Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Flight?
Ad
Ad
Leaf
All
6
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Simple structure
Leaf has a simple structure and easy code.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of a database layer
Has inbuilt connection methods for only mysqli and pdo.
See More
Top
Pro
Useful classes
Contains classes for managing requests, responses, cookies, logging, views, HTTP caching, and more.
See More
Top
Pro
Beautiful, well organised documentation
See More
Top
Pro
REST-based
See More
Specs
License:
MIT
Price:
Free
Initial Release:
October 2019
Written in:
PHP
See All Specs
Hide
Get it
here
33
0
Lumen
All
8
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Easily upgradable to Laravel
Since it's basically just a minimal version of Laravel, it can be upgraded to a full Laravel app if the need arises. No need for code changes, just import the code to a new Laravel install.
See More
Top
Con
Built for smaller tasks like APIs
See More
Top
Pro
Feature rich
See More
Top
Con
It's based off Laravel and inherits its shortcomings
Lumen inherits many shortcomings of Laravel, such as static proxy classes.
See More
Top
Pro
Highest performing PHP micro-Framework
Lumen is benchmarked at 100/rps (Requests Per Second) faster than Slim v3, which used to be considered the fastest and most performant micro-Framework to date with the ability to handle 1800/rps. (1900/rps vs 1800/rps respectively).
See More
Top
Con
Made to work alongside Laravel
Lumen as a framework is at it's full potential when used alongside it's older brother. Lumen was created to be used for microservices alongside Laravel, which is used for more user-facing applications. If a project is already using another framework other than Laravel, it would be better to use another microframework for microservices instead of Lumen.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
See More
Specs
PHP version:
7.1.3
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
106
14
Fat-Free Framework
All
26
Experiences
Pros
18
Cons
7
Specs
Top
Pro
Simple development set up
See More
Top
Con
Community is a bit small, so if you get stuck you have trouble finding answers via google
Searching for "fat-free minification" on google sometimes doesn't give you the "right" answer.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight without losing functionality
The framework is very lightweight and fast. Even though it's pretty light, it still does not lose a lot of functionality.
See More
Top
Con
Backward incompatible within minor version
There are serious incompatibilities even between minor versions (eg. between 3.6.0 and 3.6.2). Developers exhibit complete lack of understanding what is versioning of product (and which changes should be integrated in which versions), which makes this framework unsuitable for serious work. Development is slow, stable versions are rare and not treated seriously.
See More
Top
Pro
Shortened development time
Building an application that processes a URL (display a page, submit a form, invoke Ajax, etc.) requires very little code and can be achieved very quickly. Allows developers to focus on the application itself and not the plumbing.
See More
Top
Con
Default ORM doesn't support joins
The default ORM for this framework is missing some features such as joins. But it's important to keep in mind that it's a small plugin, only 23KB in size which still can be replaced with a larger ORM if needed. An alternative the drop in f3-cortex ORM which is popular, and supported by the community, which supports Joins and much more.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to get started
After you download the framework it is very simple to get an app up and running very quickly. Makes it easy for newer PHP and web app developers to start using a MVC framework.
See More
Top
Con
Need more example of working code and directory structures and usage with JS and CSS frameworks
See More
Top
Pro
Very stable
You know those frameworks that have updated 5 times during your own development phase? Well, F3 sees one or two updates per year. Never had any issues updating or upgrading. F3 just works.
See More
Top
Con
Abandoned
The project has been abandoned since 2016. (not abandoned since 2019 with multiple new releases)
See More
Top
Pro
ORM supports sql, nosql, and jig
See More
Top
Con
The default template engine is "home made"
See More
Top
Pro
Highly modular
Virtually everything is modular. You can choose which modules and libraries to include and to keep the framework as lightweight as possible.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of video tutorials
While there is a great user guide, compared to other established PHP frameworks, there is a relative shortage of video and written step-by-step tutorials for newbies to learn this framework.
See More
Top
Pro
FREE structure
See More
Top
Pro
No canned coding/directory structure
Freedom to structure your projects' directories and codes as you wish. F3 is a non-opinionated framework : you are entirely free to use the files/API/assets structure that you love. Following a minimalistic approach, F3 tends to avoid adding code and structure that are not strictly necessary, while focusing on what really matters : coding your solution; actually you learn F3 while implementing/coding your project/webapp
See More
Top
Pro
Multiple view engines
Default view engine is superb and can also work with varieties of PHP view engines including Twig.
See More
Top
Pro
Vibrant community behind the framework
The community is responsive and helpful in clarifying the aspects of the framework.
See More
Top
Pro
Very little spin up time
The time to go from knowing nothing about Fat-Free to getting a project completed is very reduced compared to other bulky frameworks.
See More
Top
Pro
Comprehensive documentation and API reference
Concise and to the point documentation. Includes many examples and complete API reference.
See More
Top
Pro
Unit testing toolkit
See More
Top
Pro
No composer, curl or dependency injectors
You download a zip file and use it by placing require(); statement. No need to use composer, curl or any dependency injector which sometime become a great pain.
See More
Top
Pro
Very little not included by default
In a framework that's so small, it puts the rest to shame.
See More
Top
Pro
Self documenting code
See More
Top
Pro
Good documentation
With many examples which are easy to follow by new users.
See More
Specs
PHP version:
5.4+
Default Template Engine:
custom
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
339
43
Slim
All
17
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Well organized and thorough documentation
Slim's documentation is well organized and detailed, every concept is thoroughly explained and it is very helpful for both advanced users and beginners.
See More
Top
Con
Very little consistency among different versions
There have been quite some changes that break the compatibility between Slim 2 and Slim 3. Even if you learned how to work with the Slim 2, you will find that Slim 3 requires re-training.
See More
Top
Pro
A good starting point
Slim is minimal and that is a good thing if you want to start from there. It can be easily extended and even supports popular packages that are used in Laravel (like Illuminate\Database (eloquent)) for example.
See More
Top
Con
Dependency injection is too weak
It is not really dependency injection, but just a configurable container.
See More
Top
Pro
REST based
REST fans will love the REST based architecture.
See More
Top
Con
Needs strong bases to create dependencies
The dependency container schema of Slim is one of the biggest PROS and CONS of the framework. It is true that this schema brings so much flexibility to add anything, but another thing that is true is that you need to have strong bases of patterns, and an extensive knowledge of your libraries to convert it into a Slim dependency.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports tie-ins for Rack-like middleware
Rack is an interface used in Ruby frameworks used to group and order modules, which most of the time are Ruby classes, and specify between them. Slim uses a simple concept for it's middleware. By wrapping HTTP requests and responses it unifies the middleware into a single method call.
See More
Top
Con
Too minimal
While it's true that Slim is a microframework, it's still too minimal. When used for throwaway projects or simple prototypes, it's perfect. But in the long run, it becomes less and less useful and you end up in implementing a full custom framework in trying to tackle all the missing features.
See More
Top
Pro
Useful classes
Contains classes for managing requests, responses, cookies, logging, views, HTTP caching, and more.
See More
Top
Pro
Flexible
Slim doesn't demand that you stick to a fixed folder structure. As long as you load Slim the right way you can do anything from there the way you like it.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely lightweight
Paired with swoole it's a micro service powerhouse.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
The Slim Framework is open source and is released under the MIT public license
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely customizable
You can add any dependency, package or class that you want to use as a contained dependency.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports Php 5.3 and PHP 7
See More
Top
Pro
Makes it easy to understand the way some abstract functions and classes are built
In Django most things are abstracted, you just call some function or class without knowing how they were built, but with Slim, you end up understanding the way some abstract functions and classes are built.
See More
Top
Pro
Hooks for executing code at different points in its life-cycle
Slim supports code hooks for executing functions at different points in time during the application's lifecycle.
See More
Specs
License:
GPL 2
Written in:
PHP
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
557
72
Symfony
All
15
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Open Source
Symfony is open source and released under the MIT license.
See More
Top
Con
Settings
Too many configurations.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy debugging with a built-in debug toolbar
Symfony comes with a built-in toolbar that helps developers debug their applications during the development phase. The toolbar is also extendable and new components, called panels can be added if needed to help with the debugging process.
See More
Top
Con
Very hard to install
Setting it up on webhost without a console is difficult.
See More
Top
Pro
Great plugin ecosystem
One of the greatest strengths of Symfony is it's amazing and large plugin ecosystem, which comes as a result of it's large and dedicated community. Having a large number of plugins means less development time and more productivity.
See More
Top
Con
Promotes bad development practices
Such as annotations via comments.
See More
Top
Pro
Highly active community
Symfony has one of the most active communities out of all the PHP frameworks. This is shown by the high number of commits made every day in the GitHub repo.
See More
Top
Con
Doctrine ORM
Symfony Standard Edition, which is the most widely used distribution, comes integrated with Doctrine, the most resource hogging ORM library.
See More
Top
Pro
Teaches you good practices
Symfony makes you be a better programmer. You have to deal with the latest object-oriented design patterns such as service-oriented architecture, dependency injection, interface abstraction, and so on.
See More
Top
Con
You need a lot of files to display a single page
For a simple hello world page you need about 5 files.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses YAML/XML/PHP/Annotation
Symfony makes use of XML, YAML or PHP annotations to create configurations in order to tell Doctrine on how properties of a certain class should be.
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful event system
Symfony has a powerful built-in event system that allows you to add flexibility to applications and makes it easier to maintain the codebase down the road.
See More
Top
Pro
Great templating engine
Uses Twig, which is a simple and easy to learn templating language that can also be used as a standalone engine, outside the framework.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses Doctrine ORM
Symfony makes use of the Doctrine ORM to add an abstraction layer over the database in order to maintain flexibility without having unnecessary code duplication.
See More
Specs
License:
MIT License
Initial Release:
2005
Written in:
PHP
PHP version:
8.0.12
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
158
31
Yii
All
13
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Rapid development through code scaffolding
Yii takes care of repetitive tasks through Gii, a web-based scaffolding tool. Gii takes care of code generation and creating code templates for: Models Controllers Forms Modules Extensions CRUD controller actions and views There are a lot of scaffolding templates made by community for Gii, that improve generated code functionality by a lot. Gii is very easy to extend yourself.
See More
Top
Con
Can be hard for beginners
Since Yii requires developers to write code following certain rules, or in other words, it requires developers to follow the "Yii way of doing things" it can be hard for beginners to warm up to it and start using it right away.
See More
Top
Pro
Comes with important security standarts
Since security is a crucial part of any application, Yii comes with great security features out of the box to help developers create a secure and reliable application. These security features contain but are not restricted to: Input validation Output filtering Features against SQL injection Cross-site scripting prevention
See More
Top
Con
Not very good at many to many relations
(but there is a good plugin, namely CAdvancedArBehavior extension to do this)
See More
Top
Pro
Highly extensible
Yii is built to be extremely extensible. Virtually every component of the framework can be extended programmatically. For example, if you want to add a unique id to your views, it's very easy to do: namespace app\components; class View extends yii\web\View { public $bodyId; /* Yii allows you to add magic getter methods by prefacing method names with "get" */ public function getBodyIdAttribute() { return ($this->bodyId != '') ? 'id="' . $this->bodyId . '"' : ''; } }
See More
Top
Pro
Integrated with a testing framework
Yii makes use of Codeception, a great PHP testing framework that helps developers run their tests. They can be unit, functional or acceptance tests since Codeception supports them all.
See More
Top
Pro
Lots of plugins available
Yii has about 2000 addons hosted on Yii's official website. These addons significantly decrease development time and increase the developer's efficiency.
See More
Top
Pro
License
Yii is free and open source and is distributed under the BSD License.
See More
Top
Pro
Strong community support
Yii has a strong and rather large community behind it. This is proven by the great number of blog posts, tutorials, guides and reviews on the Yii framework as well as the great number of extensions developed for it.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to install
Yii uses Composer to handle it's dependency installation. This is rather easy and not very time consuming, although it should be noted that Composer is very resource-intensive considering what it's job is. But that is not really Yii's fault.
See More
Top
Pro
Best framework for CRUD operation
Yii Framework Provides most of features require for crud functionalities like GridView, Listview and DetailView (with jquery search and validation functions) by generating using GII.
See More
Top
Pro
Highly extensible without effort
See More
Specs
PHP version:
5.4+
Default Template Engine:
Twig
Default ORM:
Yii Active Record
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
118
26
Laravel 5
All
20
Experiences
Pros
13
Cons
6
Specs
Top
Pro
Good for building RESTful APIs
With migrations, powerful and intuitive Eloquent CRUD, resource routing, and simple JSON response out of the box, a complete REST API can be written in hours.
See More
Top
Con
Uses too much magic methods
It complicates debugging and autocompletion.
See More
Top
Pro
Comes with an excellent built-in ORM
Laravel's Eloquent ORM is a simple and fast Object-Relational Mapping which helps with organizing the application's database. It supports the most popular databases (MySQL, Postgres, SQLite, etc.) out of the box.
See More
Top
Con
Bloated
While the speed doesn't seem to be an issue with it (on local tests), in production it may be hindered. The framework creates a ton of files and folders, some of which your app might not even use. Not good if you don't like having a ton of folders and rigid non-standard PHP folder structure for development.
See More
Top
Pro
Good documentation
Laravel's documentation is thorough and very good. It covers everything and is very helpful to experienced and new users alike.
See More
Top
Con
Hard to use model properties
You need to check all model properties in database to know it exists, or declare all them manually.
See More
Top
Pro
Handles event queuing
Laravel supports event queuing and it does so in a very simple way. To create an event that should be queued just run: php artisan handler:event SendPurchaseConfirmation --event=PodcastWasPurchased --queued This creates a handler that implements the Illuminate\Contracts\Queue\ShouldBeQueued interface. Now when this handler is called it will automatically be queued by the event dispatcher.
See More
Top
Con
Steep learning curve
While a lot of times you can write things in plain PHP, it will hinder you down the line when you want to use core features and find that you have to rewrite code which then causes issues throughout the app. Documentation is good, but you need to know what you are looking for and practical examples are non-existent. Many features have been updated throughout the versions in such a short time that tutorials you find online are confusing to sort through outdated tutorials and guides that no longer work or have been depreciated.
See More
Top
Pro
Comes with its own CLI
Laravel comes out of the box with it's own CLI called Artisan. With Artisan developers can do several different tasks such as migrating databases, seeding databases, clearing the cache and much much more.
See More
Top
Con
Poor performance
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to write web apps with authentication
Laravel comes with Authentication capabilities and a fully-powered Auth class out of the box. For passwords it uses bcrypt.
See More
Top
Con
Follows bad design practices
Uses bad practices, like Singletons, Magic models, Middleware.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to learn
See More
Top
Pro
Gives developers a great degree of freedom in how they set up their project structure
Laravel allows for free configuration and does not force developers to use a single project structure, instead they can change it to how they wish.
See More
Top
Pro
Can use Symfony components
Laravel uses many libraries built for the Symfony PHP framework. Many of these libraries are well-built and have been tested by users before. Since the point of using a web framework is to shorten development time and to avoid reinventing the wheel for problems that have already been solved, then it's logical for a framework to use libraries already built to solve problems that have already been solved.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely powerful template system
Laravel has a powerful template system called Blade. It's quite similar to Twig or Moustache with lots of curly braces but the real power comes from the usage of PHP code directly in the view. Blade templates compile directly to raw PHP and are processed in the server when a request is made.
See More
Top
Pro
Gulp tasks in the form of Laravel Elixir
In Laravel 5.0 they added Laravel Elixir, which provides an API for using Gulp tasks for Laravel applications. Elixir supports several CSS preprocessors and even some test tools. But it's still in the early stages of development and it will be developed even further in the following releases. With more methods and more Gulp tasks supported.
See More
Top
Pro
Great Ecosystem
Has a great Ecosystem with SAAS like: Forge, Envoyer, Nova & from 3rd parties like oh-dear
See More
Top
Pro
Great Community
See More
Specs
License:
MIT License
Initial Release:
June 2011
Written in:
PHP
PHP version:
7.2.0
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
free
695
164
Silex
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Built on top of Symfony components
The thing that makes Silex stand out from other PHP microframeworks is the fact that it's built using some of Symfony2's components. Making it quite powerful but still lightweight enough to be considered a true microframework.
See More
Top
Con
Documentation is not very extensive
The documentation for this framework is average, it's helpful mostly. But it is not extensive enough to cover everything in detail unfortunately.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
Silex is open source and is licensed under the MIT license.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple and elegant DI container
Based on Pimple, Silex has a simple Dependency Injection container that consists of just one file and one class.
See More
Top
Pro
Testable
Silex makes use of Symfony2's HttpKernel which is used to abstract requests and responses. This in turn, makes it very easy to test apps created with the framework.
See More
Top
Pro
Extensible
By using Pimple, the Silex application extends the Pimple class, which in turn is nothing more than an implementation of the ArrayAccess interface that has been a part of PHP since version 5.0. This makes it possible to use an instance of the Application class as if it were an array. Like so: $app = new Silex\Application(); $app['config'] = new Config($config_path); This gives developers a great deal of flexibility when injecting dependencies and when testing.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
22
9
Aura Framework
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
2
Top
Con
LICENSE
See More
Top
Pro
High quality, well tested code
This framework has highly tested code. It is very reliable. In fact, most of its libraries have gone through scrutinizer-ci.com and they all score very high.
See More
Top
Con
Small community
Aura's community is still relatively small and it can be a little hard to find help or guides if you get stuck somewhere.
See More
Top
Pro
Loosely coupling allows for lots of flexibility
Aura is a loosely coupled collection of independent libraries with no base classes. This allow for extreme flexibility in choosing what libraries are needed.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
7
1
Phalcon
All
11
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Extremely fast
Since the framework is and extension built in C it's extremely fast and efficient. It's actually one of the fastest PHP frameworks, and according to some benchmarks it's the fastest framework out there.
See More
Top
Con
Not for shared hosting
Phalcon needs root access to install the PHP extension which is written in C. Developers who plan on using Phalcon must use VPS or Cloud Hosting with root access available.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
Phalcon is open source and is available under the BSD License.
See More
Top
Con
Require good programming skills
Not so easy to use if you want to gain the best from it.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses Volt template engine
The Volt template engine, which is embedded into Phalcon itself takes it's inspiration from the Jinja template engine and as such it's nice to look at, with a clear and understandable syntax. Volt also compiles very fast, like Phalcon itself, so it avoids being a bottleneck for the framework's overall speed.
See More
Top
Con
Debugging requires knowledge of C
You need to be a C programmer to debug Zephir or C code. Or if Phalcon is not maintained anymore and you have a problem and don't have much skills in C, you will be hard-pressed to find a C programmer to fix it.
See More
Top
Pro
Very flexible project structure
You can set up the base project as you want. It's very flexible
See More
Top
Pro
Clean and light project code
Since the framework code is not in the project directory, the code is light and clean.
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable with Zephir
Zephir is a high-level language designed to create PHP extensions easily by PHP programmers with no knowledge in C. Zephir does this by compiling directly to C and then the C program is in turn compiled to be run as a PHP extension. This, coupled with the fact that Zephir's syntax is very similar to PHP makes it a perfect way for PHP developers to use it for customizing Phalcon.
See More
Top
Pro
Loosely coupled components
Some components can be used as standalone packages like models, views, etc..
See More
Specs
Written in:
PHP
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
115
13
open qoob
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Con
Still under active development
This framework is still in beta stage and under active development. This means that a lot of stuff may be subject to change and some features may not be 100% complete yet.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
Open Qoob is completely free and open source. It's hosted on GitHub.
See More
Top
Pro
Has auto loading classes
This framework uses PHP's spl_autoload methods to automatically load classes. This means that if the class is inside the project folder structure, there's no need to call, include or require it.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple and lightweight
Qoob is made to create simple REST APIs and not full-blown applications. Therefore it's quite lightweight.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
6
1
CodeIgniter
All
13
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Beginner-friendly
Setting up CodeIgniter is quick and easy. You can download the version you want from the CI homepage or directly pull the latest version from GitHub. After that, you unzip the contents to the directory that's required. The final step is to edit the config.php to suit your needs and it's set up and ready for development. There are also a lot of guides and tutorials from developers who have been using CI for a long time. This is because of the relative old age of the framework and the large community behind it.
See More
Top
Con
Outdated
CodeIgniter was first released during the times of PHP 4. This means that a lot of features that were added later to PHP are not available. Some of these features are: Support for namespaces Modular separation by default Procedural function helpers While nowadays CodeIgniter can be used along the latest version of PHP, these features were not added so as not to mess with backward compatibility. They can still be used with CI, but it requires extending core files to make it work which is a waste of time and energy and requires advanced knowloedge of both PHP and CI.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
CodeIgniter has a small footprint, just 3MB and that's including the user guide.
See More
Top
Con
No unit testing
See More
Top
Pro
Well documented
The documentation is clear, structured and thorough. It explains both commonly used and CodeIgniter specific concepts and always with clear examples.
See More
Top
Con
It does not have basic functions
Some of the missing features include controller security, filters in forms and modoles, rules of validation, among others.
See More
Top
Pro
Active community
Because it's relatively old and well-liked, it has an active community of developers behind it. It's used by a lot of websites in production.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
The MIT License (MIT) CodeIgniter is open source and is distributed under the MIT license.
See More
Top
Pro
Stable
CodeIgniter is tested by hundreds of thousand of developers that use it in production. This means that it's very hard for any bugs or problems to go unnoticed. Even when a new version is out, bugs are quickly found and patched up.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use templating engine
CodeIgniter has it's own templating engine built-in. It's based on a mustache-like templating language which is easy to learn for new developers who have never seen it. While experienced developers will feel very comfortable using it.
See More
Top
Pro
Output caching
CodeIgniter lets you cache the web pages in order to decrease loading times and increase efficiency and performance.
See More
Top
Pro
CodeIgniter v4 is a complete rewrite
CI4 will be out soon & is a rewrite.. "CodeIgniter 4 is a rewrite of the framework and is not backwards compatible." So it will support ALOT more newer functionality built-in.
See More
Specs
PHP version:
5.4.8+
Default Template Engine:
Custom CodeIgniter engine
Default ORM:
DataMapper ORM
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
149
29
Li3
All
8
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Unified relational and non-relational database API
Lithium has unified the relational and non-relational database APIs into a single one. Being one of the few frameworks to do it.
See More
Top
Con
Less than ideal documentation
Documentation is scattered so it takes a little while to learn and figure some things out.
See More
Top
Pro
Robust plugin architecture
Lithium makes use of PHP namespaces to create a powerful plugin architecture. Almost every component of the framework is replaceable.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast Bootstrap & Autoloader
This framework loads faster than most due to its class autoloader. It is flexible as well and handles older classes - but requires the developer to define transforms here for naming convention, includes, etc. Many other frameworks use Composer for autoloading and that significantly slows down their bootstrap time because Composer's autoloader is extremely compatible without much developer interaction (it does not require as much involvement for autoloading legacy libraries). So it's a trade-off, speed vs. a little bit of up-front work.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrated unit testing
Lithium comes with integrated unit testing. It also has a test dashboard.
See More
Top
Pro
Aspect inspired filter system
Lithium's filter system is based on the paradigm of Aspect-oriented programming which aims to increase modularity by separating cross-cutting concerns and helping speed up development.
See More
Top
Pro
Great for building an API
Lithium can return JSON and many other formats from the same actions that render templates increasing productivity in many cases. It handles a "type" key in the route which allows it to render various responses with different Content-Types. This is incredibly useful and easy to extend. This combined with closures in routes makes Lithium a very good framework for building a RESTful API.
See More
Specs
PHP version:
5.3+
Default Template Engine:
Custom Li3 engine
Default ORM:
Default ORM included out of the box
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
14
4
FuelPHP
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Total flexibility
Fuel has very few restrictions on how to write code. Classes and controllers can be in any file structure, any folder can be the "modules" folder and native classes can be extended any way you want.
See More
Top
Con
Small community
FuelPHP has a pretty small community compared to other alternatives. This means that there are not many resources and guides for it out there, but on the other hand, it's easier to get help from the core team of developers that are working on Fuel.
See More
Top
Pro
License
FuelPHP is open source and is released under the MIT license.
See More
Top
Pro
Out of the box HMVC structure
FuelPHP follows the HMVC pattern which makes it possible to divide the code into smaller modules.
See More
Top
Pro
Secure
Fuel takes security very serious, and as a result, has implemented the following measures to ensure the safety of your web applications: Output encoding in views CSRF protection XSS filtering Input filtering SQL injection
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful yet lightweight ORM
FuelPHP is all about being lightweight and simple, this is also demonstrated by it's built-in ORM, it's simple yet powerful. It maps a model to each table in the database, assigns fields on the table depending on the model configuration.
See More
Specs
PHP version:
5.3+
Default Template Engine:
None
Default ORM:
Default ORM included out of the box
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
14
4
CakePHP
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Built-in ORM that's easy to use
Cake has a built-in ORM which is pretty easy to use and learn. Building queries can also be done very easily and fetching entire columns can be done in one or two lines of code.
See More
Top
Con
Slow
Because of legacy code, old concepts and prioritizing development speed over everything else, CakePHP is bloated and slow.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast development
Developing in CakePHP is very fast and flexible. CakePHP is about fast and reliable development, it achieves this by following the convention over configuration principle as it's heavily inspired by Rails (which follows the same programming paradigm). Convention over configuration is all about making it easier for the developer to start immediately writing code without worrying on what's going on "under the hood".
See More
Top
Pro
Large library of helper classes
CakePHP has a large library of helper classes with features such as: Authorization AJAX Forms E-mails Internationalization etc...
See More
Top
Pro
Exhaustive list of resources to learn CakePHP
Cake's great community has thrown together an exhaustive and amazing list of resources to get started with CakePHP. It's open source and can be found on GitHub.
See More
Top
Pro
Open Source
CakePHP open source and is licensed under the MIT license.
See More
Specs
PHP version:
5.4.16+
Default Template Engine:
CakePHP Template
Default ORM:
Default ORM included out of the box
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
40
13
FlightGear
All
12
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Worldwide scenery
FlightGear has scenery that contains environments to fly in from the whole globe.
See More
Top
Con
Not as graphically advanced as commercial competition
See More
Top
Pro
Free and Open Source
All code written for FlightGear is opensource and available for anyone to use.
See More
Top
Con
Getting stuck upside down
After a crash a pilot may be stuck in an upside down position with no way to recover.
See More
Top
Pro
Crash animations in some aircrafts
See More
Top
Pro
It has world-wide multiplayer
See More
Top
Pro
Live cockpit
See More
Top
Pro
A lot of aircrafts to add
See More
Top
Pro
It has amazing graphics
See More
Top
Pro
You can almost recreate real incidents
See More
Top
Pro
No bugs
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, macOS, Linux, Raspberry Pi, FreeBSD, others
License:
open source
Multiplayer:
Yes
Graphic design:
3D
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
630
26
Back to Bed
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Interestingly uses mind bending architecture in the gameplay
Players must figure out how to traverse the architecture in order to get items they need to use to help guide the the main character, who is sleepwalking. It is through this mind bending architecture that the core of the gameplay lies as each level is a puzzle in and of itself to figure out how to gain all the items needed, which is only half the gameplay as once that is figured out they then need to guide the sleepwalker to their goal.
See More
Top
Con
Puzzles could be deeper
With such an amazing graphic design, the level of depth to the puzzles feels almost disappointing.
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent sound design
From its background music to its voice work, the sound design of The Room Two not only fits with the theme but adds to the player's immersion in the game and overall experience.
See More
Top
Pro
Surreal graphics
The graphics of Back to Bed are very surreal, as if Dahli and Escher had teamed up to design a game.
See More
Hide
$2.99
15
2
Nette
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Built around good programming practices
Nette is built to help developers create good, maintainable code using the DRY principle.
See More
Top
Con
Hard to find information in English
Nette is mostly used in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and most of the information coming from third-party sources is not in English.
See More
Top
Pro
Open source
Nette is open source and is distributed under the MIT license.
See More
Specs
Default Template Engine:
Latte
Hide
Free
14
2
Joomla!
All
8
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Specs
Top
Pro
Highly customizable templates
Joomla allows for heavily customizable templates to be changed from the admin interface without needing to hack.
See More
Top
Con
Insecure
It's common-place for a Joomla-based website to be defaced, often very quickly. This is most often due to the low quality of extensions.
See More
Top
Pro
Powerful and user-friendly admin interface
Admin interface is constantly being iterated on to remove unnecessary legacy features and to streamline the interface. Resulting in a very clean and easy to understand interface that also offers a wide range of options.
See More
Top
Con
Extensions are scarce, badly maintained & rarely good
If it's not part of the default Joomla installation, quality extensions are rare. Joomla has a extensions library, but it is full of abandoned, dated or bloated components, modules and plugins.
See More
Top
Pro
More than 8000 extensions
Which can be found here.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to pick up
See More
Top
Pro
Great for social networking and commerce sites
Joomla has both a good native support and a great list of extensions that make creating either a social networking or a commerce site easy.
See More
Specs
License:
GPLv2
Price:
Free
Multi Language Support:
Yes
Language:
PHP
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
0
324
33
Practico Framework
All
5
Experiences
Pros
4
Specs
Top
Pro
Multilingual
Spanish, English, Indi, French, Portuguese.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
It's really easy to install and use. Uncompress like others CMS and go to URL to use it.
See More
Top
Pro
OpenSource
Free to use thanks to its GPL v2 License.
See More
Top
Pro
100% Visual development
All the process to develop web or mobile apps is totally visual.
See More
Specs
License:
GNU GPL 2.0
Price:
Free
PHP version:
5.3+
Multilingual:
Spanish, English, French, Indi, Portugues
Hide
0
1
0
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop