What is the best alternative to Buffalo?

Question

Built By the Slant team

Find the best product instantly.

4.7 star rating

Try it now - it's free

score 106 · Answer 1

Revel

Top Con

Non-idiomatic code

Top Pro

Comes bundled with a code reload tool

Revel comes bundled with a code reload tool which rebuilds the project on every file change. This code reload tool is also used to run, build and deploy the Revel application that you are building. See More

Top Con

Outdated

The world has moved past its MVC obsession. It's not the way the web works anymore. The good thing about go is that it's trivial to write a server applications (literally takes minutes). relying on a bloated, archaic framework is missing the point See More

Top Pro

Good examples easy to understand with simple emulated MVC behavior

Top Con

Dead

Thankfully, this abomination is no longer being developed See More

Top Pro

No need to find and install external libraries

Revel is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete. See More

Top Con

No official support for mongo

Revel does not come with any support for MongoDB, you can integrate third-party libraries but they have been reported to crash under heavy load. See More

Top Pro

Easy to learn for fast development

Specs

License:MIT

See All Experiences

106 16

score 139 · Answer 2

Gin-gonic

Top Pro

Extensive documentation

The documentation for Gin is broad and comprehensive. Most tasks that you will need to do relating to the router can be found easily in the docs. See More

Top Con

Might not be suitable for large backend applications

Gin-gonic is great for building a REST API for the backend if you want to develop an SPA using a frontend framework. But for anything that requires more features on the server side, it would be better to use a more "batteries included" framework. See More

Top Pro

Good for building REST APIs

Gin is a pretty minimalistic framework. Only the most essential features and libraries are included, making Gin a great framework for developing high-performance REST APIs. See More

Top Pro

Well-tested and numerous middlewares

The Gin community has created numerous well-tested middlewares that make developing for Gin a charm. Features include gzip, an authorization middleware, and sentry. See More

Top Pro

High performance

Gin runs 40x faster than Martini, and runs comparatively well compared to other Golang frameworks. See More

139 20

score 35 · Answer 3

Beego

Top Pro

No need to find and install external libraries

Beego is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete. See More

Top Con

Very opinionated

Top Pro

Built-in tool which watches for changes

Beego has a built-in tool which watches the code for changes. This tool (called bee tool) can be configured to run any task once the code changes. It can run tests or reload and rebuild the whole project. See More

Top Con

Very opinionated

Top Pro

Built in ORM

Beego's eloquent ORM is a simple and fast Object-Relational Mapping which helps with organizing the application's database. Beego examples and documentation all use the beego ORM. No need to learn to use and integrate another ORMs API. See More

Top Con

Non-idiomatic code

Top Pro

Captcha

Top Con

Builds may fail silently

Sometimes even though a build has failed, the pages will still render. Apparently it caches a previous build when the current one has a problem. This can be a frustrating though because it leaves you wondering why the page you are working on stopped working out of the blue. See More

Top Pro

Auto testing

Specs

License:Apache 2.0

See All Experiences

35 15

score 5 · Answer 4

Goji

Top Pro

Great performance

Goji is an abstraction layer over the standard Go library (which has support for HTTP) and added Einhorn support. There's probably very little you can do with Goji that you can't do with the standard library and a bit of elbow grease. This makes Goji an extremely lightweight and fast framework. See More

Top Con

Doesn't add a lot of functionality on top of the standard library

Most of the tasks that Goji is used for can be completed with standard library support without adding the overhead of an additional external library and without having the risk of Goji development being abandoned one day. See More

Top Pro

Socket manager integration

Goji integrates with Einhorn, which is a language agnostic socket manager. Making it possible to have websocket support in Goji. See More

5 0

score 16 · Answer 5

Martini

Top Con

No longer maintained

Martini is no longer being actively maintained. See More

Top Pro

Well documented

A lot of effort has been put into making the documentation as clear and helpful as possible. And it shows. The documentation is thorough and complete. Every part of the framework is explained in a way that's clear and understandable. See More

Top Pro

No unneccessary cruft

Martini is a very minimal framework. It only comes packed with the most essential features and libraries needed to develop a web application. If you need more features, you can install third party libraries. This way you only use what you need. See More

Top Pro

Flexible routing

Martini's routing is flexible and DRY. It supports parameters, wildcards and regex. See More

16 8

score 26 · Answer 6

Iris

Top Pro

No need to find and install external libraries

Iris is a "batteries included" web framework, which means that a lot of features already come out of the box. This way you don't have to spend time and find third-party libraries to integrate to the framework for most of the tasks you need to complete. See More

Top Con

Previously experience with net/http

Previously experience with the Go's standard net/http package is necessary for you to move forward with Iris. See More

Top Pro

Efficiency

Efficiency by using a light engine. See More

Top Con

Author copies code

Top Pro

Development

Top Pro

API

If you're familiar with expressjs or other modern web frameworks, Iris will make you feel at home. See More

Top Pro

More than feature complete

Top Pro

More than 250 examples

More than 250 examples for implementing web application. See More

Top Pro

Low amount of bugs

Most issues are questions, few bug reports and if a bug is found it's quickly patched. See More

Top Pro

Good for big projects

Iris is a good framework for big projects and the author helps solving problems. See More

See All Experiences

26 42