Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to LilyTerm?
Ad
Ad
Terminology
All
13
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
5
Top
Con
Configuration is sometimes complicated and non-obvious
There's a "Settings" menu for configuration, but more options there would make it easier. Downloading themes and extensions from the official repo would be a big plus.
See More
Top
Pro
Scalable fonts
Font size in Terminology automatically scales according to window size. When you resize the window, so does the text.
See More
Top
Con
No True-Color support
Not able to display a modern full range of colors, yet.
See More
Top
Pro
Looks smashing
Terminals are often very dull looks wise, not so with terminology.
See More
Top
Con
Scrollback is completely nroken
Scrolling back the emulator inserts random lines from other places in the scrollback buffer in between the actuall output lines. Thus it is impossible to see a correct copy of the previous output.
See More
Top
Pro
In-terminal video, picture and thumbnail support
Thumbnails, pictures, and videos can all be rendered in-terminal, based on the directory listing or mouse interactions. For instance, using "ls" on a picture folder will produce a list of thumbnails instead of only the filenames.
See More
Top
Con
No scrollbar
The lack of scrollbar in Terminology makes navigation difficult. But you can use keys for it.
See More
Top
Pro
Splitable
You can split windows, like in terminator.
See More
Top
Con
Too many bells and whistles
Some people feel that Terminology has too many features that are not suited for a terminal, but for a window manager instead. For instance, viewing thumbnails, watching videos and gifs, and other similarly flashy things just feel like eye candy and should not be part of a terminal emulator.
See More
Top
Pro
Visually customizable
It is very customizable in every aspect of the visual options.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates well with Enlightenment WM
Terminology is part of the Enlightenment WM packages. As such, it integrates really well with Enlightenment and other tools in the package.
See More
Top
Pro
Block copy
You can copy text in blocks.
See More
Top
Pro
Copyfree licensing
Terminology uses the Simplified BSD License. As it is a copyfree license, it tends to minimize license incompatibilities, legal compliance requirements, and various other complexities that may make it difficult to understand certain licenses.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
106
20
xterm
All
16
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Lightweight
Xterm is a very lightweight terminal. It requires few resources, allowing it to run well even on lower-end machines.
See More
Top
Con
No native transparency
Xterm does not natively support transparency (though it can be emulated if needs be).
See More
Top
Pro
Used in almost every Linux distribution
If you master xterm, you won't have to learn another tty, since it is in almost every Linux distribution.
See More
Top
Con
Bad defaults
Very small default size. No way to know to how to configure size.
See More
Top
Pro
Stable, well-tested
See More
Top
Con
No tabs
See More
Top
Pro
Standard with X Window system
Xterm is installed as standard software with the X Window system, and is there even when installing other terminal emulators.
See More
Top
Con
It blinks
If it blinks for you too, you can try this: man xterm and then press Shift+G.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports sixel images
See More
Top
Con
Has few dependencies
Has dependencies like xbitmaps.
See More
Top
Pro
Shows full characters for wide fallback fonts
Many terminal emulators that deal with wider fallback fonts (i.e. double-wide characters in CJK fonts) truncate display of wide characters, show Unicode "missing glyph" characters, or simply fail to display the characters at all. XTerm is "smart" enough to simply take up the extra space needed to show such wide characters.
See More
Top
Con
Historical source code
The stories behind terminal emulation beyond their classical representatives (of which xterm is simply the most long-lived) are somewhere inbetween subtly irritating to downright surreal.
See More
Top
Pro
In about 30 years, it had only one issue, and that was fixed quickly
See More
Top
Pro
It is fast and responsive
See this.
See More
Top
Pro
Many modern terminals emulate xterm
Many terminal applications, such as OS X's Terminal.app and iTerm2 (among others), all claim xterm or xterm- variants as their $TERM and aim for support of xterm's escape sequences. Many command-line applications will assume or even hard-code escape-sequences and behavior for xterm and those terminals emulating it.
See More
Top
Pro
Configurable via Xresources
X Toolkit resources and xrdb predates what is currently called "theme". Although one needs to read man, mitigates most listed cons
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
63
21
Tilda
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Easily accessible drop-down
The drop-down function in Tilda does not get in the way and can be accessed at any time with a keyboard shortcut.
See More
Top
Con
Contains some annoying bugs
Tilda can be buggy at times. For example, if you don't close it before shutdown, it may prompt you to reconfigure it all over again on the next boot.
See More
Top
Pro
Highly customizable
There are tons of customizations you can make: from adding colors to text, turning backgrounds transparent, setting the size to be "maximized", toggling scrollbar on and off, adjusting orientation/borders/animation, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Few dependencies
Tilda is a very minimal and lean terminal emulator. It requires very few dependencies and the amount of resources needed is small.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports transparency
You can monitor information displayed by applications under Tilda.
See More
Top
Pro
Tabs support
Tilda supports tabs. By default: to open a new tab press Ctrl + Shift + t. To move through them: Ctrl + PgUp/PgDn.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
42
4
Sakura
All
10
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Lightweight
Sakura has very few dependencies, it's very lightweight, and great if your computer does not have many resources.
See More
Top
Con
libvte/gtk
It has gnome dependencies.
See More
Top
Pro
True colour support
Supports full 24-bit color.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't provide many configuration options
Sakura does not have any advanced configuration capabilities.
See More
Top
Pro
Great unicode support
Even shows combining chars correctly.
See More
Top
Pro
Few dependencies
See More
Top
Pro
Starts quickly even on lower-end machines
Sakura's quick start-up time becomes noticeable with lower-end machine's such as Eeepc 1015PX (Intel Atom 1.6 Ghz and 2 GB of RAM).
See More
Top
Pro
Tab support
See More
Top
Pro
Easy zoom
Sakura supports zooming through keyboard keys (Ctrl+'+' to zoom in and Ctrl+'-' to zoom out).
See More
Top
Pro
Ready for wayland
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
55
6
Xfce4 terminal
All
13
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Good for systems with low specs
Like other applications included in the Xfce package, this terminal emulator is very lightweight and doesn't require many resources to run. This makes it perfect for systems that have low specs.
See More
Top
Con
Cannot set text color for character under cursor to background color
Suppose you have a dark background with a light cursor and light foreground color: the light cursor will cover up whatever character it is on, so that you cannot read it. There is no option to set the foreground color for the character under the cursor to what is normally the background color. Such an option would allow you to read the character under the cursor.
See More
Top
Pro
True transparency
You can set the transparency of the Xfce4 terminal on any amount you want, out of the box.
See More
Top
Con
Execution in xfce4-terminal - e mode is not always functional
See More
Top
Pro
Tabs support
Xfce4 fully supports tabs and tab-based navigation.
See More
Top
Con
Resizing text resizes window
See More
Top
Pro
Almost everything is customizable
You can configure size, color, background, etc.
See More
Top
Con
No profiles
There's no profiles or profile-based customization in Xfce-terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Composition effects
Xfce4 terminal takes advantage of xfce composition effects.
See More
Top
Con
Can't scroll on spamming text
When text generates too fast, you can't scroll it, so you just can't read anything in such moments.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast rendering
See More
Top
Con
Does not support sixel images
See More
Top
Pro
Can be switched to a drop-down terminal
You can configure the Xfce-terminal to act as a dropdown terminal if you want, which makes for greater ease of use.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
134
18
Konsole
All
19
Experiences
Pros
13
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Directory and SSH bookmarking
Konsole can bookmark ssh and telnet sessions, directories, and it can open tabs in a folder for easy access.
See More
Top
Con
KDE Library dependencies
While not an issue if using KDE, when trying to use this terminal in other desktop environments or window managers, there will be a large amount of dependencies tied to the app, making for a large install size. For those trying to keep their desktop lean, this may be an issue.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports split-view
Konsole supports split-view which splits the window into two (or more) konsole instances. This is very useful for people who work a lot on the terminal and don't want to spend time navigating between different windows or tabs.
See More
Top
Con
Uses a lot of memory
Although it's very fast, konsole has to use a lot of resources in return. It may use up to 30 MB per instance, depending on the number of tabs and the task at hand.
See More
Top
Pro
True color and Smooth font
Konsole supports true color and smooth font. This made konsole more fanstatic than other terminal emulators.
See More
Top
Con
No good support for powerline character even with patched fonts
See More
Top
Pro
Embeddable into the desktop
Konsole can be embedded into desktop so it's always easily accessible, but not in the way of other windows.
See More
Top
Con
Can mess terminal keybinds
Most the of the time, the terminal keybinds are just ignored to obey the kde keybinds. Can be configured though.
See More
Top
Pro
Export of output in plain text or HTML format
By going to file > save output, you can send all screen output to a text file.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of DECSCUSR support
Konsole don't allow changing the cursor shape with extended DECSCUSR sequences, using instead the temporary-profile hack. This causes pain when working in (neo)vim inside Konsole.
See More
Top
Pro
Support in Dolphin file manager
Konsole can be accessed by pressing F4 in Dolphin, which is convenient for when the user needs to open the terminal in a particular spot of the file structure.
See More
Top
Con
No support for double-width characters
Konsole no supports double width characters. For powerline users, you need to add a space after powerline glyph.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports font ligature
Most terminals in Linux don't support font ligature, while many modern fonts such as PragmataPro or Fira Code already have decent coverage of font ligature. Support for font ligature makes user experience and font management much easier (i.e. you don't need to keep two copies of the same font just to use in the console)
See More
Top
Pro
Helps to identify tabs using custom icons
Users can associate each bookmark or SSH session with a custom icon, thus giving a visual hint to quickly identify a tab when a lot of tabs are open.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports advanced color schemes
In particular solarized.
See More
Top
Pro
Notification alerts about activity in a terminal
Konsole can monitor activities and notify the user through system notifications when a certain activity happens. This is a very customizable feature too: you can write scripts that can use this feature and notify you for whatever you want.
See More
Top
Pro
Exceptionally fast
Konsole is usually very fast. It boots up very quickly and takes less than a second (averages to 0.25-0.59 seconds) to display files of up to 600 MB.
See More
Top
Pro
Customize and save profiles
Profiles containing different settings can be created, saved, and loaded. Color schemes, window transparency, scroll bar, key bindings, start-up commands, window border, and menu bar can all be customized according to the user's needs.
See More
Top
Pro
Allows CTRL-SHIFT-c/v within WSL Ubuntu as well
Good menu to customize.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
157
25
Eterm
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Requires very little memory
Eterm requires only around 9 MB of RAM per terminal instance.
See More
Top
Con
Focuses too much on looking pretty
Eterm focuses a lot on being customizable and looking good, instead of focusing on features or power.
See More
Top
Pro
Transparency support
Eterm has pseudo-transparency support. This allows the user to make windows look less imposing (particularly in Terminal emulators which can comprise large chunks of text).
See More
Hide
Get it
here
4
1
rxvt-unicode
All
20
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
9
Top
Pro
Low memory usage
Rxvt-unicode uses very little memory and takes a lightweight approach without losing many important functionalities. A single instance of urxvt takes about 6.5MB-8MB of RAM.
See More
Top
Con
Unicode characters that are too wide are blanked instead of clipped
If a character in a backup font is wider than the base font, urxvt substitutes the non-displayable character. A large letter space will show the wide characters, but the result is not reasonably spaced. There is a patch from 2014 that the urxvt maintainer will not merge.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be daemonized to reduce resource usage
For those who want to lower their system's resource usage, rxvt-unicode allows for daemonization. This way you can run several instances of urxvt inside a single process.
See More
Top
Con
Requires work to look acceptable
Out of the box, rxvt-unicode is not too pleasant to look at. Some understanding of Xresources is required for updating its appearance. That being said, the experience of customizing it can be very rewarding.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports terminal transparency
Changing the transparency of the terminal is allowed for in rxvt-unicode. This not only makes for eye candy but is also good for GUI usability.
See More
Top
Con
Requires work to configure useful functionality (clickable URL's, font scaling, tabs)
See More
Top
Pro
Minimum dependencies and simple text config
See More
Top
Con
In daemon mode you can lose all your terminals
Because of sharing the same process terminal windows cannot be killed without sacrificing all other open windows. That becomes even more dangerous if you use multiple graphical managers without overriding socket with RXVT_SOCKET.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports multiple font types
Multiple font types can be displayed flawlessly in rxvt-unicode.
See More
Top
Con
Unicode rendering is buggy
There are a few references to urxvt's buggy rendering, such as unicode combining characters, which bled through during scrolling.
See More
Top
Pro
Handles bold text colour properly
Displays characters with text attribute bold actually as bold glyphs.
See More
Top
Con
Bloated
Exists because Xterm is complete trash. Although it has a lot of features, you will most likely never use them all.
See More
Top
Pro
High performance
Rxvt-unicode is much faster than most alternatives.
See More
Top
Con
No support yet for 24-bit "True Color"
Though this is still not available, you can download the patched version for 24bit, here.
See More
Top
Pro
Unicode support
International language support is provided through Unicode.
See More
Top
Con
Font size cannot be changed on the fly with the mousewheel
Sometimes you may need to enlarge the font to improve readability, or shrink it to have more real estate and "hawk's eye" view of data. In rxvt you need to change the configuration file or use these commands: $ function fontsize {printf '\33]50;%s%d\007' "xft:Dejavu Sans Mono:size=$1::antialias=false"} $ fontsize 22
See More
Top
Pro
Proper wrapping support
During selection and pasting wrapped text doesn't break into lines at place of wrapping.
See More
Top
Con
No option to have a "reverse color" cursor
While you can choose the color of the cursor and the character under the cursor, there's no automatic "reverse color" for the cursor. This makes it impossible to use rxvt-unicode if you have a light background terminal and a dark background editor.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast text rendering
Rxvt-unicode has very fast text rendering, being able to render hundreds of MB of text in a very short time.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in Perl interpreter
It has a built-in Perl interpreter, meaning that no install is needed. Simply run urxvtperl.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
391
56
Alacritty
All
11
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Blazing fast rendering with GPU-accelerated
Written in Rust with a philosophy focusing on speed and simplicity, Alacritty is one of the fastest terminal emulators out there.
See More
Top
Con
Cannot into ligatures
Alacritty does not support ligatures in Fira Code, Iosevka etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Looks good
Alacritty looks very slick on Linux, especially with GNOME or i3.
See More
Top
Con
Unreliable Font Rendering
Like a box of chocolate you never know what you're going to get.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple configuration
The configuration file is very well made and easy to use. You can fine tune your preferences to perfection in a matter of minutes.
See More
Top
Con
Sacrifices basic features for raw performance
The Suzuki GSXR of terminals. Or your ditzy, blonde high school cheerleader; fast and pretty but not a lot going on under the hood. Eschews a negative developmental philosophy towards including said functionality, with the official reason cited in project documentation as "Not within the realm of a terminal emulator" and ostensibly, "best left up to other tools such as terminal multiplexers" [such as screen or tmux]. Which is unfortunate when you factor in speed against terminal with the functionality built in vs their reliance on 3rd party tools: tmux on alacritty: 'find /usr' time: 3.234s, cpu: 72% tmux on konsole: find /usr' time: 1.777s, cpu: 96% See issue here.
See More
Top
Pro
Comprehensive font options
Alacritty can be configured to adjust line spacing (height), letter spacing (width), and individual character horizontal/vertical positions.
See More
Top
Pro
Has support for image previews in w3m and ranger
See More
Top
Pro
Has text ref-low when window is resized
See More
Top
Pro
Fast and simple but with true color support
It's simple and fast like xterm or urxvt but with truecolor support which is a big plus if you use a terminal based code editor. Basically Alacritty has all the features you need and nothing you don't (if you're using tmux for multiplexing).
See More
Specs
Font Ligatures:
No
Configurable:
Yes, via automatically reloading YAML configuration file
GPU Acceleration:
Yes
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
219
37
ROXTerm
All
6
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Drag and drop
ROXTerm supports dragging and dropping items into the Terminal window.
See More
Top
Con
Uncertain future
The original developer, Tony Houghton, declared the death of Roxterm on 2016-05 at https://sourceforge.net/p/roxterm/discussion/422638/thread/60da6975/?limit=25#3fc9. In 2018, work began to resume on Github rather than Sourceforge (https://github.com/realh/roxterm/issues/1) but the future maintenance is uncertain.
See More
Top
Pro
Advanced D-Bus usage
In ROXTerm, users can use D-Bus to configure terminals from other applications, allowing for communication between multiple computer programs.
See More
Top
Con
Not for regular users
ROXTerm is made for power users who spend most of their time on the terminal. For a regular user using ROXTerm it would be an overkill.
See More
Top
Pro
Includes a configuration manager
ROXTerm includes a configuration manager which can easily be run by selecting Configure... in the terminal's menu, or by simply running roxterm-config. You can then easily swap configuration files with other users, manage profiles, and customize things like color schemes or keyboard shortcuts.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports GTK3
ROXTerm uses the latest GTK widget set which is great a multi-platform toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
18
5
Gnome Terminal
All
22
Experiences
Pros
13
Cons
8
Specs
Top
Pro
Good integration with other GNOME-Shell apps
Gnome Terminal integrates well into Gnome Desktop, as well as the rest of the core Gnome Shell apps.
See More
Top
Con
No background transparency
While this used to be a good option, background transparency has been removed.
See More
Top
Pro
Exceptionally fast
The Gnome Terminal is usually very fast. It boots up very quickly and takes less than a second (averages to 0.25-0.59 seconds) to display files of up to 600 MB.
See More
Top
Con
Gnome library dependencies
While not an issue if using Gnome, when trying to use this terminal in other desktop environments or window managers there will be a large amount of dependencies tied to the app making for a large install size. For those trying to keep their desktop lean this may be an issue.
See More
Top
Pro
Support for tabs
Gnome Terminal allows for the use of tabs by right clicking in the terminal window and selecting open new tab or by pressing Ctrl+Shift+t by default.
See More
Top
Con
Font rendering doesn't look good
it seems that everything is fatter per default.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports scrolling
You can scroll up and down in Gnome terminal. And if you wish to do so, you can also hide the scrollbar.
See More
Top
Con
Heavyweight
To achieve a large amount of speed, Gnome Terminal has to use a relatively large amount of memory to run. It may eat up to 15-30 MB per instance, depending on the task it's doing.
See More
Top
Pro
Solarized colors
Gnome Terminal comes with a solarized colorscheme installed and ready to use.
See More
Top
Con
No tab names
Since Gnome 3, the feature for manual renaming of tabs was reaped off.
See More
Top
Pro
Content re-flow when window is resized
When using the GNOME Terminal, if you have long lines of text inside it and then you change the window, the text will also automatically update according to the new window size.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't support font ligature still in 2019
gnome-terminal uses vte for its terminal emulator, and vte simply doesn't support font ligature (yes, it's 2019). This is what its maintainer thinks about it. He really thinks supporting font ligature breaks terminal's grid, like he doesn't understand a font that's monospace is a monospace no matter if it has ligature or not.
See More
Top
Pro
Notifications upon command completion
This isn't in the current release but in development versions you get notifications when commands are complete. This is great for long-running commands, relieving you from continuously checking to see if your command is done.
See More
Top
Con
Incomplete vt handling due to using libvte
See More
Top
Pro
Configurable keybindings
Configurable key bindings can be used for copy-paste, sending SIGINT, switching tabs, and so on.
See More
Top
Con
Restrictive license
See More
Top
Pro
Transparency
We can change the alpha canal and see through the terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Open Source
See More
Top
Pro
Drop-down support
Drop-down functionality can be added to Gnome Terminal via an extension.
See More
Top
Pro
Clever memory management
Multiple terminals are managed from one gnome-terminal instance that takes up about 45 MB. Adding on other instances (with 10k lines of used buffer), each terminal requires about 16 MB of memory.
See More
Top
Pro
Getting better and better over time
Tilix used to surpass gnome-terminal but right now they are both the best options unless you have special needs.
See More
Specs
License:
GPLv3+
Source repository:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
128
27
st
All
18
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
8
Top
Pro
Low memory usage
st is built to serve as a lightweight terminal emulator. It's very light and doesn't require many resources to run, making it able to run well on older and low-end machines.
See More
Top
Con
Configuration requires recompiling
Though recompilation takes seconds, knowledge of C header files is required for customization (though it's pretty easy to do for someone who knows how to edit config files).
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely simple architecture
st consists of a single C file that takes seconds to recompile. This also makes it very easy to understand and customize.
See More
Top
Con
Text is cut off when resizing windows
In the vanilla build, when reducing windows, lines do not wrap, they are cut off. When the window is made large again, some of the text is missing.
See More
Top
Pro
24-bit "True Color" support
st supports color escape sequences for a full 16 million 24-bit color spectrum, instead of the typical 256 colors.
See More
Top
Con
Crashes when some characters or colored fonts are displayed
See More
Top
Pro
Support for fontconfig
There is full XFT (X Free Type interface library) and fallback font support through fontconfig in st. If your selected font is missing a certain glyph or symbol, but one of your other installed fonts has it, it will be shown.
See More
Top
Con
No scrollback by default
The best way to perform scrollback is to use a multiplexer (such as tmux, screen, or dvtm) if you want scrollback and reverse-search support.
See More
Top
Pro
Copyfree licensing
Copyfree licensing implies that the user has the freedom to copy, use, modify, and distribute what he/she possesses.
See More
Top
Con
New features means installing patches
Just to get copy/paste support and scrolling, you have to install patches. And it's not that intuitive for a beginner.
See More
Top
Pro
Image previews
Handles image previews (e.g. in ranger) way better than other terminal emulators.
See More
Top
Con
Internal border/margins
Doesn't support internal margins.
See More
Top
Pro
Patches are great
The patches on the site are great. Scroll back, hide the mouse, etc.
See More
Top
Con
Source code edits (aka configs) need to be redone after updating
See More
Top
Pro
Minimalist
Hackable and lightweight.
See More
Top
Con
Imperfect fontconfig support for CJK characters
It [st] doesn't seem to use CJK fonts provided by fontconfig while other programs use such fonts.
See More
Top
Pro
Blazing fast
it is extremely responsive and fast, even on older computers.
See More
Top
Pro
Clean
The terminal doesn't have any bloated features nobody uses. It is very minimal and extendable.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
185
37
Wterm
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Con
The official repository is inactive
The official repository for Wterm seems to be inactive, with open bug reports as far back as 2006.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
Wterm is very fast despite using very little memory.
See More
Top
Pro
Memory efficient
Each instance requires only about 6.3 MB of RAM, even with 10.000 lines of buffer.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
8
3
LXTerminal
All
7
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Lightweight
LXTerm is the official terminal for the LXDE desktop environment, which is a very light DE in itself. So LXTerminal is a very good choice for lower-end systems.
See More
Top
Con
Not very customizable
LXTerminal, like XTerminal and UXTerminal, is not very customizable and extendable (at least not as much as other terminal emulators).
See More
Top
Pro
Multiple tabs support
LXTerminal supports working with multiple tabs and tab-based navigation.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in transparency
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable keyboard shortcuts
See More
Top
Pro
Lighhtweight and ticks most boxes.
See More
Top
Pro
Customize-able background/foreground colors
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
22
10
QTerminal
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
2
Top
Con
Window resize
Resizing the window does not resize the contents, like rxvt-unicode does.
See More
Top
Pro
Font ligatures
QTerminal support font ligatures found in fonts like FiraCode.
See More
Top
Con
Strange default paste action
When pasting into QTerminal, one has to be careful as it assumes immediate execution.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
Compared to many terminal emulators, QTerminal is lightweight with fewer dependencies than most.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
7
0
MPV
All
10
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Integrates with streaming services
When used with youtube-dl.
See More
Top
Con
Minimal theme support
See More
Top
Pro
Needs no additional codecs
Everything MPV needs to play media files is contained within which means no outside codecs are needed.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of a typical GUI can be jarring to some
The minimal interface comes at the cost of beginner-friendliness. You need to know keyboard shortcuts by heart, settings are set in text files, right-clicking won't bring up a menu, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Minimal interface
Click to open files and get Video with sound (and passthrough of codecs like DTS etc) for a perfect cinema experience. Works okay for many files. Default window is not much more than a title bar - and if you drag/resize the window it resizes the video and leaves no empty areas. There is no visible control or display unless you use mouse/keyboard over the window. This is the best player to use unless you're going for a media center (then use MPV based Plex Media Player to display and play the Plex Server library).
See More
Top
Pro
Up to date
Always up to date, rapid development.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely responsive
See More
Top
Pro
Caches livestreams
Intelligently caches livestreams and enables jumping within the cached stream.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Mac, Linux, BSD, Android
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
1444
86
Extraterm
All
9
Experiences
Pros
8
Specs
Top
Pro
speed
not the fastest ever, but for me its a good comprimise of features vs performance
See More
Top
Pro
Cross platform
See More
Top
Pro
Supports tab, splits and panes
You can set up your own layout with multiple splits and tabs.
See More
Top
Pro
Shell integration
The shell integration makes it possible to group in command output in "frames" which show success/failure.
See More
Top
Pro
Image support
You can view images and other data types like audio directly in the terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Keyboard based text selection
It is possible to go into a cursor mode where you can select text just like in a text editor. It even supports multiple cursors.
See More
Top
Pro
Global shortcuts
You can configure global shortcuts to open the terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Keyboard friendly "Command Palette"
Just like Sublime, Atom and VSCode you can easily search and find commands from the drop down Command Palette.
See More
Specs
License:
MIT
Keep this Behind an Admin panel:
----
Hide
See All
Experiences
0
5
1
Tilix
All
22
Experiences
Pros
18
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Multiple sessions inside a single window
In addition to tiling, Tilix supports placing separate sessions in tabs or switching from one to another through a sidebar.
See More
Top
Con
Unmaintained
Bugs and pull requests are not processed.
See More
Top
Pro
Tiling makes for ease of use
The user can split terminals horizontally or vertically, according to their needs or preferences.
See More
Top
Con
No font ligatures
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates nicely into GNOME 3
Tilix follows the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines and uses the UI patterns of this desktop environment.
See More
Top
Con
Takes a bit more memory than Gnome terminal
Would've expected this to be more lightweight.
See More
Top
Pro
Good alternative to Terminator
Tiling and ability to type into multiple terminals simultaneously is Terminator's 2 most significant features. Tilix has them as well.
See More
Top
Con
Heavyweight
Tilix has quite a lot of dependencies and takes ~100MB of RAM when running.
See More
Top
Pro
Configurable shortcuts
Many actions in Tilix can be triggered with configurable shortcuts.
See More
Top
Pro
GNOME Human Interface Guidelines
Tilix follows GNOME HIG whereas gnome-terminal doesn't. GNOME should use Tilix as their default terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Transparent background
Unlike the standard GNOME Terminal, Tilix supports configurable background transparency.
See More
Top
Pro
Fancy looks
Tilix has that new GNOME look, with a HeaderBar. It can also be disabled.
See More
Top
Pro
Able to write into multiple terminals simultaneously
Inside a session, you can select multiple terminals, which will receive the same input simultaneously.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be used as a drop-down terminal
The new 1.30 version of Tilix supports a quake mode enabling it to work as a drop-down terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely fast
As fast as gnome-terminal, if not faster.
See More
Top
Pro
Copy on select
See More
Top
Pro
Faster than Gnome Terminal
When running commands it feels snappier.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy
See More
Top
Pro
Copy as HTML
You can copy text from the terminal as HTML for embedding in web settings.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
See More
Top
Pro
Solarized themes built-in
Great support for solarized color schemes, and no setup is involved.
See More
Top
Pro
Terminus can notify you about finished tasks and perform actions based on terminal output
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
145
20
MuPDF
All
10
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Super fast
It was written in C and opengl, so your hardware was used fully.
See More
Top
Con
No print option
See More
Top
Pro
Vim-mode shortcut keys
Super easy to use with rapid response.
See More
Top
Con
No two page mode
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent for presentations
See More
Top
Con
Not enough functionality
If you want "minimal," you got it.
See More
Top
Pro
Annotation capability
With mupdf-gl, you can do most of the annotations and comments.
See More
Top
Con
The annotation does not have good shortcut key support
See More
Top
Con
Cannot customize shortcut keys
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Android, iOS
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
25
5
Guake
All
11
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Drop-down terminal
You can hit F12 (by default, though it's customizable) to open a terminal overlay, Quake-style, as a drop-down from the top of the screen.
See More
Top
Con
Not cross-platform
Linux only, and additionally targeting GTK3.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports transparency
Transparency is particularly useful for when you need to refer to the information displayed by application under Guake window.
See More
Top
Con
Not very responsive
Occasionally, Guake slows down and is not very responsive.
See More
Top
Pro
Hotkey support
Guake is very fast and easy to open with a customizable hotkey, meaning there's no fiddling with menus or icons.
See More
Top
Con
No font ligature
Guake uses vte for its terminal emulation, and vte simply doesn't support font ligature (yes, it's 2019). This is what its maintainer thinks about it. He really thinks supporting font ligature breaks terminal's grid, like he doesn't understand a font that's monospace is a monospace no matter if it has ligature or not.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely customizable
Guake's appearance is very customizable: from the transparency to the width and height of the window. You can also choose which key to use for toggling the terminal window.
See More
Top
Pro
Available in many popular distro repositories
Guake is available in a lot of repositories for the most popular distros. This makes it very easy to obtain and install on almost any system.
See More
Top
Pro
Shortcut key F12 can be used to toggle
The global shortcut key, F12, can be used to easily toggle the terminal window.
See More
Top
Pro
Tabs support
Guake supports tabs, while working with them is very easy.
See More
Top
Pro
Can choose byobu as shell
You can choose byobu as shell, by adding a line to /etc/shells : " /usr/bin/byobu" and get guake with byobu ... sweet!
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
138
20
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop