Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Element?
Ad
Ad
Syncfusion JavaScript UI Controls
All
5
Experiences
Pros
5
Top
Pro
Modular and written fully in TypeScript
All components have been built as modules to enable selective referencing, so only the components and features you need are included in your application.
See More
Top
Pro
Responsive and Touch friendly
All controls are touch friendly and render adaptively based on the device they are on to provide optimal usage experience on phones, tablets and desktops.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in themes
All 4 major themes are available such as Google's Material, Bootstrap, High contrast and Office 365's Fabric themes.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast release cycle
4 major releases per year and weekly patch release.
See More
Top
Pro
Free community license
See More
Hide
Get it
here
12
0
Webix
All
11
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
3
Top
Pro
A lot of widgets
Webix is one of the most extensive UI component libraries, second only to Sencha ExtJS. Not only considering the number of widgets, but also the API methods for manipulating these widgets.
See More
Top
Con
Commercial license
It's not free for commercial applications.
See More
Top
Pro
Views can be constructed using JavaScript without HTML
The most common way of working with webix is to create a JSON configuration of your view in JavaScript. When you use TypeScript, you get complete typechecking and intellisense in your IDE.
See More
Top
Con
Not very popular
Not really a reason to not recommend it. But it has still a small user base. It deserves a lot more attention.
See More
Top
Pro
Seems to be quite stable
Even the most complicated GUIs are bug-free most of the time.
See More
Top
Con
Not modular
The library is not modular (except for some additional more complex widgets). If you only need a few widgets, you still need to include the entire library.
See More
Top
Pro
Webix Jet
The webix Jet library adds all the required features for SPA development (routing, template loading, ...)
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely simple to implement.
To get started is extremely simple. It has a low learning curve.
See More
Top
Pro
Mature project
Regular updates and releases.
See More
Top
Pro
Great support from the webix team
The company behind webix is really quick in answering any questions you have on their forum or via email.
See More
Top
Pro
Awesome responsive material skins
Great design and icons pack.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$0-$469
54
4
CaptainCasa Enterprise Client
All
10
Experiences
Pros
9
Specs
Top
Pro
Easy clustering
See More
Top
Pro
Very fast dialogs
Very fast even with many controls. CaptainCasa Enterprise client is much faster than Vaadin when writting similar programs.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast and powerful
See More
Top
Pro
Longlife framework
See More
Top
Pro
CDI via EL
Separation of the backend code and the creation of the pages / Injection of the code (CDI) into the pages via expression language (EL).
See More
Top
Pro
High security
See More
Top
Pro
Server development with Java
No javascript is needed, everything is developed on the server with Java. Optimized roundtrip.
See More
Top
Pro
Free use
See More
Top
Pro
Good scalability
In addition to the extremely good performance, which already ensures that the system can be scaled well, clustering of the system is already provided for in the software architecture.
See More
Specs
Price:
FREE
Hide
See All
Experiences
0
3
0
Cirrus
All
5
Experiences
Pros
5
Top
Pro
Supports Flexbox and CSS Grid
Supports both Flexbox and CSS grid making it a great modern choice for designing web apps.
See More
Top
Pro
CSS Only
No additional JS/jQuery required to use.
See More
Top
Pro
Mobile Responsive
Extremely responsive and supports many smaller screens.
See More
Top
Pro
Open Source
Open source and quite actively maintained on Github.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
Much smaller than Bootstrap with just as much flexibility.
See More
Hide
Free
19
2
HTML5 Boilerplate
All
7
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
1
Top
Con
Not a complete solution
HTML5 Boilerplate is basically just that, a template or a basis on which to build an HTML page. It doesn't have much mark up or components out of the box. In other words, it doesn't provide all the components and tools needed to build a UI, it contains best practices and a generall template on which to build your UI.
See More
Top
Pro
Includes a comprehensive set of server configuration files
These configuration files may help increase performance of the webapp.
See More
Top
Pro
Includes Modernizr
Modernizr checks browser support for HTML5, CSS3, as well as a few other miscellaneous elements and allows for easily writing fallbacks if they're not supported.
See More
Top
Pro
Documented and undocumented versions
To help out newcommers to either programming in general or HTML5 Boilerplate specifically, the boilerplate includes in-depth docs that help understand how things work and why certain choices are made. The documentation is highly comprehensive going even as far as to describe every single line of normalize.css that the H5BP includes.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-browser normalization
H5BP includes normalize.css that will help fix inconsistencies in the way browsers render elements.
See More
Top
Pro
Performance optimizations
HTML5 Boilerplate theme doesn't only provide a base template for building your next modern site. It also has performance optimization features built into it which include stuff like html + js minification , image size reduction as well as css minification. This link here describes how to optimize your shiny new html5 site using these built in features.
See More
Top
Pro
Optional support for XHR and Flash
With optional support for XHR, we can use techniques such as XHR eval and XHR injections to optimize the loading of external scripts and significantly reduce page load times. Alongside XHR, built-in support for Flash means that you can use your old swf/flash content on your website, where you feel you're not ready for HTML5 yet.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
29
3
SmartClient
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Good documentation
There is an online showcase and a 100+ Getting Started guide
See More
Top
Con
Expense: Free LGPL version but expensive to leverage the real power of the framework
The Developer version starts at $745 / Developer
See More
Top
Pro
Advanced UI widgets
Layouts, grids, forms with a lot of builtin functionality.
See More
Top
Con
Difficult to integrate with other frameworks like React, Vue, Angular...
SmartClient has it's own layout mechanism and doesn't have anything like Kendo UI's framework support for Angular, React, Vue, ..
See More
Hide
Get it
here
2
0
Kendo UI
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Con
Expensive commercial tools [$699, $1,499]
The other core tools developed with Kendo are the commercial tools. There is the Professional version for $699 that will result in more jQuery UI widgets and client support. The $1499 "DevCraft" Complete edition gets developers the DevCraft .NET toolbox, testing and debugging frameworks and applications, as well as priority support.
See More
Top
Pro
Free Core tools
Kendo UI is separated into a commercial and open source frameworks. The core of Kendo UI is in the open source frameworks, but some usability and benefits of Kendo UI are lost without the commercial version.
See More
Top
Pro
Platform-based UI
Kendo knows what device it is being viewed on so it can adjust the UI accordingly. If a user is on a PC the user will see things differently than on a mobile device. Between iOS and Android the user will also notice a different as it pulls from the core UI of those core systems.
See More
Top
Pro
Theme Builder
An interactive tool that has been created to customize an apps theme. Users are able to select from many pre-defined themes, edit them, and download the theme to bring into a project.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
28
5
Zino UI
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Has fallbacks for unsupported HTML5 features
Although Zino supports all modern HTML5 features, it also has graceful fallbacks in case a user is using a browser that does not support those features.
See More
Top
Con
No theme support
Zino UI provides developers with four themes out of the box. But if a developer wants to create their own custom theme, Zino does not have a theme builder.
See More
Top
Pro
Compliant with web standards
Zino adopts various w3c conventions such as WAI-ARIA, SVG, and HTML5 Canvas.
See More
Top
Pro
PHP Server wrappers
ZinoUI can be easily integrated with any PHP framework or document through the PHP wrappers that it provides.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
1
0
Sencha Ext JS
All
14
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
7
Top
Pro
Comprehensive documentation
The Sencha documentation is comprehensive, with detailed documentation and a number of examples displaying the various widgets, tools and themes.
See More
Top
Con
Sencha CMD is bloated and frustrating to work with
To do any meaningful development, you are stuck with CMD. There is a gulp task that will handle the JS concatenation, but there is nothing outside of CMD that can handle theming in their ecosystem. In addition, CMD is based on Java, and is very heavy to run (600MB+ on Windows 10 to watch for changes in the application and recompile).
See More
Top
Pro
Supports MVC and MVVM development
See More
Top
Con
Sencha CMD (their CLI) is under documented, and out of date
Their latest release of CMD changed some configuration locations, but the documentation was not updated to reflect this. There is no reference guide on the json configuration files, other than the (unfortunate use of) comments in the generated json files.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports Web and Mobile deployment out of the one framework or codebase
See More
Top
Con
They use proprietary extensions to SASS, making it incompatible with anything but their Fashion processor
On the plus side, you do not have to install ruby alongside CMD for more recent versions of ExtJS. However, their Fashion processor seems to only be available through CMD.
See More
Top
Pro
Support for easy theming of applications
See More
Top
Con
Too often breaking changes between versions. They have little concept of backwards compatibility
Compounded by the fact that there are now two "toolkits" in the same "version" of ExtJS, with certain components not existing in one vs the other.
See More
Top
Pro
Visual Design tool available
The Sencha Architect product allows you to visually build your application, or rapidly prototype a system.
See More
Top
Con
The IDE tools are not sold separately - you must purchase the appropriate license pack
You get all the IDE plugins, even if you only need one. They should offer sell them individually, or continue to bundle them with a dev license pack.
See More
Top
Pro
IDE Plugins available
A number of plugins are available for some of the commonly used IDEs (eg: JetBrains, Eclipse, Visual Studio), providing templates, refactoring support, hinting and code completion/generation, as well as management of includes and other time-saving features.
See More
Top
Con
Difficult to integrate with 3rd party software
Any third party library you wish to include has to be wrapped in some sort of component adapter. You have to do a lot of tweaking to get the build process right if you want the 3rd party lib to be bundled into your application in the right order.
See More
Top
Pro
Charting package included
See More
Top
Con
Can be expensive
The framework is a commercial package, and the recent decision to start with a minimum of 5 users may rule out smaller developer teams or startups. Recently, they have started a program that allow essentially what are contractors to purchase single licenses, but not individual, independent developers.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
9
3
Dojo Toolkit
All
6
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Highly modular
Dojo Toolkit is a highly modular framework. It uses AMD modules and the module system is extremely powerful and easy to learn.
See More
Top
Con
Not able to keep up with the future of the web
The web is moving towards web components, something that Dojo does not implement. In its current state Dojo badly needs more abstraction and it also needs to provide some form of modern application architecture.
See More
Top
Pro
Consistent and complete
See More
Top
Con
Integrated first-party loader makes interoperability extremely difficult
See More
Top
Pro
Not only web apps
Dojo is not used only for web development. The widgets featured in Dojo can also be used to create mobile user interfaces.
See More
Top
Con
No startup-function
When the dojo-javascript is loaded, it will directly run the application. No chance to intercept with the options
See More
Hide
Get it
here
47
14
GitHub
All
25
Experiences
Pros
17
Cons
7
Specs
Top
Pro
Large community
GitHub is the largest code host on the planet with over 21.4 million hosted repositories and many users. It's unarguably the largest VCS used by developers worldwide and as such, it has a vibrant community that follows it resulting in many guides and tutorials for new users. Even experienced developers can always find an answer to any question they may have.
See More
Top
Con
Rule of thumb: 1GB per repository, 100MB per file
For most repositories this is acceptable, but for already large repositories with a long history, this may be a limiting factor.
See More
Top
Pro
Nice and usable UI
GitHub's UI is clean and intuitive. Each view is designed to not fill the screen with useless information. For example, the repository view displays only the most crucial data about that repo - on the top it displays the number of commits, branches, releases and contributors. When clicked, each of them will take the user to a page that displays more detailed information.
See More
Top
Con
Proprietary
See More
Top
Pro
Integrated issue tracking
GitHub has integrated issue tracking that makes hunting and solving bugs easy. Each project's issues page can be filtered by closed issues, assignees, labels and milestones. Issues are also sortable by age, number of comments and update time.
See More
Top
Con
Steals and sells your privacy
See More
Top
Pro
Provides free hosting for static websites
GitHub Pages is a feature that allows developers to create websites for their projects or anything they need a static website for, for free.
See More
Top
Con
Limited web browser support
Modern web browsers like Waterfox are no longer supported, breaking basic UI elements and making the site unusable.
See More
Top
Pro
Anyone can fork
Any user can fork a project and submit a pull request. If accepted by the owner, the fork will be merged with the master branch.
See More
Top
Con
No OAuth2 support
In order to sign in to GitHub, users have to sign up first with unique credentials for GitHub only, so no option to sign in with Google+ or Facebook.
See More
Top
Pro
GitHub makes it easy to find open source projects
GitHub is the largest host in the world for open source projects. Developers from all over the world fork and work on countless projects hosted on it. GitHub's search box is a powerful tool that allows developers to find open source projects in areas they are interested in and where they can immediately start to contribute. GitHub also has a page dedicated solely at exploring and finding open source projects, grouping them by each topic they cover. In the same view, GitHub displays trending repositories and sorting them by day, week or month.
See More
Top
Con
Owned by Microsoft
See More
Top
Pro
Gist (Snippets)
Gists is GitHub's way to easily share code, text snippets or any kind of information with the world. They are an easy way to share text and they work as Git repos, which means that they are forkable and versioned. They are also fully compatible with Git.
See More
Top
Con
Very inconvenient UI
Very hard to switch between projects.
See More
Top
Pro
Simplified team management tools
GitHub has easy and useful features to control teams, large and small alike. Team members can be given different powers on different projects, ranging from the ability to create them, to only being able to have read-only access.
See More
Top
Pro
Convenient continuous integration with Travis CI
GitHub can be integrated with Travis CI for code testing and deployment, furthermore it is free of charge for free open-source projects.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports Two-Factor authentication
GitHub has added another layer of security to their user accounts. This layer comes in the form of Two-Factor authentication. After it's enabled, GitHub delivers an authentication code by SMS, or by a free application for smartphones. After two-factor authentication is enabled, the authentication code is sent to the account owner's phone any time someone attempts to sign into their GitHub account. This means that only someone who has both the password and authentication code can sign into the account.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy integration with cloud hosting services
Many widely used cloud hosting services are easily integrated with GitHub. Any project hosted on GitHub can be set up on these services in seconds. Some companies that offer this feature are: Amazon Web Services Google Cloud Heroku Windows Azure
See More
Top
Pro
Support for mandatory code reviews
GitHub allows maintainers to make code reviews mandatory for any repository they choose.
See More
Top
Pro
Code search functionality
GitHub supports searching code. Whether it's from a specific project or from the whole website. What's more, GitHub has excellent SEO and you can easily find any line of code hosted on public repos on GitHub even from Google.
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent native apps
GitHub has native apps for mobile (iOS and Android), Windows and Mac, which make code deployment easier and faster.
See More
Top
Pro
Student discounts
GitHub offers very good student discounts along with other things, such as AWS credits.
See More
Top
Pro
Additional features for academics
For those with a valid .edu email or valid school ID there are additional benefits such as free private hosting. While it may take time for the account to be verified, it can easily be worth it.
See More
Top
Pro
Project management tools available
GitHub has a tool called (quite intuitively) "Projects". It helps teams to organize and prioritize the work they are doing by creating roadmaps and release checklists.
See More
Specs
Git:
Yes
SVN:
Yes (Limited)
Mercurial:
No
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free / paid
357
84
Semantic UI
All
13
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
5
Top
Pro
It's semantic
Uses semantic class names for its styling, making it easier to grasp and understand even for beginners looking to jump right in.
See More
Top
Con
Large file size
Packages are much bigger when comparing to Twitter Bootstrap or Zurb Foundation. Semantic UI is really extremely large and it would be better to use specific modules and components, rather than the whole thing.
See More
Top
Pro
Load only the components you need
The whole Semantic-UI package is well organized, with every component neatly set up with it's own stylesheet and JavaScript file. This way you can load only the components you need for each page, minimizing the load time and file size.
See More
Top
Con
Not maintained anymore
Use Fomantic-UI instead.
See More
Top
Pro
The elements offer a huge amount of customization, far beyond a framework like bootstrap
See More
Top
Con
Buggy
Contains a lot of UI inaccuracies, like wrong positioning, cannot mix classes, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Beautifully designed
Semantic UI has a futuristic and beautiful design. Many will satisfied with the design, especially when Semantic UI is used as a CSS framework.
See More
Top
Con
Not for beginner developer/unfamiliar with Javascript
Many features in Semantic UI uses Javascript customization such as for Modal. This is unlike Bootstrap that can add Modal just with customizing the HTML attributes. Developers who plan to using Semantic UI must be familiar with Javascript or JQuery to get the most out of it.
See More
Top
Pro
It'll have almost any UI component/element you may think of for your project
It includes tons of UI components that you may need for almost any type of project you may work on; And of course, you can always only pick what you need.
See More
Top
Con
Small number of classes
Once you wanna do something that is not mentioned in the doc - prepare to spend an hour, then give up and implement a custom "workaround".
See More
Top
Pro
Well documented
The documentation is easy to use, well written and has lots of examples each with their source codes.
See More
Top
Pro
Official support for third-party applications
There are several official implementations of Semantic UI for many popular libraries, frameworks and CMS. Such as Angular or Wordpress.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Just start code from the beginning of the journey, from first page of documentation.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
257
65
ArtDesignUI
All
13
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Support for all major web browsers
This includes IE 7 and its newer versions.
See More
Top
Con
Looks terrible
See More
Top
Pro
Great technical support available
The ArtDesignUI team offers great technical support to users.
See More
Top
Con
Pushes some really awful ideas
Loading splash screens, non-changing URLs because everything's loaded by JS, awful HTML generation from the PHP scripts. It's just a trash fire of bad.
See More
Top
Pro
Fully responsive
See More
Top
Con
Costs €50 - €250
And that's just a year of updates.
See More
Top
Pro
Class prefix to prevent conflict with classes from other CSS files
See More
Top
Pro
Full style control with JS
No need for CSS: width, height, border, icons, colors, etc...
See More
Top
Pro
Variety of transition effects
See More
Top
Pro
Full control of the position of all elements
See More
Top
Pro
Support images with different dimensions
See More
Top
Pro
Keys press listening and mouse wheel listening
See More
Top
Pro
Full navigation control
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$50-250
12
5
Vaadin
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Compiles Java to JavaScript
Vaadin uses GWT to compile Java code into JavaScript. This means that developers using Vaadin can write both frontend and backend code in Java.
See More
Top
Con
Weak scalability
Since Vaadin stores the UI state and logic in the server, this means that for every user interaction a request needs to be sent to the server and the client needs to wait so it can know how to react. This leads to higher traffic and load times.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Vaadin has a 'design mode' which allows developers to drag and drop components into a canvas and then provide the logic for every component. There are also a lot of third party tutorials and guides which help with the initial learning curve.
See More
Top
Pro
Top notch documentation
The book of Vaadin is a must have for every developer that uses Vaadin to make web apps. It is an excellent reference manual and all around a great tool for every Vaadin related need. You can find and download the pdf online or get it for free in almost any Vaadin sponsored conference. The online documentation is also very good. It has some tutorials and video guides. There is also a vibrant community which sorround Vaadin, for any problem you may have there is a big chance that someone has already asked and answered that question on StackOverflow or in the Vaadin forums. If not, it will probably be answered quickly if you ask it.
See More
Top
Pro
Modern, configurable theming
Vaadin comes with the Valo Theme, a Sass-based theme and engine that calculates styles based on configurable variables and making it easy to define a completely new theme with a few lines of SCSS.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to develop prototypes quickly
Vaadin has what is called the Vaadin Directory which is a repository of downloadable Vaadin components which can be easily used for development. To use something from the repository, you need to download the JAR file and add it to the project.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
18
9
UiKit
All
12
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
5
Top
Con
Messy code classes
Nested classes become complicated to read to obtain desired result.
See More
Top
Pro
Well architected
The code is pretty clean and follows well-defined conventions.
See More
Top
Con
Not very popular
UiKit is not a very popular framework, especially compared to other options. As such it may be hard to find learning resources other than the official documentation or it may be more likely for development of UiKit to be dropped than for another more popular framework
See More
Top
Pro
Ready to use themes available
There are plenty of ready to use themes available from the official website. You can choose the theme that you want to use from the dropdown menu and then download the CSS, LESS or SASS file for that theme to use for the website.
See More
Top
Con
Slow development
New features and updates trickle out over 6-12 month development cycles, bug fixes are more frequent but very slow and selective as well.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use.
When using UIKit classes, it is used with the ui- prefix which is very good. Components are explained straight-forward.
See More
Top
Con
Pre-built starter templates are now behind a paywall
Easier to use Joomla! or Wordpress starter templates without paying money for it.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in animation capabilities
UiKit has some built-in animation features which can be used to animate various components.
See More
Top
Con
Closed development
Development is mostly done in-house and not publicly available.
See More
Top
Pro
Great style even out of the box
UiKit has a pretty good and clean style even out of the box without any customization needed.
See More
Top
Pro
Very customizable
UiKit's rather minimal style can be easily customizable to create an entirely new look to fit the needs of the designer.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely modular
Every aspect of the framework is designed to be modular, this way designers can easily choose which components to add to their stylesheet without risking to damage the overall style.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
163
67
Foundation
All
15
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
4
Top
Con
Can be hard for beginners to grasp
Since Foundation is built to be customizable, it's default style may not be very appealing for most. While it's true that most production-ready websites shouldn't be using the default style of a css framework (they would all end up looking the same), this is even more true for Foundation.
See More
Top
Pro
Responsive design philosophy
Foundation allows designing for multiple screen sizes simultaneously easily, meaning your content will always fit.
See More
Top
Con
Needs more pre-built components
Example would be a scroll-spy not only for one cell, but cell to cell.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses REMs instead of pixels
Foundation uses REMs instead of pixels, meaning you don't have to state an explicit height, width, padding, etc, for every device. Simply put, using REMs means you can just state font-size: 80%; and have the whole component (and its nested elements) shrink by 20%. This is great for making your site mobile friendly. There is also a Sass function in Zurb that converts pixels to REMs so if you're used to thinking in pixels, you don't have to learn a different system.
See More
Top
Con
Not UMD pattern in core
This problem will bring attention when used with Angular, React and other JS framework. It is important to know that they create app version of this framework.
See More
Top
Pro
No style lock-in
Styles are purposefully undeveloped to encourage differentiation between different sites using Foundation.
See More
Top
Con
Documentation is a bit better than average
Documentation could be written better and clearer, with many more example than they currently have. Sometimes hard to find solutions for detailed css problems.
See More
Top
Pro
Block grid
Foundation has a feature called block grid. Block grid gives designers the power to divide the contents of an unordered list into a grid that is evenly spaced. Furthermore, Foundation also takes care of collapsing columns as well as removing gutters.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy customization
Just by looking at the name, Foundation merely provides designers with a foundation of sorts on which they can build their design. It can be customized easily through SASS, a powerful CSS pre-processor or by overriding the default CSS styles.
See More
Top
Pro
Easily extensible with a selection of add-ons
There's a variety of front-end templates, icon fonts, responsive table examples, SVG icons and stencils that help you quick-start or easily improve on your site.
See More
Top
Pro
Support for off-canvas navigation
Foundation comes with an easy way of creating off-canvas menus.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses Interchange to load responsive content
Foundation comes with Interchange, it makes use of media queries to load images responsively and create content that's suited to different browsers and devices.
See More
Top
Pro
RTL support
Allows easily changing text direction. <html class="no-js" lang="ar" dir="rtl">
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in form validation
Foundation comes with Abide plugin, an HTML5 form validation library.
See More
Top
Pro
Good mobile support
Foundation was one of the first frameworks to adopt a mobile-first philosophy. By focusing on mobile design first, Foundation makes designers think on what kind of content is important, relevant and interesting to the users without thinking too much on the space.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
186
80
jQuery UI
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Cross-browser compatibility
jQuery UI, like jQuery has great cross-browser and backward compatibility with the most popular browsers on the market.
See More
Top
Con
Slow development
jQuery UI development is rather slow and new features or components are not released frequently.
See More
Top
Pro
Globalization support
jQuery UI has internationalization (globalization) support.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
18
10
Materialize
All
15
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
4
Top
Con
Refuses to use the flexbox model
Even though Materialize states that it only supports IE10+, which supports flexbox quite well, with prefixes, Materialize has refused to use Flexbox.
See More
Top
Pro
Great-looking demo
See More
Top
Con
Not maintained anymore
See More
Top
Pro
Device agnostic
Since Materialize follows Google's guidelines for Material design, which in theory is device agnostic, Materialize itself is device agnostic too. It's designed to look good on every device.
See More
Top
Con
Large / heavy
267 kilobytes, minified, for the CSS and JS.
See More
Top
Pro
Large selection of components
CSS components: Badges, buttons, cards, collections, footer, forms, icons, navbar, pagination, preloader. JavaScript components: Collapsible, Dialogs, Dropdown, Media, Modals, Parallax, Pushpin, ScrollFire, Scrollspy, SideNav, Tabs, Transitions, Waves. Mobile-specific: slide-out drawer menu, toasts.
See More
Top
Con
Deprecated
No longer supported by their maintainers.
See More
Top
Pro
Responsive
See More
Top
Pro
Mobile navigation
See More
Top
Pro
Nice showcase of sites built with Materialize
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable
While the default style is not bad at all, Materialize also gives developers the ability to customize it and fit their own style, while still keeping in line with the Material Design philosophy. Along with the CSS files, designers can also download the SASS files which can be edited and compiled.
See More
Top
Pro
12-Column Grid System
See More
Top
Pro
Included icon font
See More
Top
Pro
Meteor.js integration by developers
See More
Top
Pro
Opinionated
Material design is very opinionated on how design elements should behave and look. The basics of which revolve around certain visual elements (physics, space, momentum and light) which are used to create specific UX elements. This is very helpful because it creates a consistent feel without making every design look the same. This can be seen in Materialize too, where each element may be customized but still it keeps the consistent look of the material design.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
179
85
Skeleton
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Top
Con
Not maintained anymore
No active development for two years.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
See More
Top
Pro
Responsive grid
See More
Top
Pro
Style agnostic
See More
Top
Pro
Vanilla CSS
No bells and whistles for Skeleton, it's just CSS.
See More
Top
Pro
Media queries
See More
Hide
Get it
here
68
37
Material Design Lite
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Developed by Google
Material Design Lite is a framework created by Google, who are also responsible for the creation of Material Design.
See More
Top
Con
Deprecated
No longer maintained
See More
Top
Pro
Very customizable
See More
Top
Con
On limited support
Google moved further development efforts to Material Components for the web.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
51
31
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop