Introducing
The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome
Find the best product instantly
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now
4.7 star rating
0
What is the best alternative to Materialize?
Ad
Ad
Material Design Lite
All
4
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Developed by Google
Material Design Lite is a framework created by Google, who are also responsible for the creation of Material Design.
See More
Top
Con
Deprecated
No longer maintained
See More
Top
Pro
Very customizable
See More
Top
Con
On limited support
Google moved further development efforts to Material Components for the web.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
51
31
Bootstrap
All
17
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
5
Top
Con
Large file size out of the box
Bootstrap has an out-of-the box filesize of ~276K, which is pretty large considering it's just CSS. Most of those styles aren't even used in 90% of web pages built with Bootstrap. By only including the required styles it can be trimmed by 70%-75%.
See More
Top
Pro
Consistency across browsers
The grid layout with the predefined CSS elements and JavaScript components make it easier to have consistency across different browser versions and even different devices.
See More
Top
Con
Too many classes
Bootstrap's over-reliance on HTML classes for styling can get very messy very quickly. There's also an overabundance of DOM elements which have a lot of classes and are more often than not nested inside DOM elements with even more classes. This gets problematic down the line because the maintainability of the project gets harder when the project starts to get large.
See More
Top
Pro
Responsive design philosophy
Bootstrap is developed to be instantly compatible with all sizes of screens, so you don't have to worry about which device the user is accessing your site from. Yet if you prefer, you can disable responsiveness of Bootstrap.
See More
Top
Con
Websites can start to look the same
If the initial Bootstrap colors and styles are not changed or edited, different websites start looking the same even if they have nothing to do with each other and they are made by different developers.
See More
Top
Pro
Well documented
Documentation is thorough, well organized and full of live examples and templates ready for use. Every component and every part of the framework is explained and covered in depth.
See More
Top
Con
Hard to customise
It's quite hard to customise Bootstrap using pre-processors like SASS and LESS, the only real flexibility is with typography and colours.
See More
Top
Pro
Custom builds
If you don't want to download the full Bootstrap framework. Custom builds of Bootstrap can be created, including only the desired CSS, CSS components, and JavaScript components. This can be done directly from the Bootstrap website by simply choosing what components to download.
See More
Top
Con
Large font sizes
See More
Top
Pro
Designed to get a site running quickly
Bootstrap is designed to get a site up and running quickly. Each of it's components is pre-configured to help with getting a site up and running quickly.
See More
Top
Pro
Great community
Bootstrap is very popular and has a large community. As a result of this it is much easier to find help with anything you might need. This also gives you a treasure trove of prebuilt components to use and add to your site.
See More
Top
Pro
Supports responsive embeds
Allows easily adding responsiveness to <iframe>, <embed>, and <object> elements.
See More
Top
Pro
Easily make professional looking websites
Bootstrap makes it easy to learn how to make professional looking websites. It can even make code junkies semi-enjoy design.
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable
Bootstrap can be customized in a variety of ways. Either by overriding the default CSS styles with new CSS styles or by editing the .scss Bootstrap files.
See More
Top
Pro
A wide variety of themes available
To help you avoid the "Bootstrap look", there are many resources that provide a great selection of themes and templates for Bootstrap.
See More
Top
Pro
One of the most popular ones
Ranked on GitHub as the most starred CSS repository.
See More
Top
Pro
Builders
Builders available, such as Pingendo and Layoutit.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Free / paid
337
137
Semantic UI
All
13
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
5
Top
Pro
It's semantic
Uses semantic class names for its styling, making it easier to grasp and understand even for beginners looking to jump right in.
See More
Top
Con
Large file size
Packages are much bigger when comparing to Twitter Bootstrap or Zurb Foundation. Semantic UI is really extremely large and it would be better to use specific modules and components, rather than the whole thing.
See More
Top
Pro
Load only the components you need
The whole Semantic-UI package is well organized, with every component neatly set up with it's own stylesheet and JavaScript file. This way you can load only the components you need for each page, minimizing the load time and file size.
See More
Top
Con
Not maintained anymore
Use Fomantic-UI instead.
See More
Top
Pro
The elements offer a huge amount of customization, far beyond a framework like bootstrap
See More
Top
Con
Buggy
Contains a lot of UI inaccuracies, like wrong positioning, cannot mix classes, etc.
See More
Top
Pro
Beautifully designed
Semantic UI has a futuristic and beautiful design. Many will satisfied with the design, especially when Semantic UI is used as a CSS framework.
See More
Top
Con
Not for beginner developer/unfamiliar with Javascript
Many features in Semantic UI uses Javascript customization such as for Modal. This is unlike Bootstrap that can add Modal just with customizing the HTML attributes. Developers who plan to using Semantic UI must be familiar with Javascript or JQuery to get the most out of it.
See More
Top
Pro
It'll have almost any UI component/element you may think of for your project
It includes tons of UI components that you may need for almost any type of project you may work on; And of course, you can always only pick what you need.
See More
Top
Con
Small number of classes
Once you wanna do something that is not mentioned in the doc - prepare to spend an hour, then give up and implement a custom "workaround".
See More
Top
Pro
Well documented
The documentation is easy to use, well written and has lots of examples each with their source codes.
See More
Top
Pro
Official support for third-party applications
There are several official implementations of Semantic UI for many popular libraries, frameworks and CMS. Such as Angular or Wordpress.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use
Just start code from the beginning of the journey, from first page of documentation.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
257
65
UiKit
All
12
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
5
Top
Con
Messy code classes
Nested classes become complicated to read to obtain desired result.
See More
Top
Pro
Well architected
The code is pretty clean and follows well-defined conventions.
See More
Top
Con
Not very popular
UiKit is not a very popular framework, especially compared to other options. As such it may be hard to find learning resources other than the official documentation or it may be more likely for development of UiKit to be dropped than for another more popular framework
See More
Top
Pro
Ready to use themes available
There are plenty of ready to use themes available from the official website. You can choose the theme that you want to use from the dropdown menu and then download the CSS, LESS or SASS file for that theme to use for the website.
See More
Top
Con
Slow development
New features and updates trickle out over 6-12 month development cycles, bug fixes are more frequent but very slow and selective as well.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to use.
When using UIKit classes, it is used with the ui- prefix which is very good. Components are explained straight-forward.
See More
Top
Con
Pre-built starter templates are now behind a paywall
Easier to use Joomla! or Wordpress starter templates without paying money for it.
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in animation capabilities
UiKit has some built-in animation features which can be used to animate various components.
See More
Top
Con
Closed development
Development is mostly done in-house and not publicly available.
See More
Top
Pro
Great style even out of the box
UiKit has a pretty good and clean style even out of the box without any customization needed.
See More
Top
Pro
Very customizable
UiKit's rather minimal style can be easily customizable to create an entirely new look to fit the needs of the designer.
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely modular
Every aspect of the framework is designed to be modular, this way designers can easily choose which components to add to their stylesheet without risking to damage the overall style.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
163
67
Foundation
All
15
Experiences
Pros
11
Cons
4
Top
Con
Can be hard for beginners to grasp
Since Foundation is built to be customizable, it's default style may not be very appealing for most. While it's true that most production-ready websites shouldn't be using the default style of a css framework (they would all end up looking the same), this is even more true for Foundation.
See More
Top
Pro
Responsive design philosophy
Foundation allows designing for multiple screen sizes simultaneously easily, meaning your content will always fit.
See More
Top
Con
Needs more pre-built components
Example would be a scroll-spy not only for one cell, but cell to cell.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses REMs instead of pixels
Foundation uses REMs instead of pixels, meaning you don't have to state an explicit height, width, padding, etc, for every device. Simply put, using REMs means you can just state font-size: 80%; and have the whole component (and its nested elements) shrink by 20%. This is great for making your site mobile friendly. There is also a Sass function in Zurb that converts pixels to REMs so if you're used to thinking in pixels, you don't have to learn a different system.
See More
Top
Con
Not UMD pattern in core
This problem will bring attention when used with Angular, React and other JS framework. It is important to know that they create app version of this framework.
See More
Top
Pro
No style lock-in
Styles are purposefully undeveloped to encourage differentiation between different sites using Foundation.
See More
Top
Con
Documentation is a bit better than average
Documentation could be written better and clearer, with many more example than they currently have. Sometimes hard to find solutions for detailed css problems.
See More
Top
Pro
Block grid
Foundation has a feature called block grid. Block grid gives designers the power to divide the contents of an unordered list into a grid that is evenly spaced. Furthermore, Foundation also takes care of collapsing columns as well as removing gutters.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy customization
Just by looking at the name, Foundation merely provides designers with a foundation of sorts on which they can build their design. It can be customized easily through SASS, a powerful CSS pre-processor or by overriding the default CSS styles.
See More
Top
Pro
Easily extensible with a selection of add-ons
There's a variety of front-end templates, icon fonts, responsive table examples, SVG icons and stencils that help you quick-start or easily improve on your site.
See More
Top
Pro
Support for off-canvas navigation
Foundation comes with an easy way of creating off-canvas menus.
See More
Top
Pro
Uses Interchange to load responsive content
Foundation comes with Interchange, it makes use of media queries to load images responsively and create content that's suited to different browsers and devices.
See More
Top
Pro
RTL support
Allows easily changing text direction. <html class="no-js" lang="ar" dir="rtl">
See More
Top
Pro
Built-in form validation
Foundation comes with Abide plugin, an HTML5 form validation library.
See More
Top
Pro
Good mobile support
Foundation was one of the first frameworks to adopt a mobile-first philosophy. By focusing on mobile design first, Foundation makes designers think on what kind of content is important, relevant and interesting to the users without thinking too much on the space.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
186
80
Cirrus
All
5
Experiences
Pros
5
Top
Pro
Supports Flexbox and CSS Grid
Supports both Flexbox and CSS grid making it a great modern choice for designing web apps.
See More
Top
Pro
CSS Only
No additional JS/jQuery required to use.
See More
Top
Pro
Mobile Responsive
Extremely responsive and supports many smaller screens.
See More
Top
Pro
Open Source
Open source and quite actively maintained on Github.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
Much smaller than Bootstrap with just as much flexibility.
See More
Hide
Free
19
2
Polymer
All
12
Experiences
Pros
10
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Various basic components
It provides a base component.
See More
Top
Con
No server-side rendering
Polymer does not support server-side rendering. This results in higher loading times, more HTTP requests and it's not very SEO friendly, since search engines have no way of indexing a page if it's not rendered in the server.
See More
Top
Pro
HTML markup is not string
HTML markup as it can be a non-string.
See More
Top
Pro
Flex layout components
It provides Flex layout components.
See More
Top
Pro
CSS is easy to apply
CSS can be applied far more comfortably than React.
See More
Top
Pro
No need for special debugging tools
The presence od specialized debugging tools are advertised by competitors. The all features of web components are natively supported by browser embedded development tools.
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent routing
The router is embedded into CLI for project creation and covers as web as Progressive web app, also fused with Polymer layouts out of the box. The shop template for CLI has a complete solution including the routing.
See More
Top
Pro
Complete web app stack support
Full app stack from data tier to routing, progressive web app, responsive layouts makes no need to seek outside of Polymer ecosystem for application features. In addition to waste set of mature web components in Polymer Elements along with Vaadin Elements there are thousands of web components in the wild comparable to jQuery plugins set.
See More
Top
Pro
Excellent documentation
Polymer guides you as with tools (cli, build environment, app templates,..) as with complimentary documentation on all phases of app development from creation of app as progresive web app to production deployment instructions. As Polymer is standards based, the whole community around those standards also helping in documentation and support.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on web components
Web Components are a collection of specifications released by W3C as a way to reduce the complexity of web apps by creating reusable components. Browser support is currently poor for web components, however Polymer is developed to make web components compatible with modern browsers.
See More
Top
Pro
API is easy to understand, based on standard
The Polymer APIs are split on application layers and follow standards on all possible ways: Web Components, CSS variables, async API via Promises and so on.
See More
Specs
v2.0 GZipped size (Chrome):
10K
v2.0 GZipped size (Firefox):
32K
v1.0 GZipped size:
53K
v2.0 GZipped size (Edge):
36K
See All Specs
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
101
22
MUI CSS
All
8
Experiences
Pros
8
Top
Pro
Fast
Simple animations without too much fanciness keep the performance high and size small.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
11KB minified and gzipped
See More
Top
Pro
No external dependencies
See More
Top
Pro
Grid system - the same as Bootstrap
12-column grid
See More
Top
Pro
WebComponents library
See More
Top
Pro
HTML Email library
See More
Top
Pro
React library
See More
Top
Pro
Customizable using SASS
The MUI CSS can be easily customized by using the SASS files available on GitHub and via Bower. Customize breakpoints, font-settings and use Material Design colors.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
20
6
Skeleton
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Top
Con
Not maintained anymore
No active development for two years.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
See More
Top
Pro
Responsive grid
See More
Top
Pro
Style agnostic
See More
Top
Pro
Vanilla CSS
No bells and whistles for Skeleton, it's just CSS.
See More
Top
Pro
Media queries
See More
Hide
Get it
here
68
37
Stylify
All
7
Experiences
Pros
7
Top
Pro
Intuitive selectors
It uses native CSS property:value selectors like color:blue or font-weight:bold as a selector.
See More
Top
Pro
Selectors minification
It shrinks long selectors such as font-weight:bold to _ab12.
See More
Top
Pro
Small CSS chunks
CSS can be generated for each file, page, layout or component separately. Selector is generated only once and reused when possible.
See More
Top
Pro
On demand generated CSS
It can generate CSS on demand for example inside the express request.
See More
Top
Pro
No dependencies required
It doesn't require any post or pre processor.
See More
Top
Pro
Seamless integration
It can be easily integrated into the Nuxt.js, Next.js. It works well along with Webpack, Rollup and Vite.js. The CSS can be generated easily for Symfony, Nette or Laravel.
See More
Top
Pro
Dynamic screens
Screens can be combined using logical operangs like sm&&tolg, xl||landscape and lg&&dark. The value for media queries can be dynamic like minw640px.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
13
0
Pure CSS from Yahoo!
All
6
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Easy to customize
Has an extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize since it basically gives designers just a foundation on which they can easily build their design.
See More
Top
Con
Not suitable for beginners
Since Pure CSS only carries a minimum number of styles out of the box, it might not be great for beginners who want a complete style that looks good out of the box without having to customize it.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-Browser compatibility
A solid base built on Normalize.css to fix cross-browser compatibility issues.
See More
Top
Pro
Lightweight
Extremely small file size: 4.5KB minified + gzip.
See More
Top
Pro
Responsive
A responsive grid that can be customized to your needs.
See More
Top
Pro
Works well with Bootstrap
Easily use Bootstrap CSS and JS elements within the framework.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
30
21
Material UI
All
3
Experiences
Pros
2
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Adheres really well to the material design standard
Really nice implementation so far
See More
Top
Con
Active development means API changes are frequent
Might be a problem for large projects, but since active development is a good thing, you should consider this rather mild inconvenience weighed against the benefits.
See More
Top
Pro
Perfect for React projects
Really convenient and easy to use components
See More
Hide
0
25
23
Inferno
All
6
Experiences
Pros
4
Cons
2
Top
Pro
Modular
Use it however you want in a framework of your own custom design. When things change in the industry, swap things out instead of being locked in by someone else's design.
See More
Top
Con
Some React components may not work with Inferno
Inferno and React have different public and private APIs. If 3rd party components use a private API then it's almost certainly going to break when you use it with Inferno. Once React Fiber is implemented, even libraries that are currently working will break and will not be supported by Inferno.
See More
Top
Pro
Pretty light-weight
Inferno weighs in at 9kb gzipped, which is light-weight.
See More
Top
Con
Not very popular
Which can hinder one's opinion of its future, but the future of all "frameworks" is to break things into smaller pieces, so inferno very well might get used by the big names in the future.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast performance
Inferno is one of the fastest UI libraries around and widely considered the fastest.
See More
Top
Pro
React compatability
Using the Inferno compatibility package ("inferno-compat"), Inferno can support the vast majority of React codebases.
See More
Hide
Get it
here
19
1
Webix
All
11
Experiences
Pros
8
Cons
3
Top
Pro
A lot of widgets
Webix is one of the most extensive UI component libraries, second only to Sencha ExtJS. Not only considering the number of widgets, but also the API methods for manipulating these widgets.
See More
Top
Con
Commercial license
It's not free for commercial applications.
See More
Top
Pro
Views can be constructed using JavaScript without HTML
The most common way of working with webix is to create a JSON configuration of your view in JavaScript. When you use TypeScript, you get complete typechecking and intellisense in your IDE.
See More
Top
Con
Not very popular
Not really a reason to not recommend it. But it has still a small user base. It deserves a lot more attention.
See More
Top
Pro
Seems to be quite stable
Even the most complicated GUIs are bug-free most of the time.
See More
Top
Con
Not modular
The library is not modular (except for some additional more complex widgets). If you only need a few widgets, you still need to include the entire library.
See More
Top
Pro
Webix Jet
The webix Jet library adds all the required features for SPA development (routing, template loading, ...)
See More
Top
Pro
Extremely simple to implement.
To get started is extremely simple. It has a low learning curve.
See More
Top
Pro
Mature project
Regular updates and releases.
See More
Top
Pro
Great support from the webix team
The company behind webix is really quick in answering any questions you have on their forum or via email.
See More
Top
Pro
Awesome responsive material skins
Great design and icons pack.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
$0-$469
54
4
HTML5 Boilerplate
All
7
Experiences
Pros
6
Cons
1
Top
Con
Not a complete solution
HTML5 Boilerplate is basically just that, a template or a basis on which to build an HTML page. It doesn't have much mark up or components out of the box. In other words, it doesn't provide all the components and tools needed to build a UI, it contains best practices and a generall template on which to build your UI.
See More
Top
Pro
Includes a comprehensive set of server configuration files
These configuration files may help increase performance of the webapp.
See More
Top
Pro
Includes Modernizr
Modernizr checks browser support for HTML5, CSS3, as well as a few other miscellaneous elements and allows for easily writing fallbacks if they're not supported.
See More
Top
Pro
Documented and undocumented versions
To help out newcommers to either programming in general or HTML5 Boilerplate specifically, the boilerplate includes in-depth docs that help understand how things work and why certain choices are made. The documentation is highly comprehensive going even as far as to describe every single line of normalize.css that the H5BP includes.
See More
Top
Pro
Cross-browser normalization
H5BP includes normalize.css that will help fix inconsistencies in the way browsers render elements.
See More
Top
Pro
Performance optimizations
HTML5 Boilerplate theme doesn't only provide a base template for building your next modern site. It also has performance optimization features built into it which include stuff like html + js minification , image size reduction as well as css minification. This link here describes how to optimize your shiny new html5 site using these built in features.
See More
Top
Pro
Optional support for XHR and Flash
With optional support for XHR, we can use techniques such as XHR eval and XHR injections to optimize the loading of external scripts and significantly reduce page load times. Alongside XHR, built-in support for Flash means that you can use your old swf/flash content on your website, where you feel you're not ready for HTML5 yet.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
29
3
Quasar Framework
All
9
Experiences
Pros
7
Cons
1
Specs
Top
Pro
Uses Vue.js 2.0
Vue 3.x available as a plugin.
See More
Top
Con
Developed by a single person
Statistically, apps being developed by a single person can be gone without warning.
See More
Top
Pro
Good documentation and coding samples
See More
Top
Pro
Massive suite of well test & optimized widgets
Instant rebuild for SPA, PWA, Cordova or Electron with Material/iOS Themes.
See More
Top
Pro
Designed from the outset for desktop & mobile
See More
Top
Pro
Can build/test your PWA with/without PWA wrapper
See More
Top
Pro
Supports server side rendering (SSR) like Nuxt + SSR/PWA
"Icon genie" builds app icons and splash images for platforms selected.
See More
Top
Pro
Ability to add custom server side code when using SSR
See More
Specs
Platforms:
Windows, Linux, Mac, Web
License:
MIT
Mobile targets:
Android, Blueberry, iOS, Windows Phone, Web
Supported languages:
Javascript, Typescript
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
175
13
Angular Material
All
7
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
2
Top
Con
Latest versions docs are incomplete
The previous version had nice docs. The new one has almost nothing. And the library has changed wildly so the old docs are no use.
See More
Top
Pro
Very optimized
See More
Top
Con
Not that customizable
The use of the library can be very hard for beginners, but it gets very good when you know the features.
See More
Top
Pro
Accessibility in mind
See More
Top
Pro
Made for Angular
See More
Top
Pro
Multiple theme support
See More
Top
Pro
Themeable
You can create your own themes using the SCSS toolkit.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
free
8
1
React with pre-made components
All
18
Experiences
Pros
12
Cons
6
Top
Con
Large file size
React's react.min.js is 145.5KB in size. It's much larger than some other libraries that offer roughly the same features and it's almost the same size as some MV* frameworks such as Angular or Ember that offer more features out of the box. Although, it should be mentioned that sometimes having a smaller library may force developers to reinvent the wheel and write inefficient implementations on features that React already has. Ending up with a larger application that's harder to maintain and/or that has bad performance.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to reuse components
Since every single UI component is created independently in JavaScript, it becomes very easy to reuse them throughout your app without having to re-write them.
See More
Top
Con
You have to learn a new syntax
Requires to learn a custom syntax, JSX that has some gotchas and introduce complexity, a steeper learning curve, and incompatibility with other tools. Though you can opt out from JSX and use vanilla JS instead. But that is not recommended since it adds a lot of unneeded complexity which JSX tries to avoid.
See More
Top
Pro
Supported by Facebook and Instagram
React is built by Facebook engineers initially to be used only for their inner projects especially to solve the problem of building large complex applications with constantly changing data.
See More
Top
Con
Dependency hell
With all the third party components available for React, which when used smart is a good thing, can result in huge code bloat when used dumb. Javascript sizes can go from KB to MB without doing too much though.
See More
Top
Pro
Flux architecture pattern
Flux is a platform agnostic pattern which can technically be used with any application or programming language. One of Flux' main features is that it enforces uni-directional data flow which means that views do not change the data directly. With React this is useful because this way it's easier to understand an application as it starts getting more complicated. By having two-way data binding, lead to unpredictable changes, where changing one model's data would end up updating another model. By using the Flux architecture, this can be avoided.
See More
Top
Con
No support for legacy browsers
React has recently dropped support for Internet Explorer 8. While the library may still work on IE8, issues that affect only IE8 will not be prioritized and/or solved.
See More
Top
Pro
Virtual DOM support
Instead of relying on the DOM, React implements a virtual DOM from scratch, allowing it to calculate precisely what needs to be patched during the next screen refresh. This is orders of magnitude faster than fiddling with the DOM itself.
See More
Top
Con
Slow VirtualDOM
React's VirtualDOM is relatively slow compared to other libraries that implement a VDOM.
See More
Top
Pro
Easy to write tests
Since React's virtual DOM system is implemented completely in JavaScript, it's very easy to write UI test cases.
See More
Top
Con
Verbose
React gets a little verbose as applications get more complicated with more components. It's simply not as straightforward as simply writing HTML and JavaScript would be.
See More
Top
Pro
Tested on Facebook itself
React is used on one of the most visited websites on the planet, Facebook. With stellar results and with million of people experiencing it every day.
See More
Top
Pro
Can be used with different libraries
ReactJS can be used independently as the only library for building the front-end, or it can be used alongside JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, or even Angular.
See More
Top
Pro
One-way data flow
React's one-way data binding (or one-way data flow) means that it's easy to see where and how your UI is updated and where you need to make changes. It's also very easy to keep everything modular, fast and well-organized.
See More
Top
Pro
Extensive SVG support
Since React v0.15, SVG is fully supported. React supports all SVG attributes that are recognized by today's browsers.
See More
Top
Pro
Template engine independent
React provides a template engine (JSX) which is easy to use. But it's not mandatory.
See More
Top
Pro
Good debugging tools
React has an official Chrome Extension which is used as a developing and debugging tool. It can be used to quickly and painlessly debug your application or view the whole application structure as it's rendered.
See More
Top
Pro
Server side rendering
React can render it's components and data server side, then it sends those components as HTML to the browser. This ensures faster initial loading time and SEO friendliness out of the box, since it's indexed as any other static website by search engines.
See More
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
96
13
Element
All
4
Experiences
Pros
3
Cons
1
Top
Pro
Good documentation
The documentation is per version and it has basic examples that are easy to understand.
See More
Top
Con
Needs Vue JS
This can be PRO if you already using Vue for your project.
See More
Top
Pro
JQuery is not required
See More
Top
Pro
It's light but not empty
You can find for example date picker, option box, Sliders, Carousel, and all the basics like grid layout etc.
See More
Hide
FREE
5
1
Flutter
All
11
Experiences
Pros
5
Cons
5
Specs
Top
Pro
Open source
See More
Top
Con
Still in development
According to the website, Flutter is still in its early stages of development.
See More
Top
Pro
Great developer tools debug/hotreload/analyser
See More
Top
Con
Based on Dart language
Dart is a Java like language, easy to learn and startup fast for millions of Java developers. BUT if you have to learn it ... it's a con.
See More
Top
Pro
Based on Dart language
Dart is a Java like language, easy to learn and startup fast for millions of Java developers.
See More
Top
Con
Dart is unpopular and never gained serious community traction like Kotlin or Java
See More
Top
Pro
A single codebase for iOS AND Android
See More
Top
Con
Does not support 32-bit iOS devices
If you plan on targeting iPhone 5, 5C or earlier, you can forget about Flutter.
See More
Top
Pro
Fast
The developer's goal is to allow people to make apps running at 120 FPS.
See More
Top
Con
Google has a bad history with product loyalty
See More
Specs
Dev platforms:
Windows, Mac and Linux
Desktop targets:
announced Windows
Mobile targets:
Android and iOS
Popular Language Bindings:
Dart
Hide
See All
Experiences
Get it
here
211
32
Built By the Slant team
Find the best product instantly.
4.7 star rating
Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Try it now - it's free
{}
undefined
url next
price drop