What is the best alternative to ASP.NET Core?

Question

Built By the Slant team

We find the best product for your budget

Our AI does all the product research work so you don’t have to.

Add to Chrome

Try it now

score 23 · Answer 1

FastAPI

Top Pro

Dependency injection

It has a simple but powerful dependency injection system, it can be used to handle authentication, per-user rate limiting, authorization controls (e.g. with roles), etc. See More

Top Con

Smaller community

Since FastAPI is relatively new, its community is smaller than Django Rest Framework. See More

Top Pro

Standards

It is based on standards: OpenAPI, JSON Schema and OAuth 2.0. See More

Top Pro

Editor completion

It is based on Python type declarations, so, editors and tools can give great support. Including type checks and autocompletion everywhere. See More

Top Pro

Data validation

It validates the data using the types you declared. Even in deeply nested JSON requests. See More

Top Pro

Automatic docs

It generates interactive API documentation automatically from your code. See More

Top Pro

Background tasks

Included support for background tasks, thanks to being based on Starlette. See More

Top Pro

World class documentation

It has some of the best documentation of any framework. See More

Top Pro

WebSockets

Because it's an async framework, it can handle async-native protocols like WebSockets. See More

Top Pro

OAuth 2.0

It has integrated support for OAuth 2.0. Including declaring required scopes per endpoint. So, you can easily integrate it with external OAuth 2.0 providers or build your own with it. See More

Top Pro

Database independent

It's independent of database or ORM, but compatible with all of them. Including relational databases and NoSQL. See More

Top Pro

Async IO / optional

It's based on Async IO, which gives it high concurrency. But you can use non-async libraries and it runs them appropriately. See More

Top Pro

High-performance

It's based on Starlette and Pydantic, so, it's one of the fastest Python frameworks. See More

Top Pro

One of the fastest growing communities

Top Pro

graphql out of the box

Specs

Platforms:Cross-platform

Type:standard and feature rich micro-framework

23 0

score 91 · Answer 2

B4X

Top Pro

A very active forum where you can find any issue you have, and quick answers to new ones

Top Con

Suspicious upvotes

Most upvoters do not show any other activity than their upvote for B4X, which looks very suspicious. See More

Top Pro

A highly motivated program author who is very active in the forums

Erel Uziel is simply the most pro-active Soft-Creator/Forum Manager you will ever come across. If it has not yet been asked & answered, just ask and you will be answered withing minutes, and thanks to it being a trully international forum, this is achieved 24h/7d. See More

Top Con

Java Dependent Desktop Development

Top Pro

Very easy to use and powerful for IoT

Support for Bluetooth/BLE, MQTT, TCP/UDP, Serial, NFC, Websockets, HTTP/2 across platforms makes it the ideal tool for IoT projects. See More

Top Pro

Create easy, fast and with less code cross-platform views

B4XUI custom views are designed, by Erel and other forum members, exactly with this in mind; custom views that act and feel exactly the same no matter what platform you target. See More

Top Pro

Live code swapping

A huge productivity boost when you can run your apps on the devices and make code changes real time without needing to recompile. See More

Top Pro

Powerful general purpose programming tool

As mentioned in its website, "With B4X, anyone who wants to, can develop real-world solutions." See More

Top Pro

No complexities compared with other tools

No need to learn JAVA, C+, PHP, or any other complementary languages in order to achieve exactly what you need. See More

Top Pro

Many informative video tutorials

The tutorials help beginners as well as more experienced programmers grasping important concepts. See More

Top Pro

The best tool with the best service by Erel

Specs

Platforms:Android, iOS, Windows, MacOs, Linux, Web, Raspberry Pi, Arduino

Visual GUI Builder:Yes, even on real devices

See All Experiences

91 1

score 394 · Answer 3

Go

Top Pro

Exceptionally simple and scalable multithreaded and concurrent programming

Goroutines are "lightweight threads" that runs on OS threads. They provide a simple way for concurrent operations — prepending a function with go will execute it concurrently. It utilizes channels for communication between goroutines which aids to prevent races and makes synchronizing execution effortless across goroutines. The maximum number of OS threads goroutines can run on may be defined at compile time with the GOMAXPROCS variable. See More

Top Con

Hard to abstract even the simplest notions

Go is famously regarded as very simple. However, this simplicity becomes problematic in time. Programmers who use Go find themselves over and over again writing the same thing from a very low point of view. Domains not already served by libraries that are easy to glue are very difficult to get into. See More

Top Pro

Simplified C-like syntax that is as easy to read and write as Python

The language is designed in a manner that seems logical. Syntax is simplified to reduce burden on the programmer and compiler developers. See More

Top Con

Designed to make the programmer expendable

Go was designed for large team projects where many contributors may be incompetent. That Go can still get things done under these conditions is a testament to its utility in this niche. Go's infamously weak abstraction power is thus a feature, not a bug, meant to prevent your teammates from doing too much damage. This also means any team member can be easily replaced by another code monkey at minimum cost. Good for the company, bad for you. The more talented programmers, on the other hand, will be very frustrated by having one hand tied behind their back. See More

Top Pro

Great team working behind it

Go has a solid team of engineers working on it (some of the best networking engineers in the world are working on Go). Up until now, the great engineering of the language has compensated for its lack of power. See More

Top Con

Easy to shadow variable

Due to single character only difference, declare and assign statement can easily shadow variable from outer scope unconsciously. Example: err := nil if xxx { err := somefunctionthatreturnsanerr } return err // always return nil See More

Top Pro

API documentation is rich in content; easy to memorize

Only features deemed critical are added to the language to prevent cruft from working its way into the language. The language is small enough to fit inside one's head without having to repeatedly open documentation. Documentation is hosted on an official webpage in a manner that is simple to read and understand. See More

Top Con

No forms designer

Those who are used to Visual Studio can feel the lack of a forms designer for rapid development. See More

Top Pro

The go compiler compiles binaries instantly — as fast as a scripting language interpreter

Compiled binaries are fast — about as fast in C in most cases. Compiles on every OS without effort — truly cross-platform compiler. As a result of the fast compilation speed, you can use the gorun program to use go source code as if it was a scripting language. See More

Top Con

Performance slowdown because of indirect calls and garbage collection

Practically no meaningful Go application can be written without indirect function calls and garbage collection, these are central to Go's core infrastructure. But these are major impediments to achieving good performance. See More

Top Pro

Built-in unit testing

The idiomatic approach to writing a Go software project is to perform test-driven development with unit testing. Every source code file should have an associated *_test.go file which tests functions in the code. See More

Top Con

Implementation of interfaces are difficult to figure out

Finding out what interfaces are implemented by a struct requires a magic crystal ball. They are easy to write, but difficult to read and trawl through. See More

Top Pro

Easy to install and configure; simple to compile software

Go software can be immediately installed, regardless of your operating system, package manager, or processor architecture with the go get command. Software is compiled statically by default so there is no need to worry about software dependencies on the client system. Makefiles and headers are no longer necessary, as the package system automatically resolves dependencies, downloads source code and compiles via a single command: go build. See More

Top Con

Weak type system

Top Pro

Provides tools for automatically formatting code for your entire software project

This helps keep every programmer on the same page in a project and eliminates arguments over formatting styles. See More

Top Pro

Programmers don't have to argue over what 10% subet of the language to implement in their software project

The language promotes programming in a specific idiomatic style, which helps keep every programmer on the same page. See More

Top Pro

Great language for building networking services

Go was started as a systems language but now it has fully committed in the niche of networking services. This has been a brilliant move by Go because it allows them to capitalize on the immense talent of the Go engineering team (who are in the most part network engineers). In a world dominated by Java EE and slow scripting language, Go was a breath of fresh air and it continues to be one of the most powerful languages if you want to build networking services. See More

Top Pro

Supports 'modules' in the form of packages

Every Go source file contains a package line that indicates which package a file belongs to. If the name of the package is 'main', it indicates that this is a program that will be compiled into a binary. Otherwise, it will recognize that it is a package. See More

Top Pro

Automatically generates API documentation for installed packages

Godoc is provided to automatically generate API documentation for Go projects. Godoc also hosts its own self-contained web server that will list documentation for all installed packages in your Go path. See More

Top Pro

Demonstrates a unique, simple concept to object-oriented programming

All types are essentially objects, be they type aliases or structs. The compiler automatically associates types to their methods at compile time. Those methods are automatically associated to all interfaces that match. This allows you to gain the benefits of multiple inheritance without glue code. As a result of the design, classes are rendered obsolete and the resulting style is easy to comprehend. See More

Top Pro

Supports splitting source code into multiple files

As long as every source code file in a directory has the same package name, the compiler will automatically concatenate all of the files together during the compilation process. See More

Top Pro

Multiple variables may be assigned on a single line

This conveniently eliminates the need to create temporary variables. Fibonacci example: x, y = y, x+y See More

Top Pro

Syntax for exported code from a package is simplified to be less verbose than other languages

Any variable, type and function whose name begins with a capital letter will be exported by a project, while all other code remains private. There is no longer a need to signify that a piece of code is 'private' or 'public' manually. See More

Top Pro

Supports functional programming techniques such as function literals

This naturally also supports first class and high order functions, so you may pass functions as variables to other functions. See More

Top Pro

Performance is on the order of C and Java

Go is blazing fast, but easier to write than Python, JS, Ruby, or many other dynamic languages. See More

Specs

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac etc.

Current stable version:1.12.1 / February 25, 2019

Developer:Google with Ken Thompson, Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike

GZipped size:217 mb

See All Specs

See All Experiences

394 156

score 109 · Answer 4

Spring-boot

Top Pro

Inherits all of Spring's strengths

Boot is just a thin configuration layer over Spring Framework, as such it inherits all the strengths of Spring. See More

Top Con

Lacking in UI development

While actually very good and with a very complete and rich feature set to develop and maintain code on the server side, it still doesn't provide any rich framework for building good user interfaces. See More

Top Pro

Preconfigured starters

Top Pro

Fast prototyping

Spring boot is built for fast prototyping. See More

Top Pro

Kick down to Spring

Specs

Platforms:Cross-platform

Written in:Java

Repository:https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot

109 13

score 8 · Answer 5

Dropwizard

Top Pro

Enhanced productivity and less timewasting

The application can be run and debugged from the IDE without the need to recompile or redeploy the WAR file. This is because a Dropwizard web application creates on main program which starts the jetty container. See More

Top Con

Does not allow a lot a freedom of choice

Dropwizard removes a lot of freedom that the developer may have with other frameworks because of the fact that it tries to do everything itself. It chooses the best Java libraries for the job required, without allowing the developer much choice. See More

Top Pro

Application metrics integrated into the framework

Dropwizard comes with application metrics integrated out of the box. These metrics provide a lot of useful information such as request/response time. For example, to get the execution time of a method, the @Timed annotation is used. See More

Top Pro

Quick project bootstrap

Starting a project with Dropwizard si very easy and bootstraping is quick and painless. All that's needed is a single dependency added in the pom.xml file and it's ready to go. See More

8 0

score 105 · Answer 6

Yii

Top Pro

Comes with important security standarts

Since security is a crucial part of any application, Yii comes with great security features out of the box to help developers create a secure and reliable application. These security features contain but are not restricted to: Input validation Output filtering Features against SQL injection Cross-site scripting prevention See More

Top Con

Can be hard for beginners

Since Yii requires developers to write code following certain rules, or in other words, it requires developers to follow the "Yii way of doing things" it can be hard for beginners to warm up to it and start using it right away. See More

Top Pro

Rapid development through code scaffolding

Yii takes care of repetitive tasks through Gii, a web-based scaffolding tool. Gii takes care of code generation and creating code templates for: Models Controllers Forms Modules Extensions CRUD controller actions and views There are a lot of scaffolding templates made by community for Gii, that improve generated code functionality by a lot. Gii is very easy to extend yourself. See More

Top Con

Not very good at many to many relations

(but there is a good plugin, namely CAdvancedArBehavior extension to do this) See More

Top Pro

Highly extensible

Yii is built to be extremely extensible. Virtually every component of the framework can be extended programmatically. For example, if you want to add a unique id to your views, it's very easy to do: namespace app\components; class View extends yii\web\View { public $bodyId; /* Yii allows you to add magic getter methods by prefacing method names with "get" */ public function getBodyIdAttribute() { return ($this->bodyId != '') ? 'id="' . $this->bodyId . '"' : ''; } } See More

Top Pro

Integrated with a testing framework

Yii makes use of Codeception, a great PHP testing framework that helps developers run their tests. They can be unit, functional or acceptance tests since Codeception supports them all. See More

Top Pro

Lots of plugins available

Yii has about 2000 addons hosted on Yii's official website. These addons significantly decrease development time and increase the developer's efficiency. See More

Top Pro

License

Yii is free and open source and is distributed under the BSD License. See More

Top Pro

Strong community support

Yii has a strong and rather large community behind it. This is proven by the great number of blog posts, tutorials, guides and reviews on the Yii framework as well as the great number of extensions developed for it. See More

Top Pro

Easy to install

Yii uses Composer to handle it's dependency installation. This is rather easy and not very time consuming, although it should be noted that Composer is very resource-intensive considering what it's job is. But that is not really Yii's fault. See More

Top Pro

Best framework for CRUD operation

Yii Framework Provides most of features require for crud functionalities like GridView, Listview and DetailView (with jquery search and validation functions) by generating using GII. See More

Top Pro

Highly extensible without effort

Specs

PHP version:5.4+

Default Template Engine:Twig

Default ORM:Yii Active Record

See All Experiences

105 23

score 141 · Answer 7

Flutter

Top Pro

Open source

Top Con

Still in development

According to the website, Flutter is still in its early stages of development. See More

Top Pro

Great developer tools debug/hotreload/analyser

Top Con

Based on Dart language

Dart is a Java like language, easy to learn and startup fast for millions of Java developers. BUT if you have to learn it ... it's a con. See More

Top Pro

Based on Dart language

Dart is a Java like language, easy to learn and startup fast for millions of Java developers. See More

Top Con

Dart is unpopular and never gained serious community traction like Kotlin or Java

Top Pro

A single codebase for iOS AND Android

Top Con

Does not support 32-bit iOS devices

If you plan on targeting iPhone 5, 5C or earlier, you can forget about Flutter. See More

Top Pro

Fast

The developer's goal is to allow people to make apps running at 120 FPS. See More

Top Con

Google has a bad history with product loyalty

Specs

Languages:Dart

Dev platforms:Windows, Mac and Linux

Mobile targets:Android and iOS

See All Experiences

141 12

score 103 · Answer 8

MonoDevelop

Top Con

No longer supported (deprecated since 2018)

Top Pro

Starting up this program doesn't take as long as starting Visual Studio windows 98

Top Con

Bad formatting

MonoDevelop doesn't offer much in terms of autocompletion and code formatting. Most of the time the automatic formatting that MonoDevelop does is annoying and not really compliant with C# guidelines. See More

Top Pro

Free

MonoDevelop is free to download and use. See More

Top Con

The MonoDevelop version that ships with Unity is several versions behind

The version of MonoDevelop that ships with Unity is several versions behind the main MonoDevelop branch. It also gets updated very rarely so any annoying bugs that it may have take a lot of time to get fixed. See More

Specs

Platforms:Windows Linux Mac

103 13

score 43 · Answer 9

Adonisjs

Top Pro

Based on Laravel PHP Framework

If you are already programming in PHP with Laravel, you will have no trouble starting development with Node using Adonis. See More

Top Con

No NOSQL integration

Only used ORM, not ODM. See More

Top Pro

Similar to Rails

Top Pro

Built-in modules for everything

There are built-in modules for everything: Auth, Social Auth, mailing ect See More

Specs

Language:JavaScript

43 0

score 144 · Answer 10

Ruby on Rails

Top Pro

Small projects are very easy and it's possible to finish one in very little time

The large number of documentation, tutorials, videos and guides which help new developers who are just starting with Rails make it seem very easy to create a small and simple application by relying on code generation and components that come out of the box with Rails. See More

Top Con

Too much magic

So much behavior is implemented with dynamic behind-the-scenes changes to existing classes that obscure bugs are way too common. Conflicting interactions between multiple plugins that both try to change the same objects are a particularly pernicious example. See More

Top Pro

Many plugins (gems) available

There are many third-party plugins (Ruby gems) available for Rails development. The larger ones and those that have a lot of downloads and users are very well documented and easy to use. See More

Top Con

Learning curve seems low at first, but starts becoming steeper

Rails' simplicity is deceptive. It's learning curve is really low at first, and the huge number of tutorials and guides out there for starting with Rails make it even easier. But it starts getting harder and harder as apps become more complicated. If good code conventions and OO design are not followed, then the codebase will be all over the place and it becomes impossible to maintain it. See More

Top Pro

Massive community with lots of tutorials and guides

The sheer scale and massive number of developers using Rails has produced a large number of guides, tutorials, plugins, documentation, videos and anything that can help new and old Rails developers. See More

Top Con

Too much convention

Top Pro

Ruby is a nice readable language

Ruby has a very clean syntax that makes code easier to both read and write than more traditional Object Oriented languages, such as Java. For beginning programmers, this means the focus is on the meaning of the program, where it should be, rather than trying to figure out the meaning of obscure characters. presidents = ["Ford", "Carter", "Reagan", "Bush1", "Clinton", "Bush2"] for ss in 0...presidents.length print ss, ": ", presidents[presidents.length - ss - 1], "\n"; end See More

Top Con

Not a very popular language outside of web development

Top Pro

Good conventions

MVC is a great starting point, and perfect for APIs. You'll rarely if ever have to wonder "where should I put this code?" See More

Top Con

Bad performance

Among the slowest frameworks. If you want to scale, you will have to migrate to another land. See More

Top Pro

Supported on every major cloud or VPS hosting service

Rails is supported on every major Cloud hosting service nowadays. There are also countless tutorials that help developers deploy their Rails apps if there are any problems on the way. See More

Top Pro

Cool language

Top Pro

Meta-programming capabilities

Specs

Written in:Ruby

Default Template Engine:ERB

Default ORM:ActiveRecord

Default Test Engine:RSpec & Cucumber

See All Experiences

144 24

score 228 · Answer 11

Flask

Top Pro

Minimalist without losing power

Flask is very easy to get up and going, with vanilla HTML or with bootstrap pieces. It doesn't take much lines of Python to load Flask to get headers working, etc, and since it's all modular you don't have to have something you don't want in your application. See More

Top Con

Not async-friendly

Flask is explicitly not designed to handle async programming. See More

Top Pro

Lots of resources available online

Flask is one of the most popular Python web frameworks, if not the most popular one. As such, there's plenty of guides, tutorials, and libraries available for it. A large number of important Python libraries, such as SQLAlchemy have libraries for Flask, which add valuable bindings to make the development process and the integration between these libraries and Flask as easy as possible. See More

Top Con

HTML-oriented, not API-oriented

Not necessarily designed for making APIs, though that is possible See More

Top Pro

Extremely easy to build a quick prototype

Even though it's pretty minimalistic out of the box, Flask still provides the necessary tools to build a quick prototype for a web app right after a fresh install. With all the main components pretty much packed in the flask package, building a simple web app in a single Python file is as easy as it gets. See More

Top Con

Threadlocals and globals used everywhere

The default way of creating applications in flask makes it hard to use reusable and clean code. See More

Top Pro

Very flexible

Flask gives developers a lot of flexibility in how they develop their web applications. For example, the choice of not having an ORM, but instead choosing one suited to the task, or another area where Flask gives a lot of options to developers is the templating. They can use Jinja2, Flask's default templating language or choose from a number of different templating languages they desire. See More

Top Con

Setting up a large project requires some previous knowledge of the framework

Setting up a large project with Flask is not that easy considering how there's no "official" way of doing it. Blueprints are a useful tool in this regard but require some additional reading and are a bit tricky to get right for a beginner. The lack of some defaults can also be problematic. Having to choose between different libraries for a certain task is never easy, especially if you have never worked with Flask before. See More

Top Pro

Great documentation

The official documentation is very thorough and complete. Everything is explained in-depth and followed by extremely well-explained tutorials that tackle real-world problems. See More

Top Pro

Able to use ORM or "true SQL"

Specs

228 36

score 347 · Answer 12

Express.js

Top Pro

Great routing API

Express' extremely powerful routing API allows developers to do tasks ranging from building a REST API to building the routes for a simple web app and then take it to the next level by using route parameters and query strings. See More

Top Con

No single recommended way of doing something

Express considers itself to be a "minimalistic unopinionated framework", it basically lets the developer determine how their project will be organized. On one hand, this gives anyone terrific power and flexibility to use any library they want for a certain task and to organize their project structure however they want. But on the other hand, there's no single recommended way of organizing things, which can be a trap for beginners and experienced developers alike and result in unmaintainable projects. See More

Top Pro

Relatively mature

Being a somewhat old Node.js web app framework and being one of the most widely used frameworks, Express.js has matured quite a lot during all that time. It's more stable than its competitors and a huge community backing it. See More

Top Pro

Support for a lot of plugins

Express takes advantage of Node's NPM to distribute and install countless plugins made by third parties which solve almost anything a developer would want to do with Express. See More

Top Pro

Great for beginner Node.js programmers

With a little learning curve, it is a good choice for new NodeJS developers to get started quickly. Express boasts great, thorough documentation. See More

Top Pro

Has the largest userbase

It's by far the most popular framework for node. See More

Top Pro

Setting up is very easy

Setting up a new Express project is very easy. It consists of installing a handful of libraries through NPM run a single npm install and everything is ready to go. See More

Top Pro

Great supportive community

Express has a big community with a lot of guides and tutorials written about it by developers that have been using it for quite some time. See More

Top Pro

Good Oauth/Facebook integration with connect module

You can easily add oAuth integration/social logins to your next web app without much hassle, using this authentication middleware for connect. See More

Top Pro

Has detailed information

Very simple and fast. See More

Top Pro

Massive ecosystem of middleware

If you have not already checked out the Express.js ecosystem of middleware, you should. See More

Top Pro

Lightweight

Top Pro

Express.js is in the Node.js Foundation Incubator Program

Node.js Foundation Announcement here The Node.js Foundation is a Collaborative Project at The Linux Foundation. Linux Foundation Collaborative Projects are independently funded software projects that harness the power of collaborative development to fuel innovation across industries and ecosystems. See More

Specs

Platforms:Cross-platform

License:MIT

Written in:JavaScript

Repository:https://github.com/expressjs/express

See All Specs

See All Experiences

347 55

score 46 · Answer 13

Play Framework

Top Pro

Asynchronous Core

Top Con

Backward incompatibility

The jump from Play 1 to Play 2.x caused a lot of confusion. While it is important to have some kind of evolution, sometimes it causes backward incompatibility which can create some problems. It makes tutorials or modules made for the old version obsolete. This can make it hard for beginners to find useful resources. The template engine which used Groovy now uses Scala. See More

Top Pro

Interoperable with Java

Top Con

Not as many resources to learn

Other languages and frameworks have countless tutorials, books, moocs, etc. Java and Play does not have nearly as much. See More

Top Pro

Scala

It's like Java, but more Haskell-y. See More

Top Pro

Fast

Top Pro

Good documentation and a great community

Play has quite a large community which provides numerous tutorials and videos related to developing with Play. The Play official documentation covers many things, such as the framework itself but also specific stuff such as Akka, SBT and Netty. There are also many big companies that base their main sites around Play, one of them is LinkedIn which provides third-party documentation on a regular basis. See More

Top Pro

Play is an extensive ecosystem

Play uses Akka for concurrency, Scala for a templating engine, Netty as a client-server framework and SBT (Simple Build Tool) for building. And they all come out of the box. Play also comes with the option to scaffold your applications. Play is an all-embracing ecosystem designed to increase developer productivity and shorten development times. See More

Top Pro

Simple for beginners

Play is very simple to get started. The documentation is very helpful for beginners and advanced users alike and the official website has a great "Getting Started" tutorial to begin developing with Play. See More

Top Pro

Readable code

Play framework's convention over configuration methodology makes most Play projects have a very similar structure. This means that the code written for the framework is very readable. This enables a developer to switch between applications without having to relearn the ecosystem for every project. The built-in templating system also helps with code and makes it possible to have a very low count of lines of code. See More

Top Pro

Can use Java, one of the most widely known languages

Java is one of the most widely known languages, so people coming from that background can jump right in and not have to learn a new language syntax. See More

Top Pro

Good Websocket Support

See All Experiences

46 11

score 114 · Answer 14

Symfony

Top Pro

Open Source

Symfony is open source and released under the MIT license. See More

Top Con

Settings

Too many configurations. See More

Top Pro

Great plugin ecosystem

One of the greatest strengths of Symfony is it's amazing and large plugin ecosystem, which comes as a result of it's large and dedicated community. Having a large number of plugins means less development time and more productivity. See More

Top Con

Very hard to install

Setting it up on webhost without a console is difficult. See More

Top Pro

Highly active community

Symfony has one of the most active communities out of all the PHP frameworks. This is shown by the high number of commits made every day in the GitHub repo. See More

Top Con

Promotes bad development practices

Such as annotations via comments. See More

Top Pro

Easy debugging with a built-in debug toolbar

Symfony comes with a built-in toolbar that helps developers debug their applications during the development phase. The toolbar is also extendable and new components, called panels can be added if needed to help with the debugging process. See More

Top Con

Doctrine ORM

Symfony Standard Edition, which is the most widely used distribution, comes integrated with Doctrine, the most resource hogging ORM library. See More

Top Pro

Teaches you good practices

Symfony makes you be a better programmer. You have to deal with the latest object-oriented design patterns such as service-oriented architecture, dependency injection, interface abstraction, and so on. See More

Top Con

You need a lot of files to display a single page

For a simple hello world page you need about 5 files. See More

Top Pro

Uses YAML/XML/PHP/Annotation

Symfony makes use of XML, YAML or PHP annotations to create configurations in order to tell Doctrine on how properties of a certain class should be. See More

Top Pro

Powerful event system

Symfony has a powerful built-in event system that allows you to add flexibility to applications and makes it easier to maintain the codebase down the road. See More

Top Pro

Great templating engine

Uses Twig, which is a simple and easy to learn templating language that can also be used as a standalone engine, outside the framework. See More

Top Pro

Uses Doctrine ORM

Symfony makes use of the Doctrine ORM to add an abstraction layer over the database in order to maintain flexibility without having unnecessary code duplication. See More

Specs

License:MIT License

Price:Free

Initial Release:November 2015

Written in:PHP

See All Specs

See All Experiences

114 28

score 18 · Answer 15

Grails

Top Pro

More than 900 plugins

Grails is a full-stack web framework, not just MVC. It contains a lot of stuff out of the box, but it doesn’t enforce it. It contains over 900 plugins which provide a Groovy API for a lot of useful and well-known Java libraries. And what is more important is that they are super easy to install! See More

Top Con

Grails is a fairly complex framework

Grails is a pretty heavy piece of software. It's functionality is covered by GORM (Grails' Object Relational Mapping) which is a facade for hybernate and by Spring MVC. Everything is glued by core Spring and furthermore, Grails adds another level of abstraction on top of all this. These things may create some trouble down the road when debugging. See More

Top Pro

Very fast setup and scaffolding

Setting up a new project is quite fast and code generation (scaffolding) saves you a lot of time. It also uses a convention over configuration principle which helps you bypass all the configuration trouble. Grails also comes with a reloading mechanism out of the box. See More

Top Con

Too obtuse and JVM centric

If you're a big fan of the JVM and have mastered all its goofy quirks, Grails might be a good choice, but there are other frameworks out there that are more straightforward and easier to use. See More

Top Pro

Easy to use

Grails is designed to be a rapid development framework with a straight learning curve. It advocates convention over configuration. Extensibility is very simple when using plugins (there is a lot of them). One command in the console – and all the dependencies and configurations are managed for you. See More

Top Pro

Grails is highly scalable

Grails is an abstraction over Spring and Hibernate. This makes Grails applications fast and scalable. This is because both Spring and Hibernate are themselves scalable. See More

Top Pro

Great UI design alternatives

Do you need something advanced in the UI? You can either create it in GSP with an addon of CSS/JavaScript or you can find a plugin that will do the work for you. Plugins include integration with Bootstrap, jQuery, Yeoman and much more. See More

Top Pro

Great documentation and community

The Documentation section is actually a wiki, which can be modified by any logged in user. It has an official manual, tutorials, screencasts, a sample app and much more. If that does not do it for you, then there are countless third-party tutorials, more than 12k questions on SO and much much more See More

See All Experiences

18 6

score 362 · Answer 16

Django

Top Pro

Developing a simple prototype can be very fast

Django's philosophy of batteries included means that experienced developers won't have to plan too much ahead on what kind of application infrastructure they need and instead just start developing web applications quickly. See More

Top Con

Can feel bloated for small projects

Django's sheer scale and functionality can feel clunky and bloated for small applications. It has too many bells and whistles which can get in the way when developing a small scale application. See More

Top Pro

ORM support out of the box

Django supports Object-Relational Mapping. With models defined as Python classes which are actually subclasses of Django's django.db.models.Model. Each attribute of the model is then represented as a database field. Queries are lazily executed and Django gives developers an automatically-generated database-access API. See More

Top Con

Routing requires some knowledge of regular expressions

Given a GET request for /topics/426/viewpoints/1/sections/create, how does Django decide which bit of Python code is invoked to handle it? It compares the request path to your giant pile of regular expressions. And then if there's some other regular expression starts matching /top and all your requests for /topics/ start going there, good luck figuring out why. You won't be informed of any conflict until you notice you seem to be getting the wrong pages back. The structure of URL paths is almost universally hierarchal. There is no call to have anything as ridiculously flexible (and notoriously hard-to-read) as regular expressions to organize request routing. See More

Top Pro

The documentation does not cover real-world scenarios

It is a larger documentation indeed, however is not deep and covers non real problems or even don't show any examples. You'll be better with Google or Stackoverflow See More

Top Pro

Highly customizable

Django is in itself a highly customizable web framework. The database, template framework and ORM can all be swapped out. See More

Top Con

Template errors fail silently by default

If you make a typo in a template variable, or change a view so that variable is no longer passed to the template, you won't get an error message pointing out that something has gone wrong. That reference will just be treated as if it is an empty string instead. There is a way to configure this, but since so many templates have been written assuming this behavior, nobody ever enables template errors because it would break so much of the existing support tools (e.g. the built-in admin interface). See More

Top Pro

Has an admin panel out of the box

Django comes with a highly customizable admin panel and authentication out of the box. This makes the development and production of a simple CMS extremely easy. See More

Top Pro

Mature software with many plugins developed over the years

Django was first released in 2005, it has had a lot of time to mature and become better with each release. It also has by far the largest community out of all python frameworks who have continuously over the years built and maintained many powerful plugins. See More

Top Pro

Clear and defined MVC organization

Django follows some pretty well established MVC patterns. With everything in place and where requests follow a clear path through urlresolvers, middleware, view and context processors. See More

Top Pro

Simple database management

Just a few lines of code can instruct Django to create all the tables and fields required in your database automatically. Schemas are managed with "migrations", that are also created automatically, and can be rolled out from your development box and implemented on production systems with just a single command. This performs any database changes required, from table creation, indexes, renaming fields, and pre-populating initial data. Each migration builds on the previous migrations, so you can trace the evolution of your data and even recreate the layout of your database at any point in the lifecycle of your application. See More

Specs

Price:Free: Open Source

Multi Language Support:Excellent

Written in:Python

Default Template Engine:Django (Jinja2)

See All Specs

See All Experiences

362 77

score 200 · Answer 17

Nim

Top Pro

Great metaprogramming features

There are generics, templates, macros in Nim. They can allow you to write new DSL for your application, or avoid all boilerplate stuff. See More

Top Pro

Strict typing

Checks your code at compile time. See More

Top Pro

Compile-time execution

Nim has a built-in VM, which executes macros and some other code at compile time. For example, you can check if you're on Windows, and Nim will generate code only for it. See More

Top Pro

Really cross-platform

The same code can be used for web, server, desktop and mobile. See More

Top Pro

Built-in Unicode support

You can use unicode names for variables, there is "unicode" module for operations with unicode. See More

Top Pro

Type interferencing

You only need to specify types in your procedures and objects - you don't need to specify type when you're creating a new variable (unless you're creating it without initialization). See More

Top Pro

Multi paradigm

Imperative, OOP, functional programming in one language. See More

Top Pro

Garbage-collected

You don't need to deal with all those manual memory allocations, Nim can take care of it. But also you can use another GC, or tweak it for your real-time application or a game. See More

Top Pro

Has built-in unittest module

With built-in "unittest" module you can create test with a very readable code. See More

Top Pro

Easy to read

Nim has a lot of common with Python in terms of syntax. Indentation-based syntax, for/while loops. See More

Top Pro

Easy to integrate with another languages

You can use Nim with any language that can be interfaced with C. There's a tool which helps you to create new C and C++ bindings for Nim - c2nim. Also, you can use Nim with Objective C or even JavaScript (if you're compiling for these backends). See More

Top Pro

Supports UFCS (Unified Function Call Syntax)

writeLine(stdout, "hello") can be written as stdout.writeLine("hello") proc add(a: int): int = a + 5 can be used like 6.add.echo or 6.add().echo() See More

Top Pro

Has built-in async support

Nim has "asyncdispatch" module, which allows you to write async applications. See More

Specs

Platforms:Windows, MacOS/iOS, Linux /Android/Termux, *BSD, Solaris/SmartOS, HaikuOS, lots of others

License:MIT

CPU:All CPU architectures that have an ANSI C compiler

Site:https://nim-lang.org

See All Specs

See All Experiences

200 51

score 25 · Answer 18

Codename One

Top Pro

High performance

Top Pro

Open source

Top Pro

Highly customizable

By utilizing lightweight component architecture and the built in graphical designer and theming options you are able to customize a good looking app on any platform. See More

Top Pro

Java 8 support

Top Pro

Works with all IDEs

Works with NetBeans, Eclipse, IntelliJ, etc. See More

Top Pro

Multi-platform development environments (via build server)

You can even use Linux desktops to build native iOS apps, no need for a Mac. See More

Top Pro

Vibrant & helpful community

Top Pro

Attractive pricing

It is possible to build production grade apps even with the free version. Pricing is decent when compared to competitors like Xamarin. See More

Specs

License:GPL with Classpath Exception, allows you to build proprietary applications

Languages:Java, Kotlin

Dev platforms:Windows, Mac, Linux

Desktop targets:Windows, Mac, Linux

See All Specs

See All Experiences

25 9

score 43 · Answer 19

Xojo

Top Pro

Easy to use

Easy to make compiled native apps. See More

Top Con

Subscription-based/Not free

Using this product you're betting the company will still be around. If they get bought out by an enterprise that wants to use the tech internally, all they need to do is stop offering subscriptions and suddenly you're scrambling to rebuild your entire app on other technology. See More

Top Con

No Android support

They plan to eventually support Android, but for now, they only support iOS. See More

Specs

Platforms:Windows, Linux, Mac, Pi, Web,iOS

43 15

score 475 · Answer 20

Laravel 5

Top Pro

Good for building RESTful APIs

With migrations, powerful and intuitive Eloquent CRUD, resource routing, and simple JSON response out of the box, a complete REST API can be written in hours. See More

Top Con

Uses too much magic methods

It complicates debugging and autocompletion. See More

Top Pro

Comes with an excellent built-in ORM

Laravel's Eloquent ORM is a simple and fast Object-Relational Mapping which helps with organizing the application's database. It supports the most popular databases (MySQL, Postgres, SQLite, etc.) out of the box. See More

Top Con

Bloated

While the speed doesn't seem to be an issue with it (on local tests), in production it may be hindered. The framework creates a ton of files and folders, some of which your app might not even use. Not good if you don't like having a ton of folders and rigid non-standard PHP folder structure for development. See More

Top Pro

Comes with its own CLI

Laravel comes out of the box with it's own CLI called Artisan. With Artisan developers can do several different tasks such as migrating databases, seeding databases, clearing the cache and much much more. See More

Top Con

Hard to use model properties

You need to check all model properties in database to know it exists, or declare all them manually. See More

Top Pro

Good documentation

Laravel's documentation is thorough and very good. It covers everything and is very helpful to experienced and new users alike. See More

Top Con

Steep learning curve

While a lot of times you can write things in plain PHP, it will hinder you down the line when you want to use core features and find that you have to rewrite code which then causes issues throughout the app. Documentation is good, but you need to know what you are looking for and practical examples are non-existent. Many features have been updated throughout the versions in such a short time that tutorials you find online are confusing to sort through outdated tutorials and guides that no longer work or have been depreciated. See More

Top Pro

Easy to write web apps with authentication

Laravel comes with Authentication capabilities and a fully-powered Auth class out of the box. For passwords it uses bcrypt. See More

Top Con

Follows bad design practices

Uses bad practices, like Singletons, Magic models, Middleware. See More

Top Pro

Gives developers a great degree of freedom in how they set up their project structure

Laravel allows for free configuration and does not force developers to use a single project structure, instead they can change it to how they wish. See More

Top Con

Poor performance

Top Pro

Can use Symfony components

Laravel uses many libraries built for the Symfony PHP framework. Many of these libraries are well-built and have been tested by users before. Since the point of using a web framework is to shorten development time and to avoid reinventing the wheel for problems that have already been solved, then it's logical for a framework to use libraries already built to solve problems that have already been solved. See More

Top Pro

Extremely powerful template system

Laravel has a powerful template system called Blade. It's quite similar to Twig or Moustache with lots of curly braces but the real power comes from the usage of PHP code directly in the view. Blade templates compile directly to raw PHP and are processed in the server when a request is made. See More

Top Pro

Handles event queuing

Laravel supports event queuing and it does so in a very simple way. To create an event that should be queued just run: php artisan handler:event SendPurchaseConfirmation --event=PodcastWasPurchased --queued This creates a handler that implements the Illuminate\Contracts\Queue\ShouldBeQueued interface. Now when this handler is called it will automatically be queued by the event dispatcher. See More

Top Pro

Easy to learn

Top Pro

Gulp tasks in the form of Laravel Elixir

In Laravel 5.0 they added Laravel Elixir, which provides an API for using Gulp tasks for Laravel applications. Elixir supports several CSS preprocessors and even some test tools. But it's still in the early stages of development and it will be developed even further in the following releases. With more methods and more Gulp tasks supported. See More

Top Pro

Great Ecosystem

Has a great Ecosystem with SAAS like: Forge, Envoyer, Nova & from 3rd parties like oh-dear See More

Top Pro

Great Community

Specs

License:MIT License

Price:Free

Initial Release:June 2011

Written in:PHP

See All Specs

See All Experiences

475 117