Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Polo?
Ad
Ad
krusader
All
6
Experiences
Pros
6
Top
Pro
Versatile
Has everything you might wish for and more.
See More
Top
Pro
Root mode
Dangerous but sometimes useful.
See More
Top
Pro
Multiple tabs
Tabs with other listings, and options to move the tab to the other side.
See More
Top
Pro
Advanced renamer
Via package krename.
See More
Top
Pro
Directory compare
Compare 2 directories on content or file/date and sync them.
See More
Top
Pro
Archive support
Browse archives as folders.
See More
Hide
0
55
7
Worker
All
4
Experiences
Pros
4
Top
Pro
Innumerable button-click file ops are integrated
Rename files, move to other directories and extracting archives are of course a given...BUT THERE'S MORE! Convert media formats, make symlinks, CHMOD, change graphic formats, integrated GPG, filename UPPER/lowercase adjustments and more with just one button click!
See More
Top
Pro
Remote access
Worker supports access to remote machines through various ways (ssh, ftp, rsh, http and webdav).
See More
Top
Pro
Low system requirements
The system requirements for Worker are pretty low, making it a great option for lower-end machines. The reason why they are pretty low is because Worker is basically made of just X11 libraries.
See More
Top
Pro
Configuration GUI
Worker has a built-in configuration GUI.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
39
12
PCManFM
All
15
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
5
Top
Pro
Lightweight
General use, and most operations, are snappy and responsive.
See More
Top
Con
Can't extend with scripts
Unlike Nautilus and Caja, this can't extend with scripts. If script extension is added it can become a really good FM.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple
PCManFM is a very lightweight and simple file manager.
See More
Top
Con
Some operations are slow
Because it tries to be as lightweight as possible and tries to use very little RAM. This can unfortunately lead to it being slow sometimes.
See More
Top
Pro
Can open folder as root
PCManFM can open different folders as root, this way you don't have to use the terminal to move around files for which you need root permission.
See More
Top
Con
Right-click option choice limitation
You can only choose one option in the right-click menu instead of being able to select multiple at once.
See More
Top
Pro
Auto mounts drives
PCmanFM automatically detects and mounts available drives.
See More
Top
Con
Uses a bit more RAM than thunar
Thunar uses less RAM but you pay in slower startup and stability.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports "quick-directory" typing
While in a PCManFM window, typing either a "~" or a "/" will automatically start typing into the location bar, allows for tab completion, and pressing Enter goes straight to the typed directory.
See More
Top
Con
Directory trees can be confusing
Starts you off in a directory tree that is your home folder as if that is the very top. (Just use a single tree as it actually is and expand appropriately).
See More
Top
Pro
More RAM is available for other processes, and the system uses less swap
Overall, the system becomes faster.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses tabs instead of new windows
Tabs can practically be managed just as in a browser, so you don't end up with windows open all over your desktop. New tabs automatically start in the same location.
See More
Top
Pro
Fastest starup
PCmanFM is the fastest GUI file manager to start.
See More
Top
Pro
No back seat driver
Does not obstruct professional work by engrossing root warnings.
See More
Top
Pro
Compact
Supports fast failure resolving in bulky configuration and log folders.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
226
60
Thunar
All
27
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
15
Top
Pro
Minimal dependencies
Unlike Nautilus, which requires the whole GNOME desktop, thunar just depends on some XFCE utilities & GTK.
See More
Top
Con
No integrated search option
See More
Top
Pro
Supports "quick-directory" typing
While in a Thunar window, typing either a "~" or a "/" will automatically start typing into the "address-bar" and pressing enter goes straight to the typed directory.
See More
Top
Con
No usable image view mode
Setting view to "icons" doesn't satisfy. The icons are too small to see the image.
See More
Top
Pro
Non-recursive find
In a thunar window, any non-directory typing will search in the current directory for the filename that you type (non-recursive, unlike Nautilus)
See More
Top
Con
Simplified action bar
The action bar on Thunar is very simple and doesn't have as many features and buttons as other file managers. It only has a back, forward, up, and home buttons as well as the folder path.
See More
Top
Pro
Select by Pattern
Select multiple files in the current folder using a wildcard pattern.
See More
Top
Con
Does not integrate well into Gnome
See More
Top
Pro
Custom actions are easy to set up
Use Custom Actions to add right-click options to do things like Open as Root, Open Git GUI, etc. You can filter the file types and filename patterns that the actions will show up for. To add an "Open as Root" action, go to Edit, Configure custom actions. Assign a name and a description. Set Command as "gksudo xdg-open %f" (you'll need to install gksudo since pkexec won't work). Pick an icon (I prefer "changes-allow"). Under Appearance Conditions, select Directories, Text Files, and Other Files.
See More
Top
Con
Tree sidepane missing features
When the sidepane is in Tree mode, it does not show Places (Favorites). It also doesn't collapse folders (like Windows Explorer), adding to clutter.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports forward/back mouse buttons
Supports the M4 and M5 mouse buttons for forward/back, similarly to most browsers.
See More
Top
Con
Requires GNOME dependencies to support common features
Thunar relies on GVFS to support mounting disks or accessing web folders, however since GVFS is a third party GNOME library and made for the use in the GNOME environment its often incompatible to Thunar stable releases which results into crashes and other issues
See More
Top
Pro
Supports renaming files in bulk
With also predefined functions as insert (date, numbering,...), search/replace, etc ...
See More
Top
Con
No double pane support
Working all in all quite good out of the box, but the windows are too big. Drag & drop is working, but useless on a one-window file manager. Even for novice users it's too weak for everyday work.
See More
Top
Pro
Split View
Browse files in two directories with a dual pane view.
See More
Top
Con
Requires plugins for some basic functions of modern file managers
See More
Top
Pro
Does the job
But nothing more.
See More
Top
Con
No Split View without a patch
Which can be a deal breaker.
See More
Top
Pro
Keypress to search in folder
While in a Thunar window, typing a filename automatically selects the first matching file in the current folder.
See More
Top
Con
Moving files
Has serious problems moving files. It may stop abruptly with some undefined error message and the files would be gone afterwards.
See More
Top
Pro
Can assign custom shortcuts to scripts in XFCE
Thunar can use the editable accelerator feature of XFCE. Run xfce4-appearance-settings in terminal, go to settings tab, check "enable editable accelerator". Now open any command in Thunar menu, hover to a command, i.e. your custom "places" or your custom command, then press any combination to assign a shortcut to it. be careful though, cause it will also remove the shortcut from other command.
See More
Top
Con
Won't write to any removable media that has been on an Apple machine
Removing dot-files that Apple puts on the media (like .fseversd) allows Thunar to write to it.
See More
Top
Pro
Tabs
Use tabs to open fewer windows. New tabs automatically start in the same location. Tabs can be detached.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't integrate well with archive manager other than Xarchiver
"Extract here" function doesn't integrate well with archive manager other than Xarchiver (e.g. Ark, GNOME Archive Manager).
See More
Top
Con
Image thumbnails sometimes wrong
There seems to be a bug where sometimes images get the wrong thumbnail, this can lead to data-loss.
See More
Top
Con
Slightly unstable
Thunar crashes some times on file moves, copy-pasting etc. The developers are working on it, but it's taken a while.
See More
Top
Con
No progress bar when copying/moving file
Either this is problem with XFCE4 or Thunar, but there's no progress bar when copying/moving file with Thunar. The only way to tell whether it finished is CPU usage.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
146
52
Double Commander
All
18
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
6
Specs
Top
Pro
Multi-platform (Linux, Windows, MacOS X)
You can use same tool in all desktop OS environments.
See More
Top
Con
Apparently only one developer
See More
Top
Pro
Source code is available (true free software)
If the developer loses interest there is at least the possibility that someone else will pick up the torch.
See More
Top
Con
Freeze after mouse double-click on directory list item
See More
Top
Pro
Configurable
Lots of options allow you to configure DC the way it suits you best: Tools, Fonts, Colors, Hotkeys, Mouse, Fileviews, Plugins, Layout, Toolbars, Tabs, Icons etc.
See More
Top
Con
Much slower on Linux and Mac than on Windows
See More
Top
Pro
Directory Hotlist
Save shortcuts to folders. Organize them in a treeview with submenus. Define a name and sorting for each entry.
See More
Top
Con
Source code written in Pascal language
But this does not affect users negatively. It's just programmers problem.
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful tcmd-like search tool (alt+F7)
See More
Top
Con
Not developed anymore for Mac
See More
Top
Pro
tcmd-like multi-rename tool (CTRL+M)
See More
Top
Con
Can't edit files on remote FTP servers
See More
Top
Pro
DC uses TCmd plugin API
so you can use documentation from Total Commander for writing plugins. WCX (packer), WDX (content), WFX (file system), WLX (lister).
See More
Top
Pro
Closely follows TotalCommander UX
For instance, the 'Settings | Layout' pane is quasi-identical to TCs.
See More
Top
Pro
Very sophisticated
Although it is lightweight and simple to use, it can do very sophisticated tasks, like copying files from directories which have a certain extension or file size or have a certain text pattern in them. Also, it's very customizable and stable.
See More
Top
Pro
It's that good, you can replace tcmd on windows too
See More
Top
Pro
Source code written in (Object) PASCAL
It's all a matter of perspective. I'm not for an argument about IDE's, frameworks etc, but to me that's a big plus. I think it should be a tie, it's either a pro or a con or should that be neither a pro nor a con. It just depends on context.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Mac, Linux, BSD
License:
GPL-2.0-only
Technology:
Free Pascal
User Interface:
GUI
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
1116
309
Krusader
All
15
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
3
Top
Con
KDE dependencies
If you don't use KDE, you'll be forced to install quite a large amount of KDE libraries.
See More
Top
Pro
Great two-pane interface
See More
Top
Con
New releases are infrequent
It can be seen in https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=krusader.git that maintenance work is done in a continous fashion, but no new releases are provided. Even though it is perhaps the more feature-rich file manager.
See More
Top
Pro
Folder synchronization
See More
Top
Con
Interface can be overwhelming
See More
Top
Pro
Handles most archives. There is little difference in behaviour between an archive file and a regular folder.
See More
Top
Pro
Virtual file systems
Search results as example saved into virtual folder and can be accessed later. All file operations may be performed on items in search results as if they were files in single folder.
See More
Top
Pro
All common operations can be done with keyboard efficiently
In addition, shortcuts can be easily renamed. Unlike Dolphin and many others.
See More
Top
Pro
SFTP support
See More
Top
Pro
Many operations like copying and moving files can be queued
Long running operations can be queued. There is no point in doing them in a parallel way, as speed decreases dramatically.
See More
Top
Pro
Can view and edit many files
Even editing a file inside a .zip file. Has hexadecimal viewer embedded for binary files.
See More
Top
Pro
Filename association and instant console availability
See More
Top
Pro
Multi-rename tool
See More
Top
Pro
Searching capabilities and copying/deleting/moving in background
See More
Top
Pro
Custom commands can be added to the menu easily
And they can use the current folder, the selected files....
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
128
48
Nemo
All
12
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Elegant
The most stylish among all FMs.
See More
Top
Con
Changing the background color or font type for customization is not practical
You have to do it with finding and editing the relevant CSS files. No buttons, menus or sliders for such customization.
See More
Top
Pro
Extendable
Nemo can be extended to have additional features through third party plugins.
See More
Top
Con
Incomplete mimetypes
Like all nautilus forks it allows you to run svg-files due some incomplete mimetype coverage.
See More
Top
Pro
Easily open as root
Option to open folder as root from within the right click menu.
See More
Top
Con
Depends on GNOME
Depends on gnome toolkits an libraries.
See More
Top
Pro
Easily open file location in terminal
Option to open a folder in terminal, which can help executing commands such as bash.
See More
Top
Pro
Has dual pane functionality
This functionality was removed in Nautilus and Dolphin at least in Ubuntu-Gnome, but Nemo kept this option, making the obvious functionality of cut, copy and paste much easier.
See More
Top
Pro
Double pane and search by name capabilities
See More
Top
Pro
Supports bookmarking
You can bookmark folders that you open often, this way you can easily access them from anywhere while using Nemo.
See More
Top
Pro
Good networking options
Supports ftp, ssh and samba connections.
See More
Top
Pro
Queues file operations
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
203
73
Pantheon Files
All
6
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
4
Top
Con
Buggy
Was missing basic network connect features when Loki launched.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Pantheon files (like the Pantheon IDE) is very stylish and minimal. It's minimal and very easy to use. The most useful commands are there in plain sight, on the toolbar or the sidebar.
See More
Top
Con
Not very advanced
Pantheon files (like Elementary OS itself) does not offer many advanced features since it's mostly aimed at beginners.
See More
Top
Pro
supports natural sorting of file names
Dolphin and Deepin File Manager support it, too.
See More
Top
Con
Unstable software, not a file-manager
really, really dangerous stuff. Crashes and take your work/files into the nowhere - aware.
See More
Top
Con
Not intunitive
In some instances it is impossible to create a new folder. There just isn't right-click option or icon for it anywhere.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
40
18
Dolphin
All
17
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Immenseley configurable
As with any KDE app, Dolphin, allows adding or modifying toolbar buttons and keyboard shortcuts.
See More
Top
Con
May be a little slow on startup
Dolphin can be a little slow on startup (depending on distro, hardware etc...). Startup time can vary from a couple of seconds to up to a minute.
See More
Top
Pro
Can split views
Dolphin supports splitting the view in two navigational areas, this way you can navigate two different directories at the same time.
See More
Top
Con
Can hang on remote file systems
It doesn't cope well with remote file system nicely like sshfs or any samba, like when network is not responding/very slow. It just hangs.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrated terminal
Pressing F4 with any opened folder on a mounted path opens a console within dolphin.
See More
Top
Con
"Type" column too verbose
Despite having a large enough monitor, if you keep the size of the browser window small, the "Type" column (in "Details" view mode) insists on including the complete multipart MIME string, making the column so wide that trying to limit its width makes the column useless. Sorting by "Type" renders the list into an incomprehensible mess.
See More
Top
Pro
Also has a refresh option
Dolphin is without a doubt the best fully functional and easy to use and multitask with. Dolphin also has a refresh button which no other File manager has. It's great for tracking a large files transfer; that's what file managers are for - good common sense.
See More
Top
Con
Poor optimization on later versions
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to extend with plugins
Dolphin follows KDE's philosophy of being extendable and configurable. It can easily be configured and customized through plugins.
See More
Top
Con
Too simple
Feels weird on KDE because it has less customizing options Konqueror and any other KDE app have.
See More
Top
Pro
Auto mounts flash drives
Dolphin automatically identifies and mounts external flash drives.
See More
Top
Con
Can't perform ROOT actions
Developers set a constraint in Dolphin that deny Dolphin to run with root permissions. Hence, if you want to perform an action that require root permissions, such as rename a file in /etc/ folder, you are forced to use terminal or switch to another file manager.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast at opening graphics folders
Pictures with or without previews is optional and selectable at the touch of a button.
See More
Top
Pro
Does not use third party libraries
Unlike all those GTK-based file managers it does not have to rely on external written software for its functionality because KF5 is KDE SOftware and developed alongside.
See More
Top
Pro
Keeps its state
It starts with last opened folders.
See More
Top
Pro
Fully supports HiDPI
Supports HiDPI displays.
See More
Top
Pro
Automatically centers items
In icons view mode, the space between files gets stretched so that there is never and annoying empty space at the right side of the window.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
369
132
SpaceFM
All
13
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Incredibly customizable
Just right click on any menu or menu option (including the context menu itself) and you'll be allowed to customize it. This lets you add support or integration for features you find missing.
See More
Top
Con
Ugly
See More
Top
Pro
Minimal dependencies
It only needss gtk, udev, desktop-file-util and shared-mime-info which is available in most systems.
See More
Top
Con
Some operations are slow
Because it tries to be as lightweight as possible and tries to use very little RAM. This can unfortunately lead to it being slow sometimes.
See More
Top
Pro
Highly extensible
Functionalities can be extended by user scripts as plugins. Some scripts can also be downloaded from https://github.com/IgnorantGuru/spacefm-plugins/wiki. Plugins can be exported too.
See More
Top
Con
Not for everyone
See More
Top
Pro
Tab and panel support
SpaceFM supports up to 4 individually customizable panels as well as multi-tabbed file management.
See More
Top
Con
Ugly
See More
Top
Pro
No back seat driver
Does not obstruct professional work by engrossing root warnings.
See More
Top
Pro
Desktop management support
Can be used to set wallpaper and desktop icons with high configuration support.
See More
Top
Pro
Easily open folder as root
Can open different folders as root, this way you don't have to use the terminal to move around files for which you need root permission.
See More
Top
Pro
Gtk-2 and 3 support
Available in gtk2 and gtk3.
See More
Top
Pro
Intuitive and extendable through plug-ins
Great UI, easy to use and configure, several plug-ins available to make everyday tasks even easier.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
81
39
Caja
All
10
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Easy to configure
See More
Top
Con
Frequently very slow to transfer multiple small files
Folders move fine, but it chokes on files, where other browsers take seconds.
See More
Top
Pro
It has a reasonable set of features, out of the box
Not too much cluttered, but enough customizable.
See More
Top
Con
Mostly unconfigurable
There are not many ways to configure Caja to fit your needs. Besides what can be seen in the settings button you can't configure it further.
See More
Top
Pro
Caja script extension makes it more useful
Caja script extension adds your script in script menu, then passes the file name as a parameter. This allows you to run operation which is not included in Caja.
See More
Top
Con
Sort Order / Limited Configuration Options
It ignores special characters when sorting files and folders. Underscore, tilde, bracket, ASCII characters, .... everthing not recognized in numeric/alpha sorting. Also, I found no way to remove the triangle to reveal contents of sub-folders rather than opening... but I did quit looking after several seemly unalterable functionality issues.
See More
Top
Pro
Allows you to access remote or local locations
You can click the Files entry in the panel to access a specific location (remote or local), connect to a certain server (FTP, SFTP, SAMBA, etc.), access your bookmarks, open a new window, as well as to change its default functionality.
See More
Top
Con
Very slow to list thousands of files
Unusably so.
See More
Top
Pro
Open or run as administrator in the right-click-menu of the mouse
See More
Top
Pro
It just works
Customizable and clean, this is crushing that garbage nautilus, the overrated p.o.s. gnome destroyed.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
47
26
jFileProcessor
All
13
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Easy to run commands on selected files
Find/select files in sub-folders. run touch %f or cp %f /somefolder (this is a way to copy selected files in different levels, into 1 folder, flattening out the copy).
See More
Top
Con
Does not see attached phone files
No mtp:/ connected phone files.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy rename files script
Select files. regex to match pieces of filenames, rename adding, leaving out, and reusing saved pieces.
See More
Top
Pro
Groovy scripts to watch and act on files that get created/put into a folder.
So you can watch a folder and process files that come into it.
See More
Top
Pro
You can make your own file associations. You can make 3 types, per suffix, per filename, per exact file.
With exact file you can create a folder of job or desktop icon names. Double-click that file to run the job since it is tied to just that specific file.
See More
Top
Pro
Can make sftp connections
See More
Top
Pro
You can write a script to modify your list
Your script can modify contents in the list window it is working on.
See More
Top
Pro
Plugin scripts
Just put groovy scripts in menu-scripts folder and they will automatically run using currently selected files.
See More
Top
Pro
Run any groovy scriptable command on a list
Run commands on your lists: grep files to find stuff, delete/copy/move files, etc.. Even copy a file to a remote host and execute it.
See More
Top
Pro
Create and work with lists of filenames or any string
Search files and save to another file or a list window. Add or subtract one list from another.
See More
Top
Pro
Can do count only
Just count matching search criterion.
See More
Top
Pro
Good search
Search on modified time, file size, glob/regex name, folder depth; and/or on these and can do range.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-platform
Available for Linux, Windows, macOS - just needs java 7+ (written with 8).
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
0
6
0
Insight
All
4
Experiences
Pros
4
Top
Pro
Full ZFS support
It has full ZFS support including snapshots.
See More
Top
Pro
BSD 3-Clause
Its written under a real open license without copyleft.
See More
Top
Pro
No toolkits
It does not use freedesktop toolkits like polkit or dbus. It also does not use toolkits from other desktops like GNOME(GTK, ATK, GLIB, GIO etc.) or KDE(KF5/KIO).
See More
Top
Pro
Based on Qt
As Qt is a real multi-platform toolkit that is not developed for one desktop and platform.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
5
0
FTP Synchronizer
All
5
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Top
Con
Overpriced
Even using single license mode no longer functions correctly. No longer sending emails as it says it does.
See More
Top
Pro
Can sync multiple files across multiple websites in parallel
With FTP Synchronizer you can synchronize multiple files and multiple sites simultaneously.
See More
Top
Pro
Can schedule syncs
You can schedule when you want to synchronize a particular document for a particular website.
See More
Top
Pro
Very secure
Supports syncing over FTPS and SFTP.
See More
Top
Pro
Does not waste time by copying every file over
When syncing a folder, FTP Synchronizer intelligently finds out which files have been changed and copies only them.
See More
Hide
$49.95
10
2
nnn
All
15
Experiences
Pros
13
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Superfast
See More
Top
Con
CLI, default interface very simplified (supports mouse)
See More
Top
Pro
Rich set of plugins
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely lightweight (120 kb)
See More
Top
Pro
Unique navigate-as-you-type mode
See More
Top
Pro
Awesome new features being added in every release
See More
Top
Pro
Minimal configuration with sane defaults
Default options and navigation is simple to grasp.
See More
Top
Pro
Has a great wiki
See More
Top
Pro
Sessions
Save and resume sessions.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports cd-on-quit
Allows for quick switching between nnn and the terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Previews
The file manager has recently added support for preview hovered files using various methods.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates with the desktop environment and opens files in the default applications
See More
Top
Pro
Reasonably well-documented
However, it requires some prior knowledge of inner workings of Linux and there are no tutorials (yet). NNN author is making up for this by actively responding to GitHub issues.
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable icons and colors
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Linux, macOS, Termux, Raspberry Pi
License:
BSD-2-Clause
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
353
50
Spacemacs
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Preconfigured emacs distro
Spacemacs is just a well-configured Emacs distribution with community-sourced best in class plugins and layers selected to take the setup pain out of Emacs. Evil mode gives the Vim bindings and modes for fast editing, while Helm makes everything discoverable to make learning to be more productive simple and unintrusive.
See More
Top
Con
Emacs is slow
Emacs is single threaded which means that if you enable all the great features you might be used to from Vim, it will run noticeably slower which can be quite frustrating at times. There are efforts at a concurrent Emacs, but they don't seem to be going anywhere.
See More
Top
Pro
VIM Keybindings with EMACS ecosystem
EMACS ecosystem and language support is best in show. The EMACS is a great IDE that was in search of a good text editor. Spacemacs makes EMACS have a good text editor.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
GNU/Linux, MacOS, Windows
License:
GPL3
Multi Language Support:
Yes
Export:
Yes
See All Specs
Hide
Get it
here
80
17
fman
All
14
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
9
Specs
Top
Pro
Works on all operating systems
Windows, Mac, and Linux are supported.
See More
Top
Con
No (text) file viewer
See More
Top
Pro
Simple to use
See More
Top
Con
No explicit bookmark support for directories
It though remembers the visited directories and allows to search in this list in most-recently used order and by name.
See More
Top
Pro
Makes finding commands *by name* easy
See More
Top
Con
Mainly for key-board-orientated users
The interface is most naturally navigated by arrows and keystrokes. The target market is software developers.
See More
Top
Pro
Slick
See More
Top
Con
Has no menu bar
Hence it is not well suited for visually orientated users which find or remember commands by using a mouse and a menu. Even the fman's hero Sublime Text uses a menu bar.
See More
Top
Con
Requires email address to download
Doesn't say what it will do with this data. It is in contrast to the new laws in Europe where only necessary information is allowed to be collected. A download should not require an email address.
See More
Top
Con
Still quite buggy
So, for example, sorting only is remembered if triggered by command and not be clicking the table column header using the mouse.
See More
Top
Con
Settings can't be found by the GUI
You need to know which files to edit.
See More
Top
Con
Default dark theme
No choice between dull-dark or fresh-light.
See More
Top
Con
No portable bundle available
On Windows only a net-installer is available.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Mac, Linux
Hide
See All
Experiences
€14
207
37
WCM Commander
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Built-in terminal
Has a built-in terminal from which users can run any kind of command.
See More
Top
Con
File editing on virtual file systems not supported
You cannot edit files in the virtual file system.
See More
Top
Pro
Virtual file system
WCM Commander has a virtual file system for smb, ftp and sftp.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in editor
WCM Commander has a built-in text editor with syntax highlighting included.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
9
3
Emacs
All
41
Experiences
Pros
30
Cons
10
Specs
Top
Pro
Keyboard-focused, mouse-free editing
Emacs can be controlled entirely with the keyboard. While true, I often find the mouse and menus handy for those lesser-used commands. An aide-memoir.
See More
Top
Con
Learning curve is long
While it's better than it used to be, with most functions being possible through the menu, Emacs is still quite a bit different from your standard editor. You'll need to learn new keyboard shortcuts.
See More
Top
Pro
Total customizability
Customizations can be made to a wide range of Emacs' functions through a Lisp dialect (Emacs Lisp). A robust list of existing Lisp extensions include the practical (git integration, syntax highlighting, etc) to the utilitarian (calculators, calendars) to the sublime (chess, Eliza).
See More
Top
Con
Sometimes the extensibility can distract you from your actual work
If I ever want to lose half a day, I'll start by tweaking my .spacemacs config file.
See More
Top
Pro
It's also an IDE
You can debug, compile, manage files, integrate with version control systems, etc. All through the various plugins that can be installed.
See More
Top
Con
Keyboard combinations can be confusing for new users
For example, for navigation it uses the b, n, p, l keys. Which for some people may seem strange in the begging. However they can be changed easily.
See More
Top
Pro
Works in terminal or as a GUI application
You can use Emacs' command line interface or graphical user interface.
See More
Top
Con
Documentation is not beginner-friendly
Although lots of good built-in documentation _exists_, I have after four years of Emacs as my primary editor not figured out how to actually make use of it, and rely completely on Google / StackOverflow for help.
See More
Top
Pro
Self documenting
Emacs has extensive help support built-in as well as a tutorial accessed with C-h t.
See More
Top
Con
User interface is terrible
I was using Emacs in the early 1980's, before there were GUIs. In fairness to Emacs, its original design was conceived in that context and is rather good at some things, like flexible ability to bind commands to keyboard shortcuts. Unfortunately, it didn't keep up with the times and fails to take advantage of the entire world of GUI design that's revolutionized computer science since then. So Emacs does 5% or what an editor should do quite will, and is surprisingly under-powered and old fashioned at the other 95%. To this day, it lacks or struggles with very basic things, like interactive dialogs, toolbars, tabbed interface, file system navigation, etc., etc. The things I just mentioned, are all present in some limited and inept form, but falls far short of current standard of good user interface design. For this reason, I would not recommend Emacs to anyone who is under 50 year old, or who needs power user capabilities. For casual, unsophisticated applications by someone who grew up with green screen character based computers, it's probably OK.
See More
Top
Pro
Free
Licensed under GNU GPL.
See More
Top
Con
Emacs lisp is very poorly designed
The language that's used for user customization, extensions, and for much of the basic editor functionality, is Emacs lisp, or elisp for short. I actually like lisp in general, especially Scheme, but unfortunately, elisp is one of the worst versions of lisp ever created, barely meriting being called lisp. It's very slow, impoverished in features, inconsistent, and rather inelegant in design. Elisp needed to be overhauled 20 or 30 years ago, but the Emacs developers were not willing to do the work. I believe this is one of the major reasons Emacs is so buggy, lacking in features, development is so slow, and consequently almost nobody uses it (or should use it) anymore.
See More
Top
Pro
Great documentation
With 30+ years of use the Emacs documentation is very thorough. There are also a lot of tutorials and guides written by third parties.
See More
Top
Con
Very poorly maintained
It's not clear to what extent Emacs is still supported. There's still some development taking place, but so slow that it's almost an abandoned project. There are numerous bugs in Emacs, many these days associated with start up and package management. When you search the Internet for solutions, you often find many posts, sometimes going back months or even years, with no clear fix.
See More
Top
Pro
Vi keybindings through Evil mode
Evil mode emulates vim behaviors within Emacs. It enables Vi users to move inside the Emacs universe.
See More
Top
Con
Hard customization
For customization, you need to learn Lisp.
See More
Top
Pro
Provides org-mode
Advanced planning and publication which can start as a simple list.
See More
Top
Con
A lot of jokes in this serious software
See More
Top
Pro
Enormous range of functionalities (way beyond simple "text editing")
Through its programmability, a very broad range of functionalities can be integrated in emacs, turning it even into a "single point of contact" with the underlying operating system.
See More
Top
Con
Using Emacs on a new machine without your .emacs file
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-platform
Works on Linux, Windows, Macintosh, BSD, and others.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates planning in your development process
You can jump straight from your org-mode files to programming tasks - and back - and build a seamless workflow.
See More
Top
Pro
Versatile
Emacs is great for everything.
See More
Top
Pro
Mini buffer
You can pass complicated arguments in the mini buffer.
See More
Top
Pro
Ubiquity
Fully compliant GNU-emacs is available on many platforms, and they all understand .emacs configuration files.
See More
Top
Pro
Rectangular cut and paste
Emacs can select rectangularly.
See More
Top
Pro
Lisp customizations
With lisp customization, any behavior of Emacs can be changed. Update with pre-release patch can be also applied without recompiling the whole Emacs.
See More
Top
Pro
Visual selection and text objects with Evil
Evil is an extensible vi layer for Emacs. It provides Vim features like Visual selection and text objects.
See More
Top
Pro
dabbrev-expand (Alt-/)
Dynamic word completion.
See More
Top
Pro
Support multi-line editing, multiple frame, powerful paren, crazy jumping style
Review the "Emacs Rocks" video.
See More
Top
Pro
Has been widely used for a long time
The first verion of Emacs was written in 1974 and GNU Emacs in 1984.
See More
Top
Pro
Helm plugin adds even more power to Emacs
Powerful commands, search, and more with the Helm plugin.
See More
Top
Pro
GTK+ widgets support
Since version 25 you can run GTK widgets inside Emacs buffers. One of these is the WebKitGTK+, which allows the user to run a full-featured web browser inside Emacs with JavaScript and CSS support among other things.
See More
Top
Pro
Excelent tutorial to get you started
The tutorial you are presented with at startup shows you exactly what you need to get started and teaches you how to use the built-in help yourself later.
See More
Top
Pro
Interactive Shells
Emacs has a number of shell variants: ansi-term, shell, and eshell.
See More
Top
Pro
Emacs provides magit, the best and most complete GIT interface
Complex git history editing become a breeze with very few keystrokes. And simple ones are quickly stashed in muscle memory. Git becomes an direct extension of your brain thanks to Magit. Cherrypicking, blaming, resetting, interactive rebasing, line level commit, spinoff branches... you name it, magit already has it and has typically all those 5 to 10 git CLI commands of higher-level patterns also tide to one simple shortcut (want to amend a commit three commits away ? forgot to branch out and you've got already N commits on master ? ... etc... ).
See More
Top
Pro
Gnus
Managing several large mailing lists has never been easier using Gnus. The threading commands and the various ways of scoring articles means that I never miss important messages/authors, etc. A joy to use.
See More
Top
Pro
Eshell is cross platform
You can use the underlying operating system shell as a terminal emulation in an Emacs buffer. Don't like the default shell for your configuration? You can change it to your liking.
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent Lisp editing support
Built-in packages make editing Lisp source code feel natural.
See More
Top
Pro
Use-package and org-mode
Missing some neural package that predicts actions, maybe in the next release ...
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Unix-like, macOS, Windows, Cygwin
License:
GPL-3.0-or-later
Multi Language Support:
Yes
Auto Complete:
Yes
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
FREE
846
176
Nautilus (AKA Gnome Files)
All
12
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Allows you to access remote or local locations
On recent versions of GNOME, you can click the Files entry in the panel to access the a specific location (remote or local), connect to a certain server (FTP, SFTP, SAMBA, etc.), access your bookmarks, open a new window, as well as to change its default functionality.
See More
Top
Con
Mostly unconfigurable
There are not many ways to configure Nautilus to fit your needs. Besides what can be seen in the settings button you can't configure it further.
See More
Top
Pro
Widely supported
The program is distributed as a single source archive, which can be configured, compiled and installed on almost any Linux flavor. There are no binary files for a specific Linux distribution, but you can install it directly from the default software channels of your operating system.
See More
Top
Con
Gradually losing its features
Unlike most software, where new features are added over time, Nautilus (along with other Gnome applications) tends to lose features, and for unclear reasons.
See More
Top
Pro
Google drive integration
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't support "open as root"
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use and familiar user interface for Ubuntu users
The user interface of Files is very familiar to Ubuntu users, most probably because Canonical still uses Nautilus (an old version of it) as the default file manager for its world’s most popular free operating system, Ubuntu Linux. It split into two parts, a sidebar and the main file viewer. While you already know what the latter can do for you, the sidebar offers quick access to Places, Devices and Network locations, as well as any other bookmarks that you can add whenever you want.
See More
Top
Con
No Tree View option any more
This is a crucial feature for my daily work with a file manager and without a Tree View option a file manager seems pointless to me. The reason for dropping this feature is weird. Quoted from here: "It is the list view after all. Tree models don't work well on touch and it isn't consistent with the file chooser."
See More
Top
Pro
Convenient file moving progress
Nautilus shows the progress of file move operations in the top right. This doesn't get in your way. You can keep using the window while the operation is progressing.
See More
Top
Con
Slow
Seems to be one of few file managers that can take several seconds to open.
See More
Top
Pro
Fully supports DPI
See More
Top
Con
Comes with a ton of dependencies
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
44
16
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop