Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Parole?
Ad
Ad
Rage
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Lightweight
A very lightweight media player, with almost no dependencies.
See More
Top
Con
Customization is hard
Customization is done in efl which uses a C-like syntax.
See More
Top
Pro
Fully customizable
Since it is written with efl there is basically everything possible that you can imagine.
See More
Hide
Free
11
1
MPV
All
10
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Needs no additional codecs
Everything MPV needs to play media files is contained within which means no outside codecs are needed.
See More
Top
Con
Minimal theme support
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates with streaming services
When used with youtube-dl.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of a typical GUI can be jarring to some
The minimal interface comes at the cost of beginner-friendliness. You need to know keyboard shortcuts by heart, settings are set in text files, right-clicking won't bring up a menu, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Minimal interface
Click to open files and get Video with sound (and passthrough of codecs like DTS etc) for a perfect cinema experience. Works okay for many files. Default window is not much more than a title bar - and if you drag/resize the window it resizes the video and leaves no empty areas. There is no visible control or display unless you use mouse/keyboard over the window. This is the best player to use unless you're going for a media center (then use MPV based Plex Media Player to display and play the Plex Server library).
See More
Top
Pro
Up to date
Always up to date, rapid development.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely responsive
See More
Top
Pro
Caches livestreams
Intelligently caches livestreams and enables jumping within the cached stream.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Mac, Linux, BSD, Android
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
1444
86
Music Player Daemon
All
7
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Multiple frontends available
MPD is a music player server that requires a separate client for user interaction. There are many frontends available, with the most popular being ncmpcpp.
See More
Top
Con
Not a music player, only a music server
You know how you need your browser (Firefox, Chrome, etc.) to access web pages? The browser is what YOU touch, see, and interface with, but in order for it to give you anything it must connect to a server that "serves" appropriate content. mpd is the server in this analogy, NOT the thing you actually use. The front-ends that are available for mpd, now those are music players.
See More
Top
Pro
Features provide a good music experience
While mostly bare-bones, Music Player Daemon does include a few features which help make it perform well. Buffer support ensures that your music continues to play without interruption even when your system is under an extremely heavy (but temporary) load, gapless playback starts loading a song just before it's needed so that it's ready to play the instant the last song ends. Meanwhile, crossfading allows your songs to blend into one another for continuous playback.
See More
Top
Con
May not conform to how you organise your library
MPD expects you to have all your music in a single folder (music_directory) and use symbolic links to retrieve other resources.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use with various outputs
See More
Top
Con
Poor tagging support
Does not support enough tag types.
See More
Top
Con
Requires a refresh every time you add music
MPD won't automatically refresh it's library - if you add music to your music folder, you will have to manually tell MPD to refresh or else it won't add the new music.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
59
12
MPlayer
All
11
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Needs no additional codecs
Everything MPlayer needs to play media files is contained within which means no outside codecs are needed.
See More
Top
Con
Not much documentation on the use and configuration
See More
Top
Pro
Easy shortcut keys
Quick skip ahead buttons and other shortcut keys.
See More
Top
Con
Contrary to review, some media that play well in vlc does not play in mplayer
See More
Top
Pro
No bugs , no lag in the video display
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't support directory playback
See More
Top
Pro
Works via CLI and has multiple frontends to choose from
Some of the more popular frontends include Deepin Media Player, GNOME MPlayer, KPlayer, KMPlayer, Rosa Media Player, SMPlayer and Xt7-Player.
See More
Top
Con
Lacks a built-in visualizer
See More
Top
Pro
Multiple forks
Some of the more popular forks include MPlayer2 and mpv.
See More
Top
Pro
Nice theme available to choose from
Also, the video window is separate from the main window making it less cluttered while playing audio
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Mac, Linux
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
53
11
DeaDBeeF
All
16
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
7
Specs
Top
Pro
A lot of plugins
DeadBeef has a lot of different plugins users can use to customize the interface, controls, and options.
See More
Top
Con
shuffle mode doesn't play an entire huge playlist (over 25 days)
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
DeadBeef uses few system resources, making it great for low end systems and for those requiring a media player that uses as few resources as possible.
See More
Top
Con
GTK-App
So there is basically no integration into non-GTK desktops.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely customizable
DeaDBeef has support for title formatting scripting, like foobar2000, which allows you to customize group patterns, the converter output, the window titles, etc. to your needs. DeaDBeeF also has a Design Mode, which allows you to add new widgets to the interface and move/delete existing ones.
See More
Top
Con
Terrible GUI
stop reinventing (ugly) guis. play music and get out of my way.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses GTK2 or GTK3
Users are able to choose a GTK2 or GTK3 build of the application to use within DeaDBeeF.
See More
Top
Con
Fails when opening a CUE file
Doesn't work even after 30 minutes of tweaking. Not as good as Audacious.
See More
Top
Pro
ALSA plugin allows bit-perfect pipeline to DAC
See More
Top
Con
Ubuntu's sound menu buttons don't work
DeaDBeeF shows up in the sound menu; however, clicking the next/previous buttons doesn't do anything.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports single-album CUE files
See More
Top
Con
Not as many options as other players
When it comes to options DeaDBeef may not have as many as other more prominent music playing applications.
See More
Top
Pro
Smooth and easy
See More
Top
Con
Clunky
I've seen people showing lyrics - but I can't figure out how to make that work. It's very difficult to use the 'design' function (unlike Guayadeque) to re-arrange and design the interface beyond something like a music list and artwork...
See More
Top
Pro
Offers a ReplayGain scanner out-of-the-box
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, BSD
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
233
36
Quod Libet
All
16
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
7
Top
Pro
Great for organizing and editing large collections
Quod Libet gives the user the necessary tools to edit and organize their library from within the app. There is support for tags as well to help you quickly find the music to fit your mood. To help you sort through large libraries, you can use the filters which help filter by genera or other search perimeters.
See More
Top
Con
(not) customizable
If you get a player, you want to make it yours. QL has a lot of stuff preconfigured, which you can't make as you want it. So base is great, but never makes it to be come yours.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of plugins available
Quod Libet offers many plugins including Last FM sync, lyrics support, and iOS sync.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't support playlist files
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful search syntax
Quod Libet has powerful search syntax options, which are very useful for creating smartlists or querying a big music collection.
See More
Top
Con
The GUI could have more eye-candy
There aren't any icons within the GUI, just text. This makes it feel more like a library management tool than an audio player. A little polish would go a long way here.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Despite very good library management capability, Quod Libet is easy to use. The base music player doesn't have too many features, making it a breeze to use. However, if you want to go deeper you can install plugins. These plugins can sometimes add complexity, but it's up to you what you do or don't want.
See More
Top
Con
Rhythmbox clone
Can't find many differences with Rhythmbox.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates with IoT / home audio
Sonos, Squeezebox, ...
See More
Top
Con
GTK app
It will need a bit more of resources in a non qt environment.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in Soundcloud support
See More
Top
Con
Plugins could be better integrated
Lyrics are not downloaded automatically in Quod Libet, while simply viewing lyrics could be made a lot more accessible. There is also little information pulled from last.fm - scrubbing works, as well as there being no artist info or suggestions for similar artists.
See More
Top
Pro
Folder view
Quod Libet has multiple viewing modes, including Folder (File System) hierarchy view. The only other program to have a good folder view would be Sayonara.
See More
Top
Con
Uses quite a bit of memory
Quod Libet can use up to 130 MB.
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable looks
There are a few controls that allow the user to change how the player looks.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast & Small
Fully functional and takes up little space on the hard drive.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
96
20
Audacious
All
12
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Streamlined player not weighed down by unnecessary options
Audacious is a classic music player at heart that has not felt the need to weigh itself down with an assortment of unnecessary options. Advanced functionality can be attained through plugins available from within the program.
See More
Top
Con
No manual sorting fields
There is no option to add one's own categories to the sorting fields.
See More
Top
Pro
Tons of plugins
See More
Top
Con
Updates are not very frequent
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
My audacious uses only 18.5 MB of RAM. It has a Winamp visualization style that's very minimized and convenient.
See More
Top
Con
No bit perfect output past 24bit
Audiophiles require this, and while most users might not notice a difference, audiophiles will appreciate the improved audio quality.
See More
Top
Pro
Support for Winamp themes
Audacious can switch from its GTK interface to one that matches the looks of the famous Winamp player. What's even better is that this interface supports any Winamp themes, which allows for more options.
See More
Top
Con
Buggy
For example when using Visual Studio Code and Audacious you get flicked out to the gnome login screen.
See More
Top
Pro
Folder oriented player, but able to play any music container and highly configurable
Lets you play, delete and even change metadata of your music files.
See More
Top
Pro
The easiest player for multiple types of files
It plays dts, aac multichannel, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Compatibility with most media formats
It's able to reproduce most of media formats without external plugins.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, BSD
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
227
40
cmus
All
12
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
4
Top
Pro
CLI only
CLI makes Cmus clean, fast and minimalist.
See More
Top
Con
No album art
cmus does not display album art
See More
Top
Pro
Does not use a lot of memory
Cmus only uses about 15 MB. This is a very small and light media player, which is ideal for people with low end hardware.
See More
Top
Con
CLI only
No graphical interface is available for cmus. Everything is done through CLI (command line interface).
See More
Top
Pro
Works very well with tags from MusicBrainz database
cmus will factor in additional data from the MusicBrainz database while sorting. For example sort orders for arist or album, and the original release date for an album (in the case of a re-release).
See More
Top
Con
Difficult to use
Cmus uses odd keyboard shortcuts such as "C" to pause, "E" to add songs to queue, and "4" to edit the queue.
See More
Top
Pro
Good library structure
A lot of music players may act more like playlist viewers rather than a music library. cmus sorts by Artist > Year > Album.
See More
Top
Con
Can't play wavepack files
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
A lot of music players will be slow when starting if they have huge libraries, but CMus starts fast no matter the library size.
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable keybindings for a personal experience
You can add keybindings for just about anything - including seeking (forward/backwards 1 minute, for example) which isn't supported by all music players.
See More
Top
Pro
No mouse required
cmus does not require a mouse as it runs in the terminal
See More
Top
Pro
Open source extensions and scripts
On GitHub you can find the official WIKI where there are a dozen extensions and scripts from color themes to a lyrics viewer and the ability to play YouTube songs.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
122
25
qmmp
All
10
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Offers some skinning options
Qmmp allows the user to drastically change its look via skins. It can use Winamp and Xmms skins, as well as a list of 12 skins made specifically for qmmp that can be found here.
See More
Top
Con
Interface is not particularly intuitive
See More
Top
Pro
Small single-window interface
Unlike more popular players that draw a huge window taking up the entire screen, with tons of knobs and menus popping out in new windows, qmmp gives you a single tiny window (that looks pretty much the same as Winamp used to look) with the basic controls and the playlist. The rest is available through a menu.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight and supports almost all formats
See More
Top
Pro
Plugin based
You can extend it with plugins.
See More
Top
Pro
Qt-App
No matter what OS or desktop you use Qmmp will integrate well
See More
Top
Pro
Clean and simple interface
See More
Top
Pro
Depends on libaries
It depends on libaries instead of big fat toolkits like gstreamer.
See More
Top
Pro
integrated file browser
See More
Top
Pro
Supports cue sheets
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
30
8
Guayadeque
All
12
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
5
Top
Pro
Starts fast
Most other players start rather slowly. This one is written in C++, and the end result is excellent speed.
See More
Top
Con
Development seems to stall since 2016
See More
Top
Pro
Doesn't use much memory
Once installed, Guyadeque only uses about 15 MBs.
See More
Top
Con
Sidebar lists multiple artists as one artist
A song with multiple artists labeled like "Artist 1; Artist 2; Artist 3" will not be displayed under all three artists, but rather under an artist labeled as "Artist 1; Artist 2; Artist 3." This makes actions as simple as queuing up an album with multiple artists a huge pain.
See More
Top
Pro
Well-implemented auto playlist
After music has finished playing, Guadayeque will play a similar type of music.
See More
Top
Con
Songs with differing artists in an album are displayed as separate albums
Suppose Album 1 by Album Artist A has a lot of songs by Artist A, with one song that features Artist B. Album 1 will get fractured across different artists in the sidebar.
See More
Top
Pro
Handles large music databases very well
See More
Top
Con
Interface is too busy
There's a lot shown on each of Guayeque's screens, and the more important buttons (play/pause and skip buttons) are small and hidden in the top left corner. Most users use music players in the background, meaning they will be switching back and forth with whatever else they're doing. As such, having larger buttons in a more prime location would be preferable.
See More
Top
Pro
Smart play
It automatically make a playlist song-by-song you hear from your music file. It finds similar songs. So, as you listen to a song an endless playlist with similar songs is about to happen..
See More
Top
Con
Sometimes freezes and crashes
This can happen if you change some settings i.e. add or remove tabs etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of niceties / options / integration
Last.fm shows your profile in the software and also displays info about the artist. Lyrics are downloaded automatically when you want to see them. Cross-fading between songs keeps music constantly coming, which is very important when using music to block out ambient sounds. VU (volume unit) Meters give you something to look at while the music is playing.
See More
Top
Pro
Clean appearance
Guayadeque has a clean yet customizable appearance.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
42
11
Plex
All
8
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Supported on many devices
It's pretty hard to find a NAS or STB that doesn't support Plex.
See More
Top
Con
Needs registration
You need a PLEX account even if you use it on your local LAN.
See More
Top
Pro
Accessible via web browser
A modern web browser is enough to get everything Plex has to offer.
See More
Top
Con
Proprietary software
Unfree software.
See More
Top
Pro
Added lots of media databases
Metadata for media files will automatically be updated by using media databases. This provides posters, movie trailers, descriptions, information about actors, etc.
See More
Top
Con
No gapless audio-playback
Plex still does not support gapless playback of audio files such as mp3 or FLAC.
See More
Top
Con
Playback error: This server is not powerful enough to convert video
More hardware requirements on Plex due to a useless/non-intuitive transcoder. When using lower spec hardware (eg SBC) Plex will not transcode or play HD+ videos. When compared to other packages (eg Jellyfin which transcodes nicely using FFMeg), Plex falls short on video playback and transcode settings to get videos to play (fastest/lightest option still fails).
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Android
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free / paid
57
18
XMMS
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Support for Winamp themes
XMMS is able to use any Winamp skin available.
See More
Top
Con
Looks are dated and may be unappealing
XMMS is pretty long in the tooth now and it's design definitely reflects that.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple and familiar music player
Many users should be pretty familiar with the interface as it has been built to match that of the popular Winamp player.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
12
5
Clementine
All
32
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
19
Specs
Top
Con
Slow development
Very little development work has been going on for a while as of mid-2017. Nobody is responding to bug reports.
See More
Top
Pro
Tag editing
Clementine features competent tag managing for all music files, be it album art or just simple text entries.
See More
Top
Con
Resource exhaustive
Clementine uses up to two orders of magnitude more CPU than VLC and takes up about 180 MB of memory, plus additional memory for spawned processes (tag-readers), while VLC uses 80 MB with no other processes.
See More
Top
Pro
Intuitive and fast to set up
Clementine is easy to get up and running with lyrics, equalizer, online info, etc., within minutes after installation.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't allow gapless playback
See More
Top
Pro
Sensible UI
A fork of the 1.X line of Amarok, Clementine favours usability over design trends.
See More
Top
Con
Bit perfect output no longer configurable
Audiophiles want to play their expensive HD albums.
See More
Top
Pro
Very good folder organization
Organizes your music folder based on the tags of your library.
See More
Top
Con
Too bloated by default with things like LastFM that can't be removed
When you install it, you get ton of internet radios and services plugins, that you can't remove, only turn off. There is also useless stuff like artist info that doesn't work and stuff.
See More
Top
Pro
Remote app for Android
There is a very good remote app for Android. The app lets you do a lot: from the usual volume controls to checking the lyrics on your phone. You can even download the songs from Clementine onto your phone.
See More
Top
Con
Not customizable
It doesn't allow you to modify its interface by dragging toolbars around etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports a lot of online services
Clementine includes support for services such as Ampache, Google Play Music, Spotify, and many internet radio stations such as Jamendo and Icecast. It's also possible to search all available sources (local and online) at once, as well as mixed content playlists.
See More
Top
Con
Horrible user interface and confusing layout
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in equalizer for custom sound
There is a built-in equalizer with many presets from genre-specific rock, pop, and party, to experiences such as large hall and live. You can also tweak it yourself and name your own preset.
See More
Top
Con
Ugly
See More
Top
Pro
Creates playlists based on past music you listened to
Clementine gathers the user's listening data to use for smart playlists. Clementine uses your listening history to play music similar to the music you play most - which typically is music you will like but maybe haven't discovered yet.
See More
Top
Con
Goes crazy with CPU and RAM
Takes its toll on your system's CPU and RAM.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in format conversion
Users can format any of their music files to a different format with Clementine's built-in format conversion tool.
See More
Top
Con
Default settings aren't great
Although this is subjective, you might have to do some tweaking before you like it.
See More
Top
Pro
Can display song lyrics
Fetches lyrics from several lyric providers.
See More
Top
Con
Ugly ressource hog with no features and buggy without hotfix
And yet Nr. 1 recommended because of nerds being accustomed.
See More
Top
Pro
Looks good and is really responsive
Unlike some other players in this list, Clementine doesn't seem to go unresponsive in the Ubuntu 16.04 system and looks really good with options for Visualization too.
See More
Top
Con
Slow to start in Gnome/Cinnamon
It takes about the same time to start as an IDE or Photoshop.
See More
Top
Pro
Decent library management
Clementine allows the user to move and organize audio files easily. Some examples include the following: It's easy to find a specific album song (find artist, select album, select song). It's easy to add songs to a playlist and queue the songs. It's easy to rename files from their metadata (artist, album, song number, etc). It's easy to add cover images. There are options to find duplicates, untagged songs, etc.
See More
Top
Con
Not a lot of documentation
Clementine does not offer a lot of documentation, which can make discovering its features a bit difficult.
See More
Top
Con
Buggy
Clementine is probably the most fully featured music player for Linux, however it has its own issues. It crashes and experiences occasional memory leaks that can slow down your system.
See More
Top
Con
Database regularly messes up
See More
Top
Con
Sometimes messes up taskbar
See More
Top
Con
Last.fm support is broken
See More
Top
Con
Cannot choose which tag profile to use
I use Tag2 (ID3:2.4) which doesn't seem to be the default tag used and I can't see a way to choose this.
See More
Top
Con
No way to search on filename
See More
Specs
License:
GPL-3.0-or-later
Release Date:
2016-19-04
Development:
Open Source
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
697
192
Amarok
All
8
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Loaded with features
Amarok contains the following features: Built-in equilizer Built-in lookup of songs and artists (Amarok will display Wikipedia articles or lyrics of songs that it can find.) Ability to add online playlists or streams, which is great for online radios such as soma or di.fm. Supported by Cinnamon Desktop media widget. Built-in iPod and iPhone support. Built-in MTP and USB support. Built-in music services for Ampache, gpodder.net, Jamendo, Last.fm, Magnatune, Amazine Music, MP3tunes, and podcasts. Amarok can configure, add, and import scripts.
See More
Top
Con
UI is not the most intuitive
While the design of the UI is different to most other music players, the way it actually functions can feel foreign to many and result in a lot of confusion.
See More
Top
Pro
Original design
The design of Amarok does not resemble most other music players. It's definitely in a class of its own.
See More
Top
Con
Resource hog...
See More
Top
Pro
Global keys to move from one song to another, rewind X seconds, advance X seconds, etc
The ability to assign global keys to move from one song to another, rewind X seconds, advance X seconds, etc. Other players do not have that feature.
See More
Top
Con
No seamless transition between tracks when they're on different files.
See More
Top
Pro
Search in the playlist while seeing other songs
You can search for songs in the playlist... without adding a filter that prevents you from seeing the other songs. That way you can find e.g. the song that has been played before House of the Rising Sun. Using other players you can not search for songs in the playlist without hiding the songs that are not looked for.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't feel very responsive
This is particularly the case with the play/pause button: it feels like there's a delay from when the button is pressed to when the music actually starts/stops.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
56
23
Lollypop
All
16
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
5
Top
Pro
Super intuitive way of organizing and browsing albums and artists
You can view all the albums you have in one long list. Clicking on one of them will bring a popup at the bottom of the screen where you will see a list of all the songs on that album.
See More
Top
Con
GTK App
Its a GTK app so integration in other desktops is terrible it also uses GNOMEs ClientSideDecorations so it will break many window managers.
See More
Top
Pro
Works fast and reliably
See More
Top
Con
No equalizer
Lollypop still does not have an equalizer.
See More
Top
Pro
Super flexible layout
The latest version has a good full-screen layout and is very responsive. Goes very smoothly from full screen to minimal player (also being a GTK+ app).
See More
Top
Con
Good party mode
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates with the MPRIS sound menu
This applies for most players in the "Linux world", but not for all. Therefore I consider it worth mentioning.
See More
Top
Con
No In-App Volume Control (0.9.242)
It has no in-app volume control, it has to be managed through system 'Sound control/Applications'
See More
Top
Pro
Huge development
There is constant improvements, librem and gnome3 is possibly the future.
See More
Top
Con
Requires a well organized music collection
Lollypop will be a pain to use if music is badly tagged. The setup is a one time thing, but it can be a pain to organize a large library.
See More
Top
Pro
Cloud music
Lollypop allow you to play music from the web (iTunes charts and search from Spotify).
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates well with many desktop environments
One example being the conditional use of client side decorations (a.k.a. header bars) depending on the currently active desktop environment.
See More
Top
Pro
Good party mode
See More
Top
Pro
Clean, light and works very well.
The only one that can play a lot of files without to stop.
See More
Top
Pro
Queue option lets you change what's playing on the fly
You can add songs to a queue, and then re-order or remove songs as you please. It works similarly to a temporary playlist.
See More
Top
Pro
Online radio integration
The newest version features a nice interface for adding, browsing, and playing online radio stations. This gives you access to more music than you would normally have, which can help expand your music library for free.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
86
35
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop