Add to ChromeWhat is the best alternative to Cypress?
Top Con
Top Con
Top Pro
Top Pro
Top Pro
Top Pro
Top Pro
Top Pro
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
Lustre recommends the best products at their lowest prices.
Try it now - it's free
While some testing frameworks are complete out of the box, Mocha requires developers to select and set up assertion libraries and mocking utilities. For someone who is just starting to learn how to build tests this can be scary as they will also have to choose which libraries to use and learn them too. See More
Unlike WebdriverIO, which lets you use various test frameworks and assertion libraries (e.g. Jasmine, Cucumber, Mocha + Chai), Nightwatch comes with its own BDD-style interface for performing assertions, based on Chai. Here's a simple test example: module.exports = {
'Demo test Google' : function (browser) {
browser
.url('http://www.google.com')
.waitForElementVisible('body', 1000)
.setValue('input[type=text]', 'nightwatch')
.waitForElementVisible('button[name=btnG]', 1000)
.click('button[name=btnG]')
.pause(1000)
.assert.containsText('#main', 'Night Watch')
.end();
}
}; See More
Code readability is an important factor, if the application development involves multiple teams; if the testing team is unable to read your test cases then they won't be able to test it. Jasmine resolves this issue by providing developers with an extremely simple and "human-friendly" syntax. See More
WebdriverIO lets you use your favorite testing framework (Jasmine, Mocha, Cucumber) and assertion library (Chai for Mocha). Other projects implement their own testing and assertion APIs, for example Nightwatch, Intern. It should be mentioned though that v4.2.16 has an incompatibility with at least tap v7.1.2: stdout/stderr written during a run gets lost. See More
Chimp.js, is an emerging web application test framework that implements easy sync tests using WebdriverIO, CucumberJS and Chai. Features include: synchronous style built-in "widget framework" (an implementation of the PageObject pattern) automatically downloads dependencies (ChromeDriver, PhantomJS etc.) works with SauceLabs and BrowserStack (CrossBrowserTesting TBD) automatically takes screenshots on failures works on Windows in addition to Linux and OS X automatically produces boilerplate code for step definitions, which you can copy, paste and edit file watcher reuses the browser sessions and can run only the tests you tag, to maximize development speed See More
selenium-webdriverjs: driver.get('http://www.google.com');
driver.findElement(webdriver.By.id('q')).sendKeys('webdriver');
driver.findElement(webdriver.By.id('btnG')).click(); WD.js: browser
.get("http://www.google.com")
.elementById('q')
.sendKeys('webdriver')
.elementById('btnG')
.click() WebdriverIO: client
.url('http://google.com')
.setValue('#q','webdriver')
.click('#btnG') See More
In cases where you want (I know your test cases must be atomic) where you really really want your test cases to run in a specific order, maybe if the current one rely on those of previous case, you can use Qunit by setting QUnit.config.reorder = false and your test cases will run in the order you've provided. See More
All frontend developers already know the ease that jQuery framework has brought to their lives, in handling DOM events and accessing elements. Since Qunit was built as a part of jquery (is even used by jQuery itself for unit testing) hence it makes testing of DOM elements a lot easier. See More