Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to KiTTY?
Ad
Ad
ZOC Terminal
All
12
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Modern look
ZOC has a modern design.
See More
Top
Con
Hard to configure
It does not detect the installed shells (PowerShell, CMD, etc) automatically.
See More
Top
Pro
An actual "Terminal Emulator"
It's an actual terminal emulator (in the sense that it emulates a terminal) and not just a local console window app.
See More
Top
Con
Options creep
It has so many options that it's hard to find the one you need.
See More
Top
Pro
Scriptable
Zoc provides complete automation of the client using its macro scripting.
See More
Top
Con
Not free
Zoc requires a commercial license in order to use it, implying that it's not free.
See More
Top
Pro
Flexibility in platform support
Originally developed for OS/2 (as Zap-O-Comm), Zoc is currently available for Windows and Macintosh.
See More
Top
Pro
Can view and send to all sessions at once
Offers a thumbnail view of all session in thumbnails and type commands to all sessions at the same time.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports serial and dial-up connections
In addition to telnet, ssh, and rlogin, ZOC supports direct serial connections, modem dialing, and named pipes.
See More
Top
Pro
Tabbed sessions allows for easy navigation
Tabbed sessions mean that multiple items can be contained within a single window and can be easily navigated by the user.
See More
Top
Pro
Hideable UI
Zoc allows for every UI component except the title bar to be hidden. All features are accessible through the context menu.
See More
Top
Pro
Auto-Highlight feature
Feature to search for text bits in the data stream and highlight them with color/background.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$79.99
324
57
PuTTY
All
14
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
8
Specs
Top
Pro
Free
See More
Top
Con
Only one session per window
Cannot open a second session in the same window (you need multiple windows).
See More
Top
Pro
De facto standard client for SSH, Telnet and Rlogin on Windows
PuTTY is one of the oldest and most popular clients. It has earned the trust of a great number of users over a long period by being reliable, offering useful features and helpful support. It got into the 15 Essential Open Source Tools for Windows Admins list by InfoWorld.
See More
Top
Con
Can not save passwords
Anyway, you can use "PuTTYgen" to generate a key pair, then use "Pageant" to do a password-less SSH remote login.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be used on any Windows computer, even without admin rights
See More
Top
Con
Lacks features
It is JUST an SSH client. There are many other options with built in X-servers, Multitabbing, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Source code available
Full source available. Compile and modify it yourself.
See More
Top
Con
Ugly design, too simple
Looks very dated. Does the basic functions very well, but not much more.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight and portable
Doesn't require much resources (memory and hard-disk). Can even be run on a system by just downloading without install.
See More
Top
Con
No global settings
If you want to change a setting for all your connections, you'd have to do it individually.
See More
Top
Con
Organizing sessions
Does not have features for organizing session connections (like folders). If you have 5-10 connections that's fine. But if there are 30-50 connections - that becomes a nightmare.
See More
Top
Con
Tedious logging/tracing
Its tedious to set up logging and tracing (e.g. for serial connections).
See More
Top
Con
No login scripting
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, GNU/Linux
License:
MIT
Initial Release:
1999-01-22
Latest Release:
2021-07-17
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
297
86
Alacritty
All
11
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Blazing fast rendering with GPU-accelerated
Written in Rust with a philosophy focusing on speed and simplicity, Alacritty is one of the fastest terminal emulators out there.
See More
Top
Con
Cannot into ligatures
Alacritty does not support ligatures in Fira Code, Iosevka etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Looks good
Alacritty looks very slick on Linux, especially with GNOME or i3.
See More
Top
Con
Unreliable Font Rendering
Like a box of chocolate you never know what you're going to get.
See More
Top
Pro
Simple configuration
The configuration file is very well made and easy to use. You can fine tune your preferences to perfection in a matter of minutes.
See More
Top
Con
Sacrifices basic features for raw performance
The Suzuki GSXR of terminals. Or your ditzy, blonde high school cheerleader; fast and pretty but not a lot going on under the hood. Eschews a negative developmental philosophy towards including said functionality, with the official reason cited in project documentation as "Not within the realm of a terminal emulator" and ostensibly, "best left up to other tools such as terminal multiplexers" [such as screen or tmux]. Which is unfortunate when you factor in speed against terminal with the functionality built in vs their reliance on 3rd party tools: tmux on alacritty: 'find /usr' time: 3.234s, cpu: 72% tmux on konsole: find /usr' time: 1.777s, cpu: 96% See issue here.
See More
Top
Pro
Comprehensive font options
Alacritty can be configured to adjust line spacing (height), letter spacing (width), and individual character horizontal/vertical positions.
See More
Top
Pro
Has support for image previews in w3m and ranger
See More
Top
Pro
Has text ref-low when window is resized
See More
Top
Pro
Fast and simple but with true color support
It's simple and fast like xterm or urxvt but with truecolor support which is a big plus if you use a terminal based code editor. Basically Alacritty has all the features you need and nothing you don't (if you're using tmux for multiplexing).
See More
Specs
Font Ligatures:
No
GPU Acceleration:
Yes
Configurable:
Yes, via automatically reloading YAML configuration file
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
219
37
Xshell 6
All
11
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Connections management
See More
Top
Con
Not free
The subscription costs $89 per year.
See More
Top
Pro
Has tabs
See More
Top
Con
No stable portable version
Any portable version present is wrapper. It moves files from portable folder to appdata and backward, which often cause dataloss
See More
Top
Pro
Compose bar to send a string to multiple servers at once
See More
Top
Pro
Local shell interface to control Xshell
See More
Top
Pro
Great option for enterprises
Xshell 6 caters to enterprises with features such as multi-tab UI, dynamic port forwarding, scripting support, support for ASCII as well as non-ASCII characters, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Can use any system font
See More
Top
Pro
Tunneling bar
Channel monitoring and dynamic port forwarding.
See More
Top
Pro
User defined key map support
See More
Top
Pro
Task automation with VB script
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$89/Y
75
19
WezTerm
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Supports multiple windows, tabs, splits/panes
tmux-like functionality with native UI even on Windows systems allows managing multiple terminal sessions how you like.
See More
Top
Con
Lua learning curve for config
The only reason it would be difficult to recommend is that it's for experienced programmers.
See More
Top
Pro
Looks good
Highly customizable appearance and comes with over 240 built-in color schemes.
See More
Top
Pro
Open Source and Free
See More
Top
Pro
Supports font ligatures and stylistic sets
Ships with JetBrains Mono, a modern programmers font, so that you can enjoy modern typographical features such as contextual ligatures and font variations/stylistic sets in your terminal environment.
See More
Top
Pro
GPU Accelerated
See More
Specs
Font Ligatures:
Yes, with control over shaping and stylistic sets
GPU Acceleration:
Yes
Configurable:
Lua based live reloading configuration
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free
23
7
hyper
All
8
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
6
Top
Con
Made with Electron
It uses a considerable amount of resources, compared to other offerings.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-platform due to electron browser-based foundation
Although not Windows-friendly. But nobody uses Windows terminal anyway.
See More
Top
Con
Not as cross platform as advertised
Most features only work on Mac OS.
See More
Top
Pro
Built on electron, supports split panels and plugins
See More
Top
Con
Incorrect rendering
Terminal window has visual artifacts.
See More
Top
Con
No configuration UI; all options must be set via JSON
See More
Top
Con
Still maturing as of December 2016
Folks noticed some issues in the 1.0 release cited here.
See More
Top
Con
Difficult to find information about it, because of the confusion with hyperterminal
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
89
40
tmux
All
12
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
3
Specs
Top
Pro
Easily split panes
There is a keyboard shortcut that makes it easy to split a window and create more panes.
See More
Top
Con
Poorly designed key binding
Counter-intuitive keyboard shortcuts make tmux very hard to use and learn.
See More
Top
Pro
Windows linked to sessions
tmux calls the individual shell instances windows. They are displayed like tabs in the status line. These windows can be shared between different sessions, so that any given shell instance can be in any number of tmux sessions used for different purposes or by different users. This allows configurations like the following example: User A: wAB, wA1, wA2; User B: wB1, wAB, wB2
See More
Top
Con
Bad scrolling support
See More
Top
Pro
Preserve the state
As long as you don't close your session, you may even lose your SSH connection, it'll keep your state just as it was. So you can resume where you left off (via tmux attach).
See More
Top
Con
No builtin telnet or serial support
It's considered bloat by the maintainers and for this reason there's no builtin support for them.
See More
Top
Pro
Maximize screen space
As a tiling window manager, it'll make use of all the space. As you have multiple workspaces and you can resize, etc. you can adjust to see what matters most.
See More
Top
Pro
Frequently updated
Tmux is in a state of constant development. Updates are frequent and bug reports usually get an answer within days.
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable
Open ~/.tmux.conf to get started. You can customize keybindings, the bottom status bar, color schemes, the clock screen, your time zone, and more.
See More
Top
Pro
Mouse support
Mouse support can optionally be enabled, allowing e.g. scrolling with the mouse wheel, or switching panes with mouse clicks.
See More
Top
Pro
Only need to learn a few keyboard shortcuts and commands to make much headway
See More
Specs
License:
ISC license
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
130
7
z/Scope Terminal Emulator
All
5
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Supports tabs, making for easier navigation
z/Scope supports tabs and tab-based navigation.
See More
Top
Con
Not free
z/Scope is not free.
See More
Top
Pro
Affordable
Licenses are permanent. Price starts at $46. First year support is free. Continuing subscription, it's not mandatory to renew maintenance services.
See More
Top
Pro
Host Access
It supports IBM TN3270E / TN3270 emulation, IBM TN5250E, UNIX VT100-420, SSH and secure FTP integration.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross OS
Windows and Web-based editions.
See More
Hide
$46
16
2
Sakura
All
10
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Lightweight
Sakura has very few dependencies, it's very lightweight, and great if your computer does not have many resources.
See More
Top
Con
libvte/gtk
It has gnome dependencies.
See More
Top
Pro
True colour support
Supports full 24-bit color.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't provide many configuration options
Sakura does not have any advanced configuration capabilities.
See More
Top
Pro
Great unicode support
Even shows combining chars correctly.
See More
Top
Pro
Few dependencies
See More
Top
Pro
Starts quickly even on lower-end machines
Sakura's quick start-up time becomes noticeable with lower-end machine's such as Eeepc 1015PX (Intel Atom 1.6 Ghz and 2 GB of RAM).
See More
Top
Pro
Tab support
See More
Top
Pro
Easy zoom
Sakura supports zooming through keyboard keys (Ctrl+'+' to zoom in and Ctrl+'-' to zoom out).
See More
Top
Pro
Ready for wayland
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
55
6
iTerm2
All
27
Experiences
Pros
21
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Extremely customizable
Other than being able to customize the various shortcuts, iTerm2 also lets you customize the colorscheme, font, transparency, etc.
See More
Top
Con
Keycodes are not passed through following Linux standards
If you come from a Linux terminal emulator (Gnome Terminal, Konsole...) and you rely on key-combos that are widely supported in those, porting the same functionality to iTerm is possible but will require a lot of research and configuration on your part, so account for a long painful adoption period.
See More
Top
Pro
Autocomplete is built-in
iTerm has autocomplete features built in. It remembers your past commands and when you are writing something on the terminal, simply pressing Control-; it will show you a drop down menu of suggestions from which to choose.
See More
Top
Con
Not quite as fast as Alacritty or Kitty
Comparing these 3 terminals on the same machine/config, iTerm stands out as the slowest of the bunch. The difference may not be noticeable to all users.
See More
Top
Pro
Complete out of the box
Unlike most terminal emulators, iTerm2 comes with a pretty complete set of features. It has built-in search, autocompletion, tabbed navigation, Growl support and even a built-in clipboard manager for various API keys and such.
See More
Top
Con
Way too many menu items and settings
Finding the right one is like searching for a needle in a haystack.
See More
Top
Pro
Fine tuning for fonts
It's possible to choose a font and adjust vertical and horizontal spacing.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't support Snow Leopard 10.6.8
Some people still use Snow Leopard or other 32-bit systems.
See More
Top
Pro
Can immediately open files inside a text editor
You can Ctrl+Click on a file path to open said file in a text editor.
See More
Top
Con
Doesn't support RTL
See More
Top
Pro
Supports mouse actions
Has support for mouse actions like clicking, dragging, selecting, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Active maintainers
Issues resolved fast by quality contributors.
See More
Top
Pro
Works well with powerline fonts
See More
Top
Pro
Completely free and open source
iTerm2 is completely free and open source. It's released under the GPLv2 license.
See More
Top
Pro
Split panes
Easy to split panes to either horizontal or vertical sections. Makes it easy to observe multiple console windows.
See More
Top
Pro
Supported by many applications as a terminal app selection
If an application has terminal integration, there is high probability it allows iTerm2 to be selected.
See More
Top
Pro
Intuitive
See More
Top
Pro
Cmd+Shift+I to Input all
Wanna SSH your server from multiple tabs, here you go.
See More
Top
Pro
You only need to type in commands once
iTerm2 can store up to 4M of history of commands you already used. This, coupled with the built-in search features makes it possible to type a command only once and then search for it through the history for subsequent uses.
See More
Top
Pro
Works perfect with Oh My Zsh
It's a perfect base to add Oh My Zsh on top of it and enjoy a lot of themes and a really pleasant look and feel.
See More
Top
Pro
Works well with tmux
The great mouse and clipboard support that are built-in go really well with tmux.
See More
Top
Pro
Any key can be mapped to any function
Using the Preferences Menu you can set up hotkeys to map virtually any action you can think of to a single key or a combination of them. This is extremely helpful as it allows you to use shortcuts to edit commands you are typing in the terminal and while most terminal emulators have shortcuts for this sort of thing, few of them let you define your own.
See More
Top
Pro
GPU-rendered, blazing fast and super smooth
Many people say they use Kitty or Alacritty because they are GPU-rendered. That was true a long time ago. But iTerm2 has been GPU rendered for years now. It's so fast and smooth that you soon forget you are in a terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Beautiful, minimalistic and elegant UI
It's super-clean and during use it gets completely out of the way, it's a beautiful canvas for your terminal work, a pure joy that never gets old.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be configured as a drop-down terminal
Can be configured to work as a drop down terminal like Quake.
See More
Top
Pro
Cmd+D to split plane vertically
Very handy to use multi-tab.
See More
Specs
Supported platforms:
macOS
Ligature support:
Yes
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
654
56
Xfce4 terminal
All
13
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Good for systems with low specs
Like other applications included in the Xfce package, this terminal emulator is very lightweight and doesn't require many resources to run. This makes it perfect for systems that have low specs.
See More
Top
Con
Cannot set text color for character under cursor to background color
Suppose you have a dark background with a light cursor and light foreground color: the light cursor will cover up whatever character it is on, so that you cannot read it. There is no option to set the foreground color for the character under the cursor to what is normally the background color. Such an option would allow you to read the character under the cursor.
See More
Top
Pro
True transparency
You can set the transparency of the Xfce4 terminal on any amount you want, out of the box.
See More
Top
Con
Execution in xfce4-terminal - e mode is not always functional
See More
Top
Pro
Tabs support
Xfce4 fully supports tabs and tab-based navigation.
See More
Top
Con
Resizing text resizes window
See More
Top
Pro
Almost everything is customizable
You can configure size, color, background, etc.
See More
Top
Con
No profiles
There's no profiles or profile-based customization in Xfce-terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Composition effects
Xfce4 terminal takes advantage of xfce composition effects.
See More
Top
Con
Can't scroll on spamming text
When text generates too fast, you can't scroll it, so you just can't read anything in such moments.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast rendering
See More
Top
Con
Does not support sixel images
See More
Top
Pro
Can be switched to a drop-down terminal
You can configure the Xfce-terminal to act as a dropdown terminal if you want, which makes for greater ease of use.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
134
18
Extraterm
All
9
Experiences
Pros
8
Specs
Top
Pro
speed
not the fastest ever, but for me its a good comprimise of features vs performance
See More
Top
Pro
Cross platform
See More
Top
Pro
Supports tab, splits and panes
You can set up your own layout with multiple splits and tabs.
See More
Top
Pro
Shell integration
The shell integration makes it possible to group in command output in "frames" which show success/failure.
See More
Top
Pro
Image support
You can view images and other data types like audio directly in the terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Keyboard based text selection
It is possible to go into a cursor mode where you can select text just like in a text editor. It even supports multiple cursors.
See More
Top
Pro
Global shortcuts
You can configure global shortcuts to open the terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Keyboard friendly "Command Palette"
Just like Sublime, Atom and VSCode you can easily search and find commands from the drop down Command Palette.
See More
Specs
License:
MIT
Keep this Behind an Admin panel:
----
Hide
See All
Experiences
0
5
1
Tilix
All
22
Experiences
Pros
18
Cons
4
Top
Pro
Multiple sessions inside a single window
In addition to tiling, Tilix supports placing separate sessions in tabs or switching from one to another through a sidebar.
See More
Top
Con
Unmaintained
Bugs and pull requests are not processed.
See More
Top
Pro
Tiling makes for ease of use
The user can split terminals horizontally or vertically, according to their needs or preferences.
See More
Top
Con
No font ligatures
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates nicely into GNOME 3
Tilix follows the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines and uses the UI patterns of this desktop environment.
See More
Top
Con
Takes a bit more memory than Gnome terminal
Would've expected this to be more lightweight.
See More
Top
Pro
Good alternative to Terminator
Tiling and ability to type into multiple terminals simultaneously is Terminator's 2 most significant features. Tilix has them as well.
See More
Top
Con
Heavyweight
Tilix has quite a lot of dependencies and takes ~100MB of RAM when running.
See More
Top
Pro
Configurable shortcuts
Many actions in Tilix can be triggered with configurable shortcuts.
See More
Top
Pro
GNOME Human Interface Guidelines
Tilix follows GNOME HIG whereas gnome-terminal doesn't. GNOME should use Tilix as their default terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Transparent background
Unlike the standard GNOME Terminal, Tilix supports configurable background transparency.
See More
Top
Pro
Fancy looks
Tilix has that new GNOME look, with a HeaderBar. It can also be disabled.
See More
Top
Pro
Able to write into multiple terminals simultaneously
Inside a session, you can select multiple terminals, which will receive the same input simultaneously.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be used as a drop-down terminal
The new 1.30 version of Tilix supports a quake mode enabling it to work as a drop-down terminal.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely fast
As fast as gnome-terminal, if not faster.
See More
Top
Pro
Copy on select
See More
Top
Pro
Faster than Gnome Terminal
When running commands it feels snappier.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy
See More
Top
Pro
Copy as HTML
You can copy text from the terminal as HTML for embedding in web settings.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
See More
Top
Pro
Solarized themes built-in
Great support for solarized color schemes, and no setup is involved.
See More
Top
Pro
Terminus can notify you about finished tasks and perform actions based on terminal output
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
145
20
WinSSHTerm
All
7
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Freeware
WinSSHTerm is free for anyone to use.
See More
Top
Con
Not a true terminal emulator
It's a PuTTY interface and it's mostly used to access remote machines through ssh, so it may not be very suitable for working on a local machine.
See More
Top
Pro
Keyboard shortcuts
Keyboard shortcuts are especially valuable for professionals.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports X Server
There is easy, automatic integration with X Server and starts/stops can take place with the launch/exit of WinSSHTerm.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports file transfer
The user can start a WinSCP session inside WinSSHTerm, without the need to duplicate the session in WinSCP.
See More
Top
Pro
Highly portable
The user can run WinSSHTerm from a USB drive on different computers.
See More
Top
Pro
Ready for production use
There are no annoying bugs in WinSSHTerm. Navigation tools and keyboard shortcuts are a great time saver, especially if you have to manage multiple connections.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
35
7
Konsole
All
19
Experiences
Pros
13
Cons
6
Top
Pro
Directory and SSH bookmarking
Konsole can bookmark ssh and telnet sessions, directories, and it can open tabs in a folder for easy access.
See More
Top
Con
KDE Library dependencies
While not an issue if using KDE, when trying to use this terminal in other desktop environments or window managers, there will be a large amount of dependencies tied to the app, making for a large install size. For those trying to keep their desktop lean, this may be an issue.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports split-view
Konsole supports split-view which splits the window into two (or more) konsole instances. This is very useful for people who work a lot on the terminal and don't want to spend time navigating between different windows or tabs.
See More
Top
Con
Uses a lot of memory
Although it's very fast, konsole has to use a lot of resources in return. It may use up to 30 MB per instance, depending on the number of tabs and the task at hand.
See More
Top
Pro
True color and Smooth font
Konsole supports true color and smooth font. This made konsole more fanstatic than other terminal emulators.
See More
Top
Con
No good support for powerline character even with patched fonts
See More
Top
Pro
Embeddable into the desktop
Konsole can be embedded into desktop so it's always easily accessible, but not in the way of other windows.
See More
Top
Con
Can mess terminal keybinds
Most the of the time, the terminal keybinds are just ignored to obey the kde keybinds. Can be configured though.
See More
Top
Pro
Export of output in plain text or HTML format
By going to file > save output, you can send all screen output to a text file.
See More
Top
Con
Lack of DECSCUSR support
Konsole don't allow changing the cursor shape with extended DECSCUSR sequences, using instead the temporary-profile hack. This causes pain when working in (neo)vim inside Konsole.
See More
Top
Pro
Support in Dolphin file manager
Konsole can be accessed by pressing F4 in Dolphin, which is convenient for when the user needs to open the terminal in a particular spot of the file structure.
See More
Top
Con
No support for double-width characters
Konsole no supports double width characters. For powerline users, you need to add a space after powerline glyph.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports font ligature
Most terminals in Linux don't support font ligature, while many modern fonts such as PragmataPro or Fira Code already have decent coverage of font ligature. Support for font ligature makes user experience and font management much easier (i.e. you don't need to keep two copies of the same font just to use in the console)
See More
Top
Pro
Helps to identify tabs using custom icons
Users can associate each bookmark or SSH session with a custom icon, thus giving a visual hint to quickly identify a tab when a lot of tabs are open.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports advanced color schemes
In particular solarized.
See More
Top
Pro
Notification alerts about activity in a terminal
Konsole can monitor activities and notify the user through system notifications when a certain activity happens. This is a very customizable feature too: you can write scripts that can use this feature and notify you for whatever you want.
See More
Top
Pro
Exceptionally fast
Konsole is usually very fast. It boots up very quickly and takes less than a second (averages to 0.25-0.59 seconds) to display files of up to 600 MB.
See More
Top
Pro
Customize and save profiles
Profiles containing different settings can be created, saved, and loaded. Color schemes, window transparency, scroll bar, key bindings, start-up commands, window border, and menu bar can all be customized according to the user's needs.
See More
Top
Pro
Allows CTRL-SHIFT-c/v within WSL Ubuntu as well
Good menu to customize.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
157
25
rxvt-unicode
All
20
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
9
Top
Pro
Low memory usage
Rxvt-unicode uses very little memory and takes a lightweight approach without losing many important functionalities. A single instance of urxvt takes about 6.5MB-8MB of RAM.
See More
Top
Con
Unicode characters that are too wide are blanked instead of clipped
If a character in a backup font is wider than the base font, urxvt substitutes the non-displayable character. A large letter space will show the wide characters, but the result is not reasonably spaced. There is a patch from 2014 that the urxvt maintainer will not merge.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be daemonized to reduce resource usage
For those who want to lower their system's resource usage, rxvt-unicode allows for daemonization. This way you can run several instances of urxvt inside a single process.
See More
Top
Con
Requires work to look acceptable
Out of the box, rxvt-unicode is not too pleasant to look at. Some understanding of Xresources is required for updating its appearance. That being said, the experience of customizing it can be very rewarding.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports terminal transparency
Changing the transparency of the terminal is allowed for in rxvt-unicode. This not only makes for eye candy but is also good for GUI usability.
See More
Top
Con
Requires work to configure useful functionality (clickable URL's, font scaling, tabs)
See More
Top
Pro
Minimum dependencies and simple text config
See More
Top
Con
In daemon mode you can lose all your terminals
Because of sharing the same process terminal windows cannot be killed without sacrificing all other open windows. That becomes even more dangerous if you use multiple graphical managers without overriding socket with RXVT_SOCKET.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports multiple font types
Multiple font types can be displayed flawlessly in rxvt-unicode.
See More
Top
Con
Unicode rendering is buggy
There are a few references to urxvt's buggy rendering, such as unicode combining characters, which bled through during scrolling.
See More
Top
Pro
Handles bold text colour properly
Displays characters with text attribute bold actually as bold glyphs.
See More
Top
Con
Bloated
Exists because Xterm is complete trash. Although it has a lot of features, you will most likely never use them all.
See More
Top
Pro
High performance
Rxvt-unicode is much faster than most alternatives.
See More
Top
Con
No support yet for 24-bit "True Color"
Though this is still not available, you can download the patched version for 24bit, here.
See More
Top
Pro
Unicode support
International language support is provided through Unicode.
See More
Top
Con
Font size cannot be changed on the fly with the mousewheel
Sometimes you may need to enlarge the font to improve readability, or shrink it to have more real estate and "hawk's eye" view of data. In rxvt you need to change the configuration file or use these commands: $ function fontsize {printf '\33]50;%s%d\007' "xft:Dejavu Sans Mono:size=$1::antialias=false"} $ fontsize 22
See More
Top
Pro
Proper wrapping support
During selection and pasting wrapped text doesn't break into lines at place of wrapping.
See More
Top
Con
No option to have a "reverse color" cursor
While you can choose the color of the cursor and the character under the cursor, there's no automatic "reverse color" for the cursor. This makes it impossible to use rxvt-unicode if you have a light background terminal and a dark background editor.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast text rendering
Rxvt-unicode has very fast text rendering, being able to render hundreds of MB of text in a very short time.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in Perl interpreter
It has a built-in Perl interpreter, meaning that no install is needed. Simply run urxvtperl.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
391
56
Tabby Terminal
All
15
Experiences
Pros
9
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Con
Some functions still fail
See More
Top
Pro
It looks just beautiful
See More
Top
Con
Graphics bugs on all platforms
On Windows 10 and Debian 11, Debian 12 the graphics starts bug after some usage. It always happens, even on different computers.
See More
Top
Pro
It's open source
This helps the community to move software forward and to make it even better.
See More
Top
Con
Slow with input lag
Sadly, Electron strikes again. The input lag is noticeable and annoying. Startup also takes like 2 seconds or more (On an i7 from 2016 with SSD).
See More
Top
Pro
It comes with plugins
See More
Top
Con
80MB
It's huge. The amount of resources it consumes is not justifiable.
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable
A lot of things can be easily configured, e.g. color theme, size, window frame behavior, tab location, cursor style, hotkeys, etc.
See More
Top
Con
Cannot remove the default profiles
For example, you installed Arch Linux for Windows Subsystem for Linux some time ago, but now you have deleted it and currently use Ubuntu on WSL. After that, if you decide to try this terminal emulator, you'll find Arch there without an option to remove the profiles already included in Terminus.
See More
Top
Pro
Is cross-platform
Even the question was "...for Windows", it's nice if you can use your tools over different platforms.
See More
Top
Pro
Under active development
Hyper development has basically stalled out.
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent interface
At start opens last session terminals. Also has terminal tabs.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrated GitBash, Cmd, PowerShell, and WSL
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates with git-bash with a simple toggle in the interface
See More
Specs
License:
MIT
Hide
See All
Experiences
FREE
237
40
st
All
18
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
8
Top
Pro
Low memory usage
st is built to serve as a lightweight terminal emulator. It's very light and doesn't require many resources to run, making it able to run well on older and low-end machines.
See More
Top
Con
Configuration requires recompiling
Though recompilation takes seconds, knowledge of C header files is required for customization (though it's pretty easy to do for someone who knows how to edit config files).
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely simple architecture
st consists of a single C file that takes seconds to recompile. This also makes it very easy to understand and customize.
See More
Top
Con
Text is cut off when resizing windows
In the vanilla build, when reducing windows, lines do not wrap, they are cut off. When the window is made large again, some of the text is missing.
See More
Top
Pro
24-bit "True Color" support
st supports color escape sequences for a full 16 million 24-bit color spectrum, instead of the typical 256 colors.
See More
Top
Con
Crashes when some characters or colored fonts are displayed
See More
Top
Pro
Support for fontconfig
There is full XFT (X Free Type interface library) and fallback font support through fontconfig in st. If your selected font is missing a certain glyph or symbol, but one of your other installed fonts has it, it will be shown.
See More
Top
Con
No scrollback by default
The best way to perform scrollback is to use a multiplexer (such as tmux, screen, or dvtm) if you want scrollback and reverse-search support.
See More
Top
Pro
Copyfree licensing
Copyfree licensing implies that the user has the freedom to copy, use, modify, and distribute what he/she possesses.
See More
Top
Con
New features means installing patches
Just to get copy/paste support and scrolling, you have to install patches. And it's not that intuitive for a beginner.
See More
Top
Pro
Image previews
Handles image previews (e.g. in ranger) way better than other terminal emulators.
See More
Top
Con
Internal border/margins
Doesn't support internal margins.
See More
Top
Pro
Patches are great
The patches on the site are great. Scroll back, hide the mouse, etc.
See More
Top
Con
Source code edits (aka configs) need to be redone after updating
See More
Top
Pro
Minimalist
Hackable and lightweight.
See More
Top
Con
Imperfect fontconfig support for CJK characters
It [st] doesn't seem to use CJK fonts provided by fontconfig while other programs use such fonts.
See More
Top
Pro
Blazing fast
it is extremely responsive and fast, even on older computers.
See More
Top
Pro
Clean
The terminal doesn't have any bloated features nobody uses. It is very minimal and extendable.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
185
37
MobaXterm
All
17
Experiences
Pros
14
Cons
3
Top
Pro
Flexible
MobaXterm can connect to practically anything.
See More
Top
Con
Not completely freeware
If you use MobaXterm at work, they hope you will pay for it. This isn't horrifying, but it's not providing any new features in Linux to warrant the outlay. Its integration with Putty in Windows as an X client may make it worth the funds.
See More
Top
Pro
X server support
In case you need X11 forwarding, MobaXterm has an integrated X server.
See More
Top
Con
Split screen prevents tabbed mode
If you split a screen within a tab, you have to go back to single screen before you can switch to another tab.
See More
Top
Pro
Full linux subsystem with package manager
And you can install conda for additional package management.
See More
Top
Con
Can have some performance issues
MobaXterm can have some occasional performance issues. These happen rarely but it's worth mentioning that they exist, especially since this is a paid tool.
See More
Top
Pro
Tabbed or split mode
Multiple terminals can either be in tabs or split horizontally or vertically.
See More
Top
Pro
Integral remote file editor
Edit remote files via ssh and sftp
See More
Top
Pro
SSH tunnel controls and forwarding UI controls makes it easy
See More
Top
Pro
Automatic SFTP
With MobaXterm, there's no fiddling with multiple apps: simply connect and everything is available.
See More
Top
Pro
Connection manager
See More
Top
Pro
ENV can use Windows PATH
See More
Top
Pro
Password vault
See More
Top
Pro
Server tools (HTTPD, SSHD, SFTPD, TTFT)
See More
Top
Pro
Build in sftp file manager
Manipulate and edit remote files in the file browser.
See More
Top
Pro
Integrates with WSL
Integrates perfectly with the Windows Subsystem for Linux. Out of the box it offers a shell to that system.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports macro controls (multi commands in single screen)
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$70
278
69
FireCMD
All
5
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Sophisticated auto-completion
FireCMD supports command auto-completion. Once you start typing a command, you can press the tab key to auto-complete it.
See More
Top
Con
Not free
Although there's a free trial available, FireCDM is not free and costs $29.
See More
Top
Pro
Recursive and persistent aliases
FireCMD allows users to create up to 500 aliases.
See More
Top
Pro
HTML and CSS support makes for greater usability
HTML is a very flexible and user-friendly language for writing web pages, while CSS allows for the content of a HTML document to be separated from the style and layout of that document.
See More
Top
Pro
A free trial is available
A free trial of FireCMD is available for users to try out.
See More
Hide
$29
8
0
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop