Commonly Compared
Zen Installer
vs
SpecsUpdate
Based OnArch
Default Desktop EnvironmentGNOME, KDE Plasma, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, MATE, Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, Enlightenment, JWM, i3, Openbox, Enlightenment E16, Fluxbox, FVWM, IceWM, KWin, Mutter, GNU Screen, xcb-util-wm, Xcompmgr, Xfwm, Twm, Awesome, bbpager, Blackbox, bspwm, deepin-metacity, deepin-mutter, deepin-wm, herbstluftwm, i3-gaps, Keepass, Marco, Metacity, muffin, Notion, ObConf, PekWM, perl-anyevent-i3, PyPanel, python-smmap, python2-smmap, Qtile, ratpoison, spectrwm, Sway, vicious, wmctrl, wmname, xmonad
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Nice GUI installer
Very nice and easy to use GUI installer.
Pro Good for Linux Newbies
Nice GUI not too much know how needed to use it, but is that not the whole idea behind Arch, to understand and visualize what is happening during an Arch Linux install.
Cons
Con Not great in Virtual
Not so great when trying to setup in a virtual environment, better to just follow the wiki on the Arch Linux site.
Commonly Compared
Zen Installer
vs