What is the best alternative to Nginx?
Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
Configuration is as good as the manuals go. As soon as you have to configure it by yourself, it becomes a lot more difficult due to a rather obtuse system of configuration with long and confusing variable names, which has become infamous among web developers. See More
Jetty was not designed to be an application server, rather it was built from the ground up to be a collection of components that provide HTTP and servlet services. This results in Jetty being very flexible as well as the following benefits: Very simple to extend and/or replace components with customized behavior. The integration of Jetty into development tools like maven can be very flexible as the components that control the layout of a webapp can be updated to run an unassembled application from source rather than an assembled WAR. Very easy to remove features that are not being used to save on memory and CPU costs. Due to this flexibility Jetty can be used in the following use cases: A stand-alone traditional web server for static and dynamic content A dynamic content server behind a dedicated HTTP server such as Apache using mod_proxy or mod_jk An embedded component within a java application As a component to build an application server or Java EE server For a full list of software powered by Jetty go here. See More
Because Jetty is built by an assembly of simple components it is very easy to work with. Where possible, features are added by aggregation of components rather than creation of complex deep/optional APIs Assembly and configuration can be done by the java API, the jetty XML configuration file, which is an IOC style mapping of XML to POJO APIs, other IOC/component frameworks such as Spring and Plexus, OSGi activators, and other XML to POJO mappings such as XBeans All APIs are public which has resulted in all of the Jetty code being very well maintained and easily understood. See More
Kestrel is fairly new and doesn't yet have the full suite of security features that you might find in a more mature server. It's recommended to run IIS, Nginx, or Apache in front of it set as a reverse proxy to handle incoming connections. The connections are then passed off to Kestrel after preliminary handling. Because of Kestrels young age, it doesn't have a full defense against attacks which includes, but isn't limited to, appropriate timeouts, size limits, and concurrent connection limits. See More
Kestrel was built to be fast, so the developers had to cut out some of the higher tier features. Kestrel was designed to push requests and that's it, so if you want additional features it's recommended to run a full-fledged web server in front of it. You can see a full feature list in the specs section of this recommendation. See More
Help millions of people make better decisions.
Each month, over 1.7 million people use Slant to find the best products and share their knowledge. Pick the tags you’re passionate about to get a personalized feed and begin contributing your knowledge.