Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to B4X?
Ad
Ad
Flutter
All
11
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Open source
See More
Top
Con
Still in development
According to the website, Flutter is still in its early stages of development.
See More
Top
Pro
Great developer tools debug/hotreload/analyser
See More
Top
Con
Based on Dart language
Dart is a Java like language, easy to learn and startup fast for millions of Java developers. BUT if you have to learn it ... it's a con.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on Dart language
Dart is a Java like language, easy to learn and startup fast for millions of Java developers.
See More
Top
Con
Dart is unpopular and never gained serious community traction like Kotlin or Java
See More
Top
Pro
A single codebase for iOS AND Android
See More
Top
Con
Does not support 32-bit iOS devices
If you plan on targeting iPhone 5, 5C or earlier, you can forget about Flutter.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
The developer's goal is to allow people to make apps running at 120 FPS.
See More
Top
Con
Google has a bad history with product loyalty
See More
Specs
Dev platforms:
Windows, Mac and Linux
Desktop targets:
announced Windows
Mobile targets:
Android and iOS
Popular Language Bindings:
Dart
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
211
32
Codename One
All
9
Experiences
Pros
8
Specs
Top
Pro
High performance
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
See More
Top
Pro
Highly customizable
By utilizing lightweight component architecture and the built in graphical designer and theming options you are able to customize a good looking app on any platform.
See More
Top
Pro
Java 8 support
See More
Top
Pro
Works with all IDEs
Works with NetBeans, Eclipse, IntelliJ, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Multi-platform development environments (via build server)
You can even use Linux desktops to build native iOS apps, no need for a Mac.
See More
Top
Pro
Vibrant & helpful community
See More
Top
Pro
Attractive pricing
It is possible to build production grade apps even with the free version. Pricing is decent when compared to competitors like Xamarin.
See More
Specs
License:
GPL with Classpath Exception, allows you to build proprietary applications
Languages:
Java, Kotlin
Dev platforms:
Windows, Mac, Linux
Desktop targets:
Windows, Mac, Linux
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
32
10
Xojo
All
4
Experiences
Pros
1
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Easy to make compiled native apps.
See More
Top
Con
Subscription-based/Not free
Using this product you're betting the company will still be around. If they get bought out by an enterprise that wants to use the tech internally, all they need to do is stop offering subscriptions and suddenly you're scrambling to rebuild your entire app on other technology.
See More
Top
Con
No Android support
They plan to eventually support Android, but for now, they only support iOS.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Pi, Web,iOS
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
Hide
Get it
here
78
40
ASP.NET Core
All
11
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Fast and getting faster
Thanks to breakthroughs in ROSLYN compiler and the efforts of the .NET COre developer team, code written in C# can reach speeds just a step behind C++.
See More
Top
Con
Microsoft environment
See More
Top
Pro
Multi platform
Can run on Windows, Linux and Mac (also Visual Studio Code editor).
See More
Top
Pro
JSON optimization
In .NET Core 2.1 and 3.0, new APIs are added that make it possible to write JSON APIs that require less memory, using Span<T> and UTF8 strings, and improve throughput of applications like Kestrel, ASP.NET Core web server. See also Utf8JsonReader.
See More
Top
Pro
Tutorials and documentation quality
Both microsoft and 3rd party tutorials are mostly of high quality and encourage you to use the industry best-practices.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in middleware
Built-in middleware featuring: Authentication, Cookie policy, Health Check, MVC, Session etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Hosting
Ability to host on IIS, Nginx, Apache, Docker, or self-host in your own process.
See More
Top
Pro
Ease of Use
See More
Top
Pro
Security
It is a very secure platform.
See More
Top
Pro
Tooling
Both VS and VSCode are powerful free IDEs that are well integrated with ASP.net Core. VS Community also allows for commercial use for projects with less than 5 developers.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Docker
Written in:
C#
Default ORM:
Entity Framework
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
202
49
Quasar Framework
All
9
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Uses Vue.js 2.0
Vue 3.x available as a plugin.
See More
Top
Con
Developed by a single person
Statistically, apps being developed by a single person can be gone without warning.
See More
Top
Pro
Good documentation and coding samples
See More
Top
Pro
Massive suite of well test & optimized widgets
Instant rebuild for SPA, PWA, Cordova or Electron with Material/iOS Themes.
See More
Top
Pro
Designed from the outset for desktop & mobile
See More
Top
Pro
Can build/test your PWA with/without PWA wrapper
See More
Top
Pro
Supports server side rendering (SSR) like Nuxt + SSR/PWA
"Icon genie" builds app icons and splash images for platforms selected.
See More
Top
Pro
Ability to add custom server side code when using SSR
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Web
License:
MIT
Mobile targets:
Android, Blueberry, iOS, Windows Phone, Web
Supported languages:
Javascript, Typescript
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
175
13
twinBASIC
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Specs
Top
Pro
100% Backward Compatible with VB6/VBA
Any code that runs in VB6 will run in twinBASIC (once v1 is released). Code that runs in VBA will also run in twinBASIC, though you need to account for any dependencies on the host application's object model (e.g., the Excel or Access Application object).
See More
Top
Pro
No runtime requirement
The lack of a runtime dependency makes twinBASIC applications very lightweight and portable. Additionally, compiled executables only include necessary code from any referenced libraries. The classic "Hello, World" program compiles down to an 8 KB .exe with no external dependencies.
See More
Top
Pro
Compile DLLs to extend VBA functionality
Can be used to extend VBA functionality by compiling standard and ActiveX DLLs in both 32 and 64bit.
See More
Top
Pro
64bit compilation is supported
64bit compilation is supported, as well as 32bit.
See More
Top
Pro
At last! a replacement for VB6
At last there is a replacement for Microsoft VB6 - and for VBA too - twinBASIC programming.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Android
Hide
Free / paid
74
0
MonoDevelop
All
6
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Free
MonoDevelop is free to download and use.
See More
Top
Con
No longer supported (deprecated since 2018)
Starting with version 4.x, Xamarin rebranded MonoDevelop as Xamarin Studio, but only for the Windows version of the IDE. Stable release 7.6.9.22 / September 21, 2018
See More
Top
Pro
Starting up this program doesn't take as long as starting Visual Studio windows 98
See More
Top
Con
Bad formatting
MonoDevelop doesn't offer much in terms of autocompletion and code formatting. Most of the time the automatic formatting that MonoDevelop does is annoying and not really compliant with C# guidelines.
See More
Top
Con
The MonoDevelop version that ships with Unity is several versions behind
The version of MonoDevelop that ships with Unity is several versions behind the main MonoDevelop branch. It also gets updated very rarely so any annoying bugs that it may have take a lot of time to get fixed.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows Linux Mac
Supported languages:
C#, F#, Visual Basic .NET, Vala
Visual GUI Builder:
Yes
Stable release:
7.6.9.22 / September 21, 2018
See All Specs
Hide
Get it
here
194
26
React Native
All
8
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Allows you to develop native apps
React Native allows you to create native apps by generating native views with JavaScript instead of using a web wrapper.
See More
Top
Con
If core team doesn't use a certain feature, it's not developed
Whenever there's functionality you need that they don't use in their apps, it's not going to get developed by them, even if it's obvious it should be in the core. They always say to either submit a PR or create a separate module.
See More
Top
Pro
Large, supportive community
Despite being such a young framework (early 2015), the support for React Native grew quickly. There is a forum, active tag on Stackoverflow and many other ways to get help from the community.
See More
Top
Con
Steep learning curve
React Native is not the most beginner-friendly framework for creating mobile apps with JavaScript. It requires that the developer know React, which is known to have a steep learning curve.
See More
Top
Pro
Backed by Facebook
Facebook writes their mobile apps in React Native so the code base gets pretty thoroughly used in some highly demanding scenarios.
See More
Top
Con
Many existing JS libraries are not usable on React Native; not exactly a 1-to-1 experience to writing React either
Example: Library that provides a full calendar with agenda view. In the end it's much easier to develop in actual JavaScript with a solution such as Ionic, especially if your app needs to work well on the desktop.
See More
Top
Pro
More predictable control of the state
The one way data flow, makes it more predictable and easy to control.
See More
Top
Con
React native only supports react which is getting old
React native is only based on react which is getting old. An old tech developer can't take much breaking changes so it gets more patchs. There is a limit, and react is too verbose and complex. better alternatives available today.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
99
36
NW.js (w/xvfb)
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Node integration
The integration of Node with the DOM in NW.js opens up a number of new options in how your headless testing workflow can be facilitated. The distinct separation of JavaScript contexts, the introduction of a separate node context, and the ability to cross communicate, offers a lot of power and flexibility.
See More
Top
Con
xvfb Requirement (for now)
Headless is on the NW.js roadmap, but for now xvfb is necessary to get going. The community has done the work and you can find the details here.
See More
Top
Pro
NaCl support/integration
Access to the Native Client offers up more options in implementing your testing workflow.
See More
Specs
Supported languages:
JS, [third party modules:C#,C++Web Assembly]
Integrated Debugger:
SDK version
Hide
Get it
here
18
0
Electron
All
9
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Con
Apps can have memory issues
Apps made with Electron are likely to have memory issues unless you specifically design the app with efficient coding.
See More
Top
Pro
Healthy community
Github is behind electron and there is a lot of big companies using it to make their cross platform apps.
See More
Top
Con
High CPU Usage
Electron Has High CPU Usage
See More
Top
Pro
Active development
Electron receives updates frequently (multiple times each month). For example, the recent updates (as of July 15, 2016) are: 1.2.6 (released July 6) 1.2.5 (released June 23) 1.2.4 (released June 22) 1.2.3 (released June 16) 1.2.2 (released June 8)
See More
Top
Con
Needs to run chromium
Runs chromium in the background which consumes a lot of resources.
See More
Top
Pro
learning curve is less
Electron has less learning curve when compare to qt like other options
See More
Top
Pro
Great documentation
Electron has a nice website with great documentation. It also features a lot of samples.
See More
Top
Pro
Solid API
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
License:
MIT
Supported languages:
Javascript
Popular Language Bindings:
Javascript, C++, C#, Go, Python, Java
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
55
47
Onsen UI
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Open source and free
Onsen UI is open source, and completely free to use.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be used for web apps as well
Onsen UI is usable for classic web development as well as mobile.
See More
Top
Pro
Large selection of components
Onsen UI provides a wide selection of components that are ready to use out of the box and are easily customizable.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Onsen UI provides very clear, well-written and detailed documentation. It uses popular technologies that are likely already familiar to developers (such as jQuery and Angular). The framework is semantic and intuitive to use, making it quite fast to learn.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports React
React is the most trending front-end UI framework, naturally supporting that is a plus.
See More
Specs
License:
Apache 20.0
Mobile targets:
iOS, Android
Hide
Get it
here
29
1
Gambas
All
13
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Complete IDE for GUI development
You can't find such a level of easy GUI development in any other language on the Linux platform.
See More
Top
Con
Not cross platform
See More
Top
Pro
Constantly updated
New features and bug fixes along with performance enhancements.
See More
Top
Con
The documentation is not the best
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to get started for someone familiar with VB on Windows
See More
Top
Con
May have trouble interfacing to C code structs
Managed struct objects in Gambas makes it harder to use with C code structs.
See More
Top
Pro
Complete application development suite
Supports GTK and QT along with web. Built in Form building with JIT speed. If you are developing an application targeting Linux only give this a look.
See More
Top
Con
Difficult to satisfy runtime requirements
Runtime requirements to run applications written in Gambas are not always easy to satisfy (that is, without installing the whole development environment).
See More
Top
Pro
Fast to write apps
See More
Top
Pro
Git integration
Integration with GIT in IDE and easy to distribute apps as source package with export as .tar.gz.
See More
Top
Pro
Enhanced with a new test suite
See More
Top
Pro
Runs on Windows 10 WSL2 environment, reported successful compilation on MacOS
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Linux
Current stable version:
3.18.2
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
90
10
NativeScript
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Svelte Native
Used by Svelte framework for native development.
See More
Top
Con
Nativescript + Angular apps for Android tend to have long startup times.
It's very difficult to have acceptable startup times with NS+Angular in Android. It's not uncommon to see apps taking 6 sec or more to start AFTER having been optimized with Webpack (mandatory!). The same app in iOS takes only 2-3 sec. Also, this seems to happen only with the NS+Angular flavour. People using plain NS (without Angular) don't seem to have the issue.
See More
Top
Pro
Leverages knowledge in Angular
Angular is a very popular framework, and teams already developing angular will feel right at home with Nativescript + Angular
See More
Top
Pro
Works great with vue.js
See More
Hide
Get it
here
33
5
Solar 2D (formerly Corona SDK)
All
19
Experiences
Pros
16
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Very simple to use
See More
Top
Con
Free, but not completely
See More
Top
Pro
Free
Corona SDK is completely free. That includes pro-tier plugins.
See More
Top
Con
Making a device build requires internet connection
To build your app for the device (iOS/Android/AppleTV) Corona requires to fetch resources from online. This would include base application template and plugins. This allows not to perform local build or use Xcode or Android Studio to do a build. Even Large games/apps would build very fast with good internet connection. Your code never leaves computed. Corona SDK would transfer some information to determine which plugins and pieces has to be transferred in order to make a final steps in build. As a bonus - you get basically one button press to get from your Corona Simulator game to game on a device.
See More
Top
Pro
Corona Simulator
Corona SDK ships with Corona Simulator, which runs your game/app directly on your PC/Mac and updates every time you make changes. It provides immediate feedback to your actions, you can see your changes right on the screen, without necessity to make build to device. Getting instant feedback really boosts tenfold prototyping and development speed.
See More
Top
Pro
Good documentation and lots of tutorials
See More
Top
Pro
Content scaling
It's easy to create a game that looks good on many different sized mobile devices.
See More
Top
Pro
Live builds - update builds running on a device automatically
With the live build feature, once you have created a build and installed on a device, you get lightning fast turnaround times because any change on the code or data is updated to the devices running the game (within the local WiFi) immediately. So changes can be tested on the real hardware within a very few seconds. What's even more impressive, this even works flawless with multiple devices running the game. You have to use it to learn how good of a feature this is while development and even more, while doing QA. Imagine fixing bugs and everyone of your QA team/friends/whoever helps to get your game done, has all changes on his device without doing anything but waiting 5 seconds - outstanding.
See More
Top
Pro
Lua syntax
Uses the great and easy-to-learn Lua programming language.
See More
Top
Pro
Very comprehensive API
It's very quick to get things up and running with Corona SDK. The API is extensive and while it's not 100% feature-complete with the iOS API, it's close enough that you could create tons of games and never run into a roadblock. The API docs can be found here.
See More
Top
Pro
Amazing learning curve
Corona does not throw photoshop-like madness full of buttons editor. You can go as fast as you want, learning and building game from ground up. Eventually, you'll learn how much corona is doing for you. But to start you don't have to master complex editor software. It's a great tool to learn to start game development if you want to learn how to program and make games. Your experience will be 100% transferable to any other Pro game engine.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-platform desktop and mobile
Corona works on OS X, Windows and Android (including Kindle Fire & Nook).
See More
Top
Pro
Marketplace for 3rd party plug-ins
See More
Top
Pro
Great community
See More
Top
Pro
Ability to call any native (C/C++/Obj-C/Java) library
See More
Top
Pro
Completely free
Since Corona SDK became Solar2D, it's completely free, as only some third-party plugins are paid.
See More
Top
Pro
Open Source
Since Corona SDK became Solar2D, it's completely open source under MIT license.
See More
Top
Pro
Well supported
See More
Specs
Price:
Free
Languages:
Lua
Dev platforms:
Windows; Macintosh
Desktop targets:
Windows; Macintosh
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
394
50
AutoIt
All
10
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
6
Specs
Top
Con
Closed-source
Being a closed-source scripting language creates security concerns such as hidden back doors.
See More
Top
Pro
Rich library included
Standard library includes solutions for all occasions allowing, in addition to capturing windows, keyboard and mouse events, to create a GUI, access Obj / COM, system processes and threads, the registry, MS Office applications, work with the network and databases.
See More
Top
Con
Unfriendly forum
Has well known reputation of the forum being unfriendly to newbies and casuals.
See More
Top
Pro
Compiles into portable executable
Interpretable code can be flexibly compiled into compact executable file.
See More
Top
Con
Basic-like syntax
Basic-like syntax is much less used these days than C-like syntax.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn and start to use
Simple BASIC-like syntax and close documentation with clear examples.
See More
Top
Con
Inappropriate standard code editor
The default code editor SciTE is simple but extremely difficult to tune, not recommended for beginners. Alternative editors are weak for AutoIt.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of flexibility and power
Many necessary things, for example, capturing and analyzing screen pixels or capturing keystrokes by their scan codes, are implemented only through direct access to the Win API through a rather cumbersome code.
See More
Top
Con
Ceased to develop
Bugs are slowly fixed and the last major update was many years ago.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
87
16
PureBasic
All
15
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Standalone executables
Can create single file executables without the need to install other libraries, run time environments, etc.
See More
Top
Con
Limited free version
Free version is limited to 800 lines and can not create DLL's.
See More
Top
Pro
The syntax is very beginner-friendly
See More
Top
Con
Some bugs are present on the Linux platform
See More
Top
Pro
Same code on Windows, OS X and Linux
Same code can be compiled natively, without any interpreter for OS X, Windows or Linux, using the native GUI toolkit of the OS
See More
Top
Con
Slightly bogged syntax
Sometimes the syntax bogs down, just a little with long procedure names and such. A truly minor issue.
See More
Top
Pro
Many integrated features
Many libraries available without additional installations : 2D & 3D, database, network, sound, xml, JSON, http...
See More
Top
Con
Not RAD
Not a RAD environment.
See More
Top
Pro
Allows to program at a lower level than most alternatives
See More
Top
Pro
Lifetime license
Pay once, use forever.
See More
Top
Pro
Constantly updated
See More
Top
Pro
Supports ARM in addition to x86, AMD64 and others
See More
Top
Pro
Can compile to plain C code
See More
Top
Pro
Grest user community / forums with the developer very active
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Current stable version:
5.71
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free / paid
135
24
vuido
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Package standalone final application with Launchui-packager
Launchui packager.
See More
Top
Con
Limited set of built-in UI components
Also the components do not expose all the properties available to the underlying HTML widget. This could be because it is still under development.
See More
Top
Pro
Free and Open Source
Source can be found here.
See More
Top
Pro
Build native desktop applications on OSX, Windows and Linux
See More
Hide
Free
1
0
Proton native
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Open source
See More
Top
Con
Not popular
Not being popular as electron js, its development isn't quite at the same pace.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses native tools
Not running a browser to manage the GUI, it uses less resources than the alternatives.
See More
Top
Con
No styling
Being based on libui, CSS styling isn't available.
See More
Top
Pro
No chromium
Is not based on chromium.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
1
0
Tcl
All
9
Experiences
Pros
8
Specs
Top
Pro
Standard library
Unlike *sh Tcl has a rich standard library.
See More
Top
Pro
Sane quoting rules
Unlike in sh you don't need to quote your variable substitutions ('"$1"'). Expanding of arguments occurs mostly explicit and if yet expected in-place (e. g. using eval or subst) it follows strict and well clear rules. So exec test $argv would execute test with single argument. And appending {*} before $argv would execute test with all arguments (list expansion).
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-platform
With a little care you can have the same script work on Linux, *BSD, OS X and Windows.
See More
Top
Pro
Widely available
You can expect a reasonably recent version of Tcl to either installed or available in the repositories of any popular open source *nix.
See More
Top
Pro
Everything is a string
Tcl can operate at the same level of abstraction as the POSIX shell, which makes it easier to manipulate the output of other programs.
See More
Top
Pro
Tk and Expect
See More
Top
Pro
Standalone packages
Tcl enables easy deployment through self-contained binaries known as starpacks.
See More
Top
Pro
Rich scripting capabilities on a single line
Want to run something 5 times? Here you go: set i 0; time { puts done-[incr i] } 5 If you need real conditional cycle? Not a problem: for {set ready 0; set i 1} {$i <= 100 && !$ready} {incr i} { if {[exec do-some-thing] eq "ready" } {set ready 1} } Want to measure performance of something or repeat it max 300 times and not longer than 1 seconds? Very simple: timerate { after 20 } 1000 300 How about notifying yourself when some http-server is back online? Sure thing: while {[catch { close [socket localhost 80] }]} { after 1000 }; puts "\7\7\7ONLINE!" And you can do it also fully asynchronously using events etc.
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
54
12
Felgo (formerly V-Play)
All
17
Experiences
Pros
15
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Mature cross platform IDE
Qt-Creator IDE with Code Completion, Debugging and Profiling, integrated Quick Help, Version Control and more.
See More
Top
Con
No 3rd party tutorials
There are little to none amount of tutorials for Felgo other than what was made by the engine developers themselves.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn
Felgo is among the easiest cross-platform tools to use according to a survey done by research2guidance.
See More
Top
Pro
In-game level editor
With the Level Editor components, you can let your players share their levels with the whole game community which is cool because you don't need to create new levels on your own, but the community helps you with it. There are other community features like rewards for good level creators that helps getting more downloads.
See More
Top
Pro
Felgo game network
Leaderboards, Achievements, Challenges are available across platform, even on Desktop. You can also use Cloud Syncinc of your game data that makes it easy to start a game for example on iPhone and then continue on a Nexus Tablet or the other way around. It is also convenient because sharing to all kind of game services & networks like Facebook & Game Center is possible with a single API call. Custom hosting of Game Network servers is also possible if you want to keep the player data.
See More
Top
Pro
Native performance
Although game logic is provided in JavaScript by you, performance-critical parts of the engine like OpenGL ES rendering or particle effects are implemented in rock-solid C++, providing the ultimate performance your game deserves.
See More
Top
Pro
Advanced gaming components
Advanced Gaming Components for handling multiple display resolutions & aspect ratios, animations, particles, physics, multi-touch, gestures, path finding and more.
See More
Top
Pro
Felgo build server
No need for native SDKs, Build in and Install from Cloud with the Felgo Build Server.
See More
Top
Pro
Rapid development
Cut your development time in half. Using the QML language allows for some powerful features that cut code lines and time. Another helpful feature that can help in this area is that there are more than 50 game demos of all genres that come with full source code, meaning one can easily check to see how something was done.
See More
Top
Pro
Support can be found in forums and via e-mail
Felgo has friendly forums where core developers participate as well as fast & helpful email support.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on Qt framework
The Qt framework is a great and mature framework on its own. Using Qt as a game engine base is a smart idea.
See More
Top
Pro
Runtime-balancing
You can use ready-made components to balance any of your game properties at runtime, so also on mobile devices which is great for adjusting forces or input parameters.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of learning resources
Helps get started and improve with lots of tutorials, demo games, examples.
See More
Top
Pro
Social services and monetization
In-app purchases, game and social network integration (such as Game Center and Facebook), ads (with Chartboost and AdMob) and analytics (such as Flurry) are all available across platforms.
See More
Top
Pro
Frequent updates
Every 2-4 weeks new updates provide additional features and fixes based on what users wanted the most.
See More
Top
Pro
Level store
You can even monetize these user-generated levels with in-app purchases with the Felgo Level Store component if you like.
See More
Specs
License:
Proprietary
Languages:
HTML
Dev platforms:
Windows; OSX; Linux
Desktop targets:
Windows; OSX; Linux
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
50
12
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop