getting old
React native is only based on react which is getting old. An old tech developer can't take much breaking changes so it gets more patchs. There is a limit, and react is too verbose and complex. better alternatives available today.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
99
36
Ionic Framework
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Cordova plugins
Large quantity of plugins to access native APIs without code nothing in native language.
See More
Top
Con
Can be buggy
Ionic is still a young framework (version 1.0 was released in May 2015). There are still some quirks and bugs in the framework to work out, which you can see a list of on their Github. However Ionic is under active development and bugs are generally addressed quickly.
See More
Top
Pro
Large, friendly and active community
Ionic Framework is currently one of the most popular frameworks for hybrid mobile app development. This has resulted in a very large community of active users who contribute to the community by writing tutorials and answering questions.
See More
Top
Pro
Free and open source
Ionic is free to use and open source, resulting in an active and helpful community of users and contributors.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
128
30
Codename One
All
9
Experiences
Pros
8
Specs
Top
Pro
High performance
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
See More
Top
Pro
Highly customizable
By utilizing lightweight component architecture and the built in graphical designer and theming options you are able to customize a good looking app on any platform.
See More
Top
Pro
Java 8 support
See More
Top
Pro
Works with all IDEs
Works with NetBeans, Eclipse, IntelliJ, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Multi-platform development environments (via build server)
You can even use Linux desktops to build native iOS apps, no need for a Mac.
See More
Top
Pro
Vibrant & helpful community
See More
Top
Pro
Attractive pricing
It is possible to build production grade apps even with the free version. Pricing is decent when compared to competitors like Xamarin.
See More
Specs
License:
GPL with Classpath Exception, allows you to build proprietary applications
Languages:
Java, Kotlin
Dev platforms:
Windows, Mac, Linux
Desktop targets:
Windows, Mac, Linux
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
32
10
Xojo
All
4
Experiences
Pros
1
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Easy to make compiled native apps.
See More
Top
Con
Subscription-based/Not free
Using this product you're betting the company will still be around. If they get bought out by an enterprise that wants to use the tech internally, all they need to do is stop offering subscriptions and suddenly you're scrambling to rebuild your entire app on other technology.
See More
Top
Con
No Android support
They plan to eventually support Android, but for now, they only support iOS.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Pi, Web,iOS
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
Hide
Get it
here
78
40
NativeScript
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Svelte Native
Used by Svelte framework for native development.
See More
Top
Con
Nativescript + Angular apps for Android tend to have long startup times.
It's very difficult to have acceptable startup times with NS+Angular in Android. It's not uncommon to see apps taking 6 sec or more to start AFTER having been optimized with Webpack (mandatory!). The same app in iOS takes only 2-3 sec. Also, this seems to happen only with the NS+Angular flavour. People using plain NS (without Angular) don't seem to have the issue.
See More
Top
Pro
Leverages knowledge in Angular
Angular is a very popular framework, and teams already developing angular will feel right at home with Nativescript + Angular
See More
Top
Pro
Works great with vue.js
See More
Hide
Get it
here
33
5
Felgo (formerly V-Play)
All
17
Experiences
Pros
15
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Mature cross platform IDE
Qt-Creator IDE with Code Completion, Debugging and Profiling, integrated Quick Help, Version Control and more.
See More
Top
Con
No 3rd party tutorials
There are little to none amount of tutorials for Felgo other than what was made by the engine developers themselves.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn
Felgo is among the easiest cross-platform tools to use according to a survey done by research2guidance.
See More
Top
Pro
In-game level editor
With the Level Editor components, you can let your players share their levels with the whole game community which is cool because you don't need to create new levels on your own, but the community helps you with it. There are other community features like rewards for good level creators that helps getting more downloads.
See More
Top
Pro
Felgo game network
Leaderboards, Achievements, Challenges are available across platform, even on Desktop. You can also use Cloud Syncinc of your game data that makes it easy to start a game for example on iPhone and then continue on a Nexus Tablet or the other way around. It is also convenient because sharing to all kind of game services & networks like Facebook & Game Center is possible with a single API call. Custom hosting of Game Network servers is also possible if you want to keep the player data.
See More
Top
Pro
Native performance
Although game logic is provided in JavaScript by you, performance-critical parts of the engine like OpenGL ES rendering or particle effects are implemented in rock-solid C++, providing the ultimate performance your game deserves.
See More
Top
Pro
Advanced gaming components
Advanced Gaming Components for handling multiple display resolutions & aspect ratios, animations, particles, physics, multi-touch, gestures, path finding and more.
See More
Top
Pro
Felgo build server
No need for native SDKs, Build in and Install from Cloud with the Felgo Build Server.
See More
Top
Pro
Rapid development
Cut your development time in half. Using the QML language allows for some powerful features that cut code lines and time. Another helpful feature that can help in this area is that there are more than 50 game demos of all genres that come with full source code, meaning one can easily check to see how something was done.
See More
Top
Pro
Support can be found in forums and via e-mail
Felgo has friendly forums where core developers participate as well as fast & helpful email support.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on Qt framework
The Qt framework is a great and mature framework on its own. Using Qt as a game engine base is a smart idea.
See More
Top
Pro
Runtime-balancing
You can use ready-made components to balance any of your game properties at runtime, so also on mobile devices which is great for adjusting forces or input parameters.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of learning resources
Helps get started and improve with lots of tutorials, demo games, examples.
See More
Top
Pro
Social services and monetization
In-app purchases, game and social network integration (such as Game Center and Facebook), ads (with Chartboost and AdMob) and analytics (such as Flurry) are all available across platforms.
See More
Top
Pro
Frequent updates
Every 2-4 weeks new updates provide additional features and fixes based on what users wanted the most.
See More
Top
Pro
Level store
You can even monetize these user-generated levels with in-app purchases with the Felgo Level Store component if you like.
See More
Specs
License:
Proprietary
Languages:
HTML
Dev platforms:
Windows; OSX; Linux
Desktop targets:
Windows; OSX; Linux
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
50
12
Polymer
All
12
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Various basic components
It provides a base component.
See More
Top
Con
No server-side rendering
Polymer does not support server-side rendering. This results in higher loading times, more HTTP requests and it's not very SEO friendly, since search engines have no way of indexing a page if it's not rendered in the server.
See More
Top
Pro
HTML markup is not string
HTML markup as it can be a non-string.
See More
Top
Pro
Flex layout components
It provides Flex layout components.
See More
Top
Pro
CSS is easy to apply
CSS can be applied far more comfortably than React.
See More
Top
Pro
No need for special debugging tools
The presence od specialized debugging tools are advertised by competitors. The all features of web components are natively supported by browser embedded development tools.
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent routing
The router is embedded into CLI for project creation and covers as web as Progressive web app, also fused with Polymer layouts out of the box. The shop template for CLI has a complete solution including the routing.
See More
Top
Pro
Complete web app stack support
Full app stack from data tier to routing, progressive web app, responsive layouts makes no need to seek outside of Polymer ecosystem for application features. In addition to waste set of mature web components in Polymer Elements along with Vaadin Elements there are thousands of web components in the wild comparable to jQuery plugins set.
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent documentation
Polymer guides you as with tools (cli, build environment, app templates,..) as with complimentary documentation on all phases of app development from creation of app as progresive web app to production deployment instructions. As Polymer is standards based, the whole community around those standards also helping in documentation and support.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on web componentsβ
Web Components are a collection of specifications released by W3C as a way to reduce the complexity of web apps by creating reusable components. Browser support is currently poor for web components, however Polymer is developed to make web components compatible with modern browsers.
See More
Top
Pro
API is easy to understand, based on standard
The Polymer APIs are split on application layers and follow standards on all possible ways: Web Components, CSS variables, async API via Promises and so on.
See More
Specs
v2.0 GZipped size (Safari):
13K
v2.0 GZipped size (Edge):
36K
v2.0 GZipped size (Firefox):
32K
v1.0 GZipped size:
53K
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
101
22
jQuery Mobile
All
6
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
3
Top
Con
The project is practically abandoned
The last release was in 2014. Samsung Tizen Advanced UI (TAU), for example, was started with JQuery, but it was forked off and completely rebuilt from scratch with jQuery concepts but without JQuery dependency itself.
See More
Top
Pro
Resources
With HTML5 development being relatively amateur jQuery Mobile has a vast selection of resources to assist. These resources include websites, books, apps and other frameworks, 3rd party plugins and extensions, and more. All of these can help ramp up and excel the project development cycle.
See More
Top
Con
Clunky and slow
See More
Top
Pro
ThemeRoller
An interactive tool that has been created to customize an apps theme. Users can import a current theme, make changes, and export the theme back to the app for integration.
See More
Top
Con
No MVC support
There is no included MVC support in jQuery Mobile. It is possible to achieve this, however, using other frameworks such as BackboneJS in combination with jQuery Mobile, but there are a few limitations. Specifically that MVC frameworks, such as BackboneJS or KnockoutJS, are not compatible with jQuery Mobile page routing.
See More
Top
Pro
Download Builder
To optimize application development jQuery Mobile provides a tool to allow the user to customize the framework. It contains the ability to pick and choose which modules to include and then bundles the framework so it contains only what is needed.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
15
5
ASP.NET Core
All
11
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Fast and getting faster
Thanks to breakthroughs in ROSLYN compiler and the efforts of the .NET COre developer team, code written in C# can reach speeds just a step behind C++.
See More
Top
Con
Microsoft environment
See More
Top
Pro
Multi platform
Can run on Windows, Linux and Mac (also Visual Studio Code editor).
See More
Top
Pro
JSON optimization
In .NET Core 2.1 and 3.0, new APIs are added that make it possible to write JSON APIs that require less memory, using Span<T> and UTF8 strings, and improve throughput of applications like Kestrel, ASP.NET Core web server. See also Utf8JsonReader.
See More
Top
Pro
Tutorials and documentation quality
Both microsoft and 3rd party tutorials are mostly of high quality and encourage you to use the industry best-practices.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in middleware
Built-in middleware featuring: Authentication, Cookie policy, Health Check, MVC, Session etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Hosting
Ability to host on IIS, Nginx, Apache, Docker, or self-host in your own process.
See More
Top
Pro
Ease of Use
See More
Top
Pro
Security
It is a very secure platform.
See More
Top
Pro
Tooling
Both VS and VSCode are powerful free IDEs that are well integrated with ASP.net Core. VS Community also allows for commercial use for projects with less than 5 developers.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Docker
Written in:
C#
Default ORM:
Entity Framework
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
202
49
Electron
All
9
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Con
Apps can have memory issues
Apps made with Electron are likely to have memory issues unless you specifically design the app with efficient coding.
See More
Top
Pro
Healthy community
Github is behind electron and there is a lot of big companies using it to make their cross platform apps.
See More
Top
Con
High CPU Usage
Electron Has High CPU Usage
See More
Top
Pro
Active development
Electron receives updates frequently (multiple times each month). For example, the recent updates (as of July 15, 2016) are: 1.2.6 (released July 6) 1.2.5 (released June 23) 1.2.4 (released June 22) 1.2.3 (released June 16) 1.2.2 (released June 8)
See More
Top
Con
Needs to run chromium
Runs chromium in the background which consumes a lot of resources.
See More
Top
Pro
learning curve is less
Electron has less learning curve when compare to qt like other options
See More
Top
Pro
Great documentation
Electron has a nice website with great documentation. It also features a lot of samples.
See More
Top
Pro
Solid API
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
License:
MIT
Supported languages:
Javascript
Popular Language Bindings:
Javascript, C++, C#, Go, Python, Java
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
55
47
MonoDevelop
All
6
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Free
MonoDevelop is free to download and use.
See More
Top
Con
No longer supported (deprecated since 2018)
Starting with version 4.x, Xamarin rebranded MonoDevelop as Xamarin Studio, but only for the Windows version of the IDE. Stable release 7.6.9.22 / September 21, 2018
See More
Top
Pro
Starting up this program doesn't take as long as starting Visual Studio windows 98
See More
Top
Con
Bad formatting
MonoDevelop doesn't offer much in terms of autocompletion and code formatting. Most of the time the automatic formatting that MonoDevelop does is annoying and not really compliant with C# guidelines.
See More
Top
Con
The MonoDevelop version that ships with Unity is several versions behind
The version of MonoDevelop that ships with Unity is several versions behind the main MonoDevelop branch. It also gets updated very rarely so any annoying bugs that it may have take a lot of time to get fixed.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows Linux Mac
Supported languages:
C#, F#, Visual Basic .NET, Vala
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
GUIFramework:
GTK
See All Specs
Hide
Get it
here
194
26
Sciter
All
6
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Multi language
Support for C++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, Powerbuilder. See Go bindings on GitHub. The binding for C# on GitHub, SciterSharp does not seem to be free: in a commercial product you should acquire a commercial license.
See More
Top
Con
Linux version is not very mature
The Linux version is missing HTML/CSS features when compared to the Windows version.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
Only a single native DLL.
See More
Top
Con
Not fully HTML5 compliant
Lacking HTML5 functionality and W3C standards: grabbing a library like JQuery or Bootstrap and use it in Sciter will not work.
See More
Top
Con
Not WYSIWYG
Not WYSIWYG like WebForms or WPF.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Supported languages:
C++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, PowerBuilder
Hide
Free / paid
22
8
Fuse
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Native performance
See More
Top
Con
Little reuse of web knowledge
Fuse doesn't support Angular or React so there is little reuse of existing web tech knowledge. The team have said they are exploring Angular 2 and then maybe React though.
See More
Top
Pro
Compiles to native platform code
A key difference is that Fuse uses JS exclusively for app logic while producing native code for everything else, including population and manipulation of the UI.
See More
Top
Pro
OpenGL UI
With the option to use OpenGL based UI components, Fuse is the only of the three platforms that offer a reliable βwrite once, run everywhereβ approach where designers can control responsive layout, look and feel down to points, pixels and percentages, keyframes and easing curves.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
5
2
NW.js (w/xvfb)
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Node integration
The integration of Node with the DOM in NW.js opens up a number of new options in how your headless testing workflow can be facilitated. The distinct separation of JavaScript contexts, the introduction of a separate node context, and the ability to cross communicate, offers a lot of power and flexibility.
See More
Top
Con
xvfb Requirement (for now)
Headless is on the NW.js roadmap, but for now xvfb is necessary to get going. The community has done the work and you can find the details here.
See More
Top
Pro
NaCl support/integration
Access to the Native Client offers up more options in implementing your testing workflow.
See More
Specs
Supported languages:
JS, [third party modules:C#,C++Web Assembly]
Integrated Debugger:
SDK version
Hide
Get it
here
18
0
Angular
All
12
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Support for a composable component oriented architecture with directives
Angular uses the existing HTML structure and builds on top of it instead of requiring you to learn a new templating language. Because it's just vanilla HTML, it is more familiar, and easier for beginners to learn. Directives let Angular know which HTML elements are under its control, and how to use them. Being directly on the HTML it's more transparent what's going on, and it's possible to get a good idea of what the page is doing just by looking at the template. Also, it makes embedding possible, as you could have an angular app within an existing site so you don't have to rewrite everything at once.
See More
Top
Con
Steep learning curve
Angular isn't a simple framework, and because much of the magic goes on behind the scenes, it isn't easy to go from simply using the framework to being able to actually change how it works and extend it.
See More
Top
Pro
Provides dependency injection
With dependency injection, you can load in extra javascript and new functionality just when you need it. This is particularly helpful with testing as you can swap out services for test services. It also means in single page apps you can load dependencies only as you need them instead of loading them up all up at the start.
See More
Top
Con
It is almost mandatory to use Typescript
Although ES standard can be used, most of the documentation and resources are with Typescript.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy and straightforward data-binding
Data bindings are done on the DOM, which allows you to easily sync data between various parts of the DOM in a very succint matter. <body ng-app> <span>Insert your name:</span> <input type="text" ng-model="user.name" /> <h3>Echo: {{user.name}}</h3> </body> This snippet shows how the model attribute "name" is easily bound across different parts of the DOM without having to set up any extra boilerplate.
See More
Top
Con
HTML template does not comply to standards
Attributes are case-sensitive, which is against the HTML standards.
See More
Top
Pro
Huge ecosystem of third party components
Angular is an extremely popular JavaScript framework. Because of this, developers have developed a myriad of components which can be downloaded and integrated into any Angular application.
See More
Top
Con
Difficult to use for isomorphic apps that render the initial template on the server in a performant way. Non issue for enterprise apps.
See More
Top
Pro
Huge community that is quickly growing
Angular has the largest community out of all Javascript MV* frameworks and there are a lot of tutorials and guides out there for new and old users alike.
See More
Top
Con
Explicit configuration
Users will usually need to specify stuff that is very obvious (template location, providers etc. ).
See More
Top
Pro
All best practices
See More
Top
Con
Two-way data binding is often considered an anti-pattern
Two-way data-binding means that a HTML element in the view and an Angular model are binded, and when one of them is changed so is the other. One-way data-binding for example does not change the model when the HTML element is changed. This is a rather controversial subject and many developers consider two-way data binding an anti-pattern and something that is useless in complex applications because it's very easy to create complex situations by using it and being unable to debug them easily or understand what's happening by just looking at the code.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
68
37
Stylify
All
7
Experiences
Pros
7
Top
Pro
Intuitive selectors
It uses native CSS property:value selectors like color:blue or font-weight:bold as a selector.
See More
Top
Pro
Selectors minification
It shrinks long selectors such as font-weight:bold to _ab12.
See More
Top
Pro
Small CSS chunks
CSS can be generated for each file, page, layout or component separately. Selector is generated only once and reused when possible.
See More
Top
Pro
On demand generated CSS
It can generate CSS on demand for example inside the express request.
See More
Top
Pro
No dependencies required
It doesn't require any post or pre processor.
See More
Top
Pro
Seamless integration
It can be easily integrated into the Nuxt.js, Next.js. It works well along with Webpack, Rollup and Vite.js. The CSS can be generated easily for Symfony, Nette or Laravel.
See More
Top
Pro
Dynamic screens
Screens can be combined using logical operangs like sm&&tolg, xl||landscape and lg&&dark. The value for media queries can be dynamic like minw640px.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
13
0
Tk
All
7
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Easy styling
Once you understand how to style, the styling can look great.
See More
Top
Con
Base looks are garbage without a good amount of styling
Going with the base look for your app is a bad idea because it looks like garbage with the defaults.
See More
Top
Pro
Great for beginners
Easy to pick up and run with it.
See More
Top
Con
C# support lacking
Although the Eagle Project exists, which offers Mono and .NET Core support, C# support is not standard.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy and good looking in Mac, Linux and Windows
See More
Top
Pro
Bindings for several languages
Bindings for Python, C, C++, Ruby, Perl, Go, Java, Haskell and more, see Languages with a Tk binding.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Unix, Mac
License:
BSD
Current stable version:
8.6
Popular Language Bindings:
Tcl Python
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
25
1
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop