Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to The Unlicense?
Ad
Ad
BSD-2-Clause Plus Patent License
All
7
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
See More
Top
Con
Permissive/ Pushover License
Code can be used in closed source products
See More
Top
Pro
Simple
Simple to understand and follow
See More
Top
Con
Liability
The original author is not to be held liable for any claim or damages caused by the software.
See More
Top
Pro
GPL2 Compatible
Compatible with the GPL2 License
See More
Top
Con
No warranty
The software comes with no warranty.
See More
Top
Pro
Permissive License
Code can easily be included in other projects
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
3
0
MIT License
All
7
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Prevents lock-in
The license basically allows anyone to do whatever they want with the code as long as the original copyright and license notice is included along with the copy of the code. The code can be used for commercially, privately, it can be modified and it can be distributed.
See More
Top
Con
Does not protect long-term user freedom
The MIT/Expat license doesn't protect against open-source code being taken (without payment) and used in proprietary software. This is harmful to user freedom because it lets future development be taken out of the public domain and instead moved into non-free programs. In addition, it doesn't protect against software patents being used to attack user freedom. Unlike the Apache 2.0 and GPLv3 licenses, the MIT/Expat was written before software patents became a problem and doesn't include a patent release.
See More
Top
Pro
Short and simple
The MIT license is one of the shortest licenses of all the major recognized open source licenses. The full text is just 3 paragraphs long.
See More
Top
Con
Does not prevent others from taking and selling your software
The MIT license is permissive enough that anyone can take your code, rebrand it and sell it.
See More
Top
Pro
Explicitly allows sublicensing
The license specifically mentions that the code can be used in other software that might have a less permissive license.
See More
Top
Con
Ambiguous name
The MIT License is sometimes known as the Expat License or the X11 License because it has been used with different names in different places.
See More
Top
Pro
Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
52
7
Simplified BSD License
All
5
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Can be used with proprietary software
BSD licensed software can be used with proprietary software.
See More
Top
Con
Nothing prevents someone else from making money off of your software
The 2-clause BSD license is permissive enough that anyone can take your code, rebrand it and sell it.
See More
Top
Pro
Short and simple text
This license has one requirement with 2 clauses, both of whcih are related to the distribution of the license itself.
See More
Top
Pro
Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
See More
Top
Pro
Prevents lock-in
The license basically allows anyone to do whatever they want with the code as long as the original copyright and license notice is included along with the copy of the code. The code can be used for commercially, it can be modified and it can be distributed.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
13
3
Creative Commons
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
2
Top
Con
Can restrict commercialization
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use licensing decision tool helps customizing the license type
The Creative Commons has an easy-to-understand utility for choosing which style of the Creative Commons you want to use.
See More
Top
Con
Not recommended for software
Creative Commons does not recommend using CC licenses for software.
See More
Top
Pro
Can restrict commercialization
A popular optional clause to the creative commons is the "Attribution-NonCommercial" clause, which restricts work to non-commercial use.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
13
4
AGPL
All
5
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Top
Con
Cannot be sublicensed
See More
Top
Pro
Protects user freedom in the cloud
Designed to ensure that end-users can access source code, even when applications run on remote web servers.
See More
Top
Pro
Ensures that derivitave works are also protected by strong copyleft
Works extending the original must be licensed in a similar fashion to the AGPL, preserving and extending the user freedoms originally granted.
See More
Top
Pro
Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
See More
Top
Pro
Ensures source access
Designed to make sure users have the freedom to access source code.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
8
3
GPLv2
All
5
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
2
Top
Con
Cannot be linked with other licenses
Software licensed under the GNU GPLv2 is incompatible with all other licenses, with the exception of GPLv3 in most cases. This means that code from a GPLv2 program cannot be combined with code under another license in the same program.
See More
Top
Pro
Ensures that derivitave works are also protected by copyleft
Ensures that the software and its derivatives remain licensed under the same license to keep the software free and open source.
See More
Top
Con
Long and complicated
The license is very long and complicated, making it hard to read and comprehend. However, there is a simplified version available here.
See More
Top
Pro
Guarantees that all changes are given back
See More
Top
Pro
Ensures that the software does not become proprietary
See More
Hide
Get it
here
7
4
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop